Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St John's Mead Church of England Primary School

Inspected 4 Jul 2007 · published 20 Jul 2007 · URN 109229

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Jul 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jacqueline Ikin

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BS37 6EE

  • Name on report verified

    St John's Mead Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    109229

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+64Positivemore positive than 13% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionallyhappyenjoyconsistentlymake good progressexcellenteffectively
Criticisminconsistenciesinadequatebelowinsufficientnot alwaysnot sufficientlystrugglevariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1436w+78
  • What needs to improve1309w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,703
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 47
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%What needs to improve 48%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

St John's Mead Church of England Primary School Inspection report

p.1

109229 Unique Reference Number South Gloucestershire Local Authority 288319 Inspection number 4 July 2007 Inspection date Jacqueline Ikin Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Voluntary controlled School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 335 School

p.1

The governing body Appropriate authority Steve Melling Chair Lynette Phillips Headteacher 26 March 2001 Date of previous school inspection Hounds Road School address Chipping Sodbury Bristol BS37 6EE

p.1

01454 866501 Telephone number 01454 866503 Fax number

p.1

3 °11 Age group 4 July 2007 Inspection date 288319 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

Most pupils, in this larger than average primary school, are from White British backgrounds. A small minority are from families in the fairground business who travel. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is a little below average but a higher proportion of pupils than is usual have a statement of special educational needs. Not all the children in the Nursery enter the Reception classes and not all the children in the Reception classes have attended the Nursery. At the time of the inspection, the school was being run by an acting headteacher and an acting deputy, pending the appointment of a permanent headteacher in September. Both had been in post for two months.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 10 Inspection Report: St John's Mead Church of England Primary School, 4 July 2007

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school that prepares pupils well for their future lives. The acting headteacher provides good leadership. She has maintained the school's friendly and welcoming atmosphere and sustained development during a period of change. The majority of parents are appreciative of the school's work. One comment, typical of many was: 'The dedication of the staff shines through and we feel that this school is a safe and happy place to be'. Provision in the Nursery and Reception classes gives children a good start to their schooling. They really enjoy school and are equipped with all the right skills and attitudes to learning by the time they reach Year 1. Most pupils in Years 1 to 6, including those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, achieve well. Standards are above average in reading and writing and well above average in mathematics. This is because of good teaching and learning and the additional

p.4

Grade: 2

boost pupils receive from some outstanding teaching in Year 6. Assessment procedures are satisfactory overall. They are good in English and mathematics where they are used consistently well to make sure that work matches pupils' different needs, interests and abilities. Not enough use is made of assessment in other subjects, where work is sometimes the same for all pupils regardless of need or ability. More able pupils then mark time and the lower-attaining pupils struggle to keep up. The curriculum is satisfactory rather than good overall because of these inconsistencies. However, throughout the school, special weeks such as arts week, visits to places of interest and visitors to the school are used well to bring learning to life. Pupils' personal development and well-being are good. The good care and guidance and the genuine interest that the school takes in individual pupils are augmented well by the good links that the school

p.4

Grade: 2

has with outside agencies. The leadership and management of the school are good. Self-evaluation procedures are good overall but procedures to monitor subjects other than mathematics and English and to help governors maintain their knowledge of what happens inside the school are not systematic enough. The strong sense of teamwork in the school and the good improvements that have been made since the last inspection indicate that its capacity for future improvement is good.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• ensure that pupils of all abilities make consistent progress in subjects other then English and mathematics by improving the use of assessment to plan work which develops learning in depth and which is suitably matched to their different ages and abilities • develop a formalised programme to support all subject leaders and governors in monitoring and evaluating the school's work.

p.4

Grade: 2

Attainment on entry to the Nursery and Reception classes is broadly average. The children make good progress and by the end of their Reception Year, most reach the goals expected for children of a similar age, and the more able exceed them. By the end of Year 2, standards are above average in reading and mathematics and average in writing. By Year 6, standards are well above average in mathematics and above average in reading and writing. This represents good achievement for most pupils, including the more able and those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. The good support for pupils from fairground backgrounds, together with the good links that are maintained between the school and the traveller support teacher, helps 4 of 10 Inspection Report: St John's Mead Church of England Primary School, 4 July 2007 these pupils to achieve well when they are in school. Pupils' success in mathematics owes much

p.4

Grade: 2

to the very clear guidance that teachers receive from the subject leader and the outstanding teaching in Year 6. The innovative use of 'number clubs' also plays an important part in instilling the basic skills which pupils need to support more advanced work. The school is successfully raising standards and closing the gap between boys and girls in writing, by using methods and resources which capture the interest of boys. Progress in other subjects is variable across the school because of inconsistencies in planning for pupils' different needs.

p.5

Grade: 2

Children in the Nursery and Reception classes grow in confidence and enthusiastically engage with all the activities provided. On a number of occasions, their eyes open wide with amazement at the new things they are discovering, such as when pulling up a potato plant and finding the harvest beneath. Here, as in the rest of the school, pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Most pupils behave well, respect the feelings of others and have a well-developed sense of fair play. However, some parents and pupils report that a small amount of bullying has occurred amongst older boys. Pupils say that these incidents have been thoroughly and fairly investigated and that actions taken by the acting headteacher are improving matters. Pupils contribute well to the school and local community, for example through their work on the school council when making decisions about the development of

p.5

Grade: 2

the school grounds. They enjoy school because they say that most teachers 'make learning fun'. Attendance is satisfactory; however, too many parents take their children on holiday in term time. Pupils have a good understanding of how to keep themselves safe and healthy and know the importance of exercise and good nutrition. The good progress that pupils make in their basic skills prepares them well for their future lives.

p.5

Grade: 2

Good planning in the Nursery and Reception classes results in purposeful, well-resourced activities which lead to in-depth learning because they sustain children's interest for extended periods of time. Practitioners are skilled in working alongside the children, picking up their individual ideas and engaging in conversations which extend their understanding. In Years 1 to 6, most teachers have high expectations of their pupils in English and mathematics where lessons are consistently well planned and prepared to meet the range of different abilities. In Year 6 and in mathematics, where there is a high level of subject expertise, teaching is often outstanding. In English, good use is made of a variety of teaching methods to capture the interest of pupils who learn in different ways; for example, the use of drama and video clips to gain the interest of boys and motivate them to write. Where teaching is satisfactory rather then

p.5

Grade: 2

good, it is mostly in subjects other than English and mathematics and often involves the overuse of published worksheets, which are the same for all pupils.

p.5

Grade: 3

Well-planned learning opportunities promote children's curiosity and independence in all the areas of learning in the Nursery and Reception classes. There is good planning for English and 5 of 10 Inspection Report: St John's Mead Church of England Primary School, 4 July 2007 mathematics in the rest of the school, and provision for more able pupils and pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is generally good in these subjects. In other subjects, more able and lower-attaining pupils sometimes miss out because of insufficient planning for their needs. The curriculum is enriched well by visits, visitors and special events such as 'arts week'. Increasing use is being made of links between subjects. However, opportunities for pupils to apply their good literacy and numeracy skills in other subjects are more limited. Good provision for pupils' personal, social and health education and citizenship makes a significant contribution to their

p.5

Grade: 3

personal growth. Pupils from families that travel are given suitable additional support, both in school and while they are away, to help them keep up.

p.6

Grade: 2

Pupils feel safe and secure, and know that staff will listen if there are any problems. The majority of parents are justifiably confident that pupils are well looked after at school and appreciate the way that the acting headteacher keeps parents well informed through clear and regular newsletters. Child protection procedures are in line with government guidance and regular health and safety checks are carried out. Well thought out procedures help children to settle quickly into the Nursery and Reception classes and to move on confidently at the end of Year 6. Pupils from fairground families are given good support to settle back into school on return from their travels. The use of assessment to support and guide pupils' academic progress is good in the Nursery and Reception classes. The 'learning diaries' in the Nursery are a particular strength. In Years 1 to 6, assessments and their use to support learning in English and

p.6

Grade: 2

mathematics are good. Pupils know their targets and their progress is carefully tracked. However, assessment procedures in other subjects are not always used as effectively to help pupils know how they are getting on and to guide their next steps in learning.

p.6

Grade: 2

The leadership and management of the school ensure that most pupils achieve well. The acting headteacher has succeeded in providing a stable and supportive atmosphere and kept the school moving forward through a time of change. She has been well supported in this by the acting deputy headteacher. Self-evaluation procedures are good. The views of pupils, parents, governors and staff are sought and there is good analysis of assessment data. As a result, the school has an accurate view of its strengths and where it needs to concentrate its efforts in order to raise standards. The school's plan for improvement is thorough and identifies the right areas for attention. This has resulted in improvements, for example in pupils' writing skills. The leadership and management of mathematics are excellent and those of English, special educational needs and the Foundation Stage good. However, in other subjects, monitoring

p.6

Grade: 2

procedures are not systematic enough. Governors are very committed to the school and its community. They make suitable use of data to check the school's work but their visits to the school for this purpose are not sufficiently formalised. 6 of 10 Inspection Report: St John's Mead Church of England Primary School, 4 July 2007 .

p.6

Grade: 2

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 of 10 Inspection Report: St John's Mead Church of England Primary School, 4 July 2007

p.7

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.8

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.8

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.8

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 3 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.8

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.8

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 8 of 10 Inspection Report: St John's Mead Church of England Primary School, 4 July 2007

p.8

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 9 of 10 Inspection Report: St John's Mead Church of England Primary School, 4 July 2007

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

5 July 2007 Dear Pupils Inspection of St. John's Mead Primary School, Chipping Sodbury, BS37 6EE Thank you for making me feel so welcome when I visited your school. I really enjoyed talking to you and watching you learn and play. I can see why you are so proud of your school and why you like your headteacher and teachers so much. I decided that St John's Mead School is a good school. What I liked about your school • your school is well led and managed and your headteacher is doing a good job in making the school a better place for you to learn; all your teachers and governors support her well in this • you work hard and your teachers are helping you all to make good progress so that you reach good standards in reading and writing and very good standards in mathematics • you go on a lot of interesting visits and have special weeks such as 'art week' to help you learn • most of you act in a confident and grown-up way and do a lot to look after the school and

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

make the school a happy place • the school takes very good care of you and gives you all the support you need, particularly those of you who find learning difficult. What I think needs to be improved • I think that the work that you do in subjects other than English and mathematics is sometimes too easy for you and sometimes too hard, and needs to be better planned to help you make progress • there needs to be a carefully planned programme to help the teachers in charge of different subjects as well as the governors of your school find out how well the school is doing and how they can help it to get even better. You can help in all this by continuing to behave sensibly, work hard and make the school a happy place. Yours sincerely Jacqueline Ikin Lead Inspector 10 of 10 Inspection Report: St John's Mead Church of England Primary School, 4 July 2007

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion