Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Boston College

Inspected — · published 29 Sept 2006

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    Boston College

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+7Mostly positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectiveeffectiveimprovedenjoyeffectivelyaccurate
Criticisminadequateinsufficientnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings464w0
  • Leadership44w+71
  • What needs to improve41w−60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
544
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%Leadership 8%What needs to improve 7%

Full report text

Audience Published Provider reference Boston College

p.1

Post-sixteen TBC 107641 information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.1

Introduction

Boston College was inspected in October 2003. Inspectors from the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) and the Adult Learning Inspectorate (ALI) carried out the inspection under Section 62 of the Learning and Skills Act. The quality of provision was found to be satisfactory or better in all areas inspected, except in provision for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities which was found to be less than satisfactory. Ofsted is responsible for re-inspecting all provision that is less than satisfactory within two years of the original inspection. If inadequate areas of learning or aspects of provision remain inadequate following re-inspection, inspectors will continue to monitor progress at annual assessment visits, but the areas will not be re-graded. They will be re-inspected during the full college inspection.

p.2

Introduction

The less than satisfactory provision for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities was re-inspected on 30 November and 1 December 2005. The outcomes of the re-inspection are as follows.

p.2

Introduction

Curriculum area Original grade Re-inspection grade Provision for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities 4 Unsatisfactory 3 Satisfactory

p.2

Context

The college provides full and part time courses for students with learning difficulties and disabilities. At the time of the re-inspection, there were 43 students on foundation programmes, 13 of which were adults. Students attend courses that lead to accreditation at foundation level and at Level 1.

p.2

Strengths

 good development of personal, social and work related skills  effective partnerships to support learning  highly effective curriculum management

p.2

Areas for improvement

 insufficient recording of individual learner’s starting points  insufficient target setting for individuals in lessons information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.2

Achievement and standards

There is good development of personal, social and work related skills. Students gain skills which will be of benefit to them in their future lives. Achievement levels are at least satisfactory and some are good. Retention and attendance levels are good, and issues relating to punctuality are dealt with satisfactorily. Some students, where appropriate, have progressed from one level to the next, and some have progressed into employment. Students enjoy their courses and improved staff deployment aids their achievement. It is difficult to judge overall progress as there is insufficient recording of learners starting points.

p.3

Quality of provision

Teaching has improved since the last inspection and is satisfactory. In the best lessons good use is made of practical activities to develop students’ skills and understanding. Information communication technology (ICT) is effectively used to support learning. However, the attention to individual target setting in lessons is insufficient. Individual targets are not always set based on an accurate record of students’ current achievements. There are effective partnerships to support learning and good progression opportunities. Students benefit from good guidance and support and have increased access to appropriate work experience. Tutors provide effective personal support.

p.3

Leadership and management

Curriculum management is highly effective. Appropriate changes to the curriculum have secured improvement since the last inspection. The learning accommodation and access to IT facilities have improved. Self-assessment correctly identifies the areas for further development and effective plans are in place to continue improvements.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion