Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Huddersfield Technical College

Inspected — · published 20 Sept 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    Huddersfield Technical College

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedwell plannedeffectiveenjoystrengthssuccessfuleffectivelyaccurately
Criticisminadequateweaknessespoorlyinsufficientlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings788w+21
  • Leadership201w−19
  • What needs to improve42w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,020
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%Leadership 19%What needs to improve 4%

Full report text

Audience Published Provider reference Huddersfield Technical College

p.1

Post-sixteen March 2006 130537 information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.1

Introduction

Huddersfield Technical College was inspected in February 2004. Inspectors from the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) and the Adult Learning Inspectorate (ALI) carried out the inspection under Section 62 of the Learning and Skills Act. The quality of provision was found to be satisfactory or better in all curriculum areas inspected, except construction. In WBL construction and hairdressing the quality of provision was also found to be less than satisfactory. Ofsted is responsible for re-inspecting all provision that is less than satisfactory within two years of the original inspection. If inadequate areas of learning or aspects of provision remain inadequate following re- inspection, inspectors will continue to monitor progress at annual assessment visits, but the areas will not be re-graded. They will be re-inspected during the full college inspection.

p.2

Introduction

The less than satisfactory curriculum and WBL area of construction, and WBL in hairdressing were re-inspected on 17-18 January 2006. The outcomes of the re-inspection are as follows.

p.2

Curriculum/WBL area Original grade Re-inspection grade

Construction FE 4 2 Construction WBL 4 2

p.2

Context

There are 313 students in construction; 126 full-time students are between 16-18 years old and 19 are over 19 years old; 71 part-time students are 16- 18 and 97 are over 19 years old. Approximately 266 students are in work- based learning. Programmes are offered in plumbing, electrical installation, brickwork, carpentry and joinery at levels 1 to 3. All work-based students are employed before starting on their programmes, mostly at small companies that employ less than five people.

p.2

Strengths

 high success rates  good teaching and learning  good management of work-based learning

p.2

Areas for improvement

 provide more additional learning support in building crafts  improve recruitment practices in plumbing work-based learning information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.2

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards are good. Success rates have improved significantly, and are now well above national averages on many courses. For example on the intermediate construction award in wood occupations, success rates are now 84% against a national average of 45% and in wood occupations NVQ 1 they are 97% compared with a national average of 54%.

p.3

Achievement and standards

Achievement of apprenticeship frameworks has improved significantly since the previous inspection. In 2004/05, 65% of apprentices completed the full framework, compared with 14% in the previous year and none in 2002/03. Forty-nine per cent of advanced apprentices completed their framework in 2004/05 compared with 7% and 11% in the previous two years.

p.3

Achievement and standards

Practical skills are well developed and students acquire industry standard levels of competency. Students enjoy high levels of success in national competitions.

p.3

Quality of provision

Teaching and learning are good. Most theory teaching is lively and students are well motivated. Assessments are well planned and students’ progress is closely monitored. Workplace visits are effective and actively involve employers in the training and assessment process.

p.3

Quality of provision

The majority of students identified with additional learning needs take advantage of the support available. However, the amount of additional support offered in building crafts is insufficient to meet all students’ needs. Recruitment practices for most courses are thorough and help to ensure that students are on the right programme. In a few cases in plumbing, students more suited to level 2 have been recruited on to level 3 programmes where success rates are lower than for other courses.

p.3

Leadership and management

The management of work-based learning is good. There is an increased focus on framework completions. The collection and use of data is good. Most aspects of the arrangements for key skills and additional support have improved. The college has worked well to remedy weaknesses from the previous inspection. The self-assessment report accurately identified most of the significant strengths and weaknesses found during the re-inspection. information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.3

Context

There are 68 students on apprenticeship programmes. The College has links with 52 employer work placements. There are six qualified work-based assessors and a further six are working towards assessor qualifications.

p.4

Strengths

 high success rates on apprenticeship frameworks  good teaching and learning  good management of work-based learning

p.4

Achievement and standards

The completion rate for the apprenticeship framework is high. Successful outcomes increased from 15% in 2002/03 to 25% 2003/04. Particularly good rates were achieved in 2004/05, when they rose to 61% compared with the national average of 27%. Nine apprentices who completed in 2004/05 progressed onto the NVQ level 3 in hairdressing. Five school link pupils progressed onto apprenticeship framework in 2005/06.

p.4

Achievement and standards

Portfolios and practical work are of a good standard. In college and work- place salons, apprentices carry out proficiently a range of professional services. Attendance was good at 81%.

p.4

Quality of provision

Teaching and learning are good. Lessons are well planned and clearly link theory to practical activities. Individual learning plans are used to action plan effectively in most cases. Student progress is monitored and recorded in the teaching file to inform assessment planning. Employers are well informed about the progress of their apprentices. Schemes of work are issued to all employers and used during the review and planning process.

p.4

Quality of provision

Initial assessment is good. Additional learning support is effective, but often it is not available early enough in the students’ programme. Strategies to improve progression to advanced apprenticeships have been established. Potential advanced apprentices are identified and supported whilst on their information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk). apprenticeship framework. Effective strategies to improve success rates include initial advice and guidance and the introduction of taster days.

p.4

Leadership and management

Much improved management of work-based learning shows a good focus on communication and monitoring framework completion. Self-assessment is broadly accurate, although inspectors disagreed with the grade of satisfactory awarded by the college. The new town centre salon reflects industry standards. However, accommodation on the main site is drab and poorly maintained. Salons have few commercial and professional displays and little facility for retail.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion