Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Sycamore Short Stay School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 Mar 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
John Lilly
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
DY1 3JY
- Name on report verified
Meadow Road PRU
- URN verified
134768
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.9
- Although written guidance on teaching is available, there is not yet an agreed programme of support for staff on how to gain the skills of highly effective teaching that these pupils require. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure that staff receive better guidance on developing their teaching skills. p.4
- Ensure that pupils know at the beginning of lessons what they should learn, followed by clear guidance on how they can meet these objectives. p.4
- Develop better ways of helping pupils understand their emotions. p.4
- Their attainment on entry is very low and attainment remains low. p.4
- However, most pupils are making satisfactory progress and sometimes good progress in English and mathematics. p.4
- They make good progress in information and communication technology. p.4
- They are making satisfactory progress across all other subjects in the much better planned curriculum, which is well matched to what they would be learning in mainstream schools. p.4
- Despite inadequate accommodation, there is evidence of satisfactory progress in science and design and technology. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,728
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
134768 Unique Reference Number Dudley LEA 282686 Inspection number 15 March 2006 to 15 March 2006 Inspection dates John Lilly AI Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Meadow Road School address Pupil referral unit Type of school Dudley Pupil referral unit School category DY1 3JY 11 to 14 Age range of pupils 01384 818237 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01384 818241 Fax number 12 Number on roll Ms Lyn Culter Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Sue Kulas Headteacher Not applicable Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 282686 15 March 2006 - 11 to 14 15 March 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector.
p.3
Description of the school
The Unit provides mainly for pupils excluded from school, who are in Years 7 – 9. At the time of the inspection all of these were boys and all were in Year 9. At the end of the summer term, most staff resigned and the first half of the autumn term was covered by interim staff. A new teacher-in-charge took up post on the 1 of November 2005. The local authority has developed a strategy for managing the service as a whole, and the extension of what Meadow Road pupil referral unit can offer forms part of this strategy.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Meadow Road PRU, 15 March 2006 to 15 March 2006
p.3
Grade: 3
The provision at Meadow Road Pupil Referral Unit is satisfactory and improving. The recently appointed teacher-in-charge found much that she wished to improve. Her evaluation of the unit’s current performance matches the findings of this inspection. Her strong leadership, highly focused planning and efficient management have brought about rapid and considerable improvement. Teaching and learning are satisfactory, and the curriculum is sensibly planned and is relevant to the pupils’ needs. The behaviour and personal development of most of the pupils is good. Standards of care, welfare and guidance are satisfactory with several positive features. The accommodation is too small and this restricts what staff can offer. Even so, staff make the best of what is available and the unit presents as a bright and stimulating place in which to be and in which to learn. As a result of these improvements, more pupils are being reintegrated
p.4
Grade: 3
into mainstream schools, attendance is improving, albeit, slowly and pupils say they are learning a great deal; this is reflected in the quality of their work in books and on display. The unit is overcoming the hindrances posed by inadequate accommodation and lack of permanent staff and has good capacity for further improvement. There are good plans for future improvements. This is a journey, however, that is well begun but not finished. While clear expectations have improved behaviour, staff are not giving pupils enough help in understanding their emotions. Pupils are not always told what skills and understanding they are trying to gain in a lesson and so this makes it harder for them to improve. Although written guidance on teaching is available, there is not yet an agreed programme of support for staff on how to gain the skills of highly effective teaching that these pupils require. The unit offers satisfactory value for money.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Ensure that staff receive better guidance on developing their teaching skills. • Ensure that pupils know at the beginning of lessons what they should learn, followed by clear guidance on how they can meet these objectives. • Develop better ways of helping pupils understand their emotions.
p.4
Grade: 3
Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory. Their attainment on entry is very low and attainment remains low. However, most pupils are making satisfactory progress and sometimes good progress in English and mathematics. They make good progress in information and communication technology. They are making satisfactory progress across all other subjects in the much better planned curriculum, which is well matched to what they would be learning in mainstream schools. Achievement is especially high in art. Despite inadequate accommodation, there is evidence of satisfactory progress in science and design and technology. Especially good is the way pupils can link their work in English and mathematics to what they are learning in history. The Unit arranges for most pupils 2 Inspection Report: Meadow Road PRU, 15 March 2006 to 15 March 2006 to learn in morning sessions, and progress of all pupils in these sessions is at least
p.4
Grade: 3
satisfactory. A small minority, who have particular problems with attendance and their attitudes towards their learning, attend afternoon sessions. Progress for some of these pupils is still slow, although the curriculum and level of challenge is equally appropriate. Even so, the success of this strategy is seen as pupils are moved to the morning sessions when they become better motivated. During the inspection, progress in the afternoon session was good.
p.5
Grade: 2
The pupils’ personal development is good and they feel happy and safe when in the unit. Most show great pride in their achievements and have good attitudes to their work and towards others and an increasing number of pupils are returning to mainstream schooling. Behaviour during the inspection was good. Attendance overall is improving slowly and over time is satisfactory. The strongest element in pupils’ development is in their rapid gain in social skills. In most cases they make great progress in learning to cooperate and collaborate. This was very evident during lunchtime, when staff and pupils eat together, and during the ‘breakfast club’ start to the day. These are skills that they will need in future employment, complementing the progress made in literacy and numeracy. Through artwork pupils demonstrate strong spiritual and cultural awareness and the latter is also apparent in their history projects. As well as
p.5
Grade: 2
behaving well, they are also starting to develop a real understanding of right and wrong. They show an understanding of why these are important concepts, for example, through discussion of why we need rules when playing games and how a referee makes decisions. However, some still struggle to control emotions and this aspect of well-being needs further development. Through involvement in the life and work of the unit, they become involved in decision-making and learn how to keep themselves healthy and safe. Above all, pupils say they enjoy their time in the unit or as one said, ‘It’s great!’
p.5
Grade: 3
Teaching and learning are satisfactory with some good features. There is, however, variation. When teaching is good or better, this generates highly involved and well-motivated learning, however alienated the pupil may initially feel. In addition to being well planned, lessons are set at a level of challenge that successfully encourages the pupils to make a real effort. Feedback to pupils urges them to achieve more and more, and the planning offers a wide range of opportunities to learn. Even satisfactory teaching, however, shows a determination not to collude in the initially poor attitudes of the pupils, and this strong approach soon brings them around. However, teachers do not fully understand the aspects of what constitutes a very effective lesson. For example, teachers do not make clear enough what each pupil should learn by the end 3 Inspection Report: Meadow Road PRU, 15 March 2006 to 15 March 2006
p.5
Grade: 3
of a lesson and sometimes the authoritative style of teaching reduces pupils to one word answers. Both these features reduce pupils’ involvement in their own learning. Marking is very helpful in showing pupils where they have done well and what they should try next. The use of the ‘success maker’ software is developing well the pupils’ ability to work independently and achievements, such as in art and mathematics. This is helping pupils to see that success is possible. There is good teamwork between the class teacher and assistants and teaching assistants play an important part in developing the pupils’ speaking and listening skills.
p.6
Grade: 3
The curriculum is satisfactory in both morning and afternoon sessions, although there is a wider range of subjects provided in the morning sessions. It provides a breadth of learning that prepares for return to mainstream schooling and is planned in ways that are relevant to the needs of the pupils. There are good links between subjects, for example, between studying Macbeth and work in art, and writing and a history topic on slavery. Good use is made of music and drama. A growing strength is the wider curriculum through visits, for example, an outstanding lesson observed at a local sports centre associated with a football club.
p.6
Grade: 3
Standards of care, welfare and guidance are satisfactory with some good features. Staff consider carefully what each pupil needs to succeed and this produces helpful individual education and support plans. There is good partnership with other agencies, for example, educational psychologists. Staff take good care of the welfare of pupils and the Unit provides a secure and safe environment. Guidance for pupils is continuous and perceptive but is not as systematic or comprehensive as management recognises it needs to be. There is minimal careers education. The unit has made improving behaviour a priority and has, as yet, not sought sufficient ways to help pupils deal with and understand their emotions. Even so, all pupils have key staff mentors and they highly value their help. Child protection procedures are secure. Attendance is well monitored and the importance of good attendance is encouraged strongly with
p.6
Grade: 3
both parents and the pupils. Despite there being work still to do, improved provision has made a significant contribution in helping pupils to manage their own behaviour and to have better attitudes to learning and other people.
p.6
Grade: 2
Leadership and management are good overall. The teacher-in-charge’s initial audit of provision was extremely rigorous and realistic, and this led to a simple, highly focused and strictly pragmatic improvement plan. The plan addressed the most important things first, for example, the security and appearance of the accommodation and then 4 Inspection Report: Meadow Road PRU, 15 March 2006 to 15 March 2006 the curriculum and teaching. She refused to be daunted by the things that could have held her back, for example, accommodation, staffing and resources. Even though many staff were on temporary contracts, she provided fine leadership for them, setting clear direction and high standards. Staff morale is now high and their enthusiasm and teamwork clear to see. Consequently, improvement has been significant and rapid, and capacity for further improvement is high. There is clear strategy for the future with improvements tightly scheduled. Management ensures that the unit runs smoothly
p.6
Grade: 2
day by day but some management systems have yet to be fully developed. Evaluation has yet to be sufficiently guided by interpretation of data on, for example, progress, attainment and attendance. Individual monitoring and advice to teachers has effectively ensured teaching is satisfactory, However, there is as yet not enough guidance and training on what makes high quality teaching. The management committee ensures that the unit’s planning is in line with the development of the service as a whole and that the unit feels less ‘isolated’. Amongst other developments, there is much improved partnership with parents and the schools from which pupils have come, and to which they may return. This has helped significantly more pupils to return successfully to mainstream education. 5 Inspection Report: Meadow Road PRU, 15 March 2006 to 15 March 2006 .
p.7
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Meadow Road PRU, 15 March 2006 to 15 March 2006
p.8
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
learners?
NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA NA Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 4 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.9
and supporting all learners?
NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.10
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.10
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams Yes Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Thank you for making me so welcome in your lessons, during lunch and during the time some of you spent talking with me. I enjoyed my day in the Meadow Road Pupil Referral Unit very much. You told me you felt happy and safe in the Unit, and that you felt you were learning a great deal because of the help you got from your teachers. Several of you told me how proud you were of what you achieved. Your parents said that were very pleased with the progress you are making and a headteacher told me how pleased he was with one of your number who is now back in a mainstream school. I think that staff help you feel safe and cared for, and you told me that you agree. You are making progress in your work because you are taught by teachers who are very keen that you succeed. You are growing in self-confidence and most of you behave well. Most of you attend the Unit well, but some of you need to make a better effort to attend school. You learn
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
interesting things and feel teachers understand and help with any problems you are trying to overcome. I felt the Unit was well led and managed and that you are playing your part in making it a good place to be. To become even better, I suggested that your teachers: helped each other to improve their teaching even more; gave you more help in understanding your emotions and feelings; made it clearer to you what they wanted you to learn in each lesson. Thank you again for making my day in your Unit such a good one.
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion