Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Catherine's Catholic Primary School, Littlehampton

Inspected 7 Jun 2006 · published 12 Sept 2006 · URN 126040

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Jun 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alison Cartlidge

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Inadequate

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    BN17 6HL

  • Name on report verified

    St Catherine's Catholic Primary School, Littlehampton

  • URN verified

    126040

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportInadequate
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentSatisfactory
  • Teaching and learningInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−21Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallyimprovedhappyeffectivelyeffectivecaringconsistentlyenjoy
Criticisminadequateweaknessesinsufficientslowweakbelowdeclinednot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1349w+20
  • What needs to improve1137w−63

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,450
shorter than usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 44
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%What needs to improve 45%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report St Catherine's Catholic Primary School, Littlehampton

p.1

126040 Unique Reference Number West Sussex LEA 282048 Inspection number 7 June 2006 to 7 June 2006 Inspection dates Alison Cartlidge AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Highdown Drive School address Primary Type of school Littlehampton Voluntary aided School category West Sussex BN17 6HL 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01903 716039 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01903 722521 Fax number 134 Number on roll Mr Ian Thornhill Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Adam Lenkiewicz Headteacher 19 June 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 282048 7 June 2006 - 4 to 11 7 June 2006 Inspection Report: St Catherine's Catholic Primary School, Littlehampton, 7 June 2006 to 7 June 2006

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Pupils come from diverse social backgrounds and the proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is broadly average. Most pupils are of white British heritage. About 8% of pupils speak English as an additional language and this is broadly average. There has been a high turnover of teachers in the last few years. During the inspection, pupils in Years 3 to 6 were on an educational visit.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St Catherine's Catholic Primary School, Littlehampton, 7 June 2006 to 7 June 2006

p.3

Grade: 4

In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement. The school does not provide a satisfactory education and pupils are not learning quickly enough. The headteacher, other members of the senior management team and governors understand that teaching and leadership and management are inadequate, and that this is why pupils are underachieving. Despite this, plans for school development are insufficiently precise to provide a clear agenda and bring about the necessary changes, and not enough has been done to improve provision. As a result, standards in English, mathematics and science have declined and are well below average.

p.4

Grade: 4

Pupils’ progress is not monitored closely enough so that effective action can be taken to halt the decline in standards. Progress is especially slow in writing and mathematics and pupils’ written work in science is too superficial. Whilst teaching is frequently monitored and weaknesses are identified, not enough is done to support teachers so that they make the necessary improvements. In many lessons, teachers do not provide work that meets pupils’ differing needs and this leads to slow progress and some inattentiveness. In some lessons, behaviour is not well managed and this slows the pace of learning even more. Support and guidance for pupils’ personal development are satisfactory. Members of staff are caring and enable most pupils to behave well, and to be healthy, safe and happy. However, attendance is below average because not enough is done to discourage families from taking term-time holidays. Despite recent changes in assessment

p.4

Grade: 4

procedures, academic support is unsatisfactory and insufficient to improve achievement. Pupils’ weak basic skills do not prepare them well for the next stage in their education or for the world of work. Provision for children in the Reception Year has improved since the last inspection and is satisfactory. A relevant curriculum with a variety of interesting activities ensures that most children in the Reception class are happy at school and working within the levels expected for their age. The curriculum in Years 1 to 6 is satisfactory, although it is not adapted well enough to meet the range of needs in each class. As a whole, the school’s track record of improvement is weak and it does not provide satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Raise standards in English, mathematics and science and improve pupils’ achievement, taking swift and effective action when they do not make enough progress. • Ensure that in all lessons the pace of learning is quick, that behaviour is managed consistently and that work builds on what pupils of differing abilities already know. 2 Inspection Report: St Catherine's Catholic Primary School, Littlehampton, 7 June 2006 to 7 June 2006 • Ensure that the school improvement plan has measurable targets that relate to pupils’ progress, and make better use of monitoring information to improve teaching and learning. • Improve attendance by taking firm action to discourage absences for holidays in term time.

p.4

Grade: 4

Standards are well below average in English, mathematics and science and pupils’ achievement is inadequate. Attainment on entry to the Reception Year is broadly average. These children make satisfactory progress and by the end of the year are working within the levels expected for their age. However, pupils do not make enough progress in Years 1 to 6. Test results have declined over the last few years. In 2005, the results were significantly below average overall by the end of Year 2 and Year 6. Inspection findings indicate that standards are similar in the current Years 2 and 6 and too many pupils underachieve.

p.5

Grade: 3

Pupils’ personal development and well-being, including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, are satisfactory. Pupils’ understanding of a range of cultures and faiths is good. For example, English pupils enjoy learning about the countries and customs of their Portuguese and Polish friends. Attitudes and behaviour are satisfactory with most pupils enjoying school. However, a few pupils display inappropriate behaviour and, together with some inattentiveness, this slows the pace of learning in some lessons. Attendance is well below average, due to families taking term-time holidays. Recent steps to discourage this have shown a slight improvement over the past term but levels of attendance are still too low. Pupils have a sound understanding of how to lead healthy lives and keep safe. The new school council takes satisfactory responsibility for developments such as the creation of more clubs. Pupils provide good support within the community, particularly

p.5

Grade: 3

through helping elderly and disabled people in the parish. However, their life-skills are limited because their literacy and numeracy skills are not sufficiently developed.

p.5

Grade: 4

Teaching and learning are unsatisfactory. The school has accurately identified where there are weaknesses, but teachers are not supported well enough to help them to improve quickly. Not enough use is made of assessment information to plan work that meets the differing needs of pupils and to meet challenging targets. In addition, 3 Inspection Report: St Catherine's Catholic Primary School, Littlehampton, 7 June 2006 to 7 June 2006 behaviour is not always managed well, and in some lessons the inattentiveness of a few pupils is allowed to slow the pace of learning. Teachers’ expectations are not high enough, particularly in the levels of challenge for the more able pupils. Regular and informative marking is beginning to have an impact on the rate of learning in some year groups but pupils’ progress is not consistent across the school. A good feature is the way that pupils record their own responses to marking. Teaching and learning

p.5

Grade: 4

are satisfactory in the Reception Year, where the teacher and teaching assistants support and praise children well but are sometimes slow to correct their mistakes.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory with recent changes creating more teaching time and more meaningful links between subjects. For example, there are good links between English and history in the topic on the Ancient Greeks. The school acknowledges the need to provide greater opportunities for creativity through subjects such as art and drama. However, there is still insufficient flexibility in provision to meet the full range of pupils’ needs. Interactive whiteboards are used regularly to introduce topics and to enhance learning. The provision of extra-curricular activities is satisfactory and includes frequent clubs and visits. Visitors help to widen pupils’ knowledge of creative activities and other cultures. The curriculum for the Reception Year is satisfactory although, as the school is aware, there are not enough opportunities for purposeful, independent play.

p.6

Grade: 4

The quality of care, guidance and support is inadequate. This is because academic support and guidance do not ensure that pupils achieve well enough from Year 1 to Year 6. Assessment information is not used well enough to plan work that meets pupils’ differing needs or to monitor the pupils’ progress. Pupils with learning difficulties are not always supported well enough and, as a result, their needs are not fully met and they make insufficient progress. A bilingual assistant is used well to improve the spoken English of pupils who are learning English as an additional language, although the progress of these pupils is inadequate in other subjects. There are good procedures for ensuring that Reception children settle into school happily and these children receive satisfactory support in their learning. Robust child protection and health and safety procedures are in place and are known to all adults. However, attendance is not

p.6

Grade: 4

Leadership and management are inadequate. Whilst the school runs smoothly on a day-to-day basis, leaders and managers have not been successful in halting the decline in standards since the last inspection and these have remained well below average for 4 Inspection Report: St Catherine's Catholic Primary School, Littlehampton, 7 June 2006 to 7 June 2006 the last three years. Leaders and governors are committed to improving provision, but while there is renewed enthusiasm in monitoring standards and teaching and learning, this is not having sufficient impact. Governors, the headteacher and other members of staff are aware of the school’s weaknesses and know what needs to be improved but school development planning does not identify how the necessary changes are going to be made and what the likely impact on standards will be. The plan describes monitoring activities and how provision will be evaluated but does not have measurable targets for improvement.

p.6

Grade: 4

The school welcomes pupils from all backgrounds and has satisfactory procedures for seeking the views of parents and pupils. Whilst many parents are happy with the school, they are right to express concern over pupils’ progress. 5 Inspection Report: St Catherine's Catholic Primary School, Littlehampton, 7 June 2006 to 7 June 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St Catherine's Catholic Primary School, Littlehampton, 7 June 2006 to 7 June 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA No The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 3 The behaviour of learners NA 4 The attendance of learners NA 3 How well learners enjoy their education NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 4 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 4 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 4 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 4 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 4 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 4 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 4 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for welcoming us to your school and for showing us your work. We were pleased to find some good things at your school but we feel that it needs to improve so that you do even better. We have asked for the school to be given some extra help to put things right. What we liked most about your school: You are very polite and friendly. Your teachers are kind and caring. Your headteacher, members of staff and governors want to make the school better. You do some good things to support the community. What we have asked your school to do now: • Help you to learn more quickly in English, mathematics and science. • Make sure that you are given work that is neither too hard nor too easy. • Have clear plans showing how the school will be improved. • Improve attendance, particularly by asking parents and carers not to take you on holiday in term time. We thoroughly enjoyed talking to you about your work. We wish you all well for the future.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion