Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

The Beacon Primary Pupil Referral Unit

Inspected 13 Mar 2006 · published 30 Mar 2006 · URN 130987

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Mar 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alan Dobbins

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Outstanding

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Ipsley Pupil Referral Unit

  • URN verified

    130987

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentOutstanding
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+83Very positivemore positive than 63% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingvery wellexceptionallyvery effectiveeffectivelyexcellentenjoyeffective
Criticismat riskinadequatenot precisenot successfulbelowlownot accurately

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1231w+66
  • What needs to improve1525w+89

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,721
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%What needs to improve 55%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Ipsley Pupil Referral Unit

p.1

130987 Unique Reference Number Worcestershire LEA 282156 Inspection number 13 March 2006 to 13 March 2006 Inspection dates Alan Dobbins AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Longdon Close School address Special Type of school Woodrow South Pupil referral unit School category Redditch, Worcestershire B98 7UZ 4 to 11 Age range of pupils

p.1

01527 514068 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01527 598949 Fax number 9 Number on roll Mr Peter Garner Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr David Henley Headteacher 3 April 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 282156 13 March 2006 - 4 to 11 13 March 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

This pupil referral unit (PRU) caters for pupils in Years 1 to 6 excluded from the first, primary and middle schools in the north eastern region of Worcestershire, including the towns of Redditch and Bromsgrove, and those at risk of exclusion. At the time of the inspection, all the pupils were boys and all were White British. Pupils spend from 6 to 20 weeks at the unit. Those at risk of exclusion spend three days each week at the unit and attend their other schools on the other days. Those who have been excluded spend all their time at the unit. Most of the pupils return to mainstream settings. A minority move to the local authority’s Key Stage 3 PRU or to special units. The unit recently moved into new accommodation.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Ipsley Pupil Referral Unit, 13 March 2006 to 13 March 2006

p.3

Grade: 2

Ipsley Pupil Referral Unit is a good and improving unit that provides good value for money. This judgement reflects the unit’s own view of its effectiveness. The good leadership and management have helped improve the work of the unit since the last inspection, and the capacity for continuing to improve is good. The unit’s strength is in dealing with the personal, social and emotional issues of pupils that make it difficult for them to always behave appropriately. The powerful way in which the unit improves pupils’ behaviour is reflected in the very high percentage that return successfully to mainstream settings. Teaching is good and many pupils surprise themselves by enjoying their learning again. The curriculum appropriately focuses on pupils’ primary needs and they benefit from the good advice gained from staff and from those of many other agencies. The management committee provides good support to the leaders but pays

p.4

Grade: 2

too little a part in monitoring the referral of pupils to the unit and in checking the effectiveness of the unit against its aims. Records of pupils’ academic progress are not precise enough to make a good contribution to school self-evaluation.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•The management committee should monitor the effectiveness of the provision and the process for the referral of pupils. •Monitor and record pupils’ individual progress.

p.4

Grade: 2

Pupils are achieving well. They gain in confidence and become more mature and responsible as they take greater control of their emotions and behaviour. This has a direct effect on their response to the good teaching and enables them to make good academic progress in their lessons. Pupils make outstanding progress in dealing with their personal, social and emotional issues. Those who spend part of their week at the unit make outstanding progress toward their targets in these areas. An exceptionally high percentage of pupils return full time to their other schools to successfully continue their learning. Over the last three years, of the 28 pupils who returned to their other schools only one has been excluded. The pupils who spend all their time at the unit do equivalently well in dealing with their difficulties. All of the 11 who returned to mainstream schools are still there. Pupils enter the unit with broadly average standards, and the short time they are there

p.4

Grade: 2

means that their overall standards remain within the broadly average band. Even though their time in the unit is short, the records of their progress, for example, how much they improve in reading or against the levels of the National Curriculum, are not precise enough to accurately judge the gains they make. 2 Inspection Report: Ipsley Pupil Referral Unit, 13 March 2006 to 13 March 2006

p.4

Grade: 1

Personal and social development is excellent with moral and social development particularly outstanding. Pupils demonstrate very strong relationships with staff, readily speaking with them on any matter, including those that are difficult to talk about. They show significant improvements in self-esteem, anger management and emotional literacy and are starting to understand conflict resolution, thanks to well planned lessons in personal, social, health and citizenship education (PSHCE) and the additional workshops. Pupils respond very well to the clear guidelines on what is right and wrong and what is acceptable, because the behaviour programme, including the traffic light and zone procedures, is very well thought out and consistently applied by all staff. Incidents of inappropriate behaviour have reduced appreciably over the last three years. Pupils feel safe in the unit. Pupils realise that being at the unit is very good for them. This is reflected in many

p.5

Grade: 1

ways, including the way they work hard in lessons, their good behaviour and outstanding attendance. They relate to each other well and show obvious respect for the building. One pupil commented that the unit ‘has helped me to be calm, not only in the unit but at home also’. Parents are quick to praise the work of the unit, one saying she cannot believe how lucky she is that her son attends the unit as he is ‘now my lovely son again’. Spiritual and cultural development are good. The importance of leading healthy lifestyles is made clear in lessons and when pupils speak with staff. Pupils swim weekly and enjoy taking take part in seasonal games. They gain essential skills for living, such as shopping and budgeting, that lead to economic well-being.

p.5

Grade: 2

Teaching and learning are good. Class sizes are smaller than was the case in pupils’ other schools. As a result, they gain support more quickly. Teachers, and their assistants, know the pupils very well. This helps them plan lessons that are made up of tasks that match well with pupils’ learning needs. For example, in a mathematics lesson, all pupils made good progress because they worked on tasks relevant to them, even though the youngest was in Year 3 and the oldest was in Year 6. Even after a short time in the unit, pupils realise learning can be fun again. In most lessons, they enjoy working hard to do their best. In this, they are helped by the consistent way in which the strategies for promoting acceptable behaviour are applied. Teaching assistants make a valuable contribution to pupils’ progress. They are deployed well and are especially effective when they work with individual pupils. The classrooms are attractive places in which to learn. Although resources are generally

p.5

Grade: 2

good, computer technology is not used sufficiently to support teaching and learning. 3 Inspection Report: Ipsley Pupil Referral Unit, 13 March 2006 to 13 March 2006 However, this should change with the recent placement in each classroom of an interactive whiteboard and the availability of commercial software designed to promote learning in English and mathematics.

p.5

Grade: 2

The curriculum is good overall and the pupils who spent part of their time at the unit are prepared outstandingly well for the full time return to their schools. This is because their curriculum focuses very well on their personal, social and emotional needs. It provides many highly effective opportunities for them to gain in maturity. It is planned very well to ensure that learning in the lessons in PSHCE is fully supported by all the activities of the day, including the informal ‘chats’ pupils have with staff during break and lunchtimes and through the choice of topics in the subjects. For example, in an outstanding lesson in English, pupils explored some aspects of bullying through discussing the actions of a bully in the book they were reading, and by doing so revisited their feelings on bullying previously explored in lessons in PSHCE. For pupils who spend all their time at the unit, the curriculum is good. The provision

p.6

Grade: 2

for their personal, social and emotional development is just as strong in helping prepare them for their next schools. They have appropriate opportunities to improve their literacy and numeracy, but spend less time learning other important subjects, such as science and information and communication technology (ICT), than is the case for pupils in many equivalent units.

p.6

Grade: 2

Pupils are cared for and supported very well. The arrangements to protect their welfare and safety are rigorous. Staff are well trained and have clear knowledge of the procedures to follow if they are concerned about any pupil. Personal support plans and the related targets in pupils’ individual education plans are very effective in helping pupils take better control of their behaviour. Information from personal development measures, such as the self-esteem scale and the readiness for return scale, provide persuasive evidence of the unit’s success in this aspect of its work. Targets in the subjects are less successful in promoting learning. This is because they are not linked closely enough to National Curriculum levels so that pupils’ progress can be accurately recognised and reported to their next school. Mainstream staff have a high regard for the help and advice given by the behaviour support staff who visit them in their schools, for example, on how they might deal

p.6

Grade: 2

with the inappropriate behaviour of a single pupil or of small groups of pupils. Specialist advisors from many agencies play a full role in very effectively preparing pupils and, sometimes, their families, for their full time return to mainstream settings or other schools. 4 Inspection Report: Ipsley Pupil Referral Unit, 13 March 2006 to 13 March 2006

p.6

Grade: 2

Leadership and management are good. The head of unit gains considerable support from professional officers of the local authority and from all staff. The team ethos is strong and the good improvement in recent years is a result of this. The unit is a purposeful and happy place for pupils and staff alike. It is being increasingly recognised by headteachers in the client schools as an important extension of their own provision for dealing with pupils who challenge them. The capacity for continued improvement is good. Self-evaluation is recognised as an important part of the process of ongoing improvement. Much is done well. For example: recognising improvement in pupils’ behaviour; regularly gaining the thoughts of parents on the work of the unit; and the performance management of staff, which includes very effective procedures for checking teaching and learning and for identifying relevant training. Even so, no

p.7

Grade: 2

accurate judgement is possible on the progress pupils make in the subjects, how effective the unit is in meeting its aims and on how well the unit is doing against other equivalent units. The management committee oversees all the authority’s PRUs. Whilst this is administratively acceptable, the committee needs to be more assertive in ensuring that the procedure for admitting pupils to the unit identifies only those who can benefit from the provision. Moreover, the committee should expect the head of unit to provide more detailed evidence on how well the unit is doing. 5 Inspection Report: Ipsley Pupil Referral Unit, 13 March 2006 to 13 March 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Ipsley Pupil Referral Unit, 13 March 2006 to 13 March 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 1 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Dear Pupils I very much enjoyed my time with you and would like to thank you for talking with me and for helping me find out about your unit. I was impressed with what I saw because •You behave well in lessons and around the unit, and are extremely polite in the way in which you deal with each other and with visitors to the unit. This pleases me very much because I know that many of you have difficulties in always controlling how you behave. •You like the staff very much and you feel safe and happy at the unit. •The head of the unit, helped by staff and others from the local authority, is making the unit better at helping you deal with your difficulties and in preparing you for your full time return to your other school, or to your new school. •What you learn is right for you and you make outstanding progress in dealing with your behaviour and in becoming more mature and responsible. There are some things that can be done better

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

•The head of the unit should develop ways for showing how well you do and how good the unit is in its work. •The committee that helps manage the unit needs to keep a check that only those of you who really can be helped by the unit should be referred to it. With best wishes Dr D Alan Dobbins Lead Inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion