Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Wrenbury Primary School

Inspected 8 Jun 2006 · published 29 Jun 2006 · URN 111078

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Michael McIlroy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Jun 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael McIlroy

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CW5 8EN

  • Name on report verified

    Wrenbury Primary School

  • URN verified

    111078

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveexceptionallymake good progresscaringeffectivelypositiveimprovedwell supported
Criticisminconsistentdeclinedinadequatebelownot robustgapspoorweak

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings944w+27
  • Leadership571w+88
  • What needs to improve1596w+22

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
3,072
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 30%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 51%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Wrenbury Primary School

p.1

111078 Unique Reference Number Cheshire LEA 288850 Inspection number 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 Inspection dates Mr Michael McIlroy HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Nantwich Road School address Primary Type of school Wrenbury Community School category Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 8EN 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01270 780368 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01270 780074 Fax number 113 Number on roll Mr E Forshaw Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr M Poole Headteacher 8 May 2002 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 288850 7 June 2006 - 4 to 11 8 June 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty's Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

The school is below average in size and serves an advantaged rural area. Six per cent of pupils are entitled to free school meals, which is well below average. Almost all pupils are White British and a few are from travelling families. Twelve per cent of pupils have learning difficulties and/or disabilities which is below average and several have a statement of special educational need. In common with other schools locally the number of pupils at the school has declined in recent years. The school has been awarded the Basic Skills Quality Mark.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Wrenbury Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

This school provides a satisfactory education for its pupils and has a number of good features. Pupils make satisfactory progress overall. They enter the school with levels of skills and knowledge that are broadly average. Pupils receive a good start in the Foundation Stage and continue to make good progress in Key Stage 1. Since the last inspection, pupils in Key Stage 2 have not achieved as well as they might have, particularly in science. Following recent staffing changes the pace of learning for older pupils has now improved and currently pupils are making faster progress. Some steps have been taken to improve pupils' achievement in science, but these are at an early stage of development and more needs to be done. The quality of teaching and learning is good overall, and is making an impact on reversing the legacy of underachievement at Key Stage 2. The personal development and well-being of pupils is good. Pupils are polite and

p.4

Grade: 3

considerate to each other and behaviour is good. Attendance is average. The care, guidance and support pupils receive are satisfactory. Whilst pastoral support is good, academic guidance for pupils is inconsistent and underdeveloped. For example, the quality of marking is inconsistent and pupils do not always know what their targets are or how to improve their work further. Curriculum provision is satisfactory. There is a good range of extra-curricular opportunities for pupils, but there are some gaps in the curriculum. Leadership and management of the school are satisfactory overall. The headteacher has provided sound leadership and has developed a team which is beginning to make an impact on standards. He has maintained the school's caring ethos and expanded the number of extra-curricular opportunities for pupils. However, systems to monitor teaching and learning are not robust enough. This has hindered the early identification

p.4

Grade: 3

of underperformance. Subject leadership is underdeveloped. Governance is good. Parents are generally supportive of the school and it runs smoothly on a day-to-day basis. The school possesses adequate capacity to improve further and provides satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Raise standards at Key Stage 2, particularly in science. • Ensure procedures for monitoring teaching and learning are more rigorous and robust. • Improve the use of assessment, including target setting and marking. • Strengthen the role of subject managers, including curriculum planning and mapping. 2 Inspection Report: Wrenbury Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006

p.4

Grade: 3

Overall, pupils' achievement and standards are satisfactory. Pupils enter the Foundation Stage with skills and knowledge which are broadly average. The good care they receive and the good balance of teacher-led and child-initiated activities ensure that they make good progress towards their early learning goals. Pupils continue to make good progress in Key Stage 1 and in the most recent assessments for seven-year-olds, standards were above average. Pupils did better in reading and mathematics than in writing. Boys slightly outperformed girls in 2005. At Key Stage 2, standards are more variable and in recent years pupils have not made as much progress in their learning as they should have. In 2003 the overall standards achieved by pupils in the national tests were just above average. In 2004 they dropped sharply and in 2005 recovered to be again just above average. When compared to pupils in similar contexts, the overall progress made by learners has steadily declined

p.5

Grade: 3

over the last three years. This decline is particularly marked in science and in 2005 the progress pupils made in this subject was significantly below average. In mathematics and English, pupils achieved the levels generally expected of them. Girls performed noticeably less well than boys in 2005. Recent steps taken by the school have addressed the issue of underachievement at Key Stage 2 and are beginning to have an impact on standards. Lower attaining pupils, those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and pupils from travelling families are well supported, particularly through the deployment of teaching assistants. Consequently, they make satisfactory progress and achieve results in line with expectations.

p.5

Grade: 2

The personal development and well-being of pupils is good. This matches the school's judgement. Spiritual, moral and social development is effectively promoted through assemblies and specific lessons where pupils listen to each other's views. This is reflected in the caring nature of pupils towards one another, as exemplified by the 'buddy system' to welcome new pupils. There are good relationships between staff and pupils. Pupils are kind and courteous to visitors. Cultural awareness is developed by visitors from other cultures, displays celebrating the diversity of different countries and faiths, and links with schools in Africa and Asia. Pupils feel safe in school and know who to turn to in the event of any bullying. They enjoy school and exhibit good attitudes to learning even when teaching is occasionally dull. They are well behaved and play sensibly at break times. Pupils work well together. Attendance is average. Pupils adopt healthy lifestyles. For example, they are aware of

p.5

Grade: 2

the dangers of hazardous substances. They take advantage of wholesome snacks available in school. At playtimes, older pupils organise and play energetic field sports, such as cricket. 3 Inspection Report: Wrenbury Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 A number of pupils exercise positions of responsibility, for example, as 'road safety officers' and litter pickers. The elected school council discusses important issues maturely, such as how to fund the purchase of medals for participants in the 'Golden Mile' health initiative. Pupils make positive contributions to the local community through carol singing, participation in concerts and fundraising for charity. The school's rock band takes part in a local musical competition.

p.5

Grade: 2

The quality of teaching and learning is good. All of the lessons observed during the inspection were at least satisfactory and most were good. Activities to support pupils' learning were well matched to the needs of the pupils. Increasingly, opportunities are provided for pupils to develop their talking and listening skills by discussing their ideas in pairs. Lessons are well planned and assessment information is used to inform planning. Teachers routinely share with pupils what they want them to learn and this is reinforced through suitable activities. Classrooms are well managed and organised with even the youngest pupils understanding what is expected of them. For example, pupils in the Reception class chose their own play activities and matched their names to the activity on a display board. The good behaviour of pupils contributes positively to their learning. Teachers are encouraging and supportive, and sensitive to the needs of individuals. However, in

p.6

Grade: 2

some lessons teachers talked for too long and did not involve pupils sufficiently. Teaching assistants were well used, mostly with lower attaining pupils and those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Interactive whiteboards were expertly used by teachers to demonstrate learning points to pupils.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory and meets the needs of most pupils. It is topic-based with an appropriate emphasis on the core subjects, physical education and music provision. Pupils receive an appropriate amount of homework. There are good opportunities for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities to make progress. However, following the reduction in the number of classes, the curriculum has not been fully readjusted. Consequently, there are some gaps in the coverage of subjects, which hinder continuity and progression in learning. This partly explains pupils' poor performance in science. The school has recently recognised this issue and is beginning to address it. A wide range of extra-curricular activities is offered to pupils and there is a good level of participation. This includes woodwind, strings and rock music groups. Teaching assistants make a considerable contribution to the musical life of the school.

p.6

Grade: 3

Additionally, the school offers a variety of sporting activities, some supported by 4 Inspection Report: Wrenbury Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 external agencies. Older pupils have the opportunity to take part in a residential visit. The school participates in a local initiative to provide more able pupils with challenging experiences. Pupils' experiences are further enhanced by educational visits, for example, to Manchester Airport. The school encourages pupils to be involved in village life and culture through the Scarecrow Trail every July and maypole celebrations.

p.6

Grade: 3

The school considers the care, guidance and support which pupils receive to be good. Inspectors found it to be satisfactory because of shortfalls in the academic guidance provided for pupils. The pupils are well cared for and supervised in and around the school. Procedures for safeguarding pupils are robust. The school promotes healthy food and drinks. It encourages pupils to adopt a healthy lifestyle, through health initiatives and its emphasis on physical education. Older pupils receive guidance on growing up from health professionals and a visiting 'life education bus' provides information on the dangers of hazardous substances. Pupils are frequently reminded of safety procedures. Effective procedures exist to settle new pupils into the school and there are good links with the local nurseries. Helpful arrangements exist for those transferring to secondary school. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are well supported by skilled

p.7

Grade: 3

teaching assistants. Individual education plans are of good quality and are reviewed each term. Pupils from travelling families are well supported in their learning; the school uses advice and support from the local authority's Traveller Service to this end. Pupils' progress is tracked and regularly updated by teachers. Pupils have targets in the core subjects and these are revised each term. However, not all pupils know their targets. Marking is inconsistent and not all of it helps pupils understand the next steps they must take to further improve their work.

p.7

Grade: 3

The school judges leadership and management of the school to be satisfactory overall. Inspectors agree. The headteacher has provided sound leadership. He has placed a heavy emphasis on the development of the caring ethos of the school and has improved resources and extra-curricular opportunities for pupils. Most of the areas identified for improvement in the last inspection have been satisfactorily addressed. A number of initiatives have been introduced to assist the identification of underachievement, such as the new 'mapping grids' tracking system. Weak teaching has been satisfactorily addressed. The headteacher's evaluation of the school's effectiveness is broadly accurate. He has begun to develop an effective team which is beginning to have an impact on standards. However, systems for monitoring teaching and learning are not as robust as they could be. This has held back the early identification of issues causing underperformance.

p.7

Grade: 3

The school improvement plan is not yet as fully focused on raising attainment as it 5 Inspection Report: Wrenbury Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 could be. The views of parents and pupils are sought, but some parents believe there is scope for more consultation. Middle management is satisfactory overall. There is good leadership of the Foundation Stage and of special educational needs. Core subject leaders understand the major strengths and weaknesses in their subject areas and have drawn up development plans for their subjects. Whilst some monitor planning in their curriculum area, they do not yet monitor teaching or the work of pupils. Governance is good. Governors are fully involved in major school decisions and improvements. They monitor finances carefully and provide both support and challenge for the headteacher. The school possesses adequate capacity to improve and provides satisfactory value

p.7

Grade: 3

for money. 6 Inspection Report: Wrenbury Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 .

p.8

Grade: 3

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 Inspection Report: Wrenbury Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006

p.9

Inspection judgements

16-19 School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.10

Overall effectiveness

NA 3 How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.10

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.10

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.10

Personal development and well-being

NA 2 How good is the overall personal development and well-being of the learners? NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.10

The quality of provision

NA 2 How effective are teaching and learning in meeting the full range of the learners' needs? NA 3 How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.10

The quality of provision

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.10

Leadership and management

NA 3 How effective are leadership and management in raising achievement and supporting all learners? NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.11

Leadership and management

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them The extent to which learners make a positive contribution Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the

p.11

Leadership and management

wider community The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Many thanks for your politeness and help when we inspected your school recently. I am writing to let you know what we found. These are some of the best things we saw at your school. - Your behaviour is good. - You are taught well by your teachers. - You are caring and helpful to each other. - There are lots of clubs and music groups for you to join, such as your superb rock band. - You have a very good school council. - You have a good start to school life in the Reception class. We have asked your headteacher, staff and governors to make some changes to make things better for you in school. These are: - to see that you learn more in Key Stage 2, especially in science - to arrange for teachers in charge of subjects to visit your classes more often to see how well you are learning - to make changes to marking and your targets so that you know more clearly what you need to do to get better at your work - to provide more training for teachers who are responsible for the different subjects to help

p.12

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

them carry out the jobs they do, such as making sure you are taught everything you should be. Once again, many thanks for your politeness and help when Mr. Blaylock and I visited your school.

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion