Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Sherington Church of England School

Inspected 28 Feb 2007 · published 21 Mar 2007 · URN 110407

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Feb 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jeffrey White

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Outstanding

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    MK16 9NF

  • Name on report verified

    Sherington Church of England School

  • URN verified

    110407

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentOutstanding
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+81Very positivemore positive than 55% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingvery wellenjoymake good progressimprovedeffectivelyeffective
Criticismnot alwaysinadequateinconsistentbelownot rigorouslownot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1272w+86
  • What needs to improve992w+73

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,237
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%What needs to improve 44%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Inspection Report Sherington Church of England School

p.1

110407 Unique Reference Number Milton Keynes Local Authority 288662 Inspection number 28 February 2007 Inspection date Jeffrey White Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Sherington School address Infant Type of school Newport Pagnell Voluntary controlled School category MK16 9NF 4 °7 Age range of pupils 01908 610470 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01908 610470 Fax number 26 Number on roll (school) Mr Nigel Anderson Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Arlene Bourne Headteacher 5 March 2001 Date of previous school inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection date Age group 288662 28 February 2007 4 °7 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a very small school. The number of pupils decreased in September 2006 because of a change in the age of transfer. Consequently the school now has three rather than four year groups. No pupils take free school meals. Attainment on entry to the school is usually average but often fluctuates because of the very small numbers in each cohort. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties, although small, has risen in the last two years.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Sherington Church of England School, 28 February 2007

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school that has improved well since its last inspection. The headteacher, governors and staff have managed the change in the school's character effectively to ensure that it runs smoothly. A strong Christian ethos permeates the life of the school and underpins the promotion of pupils' personal development and well-being, which are outstanding. Pupils' behaviour is excellent and their attitudes to learning are highly positive. Attendance is very good and pupils clearly enjoy their work. Pupils are very well aware of how to stay healthy. For example, they grow vegetables in the school's garden and then thoroughly enjoy cooking and eating them. Pupils talk knowingly about how safe they feel and know who to turn to if they need help. They work together harmoniously and are learning basic skills well in English, mathematics, science and information and communication technology (ICT). Pupils are very well involved in the local community.

p.4

Grade: 2

As one parent commented, 'The school is at the heart of the life of the village'. Excellent personal development ensures that pupils are well prepared for their learning. The Foundation Stage provides a good start to the children's education and they make good progress. The quality of teaching and learning is good in each class and as a result pupils' achievement and progress are also good. Standards are above average and the very small number of pupils who took the tests in 2006 did very well to exceed their targets. The headteacher and staff have worked successfully to raise standards in writing. They are aware that more needs to be done to improve pupils' spelling and handwriting but do not always correct pupils' mistakes in these aspects of English. Pupils are well aware of their progress in reading, writing and mathematics but less so in science. Pupils are well cared for and are given good guidance to help their

p.4

Grade: 2

personal and academic development. The headteacher, staff and governors are committed to improving the school and its capacity to improve is good. Parents are very happy with their children's education and are strongly supportive. Leadership of pupils' personal development is outstanding. Good monitoring of standards and progress is followed by effective action to improve standards and progress. Governors are increasingly more involved in monitoring and evaluating the school's work and support the headteacher well. Self-evaluation is good overall but targets in the improvement plan are not always precise enough.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Mark pupils' work more thoroughly to help them improve their handwriting and spelling. • Introduce targets in science to help pupils become more aware of their progress. • Sharpen up targets in the school improvement plan. 2 Inspection Report: Sherington Church of England School, 28 February 2007

p.4

Grade: 2

Pupils' achievement is good and consequently standards are above average in reading, writing and mathematics. Good progress in the Foundation Stage ensures that the children are well prepared to start the National Curriculum when they enter Year 1. The youngest children enjoy their learning and the very effective induction procedures means that they settle happily into the life of the school. Throughout the school the excellent behaviour and attitudes result in a very positive climate for learning that helps pupils to continue to make good progress, including those with learning difficulties. Pupils participate well in small groups and in whole class discussions. They talk well about their work. Standards in science are above average by the end of Year 2 but progress is more inconsistent than in English and mathematics.

p.5

Grade: 1

The pupils' outstanding personal development and well-being, including their excellent spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, contribute very strongly to their standards and achievement. The school has no hall but every effort is made to ensure pupils get plenty of exercise. They thoroughly enjoy the fruit provided and are highly enthusiastic about tending their vegetable plot. Pupils feel that they have excellent opportunities to give their opinions and the headteacher and staff value their views. For example, their contributions have led to the provision of better play equipment. Pupils work exceedingly well in a safe environment. They are very confident workers who enjoy working together; these attributes combined with their good grasp of basic skills prepare them excellently for the next stage of their education.

p.5

Grade: 2

The good teaching and learning ensure that pupils achieve well and make good progress. Children in the Foundation Stage are helped to work alone and with each other, for example, when joining together to play percussion instruments. Throughout the school pupils are enthusiastic about their learning and participate in activities extremely well. They respond particularly well to the teachers' calm approach and use of humour. Some aspects of the teaching are excellent, for instance, in a very well managed discussion of a story book the teacher had high expectations of pupils' use of vocabulary. Consequently they improved their use of language. Good teaching has helped pupils' writing to improve, especially in the use of grammar and the development of ideas. However, pupils do not always take enough care with their handwriting and spelling. Teachers make good use of assessment to meet the range of pupils' needs.

p.5

Grade: 2

The marking of pupils' work is often helpful but not always rigorous enough. 3 Inspection Report: Sherington Church of England School, 28 February 2007

p.5

Grade: 2

The curriculum is good because it meets the range of pupils' needs well and is enhanced by a good range of extra-curricular activities. The headteacher and senior teacher have worked together well to revise the curriculum to cater for two key stages rather than the previous three. These revisions are appropriate at this stage and are contributing to continuity in the pupils' learning. Inevitably, the revised curriculum will need more time before it becomes fully established. Pupils especially enjoy the good links between subjects such as art and design, literacy, ICT and history. The school's attempts to improve creativity are meeting with some success and there is some good work in art and design and design and technology. The pupils value visits and visitors to the school. 'Themed' weeks, such as an 'African week', help to broaden pupils' knowledge of cultures different from their own and contribute well to their personal development.

p.6

Grade: 2

Good care, guidance and support enable pupils to work in safety. Their pastoral development is given very strong priority so that they know they are valued and looked after. Thorough induction procedures for the youngest pupils, including home visits and close liaison with the pre-school group, ensure a smooth transition into the Foundation Stage. Links with external agencies are very productive. Health and safety procedures and risk assessments are rigorous. In general, pupils are given good academic guidance. Effective use is made of targets in literacy and numeracy and consequently pupils are aware of their progress in reading and to a lesser extent in writing. They are less aware of their progress in science because they do not have targets.

p.6

Grade: 2

Leadership and management are good and have improved since the last inspection. In such a small school the headteacher inevitably has a considerable teaching commitment in addition to her leadership responsibilities. She manages these challenges well. The school works extremely well in partnership with others to foster pupils' well being. Leadership of pupils' personal development and well-being is outstanding. The headteacher, staff and governors are working well together to continue to move the school forward and their successes so far give a clear indication of good capacity for improvement. Pupils' performance is monitored well and followed by effective action to improve standards and achievement, for instance, in features of pupils' writing. Raising standards in spelling and handwriting now needs more attention. Governors meet their responsibilities effectively and are well aware of the school's strengths and areas for

p.6

Grade: 2

development. They are refining their monitoring procedures to develop more rigorous 4 Inspection Report: Sherington Church of England School, 28 February 2007 evaluation of the school's work. The school improvement plan is a useful tool to guide the school's direction but its targets are not always as sharp as they should be. 5 Inspection Report: Sherington Church of England School, 28 February 2007 .

p.6

Grade: 2

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Sherington Church of England School, 28 February 2007

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The behaviour of learners 1 The attendance of learners 1 How well learners enjoy their education 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: Sherington Church of England School, 28 February 2007

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: Sherington Church of England School, 28 February 2007

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for your help on my visit to your school. I very much enjoyed talking to you and hearing what you like about your school. Your behaviour is excellent and your attitudes to your learning are outstanding. Your school is good and your headteacher and staff look after you very well and help you to make good progress in your work. They and the governors want you to do well. You told me how very happy and safe you are and you know who to talk to if you have a problem. You are also learning how to be healthy and I was pleased to see some of you enjoying healthy food. You have improved some of your writing with the help of your teachers. I think your teachers could now help you to improve your spelling and handwriting even more. You enjoy having targets for literacy and numeracy to help your progress and you could now have targets in science to help you further. Your headteacher, staff and governors will now continue to work

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

together to help you make these improvements. I have asked your headteacher, teachers and governors to sharpen up the targets in the school improvement plan. With best wishes Jeff White, Lead inspector. 9 Inspection Report: Sherington Church of England School, 28 February 2007

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion