Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Greenshaw High School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
1 May 2007
- Name on report verified
Greenshaw High School
- URN verified
103000
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Students’ personal development is outstanding and students are excellent ambassadors for the school. p.6
- 1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.8
- They feel they are well prepared for the next stages of education and training because of outstanding care, guidance and support. p.4
- Those with learning difficulties and disabilities achieve exceptionally well. p.4
- Students come to the school with broadly average levels of attainment and build well on this secure foundation to make good progress by the end of Year 11. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure that shared expectations of what makes for consistently good teaching is promoted relentlessly across all departments. p.6
- Extend rapidly the skills of some middle leaders to manage their accountabilities more effectively. procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. p.6
- Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate. p.8
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes22
“Those with learning difficulties and disabilities achieve exceptionally well.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,512
- about usual (typical 3042)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 11-19 Inspection date 01 May 2007 Inspection number 286545 Unique Reference Number 103000 Local Authority Sutton Inspection number 286545 Inspection dates 01 May 2007 Reporting inspector Sheila Nolan
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Comprehensive School category Community Age range of pupils 11-19 Gender of pupils Mixed Number on roll School 1463 6 th form 234
p.1
Appropriate authority The local authority Chair Mr M Cooper Headteacher Mr J Fuller Date of previous school inspection 10-13 September 2001
p.1
School address Grennell Road Sutton Surrey SM1 3DY
p.1
Telephone number 020 8715 1001 Fax number 020 8641 7335 Greenshaw High School Inspection report Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.1
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. Document reference number: HMI 2507 01 April 2007
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors for one day. Inspectors investigated the following issues: achievement and standards, personal development and well-being, care, guidance and support, aspects of the curriculum in relation to the school’s specialist status and the consistency of middle managers. Evidence was gathered from the school’s self-evaluation (SEF), national published assessment data, the school’s own records and other documentation, and observation of the school at work. Parents’ questionnaires and interviews with senior and other staff, governors and students also informed inspectors’ judgements . Other aspects of the school’s work were not investigated in detail, but inspectors found no evidence to suggest that the school’s own assessments, as given in the SEF, were other than justified. These have been included where appropriate in this report.
p.3
Description of the school
Greenshaw High School, a specialist mathematics and Computing College, serves a very diverse socio-economic area. Applications to Year 7 far exceed available places and the sixth form is growing in popularity. The school has grown significantly in recent years. Students are predominantly of White European heritage but the school population also includes small numbers from a wide range of minority ethnic groups. Families in the area have ready access to a wide range of selective and independent schools.
p.3
Description of the school
The proportion of students eligible for a free school meal is lower than national figures. Whilst the percentage of students with learning difficulties and disabilities is average, more than double the expected proportion has a Statement of Special Educational Need. Few students have a home language other than English. Extensive building works have recently been completed.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Grade 1 Outstanding Grade 2 Good Grade 3 Satisfactory Grade 4 Inadequate Document reference number: HMI 2507 01 April 2007
p.3
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
Greenshaw is a dynamic and effective school that offers its students a good quality of education. It is an ‘exciting school and we are enthusiastic about our work,’ commented a group of staff. Students, too, consider it a ‘good place to learn’ and note the warm working relationships between teachers and pupils. The overwhelming majority of parents also agree that this specialist mathematics and computing college does well for the students. This view matches the school’s overall judgement on its provision. The sustained progress since the last inspection is underpinned by its work as a training school, which has supported teaching by spreading the good practice within the specialist areas of mathematics and information and communications technology (ICT), and by the increasingly rigorous use of information on students’ progress at senior level. Greenshaw’s capacity to improve further is good.
p.4
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
The school rightly prides itself on its inclusiveness. Despite students’ sometimes very complex needs, it manages to support the overwhelming majority of them to remain in school. Most students with learning difficulties and disabilities, and those with emotional, social and behavioural challenges, thrive in the school’s generally calm and ordered environment. Nevertheless, this can result in occasional instances of challenging behaviour. This is reflected in the concerns of a very small number of the parents who returned questionnaires. The school council convincingly assured inspectors that the school deals immediately with any anti-social behaviour, including signs of bullying.
p.4
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
Students’ personal development is outstanding. Relationships throughout the school are very positive. Students give real assent to the ‘Greenshaw Charter ‘on behaviour, equality and racial harmony. A real strength of the school is the way it involves students in decision making and policies through ample opportunities, such as the school council. Students, for example, are rightly proud of their part in finding ways of maintaining sport at breaks even during examination periods. Students report feeling safe in school and are secure in that there is always someone to turn to, be it teacher, the school nurse or community police officer. Most students are very active participants in sport and many sample the healthy menus of the canteen. In their conversations with inspectors, students clearly demonstrated that they enjoy school. Well over half stay on into the sixth form and the overwhelming majority attend
p.4
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
regularly. They are proud that they can make a difference to others through, for example, their support for a Sri Lankan school, by visiting local elderly residents or by helping Year 7. They feel they are well prepared for the next stages of education and training because of outstanding care, guidance and support. Most students asked were very well informed on their personal and academic targets and on their progress towards them.
p.4
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
There is a clear trend of improvement in results in national tests and in examinations in Years 9 and 11. Standards are above average. Students come to the school with broadly average levels of attainment and build well on this secure foundation to make good progress by the end of Year 11. Those with learning difficulties and disabilities achieve exceptionally well. In 2006, a significantly higher proportion of Document reference number: HMI 2507 01 April 2007 students than that seen nationally gained five or more higher GCSE grades that included both English and mathematics. Students make especially fast progress in mathematics, reflecting the school’s specialist status. The new digital applications course, also part of the specialist college plan, has made a good start. Still early in the course, almost three quarters of Year 9 students have already gained examination success. The school’s judgement on likely high rates of success in
p.4
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
forthcoming examinations is confirmed by the comprehensive data on students’ current progress and by modular examination results.
p.5
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
The school is keenly aware that students do not always achieve equally well in all subject areas. Those in younger year groups, for example, previously made better progress in science and mathematics than in English. Senior managers ensure that the best practice in the most successful subjects is shared increasingly effectively across all areas the curriculum. For example, recent robust actions have led to a marked improvement in English, business studies and art. This is already evident in examination results last year. Groups of students, identified as making slower progress than others, are carefully tracked to explore underlying causes. As a result, a range of successful measures are bolstering the achievement of a number of vulnerable students. There is no significant difference in the progress of students from different minority ethnic groups.
p.5
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
The good leadership and management of Greenshaw is reflected in the headteacher and senior team’s able and rigorous identification of the school’s strengths and weaknesses and in the actions taken to bring about improvement. Standards are rising and students are making good progress throughout the school. Committed middle leaders share the school’s vision of a fully inclusive school striving for excellence for all. The school has given considerable thought to its outstanding curriculum which is well enriched by a wide range of out-of-hours activities. Students are particularly appreciative of the innovative ‘learning to learn’ through ICT in Year 7 and of the different pathways open to them in Years 10 and 11. Governance is good. Governors support the school well and have a clear view of its development. They are increasingly able to question students’ performance and are aware of where improvements are needed.
p.5
Overall effectiveness of the school Grade: 2
Good teaching is promoted through the expectations of the ‘Greenshaw Good Lesson.’ In this, the school has been very successful but knows it needs to ensure that it is applied more consistently across, and within, subjects. Students learn well and this is mirrored in their very encouraging examination results and in inspectors’ judgements on classroom practice. The school has used its specialist mathematics and computing designation effectively to promote a sense of urgency in learning across the curriculum and to encourage rigorous checks on students’ understanding in lessons. Nevertheless, it recognises that not all subjects have adopted such strategies consistently. Inspectors identified that the feedback some students receive on their written work was too scant in a number of lessons, partly because middle leaders have not been effective enough in monitoring classroom practice. Document reference number: HMI 2507 01 April 2007
p.5
Effectiveness and efficiency of the sixth form Grade 2
The effectiveness and efficiency of the sixth form are good because it is well led, teaching is good and the majority of students learn well in their chosen courses. Students are highly appreciative of the open access to post-16 education and of the very strong guidance and support that sees them through their time in the school. One commented, ‘We can freely approach teachers who go out of their way to help, even in their own time.’ Well over half of Year 11 students decide to continue their education at Greenshaw.
p.6
Effectiveness and efficiency of the sixth form Grade 2
Overall standards are average, despite sometimes lower than average starting points, and students achieve well by the time they leave school. Students pinpoint the knowledgeable and enthusiastic teaching and the regular checks on their work as the two main factors contributing to their success. Most are clear as to future education and work plans through a wide range of visits and visitors from across higher education and the work place. Nearly all students successfully reach the universities of their choice.
p.6
Effectiveness and efficiency of the sixth form Grade 2
The curriculum closely matches the aspirations of current students but senior managers appreciate that future students’ needs will be better met by further opportunities of other than advanced level courses. Students’ personal development is outstanding and students are excellent ambassadors for the school. As well as their involvement with younger pupils and the wider community, they show a genuine sense of responsibility in their studies and in their mature attitudes and behaviour. Inspectors identified a loophole in the security procedures for the sixth form but the school has taken immediate action to remedy this gap. The overall quality of care, guidance and support is outstanding.
p.6
What the school should do to improve further
Ensure that shared expectations of what makes for consistently good teaching is promoted relentlessly across all departments. Extend rapidly the skills of some middle leaders to manage their accountabilities more effectively. procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk.
p.6
Inspection judgements
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate. School Overall 16–19
p.8
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? 2 2
p.8
Overall effectiveness
The quality and standards in the Foundation Stage
p.8
Overall effectiveness
The capacity to make any necessary improvements 2 2
p.8
Achievement and standards
How well do learners achieve? 2 2 The standards 1 reached by learners 2 3
p.8
Personal development and well-being
How good is the overall personal development and well-being of the learners? 1 1 The extent of learners’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 How well learners enjoy their education 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community 1 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.8
The quality of provision
How effective are teaching and learning in meeting the full range of learners’ needs? 2 2 How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? 1 2
p.8
The quality of provision
How well are learners cared for, guided and supported? 1 1
p.8
Leadership and management
How effective are leadership and management in raising achievement and supporting all learners? 2 2 Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? Yes Yes Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? No
p.8
Leadership and management
1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.8
Leadership and management
All white boxes must be completed. The grey boxes are used wherever the inspection team has sufficient evidence to come to a secure judgement.
p.8
The effectiveness of the registered day care
(where applicable) The quality and standards of the registered day care N/A How effective is the day care in helping children to be healthy? How effective is the day care in protecting children and helping them to stay safe? How effective is the day care in helping children to achieve and enjoy their learning? How effective is the day care in helping children to make a positive contribution? How effectively is the day care organised? Does the day care meet the needs of the range of children for whom it provides? Has the day care improved since the last inspection? Does the day care require enforcement action? Does the day care require a notice to improve?
p.9
The effectiveness of the funded nursery education
(where applicable) The quality and standards of funded nursery education N/A How effective is the funded nursery education in helping children to achieve and enjoy their learning? How effective are teaching and learning? How effective is the partnership with parents and carers in promoting the nursery education? How effective is the funded education in helping children make a positive contribution? How effectively is the funded nursery education led and managed? Does the funded nursery education meet the needs of the range of children for whom it provides Is the children’s spiritual, moral, social and cultural development education fostered? Has the nursery education improved since the last inspection? Does the funded nursery education require a notice to improve?
p.9
Inspection of Greenshaw High School, Sutton, Surrey SM1 3DY
Thank you for welcoming us so warmly to Greenshaw and for sharing your ideas and opinions with us. We very much enjoyed our conversations, particularly those with the members of the school council and the sixth form. We are sure you will want to know our findings.
p.10
Inspection of Greenshaw High School, Sutton, Surrey SM1 3DY
You are rightly proud of Greenshaw. You think it is a good school and we agree with you. Your able headteacher and staff want the best for you and are determined that you will make fast progress over your time in the school. You make a very positive contribution to this ambition. Because you enjoy school, you behave well and work hard. You make good progress by Year 11 and reach standards that are above national figures, particularly in mathematics. This is also because you are taught well and because most of you attend regularly. We were particularly interested in your success and clear enjoyment in your digital applications course.
p.10
Inspection of Greenshaw High School, Sutton, Surrey SM1 3DY
You recognise that you are very well cared for. We are pleased that you feel comfortable with each other and with your teachers. You tell us there is always someone to go to when needed. In the sixth form, you are generous in welcoming newcomers to the school. This is just one of the ways you take responsibilities seriously at Greenshaw. Others of you help Year 7, visit local elderly residents and support a school in Sri Lanka.
p.10
Inspection of Greenshaw High School, Sutton, Surrey SM1 3DY
When thinking about how Greenshaw could be even better, your school agrees with us that in some subjects, feedback on your written work could be more helpful. You, yourselves, identified that not all lessons were up to the mark of the best and we have asked your headteacher and subject leaders to pursue this. For your part, you can help by continuing your very good co-operation with your teachers and by operating the new sixth form security arrangement.
p.10
Inspection of Greenshaw High School, Sutton, Surrey SM1 3DY
With very best wishes for your future success at Greenshaw.
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion