Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School

Inspected 25 Jan 2007 · published 15 Feb 2007 · URN 111357

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Jan 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Madeley

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CH66 1NN

  • Name on report verified

    St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    111357

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+69Positivemore positive than 19% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveexceptionallyvery wellconsistentlyeffectivelyimprovedmake good progresspositive
Criticisminconsistenciesnot sufficientlyinadequatenot metdisruptiontoo fewlackslower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1582w+80
  • What needs to improve1334w+54

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,877
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%What needs to improve 46%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Inspection Report St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School

p.1

111357 Unique Reference Number Cheshire Local Authority 288937 Inspection number 24 °25 January 2007 Inspection dates Mark Madeley Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Rossall Grove School address Primary Type of school Little Sutton, Ellesmere Port Voluntary aided School category

p.1

Cheshire CH66 1NN 4 °11 Age range of pupils 0151 3396141 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0151 3481340 Fax number 182 Number on roll (school) Rev P Phillips Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Robert Hughes Headteacher 14 January 2002 Date of previous school inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 288937 24 °25 January 2007 4°11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This smaller than average school, formerly known as Pius XII Catholic Primary School, is very popular with the local community. Most children are of White British heritage. About half of the children live close by. The remainder come from as far as Neston in the west and Elton in the east. Very few children are eligible for free school meals. The percentage of children with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is lower than average. Over the last four years the school has planned, and later started erecting a new building on its playing field.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School, 24 °25 January 2007

p.3

Grade: 2

This is an effective school which gives good value for money. Good leadership has maintained the above average standards at the end of Year 6, identified by the last inspection, and has addressed successfully the issues for improvement then raised. The school enjoys a very positive relationship with its parents, support agencies and the health authority, all of which benefit children's personal development considerably. Procedures for the detailed checking of children's progress are good. Subject management has been improved and staff are now effective in raising standards through good action planning. The school's self- evaluation is accurate, except that it was too optimistic in its grades for care, guidance and support and personal development and well-being. The headteacher and governing body have worked very well together to get the new school buildings started and to minimise the disruption building work could have on children's learning. Taking into account the school's

p.4

Grade: 2

successes, it has shown that it has good capacity to improve even further. Children join the Reception class with the standards expected for their age. They progress well because provision in the Foundation Stage is good. Progress is also good from Year 1 to 6 and children achieve well. Teaching is effective in meeting their needs because staff assess the children thoroughly and plan lessons based on what children know. In the national tests, Year 6 children have reached above average results for the last five years. Children's behaviour is managed well and they are quick to respond to the teachers' signal for quiet. Some teachers use questioning exceptionally well to develop children's understanding of the concept taught and their speaking skills. Children have a thorough understanding of how to improve their work further because teachers' marking is very good. Teaching is good overall. However, there are a few

p.4

Grade: 2

inconsistencies between classes, and the school's monitoring and evaluation of teaching and learning are not sufficiently sharp to iron these out by enabling teachers to share existing very good practice. The curriculum is good. The reading programme is very good and leads to children reaching high standards. Recently, more practical work has been introduced into mathematics and science and this is already having a positive impact on children's learning and their enjoyment of lessons. Additional sessions in English and mathematics are used well to improve the basic skills of children with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Children report that they feel very safe and well cared for in school. They say that there is no bullying because 'we are all friends', as one Year 5 child said. They are also very aware of how to stay safe outside of school; for example, the need to avoid alcohol, tobacco and harmful drugs. They like their school very much, as indicated

p.4

Grade: 2

by the consistently above average attendance. Older children look forward to the annual residential visit, where they get good opportunities to develop their teamwork and problem-solving skills.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Improve the monitoring and evaluation of teaching and learning in order to extend the very good practice in teaching that will make progress consistently good. 2 Inspection Report: St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School, 24 °25 January 2007

p.4

Grade: 2

Children achieve well. They join with average standards and, by the end of Year 6, reach above average standards in English, mathematics and science. Good teaching in Reception builds effectively on children's experiences and helps them make consistently good progress. The vast majority of children join Year 1 having reached, and in many cases exceeded, the standards expected for their age. Standards at the end of Year 2 have been above average for five years. National assessments in reading have been well above average. Those in writing were slightly lower than usual in 2006 because too few children reached the higher level. The school has put in place initiatives to remedy this. Standards at the end of Year 6 have been above average for the last five years and have improved steadily over that time. Standards in English have been consistently well above average. Those for mathematics have improved over five years,

p.5

Grade: 2

whilst those in science have remained marginally above average. The school has introduced more experimental work into science and this is already having a positive impact on children's understanding. Children with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make good progress because their individual needs are quickly identified through accurate assessment and additional programmes are put in place to support their learning. The governing body sets the school very demanding targets, which were achieved in 2006. Standards observed in lessons and in children's books are similar to those achieved in the tests in 2006.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils' personal development and well-being are good. Children are keen to learn, behave well and respond quickly to their teachers. For example, they settled very quickly in a Key Stage 2 assembly when the headteacher gave the signal to do so. Children develop self-confidence through good opportunities to speak to adults and other children in class. They are keen to help in their own classroom and around the school. Those with specific responsibilities, like road safety officers and 'buddies', carry them out conscientiously. The school council has been influential in the past but has not met recently because the headteacher has been busy with the new building. Children raise funds for good causes at home and abroad. Their pair and group work in school and on the residential visit develops good initiative and teamwork skills. They also have good basic skills and so are well prepared for their next school. Children have

p.5

Grade: 2

an excellent understanding of how to stay safe on the roads and when using the Internet, and know to avoid the nearby railway. They know how to stay fit and well, though they could drink water more often. Children's spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Their self-esteem is fostered very well and they get many opportunities to pray and reflect on their thoughts and actions. 3 Inspection Report: St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School, 24 °25 January 2007

p.5

Grade: 2

The quality of teaching and learning is good overall and helps children make good progress. A consistently effective aspect is that children recognise that classrooms are places for learning and, as a result, there is a purposeful atmosphere in lessons. Tasks meet the needs of most children and are explained clearly so that children can get started quickly. In addition, lessons are carefully planned and most teachers amend planning for later in the week based on children's learning in earlier lessons. However, there are some inconsistencies between classes. For example, in a few mathematics lessons, all children do the same tasks and this does not sufficiently challenge the more able. Teachers involve all children in recalling previous learning. Some of them question children in greater depth, for instance, frequently asking them to explain their methods; this helps children consolidate their understanding. The pace of learning

p.6

Grade: 2

is brisk in most classes. For example, children enjoyed the 'quick-fire' nature of a task to identify the prime numbers to 50 in Year 6. Support staff are purposely deployed. They are also trained and effectively lead planned additional programmes for those children who need extra help.

p.6

Grade: 2

The curriculum meets the needs of most children well. It is broad, offering all the National Curriculum subjects, religious education and a modern foreign language. The school makes good provision for reading and this enables children to confidently access other areas of the curriculum. The school is doing more problem solving in mathematics and practical work in science and this is improving children's understanding and confidence in these subjects. Management recognises that it could do more to improve children's use of computers and mathematical skills in other subjects. Assessment information is used well to identify the more able children and a programme of music and sport is currently in place to meet their needs. The programme for children's personal, social, health and emotional development is good and makes effective use of the school nurse to supplement the expertise of the staff. The many additional

p.6

Grade: 2

activities are well attended. The school's good provision for physical education and sports clubs has been recognised nationally by the Activemark award.

p.6

Grade: 2

Care, guidance and support are good. Procedures for safeguarding children are in place. The overwhelming majority of parents feel that their children are safe and well cared for and the inspection agrees with this view. They are well informed about their children's progress through annual reports and meetings, though a little more detail on their children's attainment would be welcomed by a few. The curriculum information 4 Inspection Report: St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School, 24 °25 January 2007 provided each term is useful to parents, as is the homework diary. There is good consultation between the school, the parents of children with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and the children themselves. This enables the parents and the child to see progress and be involved in the discussion and support of the next steps in learning. All children value teachers' marking, which offers praise and ways they can

p.6

Grade: 2

improve their work. Children have a good understanding of their personal targets and work hard to achieve them. Older children like to assess their understanding of the lesson and teachers use this information to inform future planning. Working parents greatly appreciate the good quality 'before-and after-school' club facility provided by the school.

p.7

Grade: 2

The headteacher, in partnership with the capable deputy headteacher, provides the school with good leadership. He, with the governing body, has managed the process of the new school building very well. Despite potential disruptions such as noise and restrictions to the play areas, the school continues to function smoothly and children reach above average standards. Effective management has improved the checking of children's progress significantly since the last inspection. Procedures are now good and the information is used well. For example, where children's progress is slower than usual, additional programmes are put in place and their impact on standards is checked. Subject coordinators have a good grasp of standards in their subject and have implemented well-thought-out action plans to raise standards further. The reviewing of teaching takes place annually. Feedback offers some support to teachers but because

p.7

Grade: 2

the process lacks regularity and rigour it does not improve the quality of teaching. This means that children's progress is not uniformly good through all classes because the very good practice seen in school is not shared. Governance is good. The governing body keep a close watch on children's progress and the school's finances. 5 Inspection Report: St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School, 24 °25 January 2007 .

p.7

Grade: 2

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School, 24 °25 January 2007

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School, 24 °25 January 2007

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School, 24 °25 January 2007

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

We really enjoyed our recent visit to your school because you made us so welcome. You were very confident when speaking to us and we valued your views of the school. Yours is a good school because it helps you make good progress in English, mathematics and science. We agree with you that your headteacher is a very caring man who is doing a good job for you and all the staff. Your teachers are good at planning your work and sharing the questions among you. They encourage you to talk to the class and this is improving your speaking and listening skills. You read well because the skills of reading are taught effectively and most of you play your part by reading regularly at home. You told us that you liked the practical work in mathematics and science and we think that these, along with the foreign language, wonderful visits and clubs, make the curriculum good. We praise you and your teachers because your work showed

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

us that, despite the noise and distractions of the building going on next door, you managed to maintain your concentration and high standards of work. You are keen to learn and enjoy coming to school. You tell us that you feel very safe and well cared for at school and we agree that all the staff ensure you are well cared for. We saw some of you acting as 'buddies' for the younger children and you were doing a good job. Others who have jobs around the school are usually keen to do them. We think that your school prepares you well for going to the high school. Even good schools like yours need to continue to improve. We have asked your headteacher to improve the teaching still further by sharing the very good practice we saw in some classes so that you all make the best progress you can. You can help your school improve further by ensuring that you continue to work hard at all your tasks. Thank you very much for helping us with our inspection. You all made a very good contribution.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

We hope that you are all proud of what you, the staff, governors and parents have achieved. We wish you all the best for the future and hope that your new school building is all that you and the staff hope for. 9 Inspection Report: St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School, 24 °25 January 2007

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion