Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School

Inspected 25 Nov 2005 · published 9 Mar 2006 · URN 133774

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Daniel Brian Evans

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Nov 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Daniel Brian Evans

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    CR4 1YG

  • Name on report verified

    St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    133774

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Very positivemore positive than 88% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionallyenjoyconsistentlyeffectivelypositivestrongfeel safe
Criticismlackinadequatebelowslowlownot enthusiasmlowervariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1273w+83
  • What needs to improve1437w+58

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,681
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%What needs to improve 53%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School

p.1

133774 Unique Reference Number Merton LEA LEA 282380 Inspection number 24 November 2005 to 25 November 2005 Inspection dates Daniel Brian Evans AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Commonside East School address Primary Type of school Mitcham Voluntary aided School category CR4 1YG 3 to 11 Age range of pupils 020 8648 0869 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 020 8640 7056 Fax number 241 Number on roll Mr K Butt Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Ann Oddy Headteacher Not applicable Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 282380 24 November 2005 - 3 to 11 25 November 2005 Inspection Report: St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School, 24 November 2005 to 25 November 2005

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two additional inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary is a mixed voluntary aided school. It was established in September 2002 following its reorganisation from a middle deemed secondary to a primary school on the same site. The school has grown rapidly from a very small school of 90 pupils in 2002 to 250 pupils in 2005. This is its first Ofsted inspection report. Of the full-time pupils 80% come from minority ethnic groups. Pupils have a wide range of ethnic backgrounds and cultural experiences. A high proportion of pupils (36%) speak English as an additional language. Currently 27% of the pupils are entitled to free school meals. The number of pupils identified as having learning difficulties and disabilities is close to the national average. Numbers of pupils entering and leaving the school at other than the normal times are very high and currently two thirds of Year 6 pupils are in this category. There is much greater stability

p.3

Description of the school

in the Foundation Years and in Years 1 to 2.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School, 24 November 2005 to 25 November 2005

p.3

Grade: 3

The inspection team and the school agree that St Thomas of Canterbury provides a satisfactory standard of education for its pupils. Provision for the personal development and well-being of pupils is good. Teaching and learning are satisfactory but there are variations across the school with some teaching that is good or outstanding. Pupils of all ages, ethnic group and gender feel safe and enjoy coming to school. Parents are generally supportive. The school gives satisfactory value for money. Provision in the Foundation Stage is good. In Years 1 to 6, pupils attain below average standards and most make satisfactory progress. Standards have been below average in reading, writing and mathematics over past years. Pupils make better progress in English and science than in mathematics because teachers have given these subjects a higher priority in their planning over the past two years. Provision for pupils learning English

p.4

Grade: 3

as an additional language and those with learning difficulties and disabilities is satisfactory. Leadership and management are satisfactory overall. The headteacher has provided very good leadership to the school in its transition from middle to primary phases. Staff and governors work closely with her and are making good progress towards raising standards. Staff who are new to the school are well supported and quickly adapt to school routines. Efficient use of the accommodation and good learning resources support pupils' achievement well. The school has good capacity to improve.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

* Accelerate pupils' progress and raise standards in mathematics by setting sharp targets for pupils, increasing the pace of lessons particularly in solving word problems and investigations.* Improve the quality of teaching so that it is consistently good; in particular, the way teachers engage pupils' interest and make learning relevant to the needs of individual pupils.

p.4

Grade: 3

Pupils enter the Foundation Stage with standards that are below expectations for their age. Provision is good; pupils settle in quickly and make good progress because the organisation of their learning helps them to develop their personal and social skills quickly.All groups of pupils make satisfactory progress in Years 1 and 2 although; standards over the past years have been consistently below average in reading, writing and mathematics. The school has commendably focused more on tracking the progress of individual pupils and setting individual pupil targets. This is at an early stage but the evidence shows that pupils' listening and speaking are improving and that this is having a positive impact on their reading and writing. Mathematics skills are lower than those in reading, writing and science. Whilst the pupils' number skills are broadly average, they do not perform well in solving word problems and in mathematical

p.4

Grade: 3

investigations.Significant progress has been made in raising standards from a low base at the time of the school's reorganisation and this is reflected in the improving national 2 Inspection Report: St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School, 24 November 2005 to 25 November 2005 test results. The new target-setting arrangements for individual pupils are beginning to raise pupils' levels of achievement. Pupils make satisfactory progress in Years 3 to 6 and standards are broadly average. Pupils learning English as an additional language make satisfactory progress because of the support they receive. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities make satisfactory progress overall. Pupils' make satisfactory progress in information and communication technology (ICT) skills and benefit from regular access to the new technology suite.

p.4

Grade: 2

Pupils' personal development and well-being are good. They speak warmly of their time in school and feel safe. 'I enjoy my school so much' said one pupil and 'I would never go back to my old school'. They have a clear understanding of right and wrong. Most pupils behave well in lessons although a few lack enthusiasm, particularly when they find the work too hard or too easy. Attendance has steadily improved and is at the national average. This is particularly noteworthy as many pupils travel some distance to school.Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Cultural development is strengthened by celebrating the different cultural backgrounds of pupils through events such as 'International Days'. Pupils say there is very little bullying in school but that 'there are disagreements, which we sort out at the mediation point in the playground'. They are eager to become members of the School Council and

p.5

Grade: 2

willingly contribute their views about the school. Pupils use their initiative well around school by being helpful and making friends with new pupils. They participate enthusiastically in projects such as fund-raising and recycling. They are respectful of property and confident that problems that arise will be dealt with promptly and fairly. Pupils are fully aware of the importance of a healthy lifestyle.

p.5

Grade: 3

The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory, but there is a variation in its quality that the school acknowledges. Teaching and learning in the Foundation Stage is consistently good. Activities and resources are well planned to meet different needs and motivate pupils to learn and enjoy their work. Teaching in Years 1 to 6 is satisfactory. Most lessons have good warm-up activities and ICT resources are used well. Pupils generally are eager to learn. However, group activities in a number of lessons are either too hard or too easy and result in a slow pace of learning or, in some cases, unsatisfactory behaviour. The few good or outstanding lessons were characterised by teaching methods which took account of the different ways in which pupils learn. They were enhanced by the teachers' skilful provision for the wide range of needs of individuals in the class, including pupils new to the school or at an early stage in their

p.5

Grade: 3

acquisition of English. In the best lessons teachers' questions deepened the pupils' understanding and made good use of school's assessment systems. Those pupils with 3 Inspection Report: St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School, 24 November 2005 to 25 November 2005 learning difficulties and disabilities receive satisfactory support that enables them to make satisfactory progress. Support staff are well trained and play an important part in contributing to pupils' learning in lessons.

p.5

Grade: 3

Curriculum provision is satisfactory overall. The curriculum in the Foundation Stage is well balanced and broad. Teachers plan together exciting activities which are well matched to the children's needs. They promote language development and social skills effectively using a good range of resources both in and out of doors. Cross-curricular links for literacy and ICT enrich pupils' learning and extend their skills. Across the school there are good opportunities for after-school clubs, the most popular of which is the homework club. Learning is enhanced through talks by visitors and visits that are well chosen to enrich pupils' experiences. The provision for the high numbers of children who join the school after the start of the school year is sound. The school recognises the need to extend the facilities and support for families and pupils who are at very early stages of learning English. There is satisfactory provision for pupils

p.6

Grade: 3

with learning difficulties and disabilities. Imaginative music and art therapy programmes meet some pupils' very specific needs.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school provides good care, guidance and support for pupils. When pupils join the school they quickly develop a sense of belonging because the school is a welcoming family community united by a strong faith. There are good procedures for child protection and possible risks to health and safety are carefully assessed. Supervision during breaks and lunch is good and action is taken quickly to tackle potential difficulties.Pupils with learning difficulties have satisfactory support. The school's procedures for assessing pupils are effective. The tracking of their progress is at an early stage hence, occasionally pupils know what their targets are and make slow progress because they have only a partial understanding of what they have to do to achieve them. The oldest pupils are well prepared for the next stage in their education, for example, in their work on investigations in science.

p.6

Grade: 3

Inspectors agree with the school that the leadership and management are satisfactory. The headteacher took over the school in very difficult circumstances just prior to reorganisation when the school was unpopular in the community and pupil numbers were falling. As a result of her strong leadership pupil numbers are increasing and there is now a firm base on which to further improve the quality of education. Governors and staff fully share her vision of each pupil being able to achieve their best performance. The relatively new management team is settling in well. Analysis of 4 Inspection Report: St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School, 24 November 2005 to 25 November 2005 performance identify appropriate priorities for staff development. As a result, the school has rightly focused on raising standards in mathematics and addressing the lack of consistency in teaching as priorities. The quality of teaching is monitored well

p.6

Grade: 3

by senior staff and by external consultants. All staff have a clear understanding of strengths and areas that need to improve. New and inexperienced teachers are supported very well.The governors work closely with the school management team during a period of continuing change. Financial strategies are skilfully linked to motivate pupils' learning as, for example, in the introduction of interactive electronic whiteboards. Administration staff are a considerable asset to the school. Accommodation is spacious and learning resources are good. Parents generally are supportive but there are a number who would like to have more and earlier information about events in the school. 5 Inspection Report: St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School, 24 November 2005 to 25 November 2005 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Primary School, 24 November 2005 to 25 November 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 3 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for welcoming us to your school and telling us about your work. There are many things about your school that we like very much. * We admired the interesting work you have been doing this term and which is displayed around the school* Most of you behave well and you are a pleasure to talk to * Many of you are aware of how to live healthily and join in activities outside lessons* We were very impressed with the photographs of your activities during your International Day. You are beginning to pick up new things more quickly because teachers help you learn* You try hard in lessons. Some of your writing is especially good. We have asked your school to improve a few things to make it even better. These things are: * To improve your number skills and problem solving in mathematics * The teachers already provide you with some good lessons, but they need to make sure that these occur more often across all subjects and with all classes. You will need to work with your teachers to find different

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion