Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Long Lawford Primary School

Inspected 1 Mar 2006 · published 21 Mar 2006 · URN 125570

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Julia Coop

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    1 Mar 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Julia Coop

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    CV23 9AL

  • Name on report verified

    Long Lawford Primary School

  • URN verified

    125570

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+35Positivemore positive than 15% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedenjoypositiveexceptionallystrengthssuccessfullyeffectiveeffectively
Criticismnot alwaysweaknesseslackinadequateinconsistentinsufficientconcernsseriously

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1267w+53
  • What needs to improve1479w+26

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,706
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%What needs to improve 53%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Long Lawford Primary School

p.1

125570 Unique Reference Number Warwickshire LEA 281961 Inspection number 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006 Inspection dates Julia Coop AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Holbrook Road School address Primary Type of school Rugby Community School category Warwickshire CV23 9AL 3 to 11 Age range of pupils 01788 543332 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01788 550366 Fax number 223 Number on roll Mr Duncan Snook Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Robert Morrissey Headteacher 22 May 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 281961 28 February 2006 - 3 to 11 1 March 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This is an average sized school serving a mixed area on the outskirts of Rugby. The number of pupils eligible for free school meals is average as is the proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities. Almost all pupils are of White British origin. There are a small, but increasing, number of Polish pupils at the early stages of learning English. Children start with average skills but in some years they start below average. Over that past few years, due to promotion and other reasons, the school has had many staffing changes, particularly in Years 3 to 6. Following two terms with an acting Headteacher, a new headteacher was appointed in September 2005. The school was awarded a Silver Arts Mark in 2004.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Long Lawford Primary School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

This is a satisfactory school with good features, providing satisfactory value for money. The new headteacher has put emphasised the personal development of pupils so that behaviour and attitudes are now good. Parents and pupils greatly appreciate this improvement. Good teaching in the Foundation Stage ensures children make good progress. Progress in Years 1 to 6 is satisfactory. Pupils with learning disabilities and difficulties make similar progress to their classmates as do pupils just beginning to learn English. More able pupils do better in mathematics and science than in English. Although the curriculum is satisfactory overall pupils do not use writing or information and communication technology (ICT) well enough in other subjects. This slows down learning. The quality of teaching is satisfactory. It is good in Years 2 and 6, but in other classes the quality is inconsistent. Some lessons lack sufficient pace and work

p.4

Grade: 3

is not matched closely enough to the pupils’ needs and this affects the rate of progress. All pupils are well cared for on a day-to-day basis although not always clear about how they can improve the quality of their work. Leadership and management are satisfactory. The school has been through an unsettled period, but the headteacher gives a very clear lead to the school. Senior staff provide good support. The school knows its strengths and weaknesses well, but systems established to improve teaching and the rate of progress are too new to have made an impact. Governors are developing a clearer understanding of their role. The school is improving rapidly and has the capacity to continue to do so.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Improve the quality of teaching and the rate at which pupils learn by ensuring lessons are brisker and activities are better matched to the pupils’ different needs. • Give more guidance to pupils about how they can improve the quality of their work. • Improve planning to ensure that pupils have more opportunities to develop their writing and ICT skills in other subjects.

p.4

Grade: 3

Standards at the end of Year 6 are above average and reflect satisfactory progress overall in relation to the pupils’ above average starting points in Year 1. More able pupils do better in mathematics and science than they do in English, as a result of insufficient opportunities to develop their writing skills in subjects across the curriculum. The school did not reach the challenging targets it set for pupils’ performance in the English national tests in 2005 but reached them in mathematics and science. Children in the Foundation Stage learn well. They are happy and enjoy learning making good progress in a secure and interesting learning environment. Most of the pupils new to speaking English make secure progress. Pupils with learning disabilities and difficulties also make satisfactory progress overall. However, in some classes the progress of a 2 Inspection Report: Long Lawford Primary School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006

p.4

Grade: 3

small minority of pupils across the whole ability range is held back when lessons lack pace and when work is not matched closely enough to pupils’ different needs.

p.5

Grade: 2

Personal development is good. Since September the school has worked successfully to promote positive attitudes and considerate behaviour, so that pupils enjoy school more. This is reflected in their above average attendance. Pupils’ spiritual, moral and social development is good although experience of other cultures is not as strong. Increasingly pupils are sensitive to each other’s feelings and are prepared to offer mutual support. Pupils are very kind to their new friends recently arrived from Poland. Pupils say that the decision last term to exclude a small number of pupils was well deserved and effective. They appreciate that behaviour has much improved. Most pupils know how to keep safe, are aware of the benefits of regular exercise and adopt healthy eating habits. Pupils make a satisfactory contribution to the community and value regular opportunities to make suggestions about school life such as improving

p.5

Grade: 2

the reward system, the format of assemblies, outdoor facilities and selecting the focus for fund-raising. Basic skills are well developed, although literacy and ICT skills require more consistent application in all subjects to better prepare pupils for their future.

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching is satisfactory. Some is good, but the quality is not consistent. Teaching in the Foundation Stage is good and based on a clear understanding of how young children learn best. Interesting activities engage the children’s interest and are carefully matched to their different needs. Teaching in Years 2 and 6 is a strength. It is characterised by high expectations, and a variety of approaches that ensures learning is brisk and productive. For example, in a Year 2 mathematics lesson, pupils could hardly wait to start creating odd and even patterns because the teacher set a good pace and provided challenging but interesting tasks. Teaching in other years is satisfactory overall. New behaviour guidelines are being consistently applied, ensuring there is a positive learning atmosphere in most lessons. However, there are weaknesses that are resulting in some pupils not yet making the progress they are capable of.

p.5

Grade: 3

Marking, for example, does not always show pupils what they need to do to improve. Teachers’ planning does not always ensure activities are matched to pupils’ different capabilities. As a result, some find the work is too easy, while activities, such as cutting and sticking, do not always interest or challenge pupils with learning needs. Some lessons do not move along fast enough, which prompted one pupil to ask ‘are we going to start work soon?’ In addition, computers are infrequently used to support learning in lessons and few interesting writing tasks are planned in other subjects. These features slow the rate of progress over time. Staff are becoming more confident to meet the needs of pupils new to speaking English. Teaching assistants generally provide good 3 Inspection Report: Long Lawford Primary School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006 support in group work to less able pupils, but in some classes they could be more

p.5

Grade: 3

supportive of learning in whole class activities.

p.6

Grade: 3

Overall the curriculum is satisfactory. There are strengths, such as in the provision for art, swimming and French. Pupils say that they enjoy the good range of extra activities such as drama. Sport is well used to engage small groups of boys before school in the morning. This helps them to settle down to purposeful learning more quickly. Good emphasis is placed on teaching pupils how to stay safe and make sensible decisions. These activities contribute well to pupils’ personal development. The provision for English and mathematics is satisfactory. It is most successful in Years 2 and 6, where there is good challenge for all abilities. However, in other year groups planning is not always precise enough to ensure activities meet the needs of different ability groups. Less able pupils for example can rely too much on the support from teaching assistants, which slows down their progress. In addition, too many worksheets used in subjects

p.6

Grade: 3

such as history and religious education, restrict opportunities to develop writing skills.

p.6

Grade: 3

The care provided by the school is satisfactory with some strengths. Consistent guidance from staff and the headteacher helps pupils to understand how to treat others and behave well. Small numbers of Polish pupils have been helped to adjust by the school employing an interpreter. Child protection procedures are secure and are well understood by teaching staff. Pupils know that staff take their concerns seriously and take prompt action when necessary. The school has for example adopted a zero tolerance approach to bullying. There is an increasing emphasis on support staff training to improve the guidance given to pupils, particularly during breaks and lunchtimes. Collaborative working with outside agencies to improve support for pupils with learning and behavioural difficulties is good and making a positive contribution to improved attitudes to learning. As a consequence pupils feel happy and safe. Assessment has

p.6

Grade: 3

improved and is now satisfactory. Pupils have group targets in writing, which is supporting learning. However, the school knows that assessment information is not used consistently to plan challenging work for all groups of pupils. Although pupils’ work is regularly marked it is not always helpful to pupils. As a result, pupils are not helped enough to understand how they can improve their work in some cases. This slows down their progress.

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory with strengths in the leadership of the new headteacher. He provides a determined and effective lead to the school, successfully creating a renewed sense of ambition and teamwork. Unsatisfactory 4 Inspection Report: Long Lawford Primary School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006 behaviour has been successfully tackled with good support from outside agencies. Parents and pupils, whose views are now sought and acted on, appreciate the improved atmosphere and opportunities for learning in the classrooms. In his drive to tackle weaknesses the headteacher has received good support from the deputy and recently promoted senior teacher who share his goals and commitment. They now have a more central and satisfactory role in the running of the school. Good guidance from the headteacher is ensuring they are rapidly developing their leadership and management skills. Governors are supportive and are reviewing their working practices, but do not

p.6

Grade: 3

yet monitor the work of the school closely enough. A useful system has been established to track performance and check individual progress. There is a good action plan pinpointing correctly the areas most in need of improvement including the need for improved cross curricular links and better use of ICT. Regular monitoring of teaching has been established. However, systems and procedures are new and there is still work to be done to improve teaching further and accelerate the rate of pupil progress. The recent changes bode well for further improvements and have the potential to help Long Lawford fully achieve its vision of becoming an ‘Achieving, Caring and Enjoyable school’. 5 Inspection Report: Long Lawford Primary School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Long Lawford Primary School, 28 February 2006 to 1 March 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 2 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

2 March 2006 Dear Children Thank you very much for making us so welcome in your school and talking to us about yourselves and your work. We really enjoyed visiting your school and finding out about how you learn. We would like to tell you what we found out: • We think you behave well and are polite and friendly • We were very pleased to see how kind you are to your new Polish friends • We think that you have a good time in all the clubs the school provides • We were pleased that you know how to keep healthy and stay safe • Your headteacher wants to provide the best education possible for you We have asked the teachers to find ways to make Long Lawford an even better school. The most important things are: • Make sure that lessons are brisk and activities are more challenging and interesting for some of you • Plan more opportunities for you to use your writing and ICT skills within other subjects • Provide

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

you with more guidance about how you can improve your work. We hope that you will keep trying hard in lessons and that you will enjoy learning for a long time yet. Yours sincerely Julia Coop Lead Inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion