Other · Ofsted report
Boston College
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Name on report verified
Boston College
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Curriculum4
“highly effective curriculum management” p.2Leadership & governance2
“highly effective curriculum management” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 544
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 31, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Audience Published Provider reference Boston College
p.1
Post-sixteen TBC 107641 information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).
p.1
Introduction
Boston College was inspected in October 2003. Inspectors from the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) and the Adult Learning Inspectorate (ALI) carried out the inspection under Section 62 of the Learning and Skills Act. The quality of provision was found to be satisfactory or better in all areas inspected, except in provision for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities which was found to be less than satisfactory. Ofsted is responsible for re-inspecting all provision that is less than satisfactory within two years of the original inspection. If inadequate areas of learning or aspects of provision remain inadequate following re-inspection, inspectors will continue to monitor progress at annual assessment visits, but the areas will not be re-graded. They will be re-inspected during the full college inspection.
p.2
Introduction
The less than satisfactory provision for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities was re-inspected on 30 November and 1 December 2005. The outcomes of the re-inspection are as follows.
p.2
Introduction
Curriculum area Original grade Re-inspection grade Provision for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities 4 Unsatisfactory 3 Satisfactory
p.2
Context
The college provides full and part time courses for students with learning difficulties and disabilities. At the time of the re-inspection, there were 43 students on foundation programmes, 13 of which were adults. Students attend courses that lead to accreditation at foundation level and at Level 1.
p.2
Strengths
good development of personal, social and work related skills effective partnerships to support learning highly effective curriculum management
p.2
Areas for improvement
insufficient recording of individual learner’s starting points insufficient target setting for individuals in lessons information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).
p.2
Achievement and standards
There is good development of personal, social and work related skills. Students gain skills which will be of benefit to them in their future lives. Achievement levels are at least satisfactory and some are good. Retention and attendance levels are good, and issues relating to punctuality are dealt with satisfactorily. Some students, where appropriate, have progressed from one level to the next, and some have progressed into employment. Students enjoy their courses and improved staff deployment aids their achievement. It is difficult to judge overall progress as there is insufficient recording of learners starting points.
p.3
Quality of provision
Teaching has improved since the last inspection and is satisfactory. In the best lessons good use is made of practical activities to develop students’ skills and understanding. Information communication technology (ICT) is effectively used to support learning. However, the attention to individual target setting in lessons is insufficient. Individual targets are not always set based on an accurate record of students’ current achievements. There are effective partnerships to support learning and good progression opportunities. Students benefit from good guidance and support and have increased access to appropriate work experience. Tutors provide effective personal support.
p.3
Leadership and management
Curriculum management is highly effective. Appropriate changes to the curriculum have secured improvement since the last inspection. The learning accommodation and access to IT facilities have improved. Self-assessment correctly identifies the areas for further development and effective plans are in place to continue improvements.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion