Other · Ofsted report
Pennine Camphill Community
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Name on report verified
Pennine Camphill Community
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- If inadequate areas of learning or aspects of provision remain inadequate following re-inspection, inspectors will continue to monitor progress at annual assessment visits, but the areas will not be re-graded. p.2
- There has been slow progress in addressing the issues raised at the last inspection and actions taken have had a limited impact. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 610
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 32, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Audience Published Pennine Camphill Community
p.1
Post-sixteen September 2006 information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).
p.1
Introduction
Pennine Camphill Community was inspected in June 2004. Inspectors from
p.2
Introduction
Inspectorate (ALI) carried out the inspection under Section 62 of the Learning and Skills Act. The quality of provision was found to be satisfactory or better in all areas inspected, except in Literacy, Numeracy and Communication which was found to be less than satisfactory. Ofsted is responsible for re- inspecting all provision that is less than satisfactory within two years of the original inspection. If inadequate areas of learning or aspects of provision remain inadequate following re-inspection, inspectors will continue to monitor progress at annual assessment visits, but the areas will not be re-graded. They will be re-inspected during the full college inspection.
p.2
Introduction
The less than satisfactory literacy, numeracy and communication was re- inspected on 29 and 30 June 2006. The outcomes of the re-inspection are as follows.
p.2
Introduction
Curriculum area Original grade Re-inspection grade Literacy, Numeracy and Communication 4 4
p.2
Context
There is no discrete provision for literacy, numeracy and communication skills. These subjects are taught through the three curriculum areas: learning through living, learning through work and learning through lessons. At the time of inspection, 28 learners were involved in improving their literacy, numeracy and communication skills, 11 of whom were working at pre-entry level and the remainder at entry level 1.
p.2
Context
Strengths good development of speaking and listening in a wide range of situations good use of realistic settings to support learning very effective use of co-worker support that contributes to students’ learning and confidence
p.2
Context
Areas for improvement lack of clear strategy to implement the literacy and numeracy policy throughout the college insufficient linking of baseline assessments to lesson planning information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk). insufficient recording of progress in lessons slow progress made in addressing issues raised at the last inspection
p.2
Achievement and standards
Learners develop good speaking and listening skills in a wide range of situations. At a meal-time, for example, a learner who had been an elective mute was being encouraged to ask for items from fellow learners, co-workers and other staff. Baseline assessments have improved and provide a satisfactory starting point for developing literacy and numeracy. The information from these assessments however, is not linked systematically in all curriculum areas to plan for further learning and assessment.
p.3
Quality of provision
Teaching is mostly satisfactory. Realistic settings are used well to support learning. The learners are actively engaged in negotiating and planning learning activities. Recording of learners’ literacy and numeracy skills is insufficient and does not routinely capture individuals’ progress in each lesson. Half-termly recording is too descriptive and does not sufficiently document individual learner progress. Literacy and numeracy skills are effectively developed in some lessons, but this is not consistent across the college. Overall, learners are well supported. The use of co-workers to support learning has improved significantly and they are more active in enabling the learners to develop skills and confidence.
p.3
Leadership and management
There has been slow progress in addressing the issues raised at the last inspection and actions taken have had a limited impact. Formal and informal monitoring provides the management with a clear understanding of the extent to which literacy and numeracy is integrated into learning. A literacy, numeracy and communication (LNC) co-ordinator has been appointed to lead and support LNC throughout the college. Plans to implement the LNC policy are still developing but there is not a clear strategy to ensure this policy is applied swiftly across all areas.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion