Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Savio Salesian College

Inspected 17 Mar 2006 · published 4 May 2006 · URN 104959

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Cathryn Kirby

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Mar 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Cathryn Kirby

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    L30 2NA

  • Name on report verified

    Savio High School

  • URN verified

    104959

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentSatisfactory
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 75% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedexceptionallyoutstandingsuccessfulmake good progresseffectivepositiveeffectively
Criticisminadequatetoo lowbelowseriouslimitedpoorweaknessesweakness

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings751w−74
  • What needs to improve2495w+38

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
3,210
about usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 44
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 23%What needs to improve 76%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

104959 Unique Reference Number Sefton LEA 284972 Inspection number 16 March 2006 to 17 March 2006 Inspection dates Ms Cathryn Kirby HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 which gives Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools the authority to cause any school to be inspected. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.1

Netherton Way School address Secondary Type of school Bootle Voluntary aided School category Merseyside L30 2NA 11 to 18 Age range of pupils 0151 521 3088 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0151 525 8435 Fax number 813 Number on roll Mr T Lawless Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Fr G Briody Headteacher 17 March 2003 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 284972 16 March 2006 - 11 to 18 17 March 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

When Savio High School was monitored in March 2005 the visit raised serious concerns about the standard of education provided. The school was subsequently inspected by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and three additional inspectors in March 2006.

p.3

Description of the school

Savio High School is a smaller than average Catholic comprehensive in Bootle, Merseyside. It serves an area that suffers from social and economic deprivation, as reflected in the relatively high proportion of pupils who are entitled to free school meals. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is above average. Almost all the pupils are white British. There are 813 pupils on roll, including 96 in the sixth form. The headteacher joined the school in September 2005.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Savio High School, 16 March 2006 to 17 March 2006

p.3

Grade: 4

In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than in all the circumstances it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a Notice to Improve. Significant improvement is required in relation to achievement and standards. The school also requires significant improvement in relation to the sixth form. Savio High School is not an effective school because pupils underachieve in Key Stage 3 and in science and mathematics between the ages of 11 and 16. Girls underachieve compared to boys. In the sixth form, achievement and standards are unsatisfactory and the curriculum does not adequately meet the needs of the small number of students. The new headteacher has strengthened links with external agencies and the local authority and arranged appropriate training for managers. The school has been

p.4

Grade: 4

successful in securing a bid for specialist status in business and enterprise. Since its last inspection in March 2002, the school has improved the quality of teaching and learning, although the proportion of lessons in which pupils make good or better progress is too low. Resources and provision for teaching information and communication technology (ICT) have improved; so too has attendance, from a very low base, although it remains below average. The school's systems for checking the progress of many of the actions it initiates and gauging their impact are not rigorous enough. Pupils make satisfactory progress in their personal development. Their behaviour is good in lessons and around the school. The care, guidance and support they receive are satisfactory overall and the school cares well for its most vulnerable pupils. Arrangements to support pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are

p.4

Grade: 4

underdeveloped. Staffing levels are satisfactory but, when viewed against the inadequacies in provision, the school does not provide satisfactory value for money.

p.4

Grade: 4

Achievement and standards in the sixth form are inadequate. The curriculum is limited by the small numbers of students in each year group and is not well-matched to the needs of the pupils, particularly those in Year 12. Self-assessment and review do not effectively inform development plans, therefore leadership and management are inadequate. The school is in negotiation with a partner school to offer a more suitable range of courses. Entry requirements for academic courses starting in September 2006 have been reviewed and tightened. A new system of monitoring the students' progress has recently been introduced but it is too soon to gauge its impact on raising standards.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Raise standards, particularly in science and mathematics, and improve the achievement of girls. 2 Inspection Report: Savio High School, 16 March 2006 to 17 March 2006 • Sharpen systems for checking the progress and gauging the impact of school improvement work. • Increase further the proportion of lessons in which pupils make good or better progress. • Ensure sixth form students are enrolled on courses which are appropriate to their needs.

p.4

Grade: 4

Pupils enter the school having achieved broadly average results in their primary schools. By the end of Key Stage 3 standards are below average. Although standards rose slightly in English, mathematics and science between 2004 and 2005, the school did not meet its targets. Between the ages of 11 and 14 pupils underachieve; they do not make the progress that they should. In Key Stage 4 standards are below average and the proportion of pupils gaining five A* to C grades at general certificate of secondary education (GCSE) fell between 2004 and 2005. By the end of Key Stage 4 many pupils make up for some of the ground lost in the earlier key stage and their progress is broadly satisfactory, although they do not make the progress they should in mathematics and science. Girls do not do as well as boys; none achieved an A* to C grade in GCSE science single award. Considerable variation exists between subjects at GCSE; pupils make good progress in physical

p.5

Grade: 4

education and sociology. Overall the pupils' progress by the end of Key Stage 4 declined slightly between 2004 and 2005. The school has recently introduced a system for tracking each pupil's progress and is beginning to develop a view of standards across subjects. Although the quality of teaching has improved, the proportion of lessons in which pupils make good or better progress is too low to have a significant impact on raising standards.

p.5

Grade: 3

The pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. The values underpinning the school's faith are evident in the courteous and considerate manner with which most pupils conduct themselves. Behaviour is good and pupils are sensible in situations where safety is important. There is an adequate range of opportunities for pupils to take responsibility, including serving on the school council, raising funds for charities and acting as mediators in conflict. Sixth-formers help younger pupils in lessons. However, there is no close monitoring of the extent of pupils' involvement in opportunities to make contributions to the wider school community The pupils' attitudes to school and learning are satisfactory. Attendance, although improving as a result of a systematic and closely monitored range of procedures, is still below average. Punctuality at the beginning of the school day is poor. However,

p.5

Grade: 3

where teachers encourage and help the pupils to take a more independent approach to their learning, attitudes are much better. Pupils are aware of the importance of 3 Inspection Report: Savio High School, 16 March 2006 to 17 March 2006 health-related issues such as diet and exercise, but this awareness is not always apparent in their choice of food at lunchtime. Older pupils demonstrate a good range of work-related skills when using computers, but these are not matched by their skills in literacy and numeracy.

p.5

Grade for sixth form: 4

The quality of teaching has improved and is now satisfactory overall. Some good or better teaching was seen across a number of subject areas including mathematics. However, further improvement will be needed if all pupils are to reach the standards of which they are capable. In the best practice teachers realise the value of structured lessons with clear aims, where pupils are allowed to share and discuss what they think. The pace of many lessons is good, so that pupils can get a lot done. Outstanding lessons in GCSE physical education and sociology were characterised by a clear and shared purpose, brisk pace and motivation which drove pupils to do their best. Relationships are a major strength; pupils and teachers show care and respect for each other. The quality of lesson planning however is too variable; this results in agreed areas of focus, like literacy and relating work to pupils' needs, being overlooked. Many

p.6

Grade for sixth form: 4

lessons present tasks and information in the same way for all pupils. While some attention is given to those seen to be struggling, teachers pay too little regard to how to develop the ideas and expression of pupils of average ability or challenge the most able pupils. In these lessons, this is the main reason why pupils make satisfactory rather than good progress. Teachers have good subject knowledge and present and explain things clearly. Pupils are given many opportunities to do practical tasks and discuss work in pairs. They generally concentrate well, but remain too reliant on the teacher for ideas. Teachers are beginning to understand and use assessment information as a means to track pupils' progress and, although pupils know what grades and levels they should be aiming at, this system is in the early stages. The quality of marking is satisfactory overall, but departmental reviews have not resulted in a consistent approach to marking,

p.6

Grade for sixth form: 4

which will help pupils to improve their work.

p.6

Grade for sixth form: 4

The curriculum provides a satisfactory range of courses. In Years 7 to 9 there is good emphasis on the core subjects of English, mathematics and science; these take up nearly half the week. The provision for teaching ICT as a discrete subject has improved across the school and all pupils have sufficient opportunity to develop their skills. However, the use of ICT to support teaching and learning in the wider curriculum is 4 Inspection Report: Savio High School, 16 March 2006 to 17 March 2006 underdeveloped. The curriculum is enriched by a range of additional subjects. There is a limited but suitable range of vocational subjects. The school is wisely reviewing the curriculum pathways and the guidance pupils receive at Key Stage 4. Business Studies is popular and fits well with the school's new status as a specialist business and enterprise college. An alternative curriculum for a small number of pupils who

p.6

Grade for sixth form: 4

find academic study difficult combines courses at a local college and work experience. A suitable range of external visits and activities enriches the curriculum and pupils appreciate the good choice of activities after school. However, they would like more to do at lunchtime.

p.7

Grade: 3

Overall the care, guidance and support given to pupils are satisfactory. Support for the most vulnerable pupils is a strength of the school. A whole-school system to track pupils' academic progress has made a promising start, but it is too soon to assess its impact on eliminating underachievement. Provision to make sure pupils are safe in school and during school activities is good. However, arrangements to support pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are underdeveloped and not well understood by staff; the school does not formally review the progress these pupils make. A recently established and rigorous induction process means that pupils intending to join the sixth form are guided well in their choices; this has not been the case in the past.

p.7

Grade for sixth form: 4

The headteacher joined the school in September 2005. He has begun to establish a professional dialogue around teaching and learning, the curriculum and other key areas of the school's work. He has strengthened links with local schools and the local authority's school improvement service and has secured appropriate training for middle and senior managers. The school has been successful in bidding for specialist status in business and enterprise. There is an emerging understanding amongst the staff of the strengths and weaknesses of provision. The school's work has improved the quality of teaching and learning since the monitoring visit in March 2005 and this is now satisfactory. However, not all managers demonstrate the capacity to lead and manage the actions necessary to raise standards with the required urgency. Some middle managers still have difficulty seeing the main messages from analysis of examination

p.7

Grade for sixth form: 4

results and linking them to what is going on in classrooms. The school's approach to evaluating the progress of actions taken is not sharp enough; consequently it does not have a wholly accurate view of its provision. Persistent unsatisfactory performance is not challenged rigorously enough. Governance is satisfactory but would benefit from holding the school to account more rigorously and frequently for the progress of actions intended to raise standards. 5 Inspection Report: Savio High School, 16 March 2006 to 17 March 2006 The school's own evaluation is detailed but lacks an objective review of actions taken to improve the quality of provision. Some departments are rising well to the challenge of increased responsibility and accountability for the quality of teaching and learning in their areas. In others, development plans do not link coherently with the wider school improvement plan. The school has worked hard to develop a common approach

p.7

Grade for sixth form: 4

to the tracking of pupils' progress and the use of assessment information; this is in the early stages of development. Suitable plans have been implemented to improve the range of options and choices available at Key Stage 4. The school has plans to address a similar weakness in the post-16 curriculum. Deficiencies in accommodation and decoration make some teaching areas drab and uninspiring; this detracts from the school's efforts to raise standards. 6 Inspection Report: Savio High School, 16 March 2006 to 17 March 2006 .

p.8

Grade for sixth form: 4

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 Inspection Report: Savio High School, 16 March 2006 to 17 March 2006

p.9

Inspection judgements

16-19 School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.10

Inspection judgements

4 4 How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? 3 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage 4 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation Yes Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements No No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.10

Inspection judgements

Achievement and standards 4 4 How well do learners achieve? 4 4 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.10

Inspection judgements

4 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 4 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.10

Inspection judgements

Personal development and well-being 3 3 How good is the overall personal development and well-being of the learners? 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The behaviour of learners 3 The attendance of learners 3 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.10

Inspection judgements

The quality of provision 4 3 How effective are teaching and learning in meeting the full range of the learners' needs? 4 3 How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? 3 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.10

Inspection judgements

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.10

Annex A

Leadership and management 4 3 How effective are leadership and management in raising achievement and supporting all learners? How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities insufficient evidence Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.11

Annex A

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them The extent to which learners make a positive contribution Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the

p.11

Annex A

wider community The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams Yes Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form Yes Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for making us so welcome when we came to inspect your school. All of you that we met and talked with were very polite and are a credit to your school. We observed that the vast majority of you behave well in lessons and around school. Relationships in lessons between teachers and pupils are good. The teaching you receive has improved since we last visited. You told us that you enjoy the activities after school but would like more to do at lunchtime. However, not all of you gain the exam grades you are capable of, so we have asked Father Briody and your teachers to do the following: - increase the proportion of you who achieve Levels 5 and 6 in Year 9 and grades A* to C in Year 11 - check that all the work the school is doing to improve things is really making a difference - improve the teaching even more, so you make good progress in all your lessons - make sure sixth-form students are enrolled onto courses which are best suited to their needs,

p.12

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

so that more of you are successful and sixth-form exam results improve. You can help too by making sure you attend regularly and arrive at school on time, so that the day can start promptly for everyone. Remember, employers, colleges and universities are interested in people who have a good record of attendance and punctuality! We have recommended that your school is inspected again, in around a year's time, to check particularly that your results are improving. We wish you well for the future.

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion