Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Orgill Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
21 Jun 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Shirley Herring
- Achievement verified
Good
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CA22 2HH
- Name on report verified
Orgill Primary School
- URN verified
131443
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- AchievementGood
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.9
- The popular after school clubs and the excellent range of visits contribute well to pupils’ learning and their enjoyment of school. p.4
- The school arranges an excellent number of visits and also visitors to school to make learning more interesting for you. p.11
- The level of care, guidance and support is good and the school is justly proud of its reputation in caring for vulnerable pupils. p.4
- You were well behaved, polite and friendly and helped us to find our way around school. p.11
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Provide more opportunities for pupils to practise their writing skills in subjects such as history and geography. p.4
- Continue to work closely with the small number of parents who do not send their children to school regularly. p.4
- Develop the use of the outdoor area in the Foundation Stage to extend learning in all areas and give greater access for the children in the Reception class. 2 Inspection Report: Orgill Primary School, 20 June 2006 to 21 June 2006 p.4
- Standards are broadly average and achievement is good. p.5
- Children enter the Nursery with skills that are below the usual level for their age, with weak language and social skills. p.5
- Good teaching in the Foundation Stage, with a clear emphasis on developing speaking and personal skills, enables all children to achieve well and make good progress. p.5
- Nevertheless, attainment in these areas is below average overall as children enter Year 1. p.5
- The school’s good use of assessment information to provide additional support and challenge where needed has led to a good improvement in standards over the last three years, particularly in mathematics. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,695
- about usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 1%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
131443 Unique Reference Number Cumbria LEA 282211 Inspection number 20 June 2006 to 21 June 2006 Inspection dates Mrs Shirley Herring Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Southey Avenue School address Primary Type of school Egremont Community School category Cumbria, CA22 2HH 3 to 11 Age range of pupils 01946 820234 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01946 823879 Fax number 232 Number on roll Mr Richard Smith Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Headteacher 1 October 1999 Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 282211 20 June 2006 - 3 to 11 21 June 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
Orgill is an average size primary school serving an area of considerable social deprivation and all pupils are from a White British background. The number of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is above average and a high proportion have statements of special educational need. Three pupils are cared for outside the family. As it is the only one in the locality, the Nursery admits children from a wide area and many continue their education in other local schools. Children enter the Nursery with below average skills overall and social and language skills are a particular weakness. The school is being led by an acting headteacher for the term between the departure of the previous headteacher and the arrival of his successor. There is a Community Development Centre on site.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Orgill Primary School, 20 June 2006 to 21 June 2006
p.3
Grade: 2
Orgill is a good school in which pupils achieve well. This supports the school’s own view and that of parents and pupils. The school is led and managed well. Regular monitoring of lessons has helped to improve the quality of teaching, which is now good, and raise achievement. The thorough analysis of pupils’ progress has been used effectively to raise standards, particularly in mathematics. Improvement in English is at a slower pace, partly because of missed opportunities to write consistently in other subjects. Provision for children in the Foundation Stage is good but the large outdoor area is not yet fully utilised to extend learning across all areas and access is somewhat restricted for children in the Reception class. Children achieve well and make good progress. However, by the end of Reception, standards are below expectations, particularly in language skills. By Year 2, standards are below average in reading and writing but above average in
p.4
Grade: 2
mathematics. This represents good progress, given the weak language skills pupils have on entering school. By Year 6, standards are broadly average in mathematics, above average in science, and close to average in English, and pupils make good progress. Personal development is good. Initiatives such as the use of a learning mentor have helped to improve behaviour significantly since the last inspection. Attendance is improving but, despite the school’s best efforts, a minority of parents do not ensure that their children attend regularly. The popular after school clubs and the excellent range of visits contribute well to pupils’ learning and their enjoyment of school. The level of care, guidance and support is good and the school is justly proud of its reputation in caring for vulnerable pupils. Provision for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is good so they achieve well. The school works closely with other
p.4
Grade: 2
professionals to provide good support for its pupils. Good improvements since the last inspection in standards and behaviour indicate the capacity to improve further. The school provides good value for money.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Provide more opportunities for pupils to practise their writing skills in subjects such as history and geography. • Continue to work closely with the small number of parents who do not send their children to school regularly. • Develop the use of the outdoor area in the Foundation Stage to extend learning in all areas and give greater access for the children in the Reception class. 2 Inspection Report: Orgill Primary School, 20 June 2006 to 21 June 2006
p.4
Grade: 2
Standards are broadly average and achievement is good. Children enter the Nursery with skills that are below the usual level for their age, with weak language and social skills. Good teaching in the Foundation Stage, with a clear emphasis on developing speaking and personal skills, enables all children to achieve well and make good progress. Nevertheless, attainment in these areas is below average overall as children enter Year 1. The school’s good use of assessment information to provide additional support and challenge where needed has led to a good improvement in standards over the last three years, particularly in mathematics. In the 2005 assessments in Year 2, standards were below average in reading and writing but above average in mathematics. This represented good achievement and progress overall, given pupils’ weak language skills as they enter school. In the 2005 national tests in Year 6, the number of pupils achieving the expected level
p.5
Grade: 2
in English was close to average, though few achieved the higher level and achievement was sound. Standards in mathematics were broadly average overall and science was above average, representing good achievement and progress overall. Strategies such as teaching pupils in smaller groups of similar ability have helped to raise standards in mathematics dramatically, from 47% reaching the expected level in 2003 to 78% in 2005, and a third of pupils achieved the higher level. However, it is taking longer to increase the number reaching the higher level in English. Examination of pupils’ current work and the school’s good assessment systems indicate that pupils continue to make good progress overall. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities receive a good level of support and they achieve well.
p.5
Grade: 2
Personal development and well-being are good. Relationships are very good and pupils are courteous and friendly. Pupils are highly valued by staff and this helps them to develop self-esteem and confidence. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural education is good and pupils have a good understanding of the differences between right and wrong. They have positive attitudes to work so that the school is a purposeful and happy learning community. Pupils know about and understand issues relating to bullying and racism. They behave well and enjoy coming to school. The ‘buddy’ and play-leader schemes help them to learn how to take care of each other. Attendance is slightly below average because a minority of parents does not ensure that their children attend regularly. However, as a result of the strategies put in place by the school, including a breakfast club, attendance is improving. Pupils learn to work safely
p.5
Grade: 2
and know about the importance of a healthy diet and exercise in leading healthy lifestyles. They make a positive contribution to the school and help to organise fund 3 Inspection Report: Orgill Primary School, 20 June 2006 to 21 June 2006 raising activities for those less fortunate than themselves. In the Foundation Stage, children settle quickly in to school because they have well established routines and find their work exciting and stimulating.
p.5
Grade: 2
Teaching and learning are good. Teachers ensure that work is well suited to different abilities so that most pupils achieve well. Information from the school’s thorough assessment systems is used well in order to plan the next stages in learning. Good questioning and regular use of talking partners are helping to develop pupils’ speaking and listening skills. Teachers make good use of visits out of school and of the expertise of visitors to school to make learning relevant and exciting. Pupils are managed well so that they cooperate during lessons and sustain their concentration. Teachers mark work thoroughly and provide useful comments, which help pupils to understand what they need to do to improve. Good use is made of teaching assistants in helping to raise standards, particularly in the work of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Individual education plans clearly indicate manageable targets for
p.6
Grade: 2
improvement so that these pupils achieve well.
p.6
Grade: 2
The curriculum is good. It is broad, with a clear emphasis on developing the basic skills in literacy, numeracy and information and communication technology (ICT). However, insufficient opportunities are given for pupils to extend their skills in literacy by using them consistently in subjects such as geography and history. A very comprehensive programme of personal, social and health education provides a good grounding in the understanding of citizenship, relationships and healthy living. The popular out-of-school clubs help pupils to extend learning. This is further enriched by the excellent range and variety of visits out of school, including residential visits, and of visitors to school, such as theatre groups and story-tellers. This is helping to enrich pupils’ experiences and vocabulary. Pupils learn French and have opportunities to practise their skills on school visits to France. The curriculum in the Foundation Stage is good, based on
p.6
Grade: 2
practical experiences, so that children get a good grounding in basic skills. However, the large outdoor area is not yet fully utilised to extend learning across all areas, and access for Reception children is restricted.
p.6
Grade: 2
Care, guidance and support are good. Pupils feel safe and confidently approach an adult if they have any problems. They show high self-esteem and confidence because each pupil is valued and relationships are good. Arrangements for safeguarding 4 Inspection Report: Orgill Primary School, 20 June 2006 to 21 June 2006 vulnerable pupils are in place and child protection and health and safety arrangements are implemented well. The school provides exemplary support for pupils who find behaviour or concentration difficult. For example, the work of the learning mentor, the nurture group and that of other skilled support staff at lunch and break times helps to maintain good behaviour. The school checks personal development carefully and works well with external agencies, especially those concerned with pupils who have learning difficulties and/or disabilities. The school makes good use of its assessment and tracking systems to check the progress of individuals and groups in
p.6
Grade: 2
order to provide guidance for them to improve.
p.7
Grade: 2
The school is led and managed well. The school uses its accurate evaluation of its own work systematically to bring about improvements. For example, the current emphasis on encouraging all pupils to speak and explain their thinking in all lessons has led to a good improvement in pupils’ speaking skills and in their confidence and self-esteem. The strong teamwork, and the contributions of all staff with management responsibilities in monitoring the work of the school, is enabling the school to continue its improvements during a period of change in leadership. The school has devised imaginative ways to fulfil its aims of providing good pastoral care for its pupils; the introduction of the inclusion group and the learning mentor has helped to improve pupils’ attitudes and behaviour well, and has dramatically reduced the number of exclusions. The governors are closely involved in the work of the school and provide
p.7
Grade: 2
well-informed support and challenge. The good improvements in behaviour and in standards since the last inspection indicate the capacity to improve further. It provides good value for money. 5 Inspection Report: Orgill Primary School, 20 June 2006 to 21 June 2006 .
p.7
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Orgill Primary School, 20 June 2006 to 21 June 2006
p.8
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
learners?
NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.9
and supporting all learners?
NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.10
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.10
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0207 421 6800 F 0207 421 6707 Ofsted helpline 08456 404045 To the pupils of: Orgill Primary School Southey Avenue Egremont Cumbria CA22 2HH 22 June 2006 Dear pupils Thank you for making Mr Earley and me so welcome when we inspected your school recently. You were well behaved, polite and friendly and helped us to find our way around school. We agree with you that Orgill is a good school. You have good teachers who plan interesting lessons to help you learn well. You play your part by listening to instructions and getting on with your work quickly. You are doing well in mathematics and science and your writing is improving. To help you improve your writing even more, we have asked your teachers to give you more chance to write in lessons such as history and geography. All the adults in school look after you well and those of you who find it difficult at playtime know there is always someone to help you.
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
The school arranges an excellent number of visits and also visitors to school to make learning more interesting for you. You can help by trying to make sure you go to school every day, so that you do not miss anything. I enjoyed being in the Nursery and Reception classes, particularly when everyone dressed as pirates. You seemed to be enjoying yourselves and you were learning a lot. I have asked your teachers to use the outdoor area for more activities. Yours sincerely Mrs Shirley Herring Lead inspector
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion