Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Greengate Junior School

Inspected 26 Jan 2007 · published 14 Feb 2007 · URN 112206

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Jan 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Keith Oglesby

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Outstanding

  • Curriculum verified

    Outstanding

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    LA14 1BG

  • Name on report verified

    Greengate Junior School

  • URN verified

    112206

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportOutstanding
  • CurriculumOutstanding
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+86Very positivemore positive than 79% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingenjoyeffectivemake good progressexceptionallyproudvery well
Criticisminadequatebelowweaknessesinconsistenciesdeclinemissedlownot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1384w+83
  • What needs to improve1314w+86

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,657
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%What needs to improve 49%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Inspection Report Greengate Junior School

p.1

112206 Unique Reference Number Cumbria Local Authority 289202 Inspection number 25 °26 January 2007 Inspection dates Keith Oglesby Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Greengate Street School address Junior Type of school Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria Community School category LA14 1BG 7 °11 Age range of pupils 01229 894628 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01229 894629 Fax number 310 Number on roll (school) Mr Joe Wardman Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Colin Smith Headteacher 1 March 2002 Date of previous school inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 289202 25 °26 January 2007 7°11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Greengate is a larger than average three-form entry school, close to the centre of Barrow. It serves an area of high deprivation. The percentage of pupils entitled to free school meals is above average and the proportion who have learning difficulties and/or disabilities is also above average. Twenty two pupils have statements of special educational need, proportionately higher than is found in most schools nationally. The majority of pupils are of White British origin. No pupils are at an early stage of learning English. The school holds the Healthy School award and the Artsmark and Activemark gold awards.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Greengate Junior School, 25 °26 January 2007

p.3

Grade: 2

Inspectors agree with the school’s own judgement, that Greengate is a good school with some outstanding features. These include the inspiring leadership of the headteacher, the curriculum and the excellent quality of care and support for every pupil. The headteacher has been in post for many years and has lost none of his determination to provide the best possible education for the pupils in the school. Parents, governors, staff and pupils all recognise this. Amongst many positive comments, one parent wrote, ‘I cannot commend the headteacher enough for his continued commitment, enthusiasm and dedication to his pupils’. Leadership and management at all levels are good. All adults are encouraged to develop their skills and get involved in the work of the school. Consequently, everyone feels valued, supported and part of an effective team. Pupils achieve well in their personal development and academically. This is because

p.4

Grade: 2

they enjoy school and lessons, behave well and want to learn. They show respect for adults and for each other. The exceptional arrangements for care, support and guidance ensure that all are fully included in everything the school has to offer. Teachers listen to the views of their pupils and value the many contributions that they make to the life of the school. Most of the teaching is good. Lessons are lively, interesting and well matched to pupils’ needs. As a result, most pupils make good progress, some overcoming personal and learning hurdles on the way. Standards are in line with the national average by the end of Year 6 and are higher than they were at the time of the previous inspection, although standards in writing remain below what they should be. There are other inconsistencies in the rate of progress in some classes. This is because a small proportion of lessons do not have the pace and high expectations evident elsewhere.

p.4

Grade: 2

The curriculum is outstanding and adapted well to meet the needs of all the pupils. There is an excellent range of extra activities and events. Many of these are linked to other local organisations. This is an outward-looking school, which has become a hub of activity in the local community. These links provide opportunities for pupils and parents to extend their experience and skills; for example as allotment holders, working with the elderly or representing the school council at district meetings. Self-evaluation is rigorous and accurate. The school looks critically at everything it does and is constantly seeking ways to do better. Its capacity to improve is good. Finance is well managed and the school provides good value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Raise standards in writing. • Raise the quality of teaching and learning so that all lessons match the quality of the best. 2 Inspection Report: Greengate Junior School, 25 °26 January 2007

p.4

Grade: 2

Pupils’ achievement is good. They join the school with below average levels of attainment, but reach nationally expected levels by the end of Year 6. This is an improvement since the previous inspection. National test results dipped in 2006, particularly in English. This reversed two years of rising standards in all subjects. The decline was due to the high proportion of pupils with learning difficulties in this cohort, as well as some pupils who were affected by personal or family problems. The work seen during the inspection matches earlier test results and indicates that the 2006 results were not typical of current standards within the school. Standards are in line with those expected in reading, mathematics and science, although writing remains below average. Pupils with learning difficulties make good progress. This is because of the good teaching and support they receive. The more able pupils also achieve well because

p.5

Grade: 2

teachers make sure they are challenged. There are some variations between boys’ and girls’ progress in different year groups and subjects, but the school is quick to introduce strategies to deal with these. There is no consistent underachievement by any group of pupils.

p.5

Grade: 2

Personal development and well-being are good. Pupils love coming to school. This is clearly reflected in the above average attendance. They work hard, show consideration to each other and are proud of their school. Behaviour is nearly always good. Pupils who sometimes find this difficult are managed very well. As one boy put it, ‘The headteacher and teachers try to get through to you, reason with you, and don’t jump down your throat’. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. The school celebrates every possible achievement, however small, to raise self-esteem and motivate pupils to do the best they can. They enjoy taking responsibility, for example as a trained playground buddy, or on the effective school council. Pupils feel safe and trust the school to look after them. They are learning how to live safe, active and healthy lives and make sensible decisions. The excellent school cook works closely with staff and

p.5

Grade: 2

children to emphasise the importance of a good diet. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage in their education. They use technology confidently and make good progress in developing basic skills. Social skills are extended through active lessons and the many valuable visits and links with the local community. The school is especially proud that pupils move on with positive attitudes and self-esteem to face what lies ahead. 3 Inspection Report: Greengate Junior School, 25 °26 January 2007

p.5

Grade: 2

Teaching and learning are good. There is no unsatisfactory teaching, most is good and some outstanding. Lessons are calm, orderly and purposeful, because the pupils want to learn and please their teacher. A strength everywhere is the care for each individual; teachers make sure that everyone is included and has a chance to succeed. Relationships are excellent. There is a strong team of support staff who make a valuable contribution to learning. The staff make lessons interesting and relevant, often using technology effectively. Consequently, pupils are nearly always motivated, busy and enjoy the work. One boy was anxious to point out however, that ‘Just because we enjoy the work it doesn’t mean we are not learning’. In a small number of lessons, pupils spend too much time listening. As a result, concentration and behaviour can dip and learning slows. Sometimes teachers do not leave enough time for pupils to make the most of their independent work. However,

p.6

Grade: 2

a strength in this school is that all teachers are self-critical and want to do even better. The very good teamwork and the expertise available equip the school well to raise teaching standards even higher.

p.6

Grade: 1

The school has a highly effective curriculum with an outstanding range of extra clubs, visits and events. These are popular and well supported; for example, the orchestra has almost fifty members. Parents also appreciate what the school provides; one wrote, ‘The school offers a lot more than the National Curriculum, staff put a lot of time into extracurricular work and should be credited for this’. A clear focus on developing pupils’ spoken English, reading, writing, numeracy and computer skills contributes well to the good achievement seen. The school recognises the particular needs and interests of their pupils and adapts the curriculum to meet these. For example, pupils enjoy the extra challenges built into the ‘every child has a talent’ scheme. Effective extra help is provided when learning slows, for example in reading and mental calculation work. One particularly successful initiative has been the introduction of

p.6

Grade: 1

themed writing weeks. Imaginative spaces are created to suggest settings and ideas for stories. Pupils enjoy working in these and sometimes surprise even themselves by the quality of their efforts. The school reviews its curriculum regularly; for example, it has recently adapted the science curriculum to improve standards.

p.6

Grade: 1

The quality of care, support and guidance provided by the school is outstanding. The school values all its pupils and provides a safe and stimulating environment for them. Pupils know that adult help is never far away. As one child commented, ‘The teachers 4 Inspection Report: Greengate Junior School, 25 °26 January 2007 stand right by you if you’re ill or upset’. Staff make great efforts to ensure that pupils are happy in school and to overcome factors that could interfere with learning. A counsellor is available to help with pupils’ emotional well-being. Parents are very appreciative of the school and recognise the quality of care and the determination to help pupils succeed. One wrote, ‘The school should be very proud of the reputation it has’. The school has some inventive systems for rewarding good conduct, effort and success, which underpin the personal development of pupils. For instance, the pupils value the

p.6

Grade: 1

Gold Cards, which ‘buy’ them privileges. There are well-established procedures for child protection and security. The quality of display is superb and reflects the school’s ethos of celebrating pupils’ achievement in all its forms. Teachers’ use of thorough assessment and tracking procedures monitor and guide pupils’ progress. Pupils, particularly in the older classes, value the practical guidance they are given through individual targets and teachers’ marking that tells them what they need to do better. Pupils with learning difficulties have high quality support from experienced staff, enabling them to enjoy school and make good progress. There are good arrangements to welcome new pupils and to smooth the transition to secondary schools.

p.7

Grade: 2

Leadership and management are good. The leadership of the headteacher is outstanding. His high profile presence, vision and energy inspire adults and children alike and win the confidence of parents. He is ably supported by a highly skilled senior team. Consequently, morale is high and adults work together very well to ensure the pupils gain the best from every moment in school. There are effective systems to keep an eye on pupils’ progress and the quality of teaching and learning. Leaders have an accurate picture of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They are quick to act when achievement falls, as shown by the decisive and rapid response to the performance of some pupils in the 2006 national tests. Governors support the school well with frequent visits. They are increasingly active in the evaluation of the school’s teaching and results. There are strong and productive links with other schools and the local authority.

p.7

Grade: 2

5 Inspection Report: Greengate Junior School, 25 °26 January 2007 .

p.7

Grade: 2

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Greengate Junior School, 25 °26 January 2007

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The attendance of learners 1 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

1 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Greengate Junior School, 25 °26 January 2007

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: Greengate Junior School, 25 °26 January 2007

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Greengate Junior School Greengate Street Barrow-in-Furness Cumbria LA14 1BG 28 January 2007 Dear Pupils As you know, we visited your school recently for two days. I am writing to thank you for being so helpful and willing to talk to us. We had a great two days and enjoyed seeing you and your teachers in action. Many of you told us you were proud of your school; you should be. What a pity we missed one of your famous shows, although the Year 3 assembly was pretty good. We think some of the best things about your school are: • the way you show respect to your teachers and each other • you work hard and get involved in lessons • all the clubs, visitors and special events that we know you appreciate • the way all the adults go the extra mile to make sure you are safe, happy and learning • the lessons - your teachers work so hard to make them interesting and demanding • the time and energy that Mr Smith and all the staff put into the school. Does he ever have

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

time to sleep? We think your school could be even better if all the lessons were as good as the best ones, so you all made even better progress. Nearly all lessons are really good anyway, so you are nearly there. Of course lessons are not just about teachers, you have to do your bit! Another improvement needed is the standard of your writing; it’s a bit behind the other subjects. We saw some excellent examples and we can see it’s improving, but it could be even better. Yours sincerely Keith Oglesby, Yvonne Clare, Jen Rotheram. The inspection team 9 Inspection Report: Greengate Junior School, 25 °26 January 2007

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion