Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Crownfield Infant School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 Nov 2007
- Inspectorssingle source
Hugh Protherough
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
RM7 8JB
- Name on report verified
Crownfield Infant School
- URN verified
102295
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The children thrive in this positive environment and their personal development is outstanding. p.4
- The teachers' friendly approach and clear expectations lead to positive relationships and excellent behaviour. p.4
- The school's close links with a local consortium have also been extremely helpful in strengthening still further the excellent levels of care and support. p.4
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Crownfield Infant School, 20 November 2007 p.7
- The curriculum is firmly established and following the creation of an excellent and well resourced outside environment, the children now benefit from regular physical exercise and exciting new dimensions to their learning. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ■ Define the detail of how pupils can improve their writing within the school's new curriculum framework. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Crownfield Infant School, 20 November 2007 . p.5
- in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Crownfield Infant School, 20 November 2007 p.6
- School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,916
- shorter than usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Crownfield Infant School Inspection report
p.1
102295 Unique Reference Number Havering Local Authority 286330 Inspection number 20 November 2007 Inspection date Hugh Protherough Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Infant Type of school Community School category 4 °7 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 212 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Pam Craig Chair Mrs Sharon Nacmias Headteacher 15 April 2002 Date of previous school inspection White Hart Lane School address Collier Row Romford RM7 8JB 01708 741826 Telephone number 01708 765978 Fax number
p.1
4-7 Age group 20 November 2007 Inspection date 286330 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector. He evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: The extent to which the school's action to improve pupils' writing is resulting in better achievement, especially the boys? Do the leaders responsible for English and Foundation Stage have a secure oversight of standards and the quality of education in their areas of responsibility? What is the impact of the school's work with parents, carers and other agencies in raising pupils' achievements? Other aspects of the school's work were not inspected in detail, but the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school's own assessments, as given in its self-evaluation, were not justified and these have been included where appropriate in this report.
p.3
Description of the school
The majority of pupils at this average sized infant school are of white British origin. One in five is from a wide variety of other backgrounds. Few of these are at the early stages of learning English. The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals is above average. Almost a quarter of pupils are identified as having learning difficulties or disabilities (LDD) which is above the national average; of these two pupils have statements of special educational need (SEN).
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Crownfield Infant School, 20 November 2007
p.3
Grade: 2
'My son enjoys school so much and he is learning so well and that is down to his teachers ... he can't wait to get to school each day.' This comment is typical of the highly positive views expressed by the overwhelming majority of parents about Crownfield Infant School. They are right to be pleased. This is a good school that has made important improvements since the last inspection, especially in relation to provision in the Foundation Stage, and is well positioned for the future. The bedrock of the school's success is the passionate commitment of the headteacher and her staff to the development of the educational partnership between home and school. Parents are delighted about the ease with which they can contact the staff to discuss any aspect of their child's development and many recognise the good support provided for pupils with LDD and SEN. Regular newsletters, home-school communication books, and a range of meetings
p.4
Grade: 2
and courses for parents all help them to support learning at home. The children thrive in this positive environment and their personal development is outstanding. They arrive at school happy and enthusiastic. The teachers' friendly approach and clear expectations lead to positive relationships and excellent behaviour. The children know that they benefit from regular exercise and healthy eating and are making the most of the school's good provision. The school's close links with a local consortium have also been extremely helpful in strengthening still further the excellent levels of care and support. The inspection also focused, in part, upon pupils' writing. The school has rightly identified that the national assessments of seven-year-olds in 2007 show that whilst overall standards in writing were in line with the national average, the boys were not doing as well as the girls. Closer analysis of these results shows that boys heavily outnumbered the girls and a significant
p.4
Grade: 2
number had LDD and SEN. Although some of these struggled to reach the expected level in writing, they made good progress in relation to their starting points in Year 1. The inspector's analysis of the current Year 2 shows that children are achieving well and that more boys are reaching the expected levels. However, the few pupils who exceed the expected levels are mostly girls and the school is now concentrating on improvements in this area. The inspectors' sampling of teaching reflects the close teamwork of the staff team. Lessons are thoroughly planned and cater effectively for the wide range of needs in each class. A significant feature of literacy sessions is the way that adults help the children to learn about the sounds of letters (phonics). The teachers' systematic approach is of particular benefit to the boys because the physical actions and rhymes used as part of each lesson reinforce learning.
p.4
Grade: 2
It is also possible to observe the benefits of this approach when children are writing because most feel confident in using their phonic knowledge to tackle unfamiliar spellings. The inspector's analysis of children's previous work reveals that they are producing a good volume of writing. They write for a variety of purposes, but are sometimes constrained from developing greater independence as a result of the use of exercises and worksheets. The new curriculum framework devised by staff offers increased opportunity for pupils to make links in their learning between the subjects of the National Curriculum. However, the detail of how further improvement in pupils' writing can be managed within this is not yet in place. The leadership team are well organised and thorough. Those middle managers such as the English co-ordinator have good oversight of their responsibilities. They maintain comprehensive
p.4
Grade: 2
records of what is being taught and keep careful checks on the quality of pupils' work. 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Crownfield Infant School, 20 November 2007 Assessment information is well used to support teachers' planning and in setting targets for individual pupils that further support the home-school partnership. A committed governing body successfully supports the headteacher and her team. Together, they know their school well and have made accurate assessment of its performance. They manage their budget prudently and with a sharp eye on long-term trends. Thus although a fall in the number of pupils has resulted in a reduction in the amount of Foundation Stage teachers, the revised arrangements in Reception classes are working well.
p.4
Grade: 2
Since the last inspection, the leadership of the Foundation Stage has brought about important improvements to provision for children in the Reception classes. The curriculum is firmly established and following the creation of an excellent and well resourced outside environment, the children now benefit from regular physical exercise and exciting new dimensions to their learning. Children entering the Reception class arrive with wide ranging abilities, but overall their levels of attainment are below national expectations. They make good progress so that by the time they enter Year 1 the majority are working within the nationally expected goals for five-year-olds. Past records suggest that girls have tended to achieve more swiftly than boys, especially in communication, language and literacy. The current day-to-day assessments of the children maintained by Reception staff are building into comprehensive records of individual
p.5
Grade: 2
progress. A recent set of early writing assessments offers an excellent baseline from which to judge pupils' writing development and includes promising samples of boys' early writing. Other informal observations during the inspection also indicate that in terms of using language to organise and clarify thinking boys are performing better than last year. New teaching arrangements introduced in September are working well. The teachers' precise planning and daily assessment sheets ensure that all adults working in the Reception bases understand the focus of their work and that children experience a good balance of directed and child initiated experiences. As a result the children have settled happily into the routines of school. Many spoke readily with the inspector about their work and demonstrated confidence when choosing activities to pursue.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ Define the detail of how pupils can improve their writing within the school's new curriculum framework. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Crownfield Infant School, 20 November 2007 .
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Crownfield Infant School, 20 November 2007
p.6
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.7
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements
p.7
Achievement and standards
2 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.7
learners?
1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 1 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.7
and interests of learners?
1 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.7
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Crownfield Infant School, 20 November 2007
p.7
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Crownfield Infant School, 20 November 2007
p.8
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
29 November 2007 Dear Children Inspection of Crownfield Infant School,Romford,RM7 8JB I promised the school council that I would write a letter to you after my visit to tell you what I thought of your school. Here it is! First, I want to thank you very much for making me so welcome. I had a busy and exciting day. I think Crownfield Infants is a good school. You told me that your teachers make your lessons fun and that you have lots of exciting clubs that you enjoy. I agree. I also like the way you all take care of each other and behave sensibly around the school. Another thing that makes your school special is the way that your teachers and parents work together to help you to do as well as you can. It was good to see you working hard and doing well in so many things; writing story-boards, learning your 'Jolly Phonics', sharing stories, and discovering all about The Great Fire of London,' (as well as splashing in puddles in the Reception play area!)
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
I think you are doing well in your work, but could do a bit better in your writing, (especially the boys!). I have asked your teachers to finish planning their new ideas that will give you even more interesting things to write about. With best wishes Hugh Protherough Lead Inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Crownfield Infant School, 20 November 2007
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion