Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
St Francis Catholic Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Jan 2007
- Inspectorssingle source
Bogusia Matusiak-Varley
- Achievement verified
Good
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Good
- Postcode verified
B19 1PH
- Name on report verified
St Francis' Catholic Primary School
- URN verified
103437
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- AchievementGood
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: St Francis' Catholic Primary School, 11 °12 January 2007 p.9
- Pupils attain broadly average standards by the end of Year 6 in English, mathematics, science and information and communication technology (ICT) and their achievement is good with outstanding examples of achievement seen in ICT. p.4
- The headteacher is an outstanding leader who is passionate about the pupils contributing fully and making a difference to the community. p.4
- We are delighted that you have high expectations of being famous sports people, actresses and singers. p.11
- Your headteacher is doing an outstanding job at leading your teachers in ensuring that you get the best possible chances in life. p.11
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Raise standards in Years 1 and 2, especially for more capable pupils, in writing. p.4
- Improve the quality of teaching in Years 1 and 2 so that all teachers use data from assessment to plan tasks that meet pupils' needs. 2 Inspection Report: St Francis' Catholic Primary School, 11 °12 January 2007 p.4
- Develop middle management so it has a more prominent role in raising standards throughout the school. p.4
- Children enter the Reception class with very low levels of attainment for their age. p.5
- They make good progress because of the good emphasis on teaching basic skills. p.5
- Nevertheless, the majority are still working towards the standards for communication, language and literacy and mathematical development by the time they start Year 1. p.5
- Progress in Years 1 and 2 is satisfactory overall but inconsistent across year groups. p.5
- Pupils' achievement is satisfactory but standards in reading, writing and mathematics are below average. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,855
- about usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report St Francis' Catholic Primary School
p.1
103437 Unique Reference Number Birmingham Local Authority 286660 Inspection number 11 °12 January 2007 Inspection dates Bogusia Matusiak-Varley Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Nursery Road School address Primary Type of school Handsworth Voluntary aided School category Birmingham B19 1PH 4 °11 Age range of pupils 0121 4645072 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0121 4643728 Fax number 399 Number on roll (school) Helen Ryan Chair The governing body Appropriate authority Johanne Hennigan Headteacher 11 November 2002 Date of previous school inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 286660 11 °12 January 2007 4°11 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
This is a large primary school; situated on the outskirts of Lozells and Handsworth, areas of high social and economic deprivation. Racial hotspots in the community have seen some very serious incidents. The school has a high percentage of pupils from different ethnic groups, 21 different languages are spoken, nearly 45% have support for learning English as an additional language, one third of the children attending the Foundation Stage are at the early stages of learning English as an additional language and the school has recently admitted a number of Polish children. Forty-five per cent of pupils are entitled to free school meals. The number of pupils entering and leaving the school during different times of the academic year is high at 23% and this affects end of Year 2 and Year 6 academic standards. Whilst staffing is stable, the school experiences difficulty in attracting staff to come and teach in the area.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St Francis' Catholic Primary School, 11 °12 January 2007
p.3
Grade: 2
This is a good school which is rightly prized in the community for enabling pupils to make informed choices and become good citizens. It rises above the challenges presented in the local area. The school offers a good education and its mission statement of striving to ensure that everyone is valued and achieves their full potential regardless of colour, culture or creed underpins all aspects of school life. Achievement and standards are good. Pupils attain broadly average standards by the end of Year 6 in English, mathematics, science and information and communication technology (ICT) and their achievement is good with outstanding examples of achievement seen in ICT. By the end of Year 2, standards are below national average in English, mathematics and science; they are average in ICT. Overall, achievement is better in Years 3 to 6 than in Years 1 and 2 because teaching is consistently good. In Years 1 and 2 teaching is satisfactory but variable. Pupils are not always doing as well
p.4
Grade: 2
as they could because tasks set do not consistently meet their needs. This is mainly due to weaknesses in the use of assessment information when tasks are being planned and particularly restricts the more capable pupils' rates of progress. Overall, teaching and learning are good. Children make good progress in the Foundation Stage. They acquire basic skills at a rapid rate but they do not attain the expected standards in communication, language and literacy, and mathematical development because of their very low starting points. The school offers a good curriculum suited to the needs and interest levels of pupils coupled with good teaching, care, guidance and support. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development and pupils' personal development and well-being are strong. Nevertheless, there are too few opportunities for pupils to develop their skills of independent learning throughout the school and, in Years 1 and 2, pupils are not
p.4
Grade: 2
writing enough due to the overuse of worksheets which sometimes limit what they might otherwise achieve. Pupils have good attitudes to learning, behave well and attendance is satisfactory. Learning mentors provide good levels of support resulting in pupils being able to manage their feelings well and so subsequently learn better. Leadership and management and governance are good. The headteacher is an outstanding leader who is passionate about the pupils contributing fully and making a difference to the community. She is well supported by her senior teachers but middle management, being new to their posts, have not yet had sufficient time to impact on standards. School self-evaluation is accurate and, since the last inspection, standards of writing have risen in Years 3 to 6 but not in Years 1 and 2. Due to the many good outcomes the school is well placed to continue to improve.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Raise standards in Years 1 and 2, especially for more capable pupils, in writing. • Improve the quality of teaching in Years 1 and 2 so that all teachers use data from assessment to plan tasks that meet pupils' needs. 2 Inspection Report: St Francis' Catholic Primary School, 11 °12 January 2007 • Develop middle management so it has a more prominent role in raising standards throughout the school.
p.4
Grade: 2
Children enter the Reception class with very low levels of attainment for their age. They make good progress because of the good emphasis on teaching basic skills. Nevertheless, the majority are still working towards the standards for communication, language and literacy and mathematical development by the time they start Year 1. Progress in Years 1 and 2 is satisfactory overall but inconsistent across year groups. Pupils' achievement is satisfactory but standards in reading, writing and mathematics are below average. Standards in ICT are average and all groups of pupils make good progress. More capable pupils make inconsistent progress because they are not sufficiently challenged especially in writing, as on occasions, too many worksheets are used which restrict their writing, especially in science. Pupils make better progress in Years 3 to 6 and standards are broadly in line with the national average in English, mathematics and science. The 2006 test results show a
p.5
Grade: 2
significant increase in the percentage of pupils attaining the higher levels, especially in writing and mathematics. This is because performance management has focused on raising standards, and very rigorous monitoring of teaching and learning, undertaken by the headteacher and senior management team, has been effective. Pupils learning English as an additional language and those with learning difficulties and disabilities do well and almost all reach or exceed their targets. The six week focus for pupils learning English as an additional language to equip themselves with basic vocabulary is paying dividends.
p.5
Grade: 2
By the time pupils leave school they are confident, outgoing, able to articulate their opinions and have a good sense of right and wrong. They have a good understanding of cultural diversity and social awareness because of the high emphasis placed upon the teachings of Jesus and the Christian faith. Pupils are very aware of good role models in the various cultures the school represents such as Martin Luther King and Ghandi. Pupils take their responsibilities very seriously and the school council and peer mediators contribute to the smooth running of the school. 'You can always sort things out by being respectful', said one Year 6 pupil. Learning mentors help pupils to manage their anger. Although the school has had a high number of exclusions, these have all followed the correct procedure and pupils have been fully integrated back into education. Pupils are proud of their school and show this by keeping it neat and tidy.
p.5
Grade: 2
A group of Polish pupils interviewed said that when they arrived they were made to feel most welcome in the school and help is always available when they need it. 3 Inspection Report: St Francis' Catholic Primary School, 11 °12 January 2007 Pupils know about healthy eating, as reflected in the choices they make of the delicious food in the canteen. Pupils love sport; they are competitive and know about staying safe. They achieve economic well-being by being good team players and achieving well in English, mathematics, science and ICT. However, opportunities for independent learning are too few and this prevents pupils' personal development from being outstanding.
p.5
Grade: 2
Teaching is good in Reception and in the upper juniors; in Years 1 and 2 it is satisfactory with some year groups demonstrating examples of good teaching. Teachers, support staff and learning mentors work well together and, as a result, vulnerable pupils, those with learning difficulties and disabilities and with English as an additional language, make good progress. However, in Years 1 and 2, teachers do not use data from assessment to challenge the most capable pupils and this, coupled with an over-reliance on worksheets, restricts pupils' progress in writing. Throughout the school, teachers use interactive whiteboards well and this engages pupils in their learning. Teachers have higher expectations of their pupils in Years 3 to 6 and the quality of marking in Years 5 and 6 is outstanding. In Years 5 and 6, for example, teachers point out to pupils how they can improve their work. Consequently in the next task set, pupils remember what they need to do in order to improve,
p.6
Grade: 2
resulting in them achieving their targets.
p.6
Grade: 2
The school provides a good curriculum which is effectively tailored to meet the needs of pupils. For instance, Foundation Stage provision has been extended into Year 1, and greater use is being made of speaking and listening activities, and of drama, as preparation for writing. The success of this is reflected in the improved percentage of pupils attaining the higher levels in Year 6 in the 2006 test results. Work in physical education and in personal, social and health education effectively promotes awareness of matters relating to pupils' safety and health. The curriculum is supported by a good range of visits and visitors. Special events such as Black History Month and Health Week enrich pupils' experience well, as do opportunities to learn musical instruments, and also French and Spanish, which have recently been introduced. This contributes positively to the enjoyment and achievement in learning of all groups
p.6
Grade: 2
of pupils. Opportunities to acquire workplace skills are well fostered through regular opportunities to work with partners and in teams, encouraging the emergence of workplace skills. The school offers a broad range of extra-curricular activities, including sports, arts and other clubs. Pupils' levels of participation in these activities are good. 4 Inspection Report: St Francis' Catholic Primary School, 11 °12 January 2007
p.6
Grade: 2
The care, guidance and support provided for pupils are good. The school has a strong Christian ethos, which is reflected in the good relationships between pupils and their teachers and other adults. Parents agree that their children feel safe and are well cared for at school. Pupils are encouraged to be mutually supportive. The learning mentors and other support staff make a good contribution to pupils' pastoral and academic care. Child protection procedures are effective, including the arrangements to refer pupils to the local authority's social care department, and to ensure the safe recruitment of staff. Risk assessments relating to the premises and for organised excursions are secure. Arrangements to set targets for individual pupils, in order to help them improve their work, are well developed, and involve parents on a termly basis. However, the use made of information from assessment is not consistent across the school and is a
p.7
Grade: 2
weakness especially in Years 1 and 2. The school has good systems for tracking pupils' academic attainment and additional support is provided for any who have not made expected progress.
p.7
Grade: 2
The headteacher is determined to provide the very best for every pupil and her staff and she relentlessly leads them to attain success at a fast pace offering support at all levels. The school has a very positive 'can do' ethos in which teamwork is strong. Through effective school self-evaluation and monitoring of teaching and learning all staff strive hard to make the school better. The senior management team support the headteacher well but middle managers, being new to their posts, are not yet fully engaged in sharing best practice in their subjects with staff and do not yet monitor teaching and learning. The school is outward looking and has outstanding relationships with other schools and the community. For example, the school has worked in conjunction with the local catholic secondary school to produce an anti-bullying newspaper. The school is the heart of the parish and the community welcomes the children's input towards the
p.7
Grade: 2
liturgy. The school takes full account of the views of pupils, parents and governors. Governors support the school well and they have been instrumental in developing improvements to the building. They are fully involved in school self-evaluation and know the school's strengths and areas for development well. 5 Inspection Report: St Francis' Catholic Primary School, 11 °12 January 2007 .
p.7
Grade: 2
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St Francis' Catholic Primary School, 11 °12 January 2007
p.8
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
2 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 3 The attendance of learners 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
and interests of learners?
2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 Inspection Report: St Francis' Catholic Primary School, 11 °12 January 2007
p.9
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 Inspection Report: St Francis' Catholic Primary School, 11 °12 January 2007
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Thank you for making us feel so welcome in your school; we thoroughly enjoyed our two days with you. You attend a good school, your teachers are very caring, they teach you well and, in spite of the many difficulties you face in the community you are good citizens. You learn well and know right from wrong. We are delighted that you have high expectations of being famous sports people, actresses and singers. Keep reaching for the stars and you will get there! You behave well around the school and you are very caring. Your hard efforts at fund raising are supporting many charities; well done! Your headteacher is doing an outstanding job at leading your teachers in ensuring that you get the best possible chances in life. Your learning mentors really help you learn and you are all so fond of the staff. We have asked your headteacher and teachers to help you learn even better. You can help by making sure that in Years 1 and 2 you reach higher standards. Those of you who find learning
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
easy need to write more. We have asked your teachers to share information about how well you are doing with you so that you all know what to do in order to improve. We have also asked those teachers with responsibilities for subjects to help you get even higher standards. You can help by asking them about what other children of your age are doing in different schools to achieve high standards. We wish you all the very best in the future, and to the Polish group of pupils we interviewed, a little message for you and your friends, Uczcie sie dobrze i szczesc Boze (work well and God Bless). 9 Inspection Report: St Francis' Catholic Primary School, 11 °12 January 2007
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion