Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

John Cleveland College

Inspected 12 Jan 2006 · published 2 Feb 2006 · URN 120299

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Paul Brooker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Jan 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Brooker

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    LE10 1LE

  • Name on report verified

    John Cleveland College

  • URN verified

    120299

Page 8 of 12
Page 8 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+77Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyvery wellpositiveoutstandingexcellentstrengthsexceptionally
Criticisminadequateunevenlowpoornot alwaysweakerinsufficientlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings736w+56
  • What needs to improve2634w+81

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
3,337
about usual (typical 2787)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 22%What needs to improve 78%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report John Cleveland College

p.1

120299 Unique Reference Number Leicestershire LEA 283969 Inspection number 11 January 2006 to 12 January 2006 Inspection dates Paul Brooker HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Butt Lane School address Secondary Type of school Hinckley Foundation School category Leicestershire LE10 1LE 14 to 18 Age range of pupils 01455 632183 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01455 638030 Fax number 1564 Number on roll Mr Geoff Wass Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Andrew Harris Headteacher 14 January 2002 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 283969 11 January 2006 - 14 to 18 12 January 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and four Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

John Cleveland College is much larger than most secondary schools. The college draws its student population from across Hinckley, and reflects the town population. The vast majority of students are from White British backgrounds. The proportion entitled to free school meals is much lower than the national average. At 7%, the proportion of students identified by the college as having learning difficulties and/or disabilities is lower than average. The college accommodation is spread over an awkward site on different levels and in a large number of separate teaching blocks.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: John Cleveland College, 11 January 2006 to 12 January 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The college provides a satisfactory education for its students and has sustained rapid improvement since its last inspection. The college’s assessment matches that of inspectors. It has a number of strengths. The college provides very good care and guidance for its students, and their personal development is consequently a notable strength. The students behave well and generally have positive and mature attitudes to learning. The principal’s unwavering leadership and rigorous management very effectively guides the college’s development and its drive to raise standards. The quality of teaching has continued to strengthen since the last inspection. It is satisfactory overall with notable strengths. However, the quality of learning is rather uneven within and between lessons because planning does not always take sufficient account of the range of ability in each class. The curriculum is good and is constantly under review. There is a good

p.4

Grade: 3

range of extra-curricular provision. The college is rightly proud of its many sporting and musical achievements. Standards of attainment have continued to rise across the college and are above national average figures in the sixth form. However, the college recognises that a minority of students in Years 10 and 11 could achieve more, particularly those who enter the college with low levels of attainment and those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. The college has the capacity for further improvement. Rigorous systems for self-evaluation ensure that the college has an accurate and robust view of its own strengths and areas for development. This information is used very well to plan the college’s development. Moreover, staff at all levels demonstrate an energy and determination to improve. The college offers good value for money. Financial management has very effectively turned round a budget deficit. The cramped and shabby accommodation remains an

p.4

Grade: 3

impediment to providing high quality education despite judicious improvements since the last inspection.

p.4

Grade: 2

The sixth form provides a good education for its students. Results in the most recent A-level examinations in 2005 improved on the previous year and reflected a rising trend. Standards of attainment are well above average which, given the students’ starting points, represents at least satisfactory achievement. The students’ personal development is good because of the very good systems the college has for their care, guidance and support. The curriculum is good and offers many opportunities for students to widen their interests. Moreover, sixth form students make an important contribution to the wider college community. The leadership of the sixth form is good 2 Inspection Report: John Cleveland College, 11 January 2006 to 12 January 2006 and is well focused on raising standards. Self-evaluation is accurate and is effectively used.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•Continue to improve achievement and raise standards of attainment for students with learning difficulties and disabilities and those with low levels of prior attainment in Years 10 and 11. •Ensure that the quality of learning is consistently good by planning more carefully to meet the individual needs of all students in lessons. •Further develop the accommodation so that it better meets the needs of the students and the college’s aspirations.

p.5

Grade: 3

Achievement is satisfactory overall. The students’ attainment on entry to the college in Year 10 is broadly in line with that seen nationally. In general, the students make satisfactory progress in Years 10 and 11 and standards in GCSE examinations are broadly in line with the median for all schools. The proportion of students attaining five or more GCSE grades A* to C has increased significantly in recent years and rose to 60% in 2005, a figure that is above the national average. By contrast, however, the results show that more could be expected from students with low levels of attainment on entry and those with learning difficulties. The college makes good use of assessment data to analyse results, to track the students’ progress and to guide intervention and development planning. Areas where standards need to improve are highlighted and suitable steps taken to address these. Intervention strategies were particularly effective in 2005 in ensuring that higher-attaining pupils

p.5

Grade: 3

achieved well. Students enter the sixth form with standards that are well above those in most schools, and results in public examinations reflect this intake. Standards reached by students at the end of Year 13 are well above the national average. Given their starting points, achievement is satisfactory in the sixth form, although students do better than this in many subjects, particularly psychology.

p.5

Grade: 2

The students’ personal development and well-being are good. They are mature and behave well around the college and in lessons. They are tolerant and relate well to each other, and are confident, articulate and readily communicate their views with adults. In general, students work purposefully and have positive attitudes to learning. When teaching is rather mundane, most students retain their concentration well but others tend to drift off task. Most students enjoy their lessons and many take part in the wide range of other activities outside the classroom. However, there are relatively few opportunities for them to develop spiritually and to extend their understanding of other cultures. 3 Inspection Report: John Cleveland College, 11 January 2006 to 12 January 2006 The students are able to make a positive contribution to their college and the wider community, particularly through the work of the college council and through

p.5

Grade: 2

fund-raising for charity. Students respond well to the many opportunities for self-development through extra-curricular activities, trips and residential visits. A significant number benefit from participating in the Duke of Edinburgh Award scheme and/or the college’s voluntary service programme. Students feel they are listened to very well. The college and governing body regularly survey their views and act on the findings. In addition, they appreciate the fact the college responds positively to specific requests for additional activities. The students adopt safe procedures both in lessons and around the college. They feel safe and are confident that procedures to combat bullying are applied consistently. The recent developments to encourage healthy eating are beginning to take good effect. The experiences and skills that the students develop at the college, combined with the guidance that they receive, ensure that they are well prepared for the next stage

p.6

Grade: 2

of their education and for their future economic well-being. The college has had significant success in raising levels of attendance in recent years and in achieving its ambitious target of 92.2% for 2004/5.

p.6

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory overall, with many good and some outstanding features. In general, work is carefully prepared and well directed. One notable strength of the teaching is the relationships that exist between teachers and students; these help to build students’ confidence and contribute to their personal development. In the best lessons work is planned in detail to ensure that students of all abilities make good progress. The best lessons seen on the inspection were characterised by sharply focused tasks, varied activities, challenging and well-targeted questioning and skilful management. Lively presentations, including good use of information and communication technology (ICT), motivated the students to respond and engage in their learning. The most effective teaching made very good use of assessment to plan work for different students, often with different outcomes. In addition some excellent

p.6

Grade: 3

marking outlined for students precisely what they need to do to improve their work and gain good examination grades. When teaching is outstanding, students of all abilities make excellent progress in lessons and over time. When teaching is less effective the students are not involved enough in the lesson, and the quality and pace of learning is too uneven. In general, the students who did not participate fully made less progress than others. In some lessons too many students were passive when the teacher dominated proceedings. In these lessons students are not encouraged to take full responsibility for the work. 4 Inspection Report: John Cleveland College, 11 January 2006 to 12 January 2006

p.6

Grade: 2

The curriculum provides well for students across the college. The college provides a good range of option choices, including a wide range of vocational subjects for students in Years 10 and 11, and good flexibility, for example, with early examination entry. Gifted and talented students are very well provided for through special activities and challenging work in classes. Students who are disaffected by mainstream subjects are well provided for through a course partly based at the local college of further education. Suitable steps have been taken to ensure that courses for lower-attaining students and those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities better meet their needs. However, not all students follow a course in ICT. Extra-curricular provision is good, with a wide range of sports clubs, musical and other activities. The Duke of Edinburgh’s Award is flourishing. The college liaises closely with local high schools to ensure that courses meet students’

p.7

Grade: 2

individual needs and aspirations, and it works closely with the local college of further education to offer a wide range of courses that meet the needs of the sixth form students well.

p.7

Grade: 2

The college is a very caring community that students describe as ‘friendly’ and where ‘relationships are good’. Students know that their progress is monitored carefully and the college directs help at those who need it, including the use of a strong team of learning advisers. Effective use is made of targets to guide the students’ progress. Following rapid recent improvement, support for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is now satisfactory. Procedures to combat bullying and racism are good. The college provides good guidance for students, for example, through the careers library and preparation for work experience. There is a good programme of health education, for example, providing effective sex and drugs education and guidance on healthy eating. There are good links with other agencies, and training in and awareness of Child Protection procedures are good. The college provides a safe and healthy physical environment.

p.7

Grade: 2

Transition arrangements are good. The college makes sure that students settle quickly and know what to expect before they arrive at the college.

p.7

Grade: 2

The principal provides unwavering leadership and rigorous management for the college. He continues to sustain the rapid improvement that took the college out of special measures just over two years ago by effectively embedding the college’s systems for effective self-evaluation. He provides a clear strategic direction for the college and 5 Inspection Report: John Cleveland College, 11 January 2006 to 12 January 2006 he has a detailed grasp of its everyday work. Furthermore, he is skilful in developing leadership at all levels within the college and delegating management responsibilities. He is well supported by strong and effective leadership teams. Curriculum leadership has strengthened since the last inspection and is good, and the pastoral system has been sensibly restructured. Collectively, senior and middle managers implement robust systems for checking the work of the college. Line management systems are well

p.7

Grade: 2

developed and effectively hold people to account. Information from monitoring is effectively used to guide training and development across the whole college and to provide effective support for weaker teachers. The programme of continuing professional development is good, and has steadily improved the quality of teaching and has had a demonstrable impact on standards. However, the college is not complacent. There is a sharp focus on improving achievement, based on accurate and systematic self-evaluation. The college’s financial management is very effective. In just three years the college has turned around a £500,000 budget deficit. Despite financial constraints, a number of significant steps have been taken to improve the college’s poor accommodation: the ‘bridge’ art gallery is an example of the innovative way that funds have been used to improve facilities as well as raising aspirations and celebrating achievement. The

p.8

Grade: 2

college makes the best of its accommodation, some of which is inadequate. Very good work has been done to make classrooms stimulating learning environments. The college’s science college status makes a positive contribution in science and mathematics and has been well used to foster good links with feeder schools and the wider local community. The governing body is well organised and well informed. Clear procedures are in place to monitor the work of the college and to effectively hold it to account. 6 Inspection Report: John Cleveland College, 11 January 2006 to 12 January 2006 .

p.8

Grade: 2

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 Inspection Report: John Cleveland College, 11 January 2006 to 12 January 2006

p.9

Inspection judgements

16-19 School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.10

Inspection judgements

2 3 How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? 2 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage 2 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation Yes Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements Yes Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.10

Inspection judgements

Achievement and standards 3 3 How well do learners achieve? 2 2 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.10

Inspection judgements

3 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.10

Inspection judgements

Personal development and well-being 2 2 How good is the overall personal development and well-being of the learners? 2 3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3 The behaviour of learners 2 2 The attendance of learners 2 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community 2 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.10

Inspection judgements

The quality of provision 3 3 How effective are teaching and learning in meeting the full range of the learners' needs? 2 2 How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? 2 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.10

Inspection judgements

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.10

Annex A

Leadership and management 2 2 How effective are leadership and management in raising achievement and supporting all learners? 2 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review 2 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can 2 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities insufficient evidence Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.11

Annex A

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them The extent to which learners make a positive contribution Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the

p.11

Annex A

wider community The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams Yes Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form Yes Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

John Cleveland College Butt Lane Hinckley Leicestershire LE10 1LD Dear Students, Thank you for welcoming us when we came to inspect your college recently. We enjoyed talking to you and seeing your work. It was interesting and very helpful, not least because your opinions were honest and perceptive and enabled us to confirm what the college told us. You described clearly the improvements that have been made and the areas for improvement, and articulated your views well. Many of you are appreciative of the wide range of courses and extra-curricular opportunities offered. You were also rightly proud of what you contribute to the college and the wider community, such as your mentoring work and the many fundraising activities. It is clear that the college has continued to make good progress since the last inspection. The exam results have improved and many of you do very well at GCSE and in the sixth form. The

p.12

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

college has many strengths: for example, it is well led and managed; the principal’s leadership is strong; there is a very good level of care and guidance; and we agree that the sixth form is good. However, there are always areas for improvement. In each case the college is well aware of the issues and has already made suitable plans to address them: The overall results at GCSE and A level have risen in recent years and are often above national average figures. However, the college knows that some students could achieve more. The quality of teaching has many strengths. However, the quality of learning is best when teachers have high expectations of your involvement, and when lessons are planned in detail. In some lessons you are allowed to be too passive and the work needs to be more challenging. The site is not ideal, and many of you have to put up with cramped or shabby accommodation, for example, in some classrooms, assembly and social spaces. The college has done very well

p.12

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

in using its resources to make improvements, and needs to continue this. We wish you all every success in the future. Yours sincerely, Paul Brooker HMI Lead inspector

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion