Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Netherhall Learning Campus Junior School

Inspected 1 Mar 2006 · published 15 Mar 2006 · URN 107620

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Stephen Hardwick

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    1 Mar 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephen Hardwick

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    HD5 9NT

  • Name on report verified

    Rawthorpe Junior School

  • URN verified

    107620

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentSatisfactory
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+64Positivemore positive than 75% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallygood progressimprovedsuccessfuleffectivestrongpositiveeffectively
Criticismbelowconcernsinadequatepoorseriouslowyet tovariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1326w+64
  • What needs to improve1729w+61

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
3,017
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 43%What needs to improve 56%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Rawthorpe Junior School

p.1

107620 Unique Reference Number Kirklees LEA 284125 Inspection number 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006 Inspection dates Mr Stephen Hardwick HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 which gives Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools the authority to cause any school to be inspected. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.1

Rawthorpe Lane School address Primary Type of school Rawthorpe Community School category Huddersfield, West Yorkshire HD5 9NT 7 to 11 Age range of pupils

p.1

01484 300080 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01484 300080 Fax number 194 Number on roll Mrs Rachel Sixsmith Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr I Williamson Headteacher 2 November 1998 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 284125 28 February 2006 - 7 to 11 1 March 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

When Rawthorpe Junior School was inspected in April 2004, it was judged to require special measures because it was failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education. Her Majesty's Inspectors of Schools subsequently visited the school on four occasions to monitor its progress, and reinspected the school in March 2006.

p.3

Description of the school

Rawthorpe Junior School serves housing estates that are about a mile from the centre of Huddersfield. It shares a large open site with an infant and nursery school and a secondary school. It is of average size. Almost half the pupils are entitled to free school meals, a proportion that is almost three times the national average and reflects the relatively high levels of social and economic disadvantage in the area. The proportion of pupils with additional learning difficulties and/or disabilities, 33%, is also above average. The school houses specialist provision for pupils with a physical disability; there are currently three of these pupils on roll. In recent years the number of pupils with minority ethnic backgrounds has risen: this is now 40%, and half of them speak English as an additional language. Some of these pupils are from families seeking asylum. The pupils' attainment on entry to the school is below average.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Rawthorpe Junior School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

In accordance with section 13 (4) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures. Rawthorpe Junior School has improved a great deal since its previous inspection, when it was judged to be poor. There was a marked rise in the school's results in national tests in 2004 though this was not fully sustained in 2005, when scores were well below average. Nonetheless, the pupils make at least satisfactory and often good progress in lessons, as a result of better teaching. The curriculum meets requirements and is supplemented by a sound range of extra activities. Measures taken to tackle misconduct and disinterest in work have proved particularly successful: the school is orderly, the pupils' attitudes and behaviour are at least satisfactory, and the need to use exclusion as a sanction has fallen from unusually high to acceptable levels. This has been a critical

p.4

Grade: 3

improvement, freeing teachers and senior staff to focus on their main tasks rather than controlling outbursts from disaffected pupils. Raising attendance has proved more difficult; it has been higher in the last two terms but remains below average. The school's problems stemmed in part from frequent changes in leadership, but the arrival of the current headteacher in summer 2004 heralded a period of greater stability. The headteacher has worked very hard for the school, provided good leadership and management, and gained the confidence of the community. He has been well supported by the teachers and governors in overcoming the serious nature of the problems he faced. The school has the staffing, plans and resources to continue to move forward, and there are thorough systems for monitoring progress. The school now provides satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

Despite the gains that have been made, the priorities remain much as they were, as the school recognises in its plans. These are to: • continue to raise standards, maintaining the focus on basic skills • continue to improve attendance • continue to improve the quality of teaching.

p.4

Grade: 3

The school's results in the national tests for Key Stage 2 pupils rose considerably in 2004, but fell back in 2005 and were well below average. Just over half the pupils reached Level 4, the standard expected for Year 6, in each of English, mathematics and science; few reached the higher Level 5. A quarter of the pupils who took the tests in 2005 spent part of their Key Stage 2 education in other schools. Nonetheless, the pupils as a whole made below average 2 Inspection Report: Rawthorpe Junior School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006 progress during the key stage. Their gains were poorer than those who took the tests in 2004, but better than those for 2003. These ups and downs stem from the chequered quality of provision these pupils received during their time at Rawthorpe. There was little variation in the progress made by the different groups of pupils, though those with a non-English first language fared well, making above average progress.

p.4

Grade: 3

Many of the current pupils have ground to make up, but the picture for them is more promising. The teaching is consistently better than previously, enabling the pupils to make satisfactory and often good progress in lessons. The school's own assessments indicate that the proportions of pupils reaching the level expected in Year 6 are set to rise.

p.5

Grade: 3

A range of measures has been introduced to improve the pupils' behaviour and attitudes, and tackle the concerns that were raised when the school was inspected in 2004. These have proved successful. The pupils' attitudes and behaviour are satisfactory overall, but in many classes they are good. Under good leadership from senior staff, the use of rewards and punishments has become much more effective and consistent. The pupils know the parameters of what is acceptable and they are proud to receive the various prizes for good effort, attendance and behaviour. In many classes, the pupils settle instantly to their work and are keen and interested. In others, the pupils need reminders to listen or tidy away, but they readily do as they are told. Lessons are no longer regularly disrupted by misbehaviour and showing off, and the need to use exclusion as a sanction has fallen accordingly. Behaviour at breaktimes on the

p.5

Grade: 3

playground and in assembly has shown similar improvement. There is now much purposeful play, with equipment and areas set out to encourage games. The pupils' overall attendance has been persistently low; in 2004/05, it was 92.6%, compared with a national figure of 94.6%. However, recently the school's considerable efforts have begun to pay dividends. The figure for the autumn term 2005 was 93.8%. Pupils have responded enthusiastically to the weekly award for the class with the highest attendance, and the learning mentor and education welfare service have challenged the families of regular absentees. Provision for the pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory overall. However, the ethos of the school is greatly improved, with a growing sense of community and enjoyment. Assemblies are lively occasions, when themes such as the effects of bullying are introduced, to be followed up in lessons. The pupils sing

p.5

Grade: 3

enthusiastically and time is set aside for reflection. Different faiths and cultures are studied in subjects such as history and religious education, but also within special events such as a recent 'international day'. Good use is made of the local environment to further the pupils' understanding of their immediate heritage. There is a strong focus on class and school rules, so the pupils know right from wrong and recognise why punishment might be necessary. The pupils have a voice in the school's affairs through the school council, which has been instrumental in improving provision at playtime. 3 Inspection Report: Rawthorpe Junior School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006 When its award as a Healthy School was renewed in 2005, the school received much praise for the way it promotes physical exercise, a balanced diet, social responsibility and a clean and attractive environment. The pupils contribute to the wider community

p.5

Grade: 3

through charities and the three schools that share the site are developing a common approach to, for example, home-school agreements. The skills the pupils learn with computers and in literacy and numeracy provide a satisfactory basis for their future livelihood.

p.6

Grade: 2

When the school became subject to special measures, teaching and learning were judged to be unsatisfactory, partly because of the frequent need to employ temporary teachers. Staffing has become much more stable, allowing the school to capitalize on an extensive programme of support and training. The teachers have worked hard and morale has risen. The result is that teaching and learning are good overall, enabling the pupils to make much more rapid progress in class. All the lessons were well planned, prepared and organised, and based on clear learning objectives that were carefully explained to the pupils. Additional adults contributed well, especially in leading small groups. Most lessons were briskly paced, with all the pupils expected to answer when the class was being taught as a whole. The better teaching was marked out by high expectations, enthusiastic and knowledgeable presentations and continual checks to ensure that the pupils were learning what was

p.6

Grade: 2

intended. Occasionally, in some of the satisfactory lessons, the teacher tolerated too much wasteful chatter when the pupils were working independently. The pupils have benefited from the consistent routines that have been established from class to class. By Year 6 they learn good work habits, for example, in the way they gather books and equipment and settle quickly at each stage of a lesson.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum meets requirements. It is broad and balanced, and recognises the needs of the pupils in the emphasis given to literacy and numeracy. Attention is increasingly being given to raising the pupils' interest and enjoyment in learning through special events, visits and the work of a musician who leads lively singing sessions. There is a sound range of additional activities, such as a breakfast club, sports and chess.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school pays proper regard to the pupils' safety and welfare. The relatively high numbers of vulnerable children are monitored closely, as are those in need of regular 4 Inspection Report: Rawthorpe Junior School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006 medication. Outside agencies are much involved in devising well-judged programmes for pupils with additional learning difficulties and/or disabilities. There is careful supervision at breaktimes, and risk assessments are undertaken as required. In a recent survey, almost all the pupils indicated that they felt safe and knew who to turn to for help. The school has taken part in a national project to promote responsibility and good behaviour. This has proved successful. Some of the pupils, for example, act as 'befrienders', enabling other pupils to share concerns in confidence before seeking adult advice. The systems for assessing the pupils' standards and tracking their progress have been

p.6

Grade: 2

overhauled. They provide detailed information on how well each pupil is faring, and their progress towards targets is reviewed each term. Action is taken appropriately to provide extra help where necessary or additional work in a particular area. The pupils know their targets and what they need to accomplish next.

p.7

Grade: 2

When the school was inspected in 2004, its performance and progress had been adversely affected by changes in leadership. Since the headteacher joined the school in the summer of 2004, there has been much greater stability in staffing, helping the school to profit from training and establish consistency in how it operates. The headteacher has worked very hard, setting the pupils' welfare, equal opportunities and standards at the heart of efforts to improve. He has provided good leadership and management, and gained the confidence of the community. Senior staff have taken responsibility for key areas, such as the pupils' behaviour, and the coordinators for the core subjects have given a strong lead, as well as setting good role models in their own teaching. The governors too have fulfilled their responsibilities, for instance, by maintaining oversight of the impact of each initiative. However, the school is dependent

p.7

Grade: 2

on an active core of governors and attendance at meetings is low. There is a rigorous system for monitoring how well actions are succeeding, and the range of people involved has gradually been increased to strengthen expertise. Plans have frequently been updated to take account of what has been learned and where efforts and resources need to be directed. These have been well judged and based on appropriate priorities. Overall, the school has made satisfactory and, in some respects, good progress on the key issues that arose from its inspection in 2004. The effect of measures to improve attendance, however, has yet to be fully realised. Given the foundation and momentum that have been established, the school is well placed to improve further. The school has met the challenge to strengthen the partnership with parents. Feedback from parents has been positive, whereas previously there were regular expressions of

p.7

Grade: 2

concern. Parents have been kept well informed about events and the curriculum through newsletters, and attendance at consultation evenings has risen. 5 Inspection Report: Rawthorpe Junior School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006 The local authority has provided a considerable amount of support that has been well matched to the school's needs, in particular over teaching, behaviour, assessment and special educational needs. The work of the authority's contact officer has been much valued, for instance, in taking stock of the school's position and determining the help that might prove most effective. 6 Inspection Report: Rawthorpe Junior School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 Inspection Report: Rawthorpe Junior School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006

p.9

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.10

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.10

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 4 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.10

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.10

learners?

NA 3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 3 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 3 How well learners enjoy their education NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.10

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.10

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.10

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.11

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.11

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.11

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.11

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Congratulations! Rawthorpe Juniors no longer requires special measures. Mr Williamson and the teachers have worked very hard to improve your lessons so you learn more. They have also made school a more interesting and calmer place to be. You too have played your part. Your behaviour is better and you try harder in class. It has been good to see you act helpfully and responsibly, for example, as befrienders. Your attendance has also improved, but there are still a few of you who take too much time off school. I have asked the teachers to carry on with the work they have begun, because your standards in the tests at Year 6 are still not as high as they should be. I have enjoyed my visits to Rawthorpe and the conversations I have had with many of you about what you were doing. I hope you can build on everything that you and the teachers have achieved. Best wishes for the future.

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion