Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
The Grove Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Dec 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Helen Ranger
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Satisfactory
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
CB4 2NB
- Name on report verified
The Grove Primary School
- URN verified
110668
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentSatisfactory
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: The Grove Primary School, 13 °14 December 2006 p.9
- There are examples of excellent practice but this is not widespread. p.4
- You are lucky to have so much space and the building is looked after very well. p.11
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- school's overall effectiveness is satisfactory, the extent to which the senior leadership team sets clear direction leading to improvement is inadequate. p.4
- Before its next section 5 inspection, Ofsted inspectors may visit the school to monitor the progress that it has made in remedying this weakness. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Raise standards in English and mathematics by ensuring that teaching and learning are consistently good. p.5
- Agree a plan for the school's long-term development which identifies the joint and separate roles of the leadership team in realising their vision for the future of the school. p.5
- Ensure that staff vetting checks are kept in a single central record. p.5
- Pupils from all backgrounds, including those with learning difficulties, achieve satisfactorily. p.5
- They do well in the Reception class, especially in basic language, communication and social skills. p.5
- In Year 2, attainment has risen over the past three years. p.5
- In 2006, when fewer pupils than usual in this age group had learning difficulties, they reached above average standards in reading, writing and mathematics. p.5
- Pupils in the current Year 2 class which, for this school, has a more typical number needing extra support, are working at below average standards. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,627
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report The Grove Primary School
p.1
110668 Unique Reference Number CAMBRIDGESHIRE Local Authority 288735 Inspection number 13 °14 December 2006 Inspection dates Helen Ranger Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Campkin Road School address Primary Type of school Cambridge Community School category CB4 2NB 4 °11 Age range of pupils 01223577017 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01223577018 Fax number 177 Number on roll (school) Mrs P Crankshaw Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Dr C Watson Headteacher 18 June 2001 Date of previous school inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 288735 13 °14 December 2006 4°11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
This is a smaller than average school. It serves an area of the city that has a degree of social and economic deprivation and levels of free school meals are higher than average. Many pupils join the Reception class with standards that are well below the levels expected for their age. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties is well above average. About 80% of pupils are from White British backgrounds and the rest come from a wide range of minority ethnic backgrounds. Twelve pupils do not speak English as their first or main language and the majority of this group is at an early stage of learning the language. A high number of pupils join the school part way through their primary education. For example, fewer than a third of the Year 6 pupils last year started their primary education at this school.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: The Grove Primary School, 13 °14 December 2006
p.3
Grade: 3
The Grove Primary is a satisfactory school. Pupils get off to a good start in Reception. They make steady progress as they move further up the school. Standards by Year 2 and Year 6 are below average in the key subjects of English and mathematics, but achievement is satisfactory in relation to pupils' often low starting points. The below average standards reflect the high proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and the high number who join the school part way through their education, often having experienced some disruptions to their schooling. Pupils' personal development and well-being, including their behaviour, are satisfactory. Teaching and learning are satisfactory overall but vary too much, because lessons range from outstanding to inadequate. Teachers form good relationships with pupils and most lessons include interesting, well organised activities. In weaker sessions, activities do not cater well enough for the full range of ability in the class, particularly
p.4
Grade: 3
the more able pupils. The curriculum is satisfactory; it has benefited from improvements to the building and to provision in information and communication technology (ICT). There has been good improvement in how pupils' achievements are recorded and tracked across the school. This helps both the class teachers and senior staff to check how much progress pupils are making in key areas, especially literacy and numeracy. The care, guidance and support offered to pupils are satisfactory. Their pastoral care is good. Pupils' academic support and guidance is not as strong. This is because the arrangements for sharing learning targets with pupils and giving feedback through marking are not applied consistently by all teachers. There are examples of excellent practice but this is not widespread. Leadership, management and the value for money that the school provides are satisfactory in most respects. Improvements since the last inspection in how pupils'
p.4
Grade: 3
achievements are monitored and analysed mean that senior staff and subject leaders have a sound evaluation of how well the school is doing and what needs to improve. The headteacher has high aspirations for the future. However, he and the rest of the senior leadership team do not present a united vision for the future, and individual members of the team have different priorities. This means that improvement is rather piecemeal and not as rapid as it could be. The governing body is in a stronger position than in recent years because competent new governors have been recruited to fill vacancies, but they are not given a clear enough steer for their work by the senior staff. In one important area, governors do not fulfil their legal duties. To safeguard pupils, checks are made on all adults working in the school but governors have not ensured that these are summarised into a central record, as required. Although the
p.4
Grade: 3
school's overall effectiveness is satisfactory, the extent to which the senior leadership team sets clear direction leading to improvement is inadequate. Before its next section 5 inspection, Ofsted inspectors may visit the school to monitor the progress that it has made in remedying this weakness. The school would receive two to five days notice of such a visit. 2 Inspection Report: The Grove Primary School, 13 °14 December 2006
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Raise standards in English and mathematics by ensuring that teaching and learning are consistently good. • Agree a plan for the school's long-term development which identifies the joint and separate roles of the leadership team in realising their vision for the future of the school. • Ensure that staff vetting checks are kept in a single central record.
p.5
Grade: 3
Pupils from all backgrounds, including those with learning difficulties, achieve satisfactorily. They do well in the Reception class, especially in basic language, communication and social skills. In Year 2, attainment has risen over the past three years. In 2006, when fewer pupils than usual in this age group had learning difficulties, they reached above average standards in reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils in the current Year 2 class which, for this school, has a more typical number needing extra support, are working at below average standards. Results in the Year 6 national tests have been below average in recent years and especially low in mathematics, although pupils make sound overall progress by Year 6 compared with their results in Year 2. The pupils who are presently in Year 6 are working at below average standards.
p.5
Grade: 3
Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory overall, although their spiritual awareness is not as well developed as the other elements. Behaviour is satisfactory and attitudes to work are mostly positive. However, some pupils have not learned to be consistently good listeners or efficient learners and there are a few who are unable to sustain their concentration in lessons where the work does not interest or challenge them sufficiently. Attendance is good; it has improved steadily to an above average level, although some parents persist in taking term-time holidays. Pupils adequately understand the importance of having healthy lifestyles and how to keep themselves safe. They say that any incidents of bullying are generally quickly dealt with. Nearly all enjoy school and value their friendships. The school council gives them a voice in the running of the school and they are pleased with the changes they have
p.5
Grade: 3
made, for example new litter bins and improved markings on the playground. Pupils' involvement in activities such as fund raising combines with their satisfactory academic and social standards in helping to lay sound foundations for their future lives in education and the world of work. 3 Inspection Report: The Grove Primary School, 13 °14 December 2006
p.5
Grade: 3
Teaching and learning are good in the Reception class, where activities are practical and exciting and staff work well together to establish good attitudes to learning. Good use is made with this age group of the indoor space and there are well considered plans to develop the 'outdoor classroom' further. In the rest of the school, lessons vary in how well activities are planned to cater for the full range of attainment in each class. Teachers also vary in how well they manage pupils' behaviour or interest them sufficiently in their work to ensure that attitudes to learning are consistently good. Examples of this being done very successfully were seen in Key Stage 2. Teachers work well with the team of teaching assistants to support pupils as needed, especially those with learning difficulties and those learning English as an additional language.
p.6
Grade: 3
The curriculum is satisfactory. Staff are gradually developing a more interesting curriculum by forging relevant links between subjects. ICT activities are increasingly included, following the very recent installation of computerised whiteboards. Use of the local environment, such as the recent visit to the local church for pupils in Years 1 and 2, helps to bring learning alive. A weakness in the curriculum is a lack of consistency in the approach to teaching reading and writing skills. A good range of clubs and out-of-school activities enables pupils to extend their interests and skills, especially in sport. Pupils benefit from a very extensive building and outdoor site which have been improved very well in recent years.
p.6
Grade: 3
Care, guidance and support are satisfactory. There are strengths in pastoral care and most parents are pleased with the support given to their children. The ABC club provides useful 'out-of-hours' care. Staff know the pupils and their families well. The site manager is rigorous in ensuring safe, clean and well maintained accommodation. There are effective arrangements to support pupils with learning difficulties and those learning to speak English. The school works well with relevant external agencies to provide specialist help for these pupils if needed. The staff are vigilant about raising any child protection concerns they may have. The ways in which pupils' academic learning is guided and supported vary across the school. While pupils know what their learning targets are, staff are inconsistent in how well they use the targets to help pupils improve their work. Teachers' marking, while positive, does not consistently
p.6
Grade: 3
inform pupils how well they are doing in sufficient detail or provide clear information on how they can do better. 4 Inspection Report: The Grove Primary School, 13 °14 December 2006
p.6
Grade: 3
Leadership and management are satisfactory. Parents' and pupils' views are mostly positive. The school is making effective use of support available from the local authority, especially in raising standards in literacy and numeracy. The track record of development, such as good provision for pupils who need extra help, better assessment arrangements and the extensive improvements to the building, demonstrate an adequate capacity to improve further. The senior staff are capable individuals. For example, they check standards and the curriculum in separate subjects effectively. However, they do not work well enough as a team and this does not sufficiently encourage the efforts of other staff and the governors. Important documents such as the main development plan, subject action plans and the school's self-evaluation form do not reflect a clear enough overall strategy. With the exception of correctly collating the checks made on staff, governance is
p.7
Grade: 3
satisfactory. The experienced and supportive chair of governors has provided stability during times when governor recruitment and retention were difficult. The school now has a fuller complement of governors than for some time and they are supporting its development, for example by setting up a strategic committee to oversee progress towards a long-term vision. 5 Inspection Report: The Grove Primary School, 13 °14 December 2006 .
p.7
Grade: 3
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: The Grove Primary School, 13 °14 December 2006
p.8
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3 The behaviour of learners 2 The attendance of learners 3 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
and interests of learners?
3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: The Grove Primary School, 13 °14 December 2006
p.9
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities No Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: The Grove Primary School, 13 °14 December 2006
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
15 December 2006 Dear Children The Grove Primary School, Campkin Road, Cambridge, CB4 2NB This letter is to thank you for your help when the inspection team visited your school just before Christmas and to tell you what we found during our visit. Special thanks go to the group of pupils who gave up their time to tell us about your school and about the work of the school council. We think that you make sound progress in your work and in how you grow into mature young people. The children in Reception are given a good start to their time in school. Those of you who need some extra adult help with your work or behaviour are cared for well. We would like the staff to keep helping you to reach higher standards in English and mathematics, as these subjects are important for the rest of your lives. Some of your lessons are really good. Your teachers make them fun and interesting and plan activities that help you all to learn well. Some
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
lessons are not as good as the rest and we have asked your school to keep trying to make sure you all are taught as well as possible. Dr Watson and all the staff have worked hard to improve the building. You are lucky to have so much space and the building is looked after very well. Your new ABC club rooms are super! Your teachers and governors have lots of ideas for how your school can improve. We have asked them to do plenty of talking together to make sure they agree on the best ways for the school to get better. In that way we hope they will make sure you get an even better education. I enjoyed watching you practise your nativity play and I hope the evening performance went well. Happy New Year to you all. Best wishes, Mrs Helen Ranger Lead inspector 9 Inspection Report: The Grove Primary School, 13 °14 December 2006
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion