Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
St Chad's CofE (C) Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Jun 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Mary Hamby
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness AI-checked
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Name on report verified
St Chad's CofE (C) Primary School
- URN verified
124265
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumGood
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.9
- The pupil who said this was absolutely right because relationships are excellent, based in the school’s Christian values. p.4
- There are some consistent strengths in the teaching, such as how the pupils are taught to keep themselves safe and healthy and how topics are effective in reinforcing key messages, such as the dangers of smoking. p.4
- However, it is not as good as it could be in ensuring that the teaching is consistently effective and that the more able pupils are served well enough. p.5
- The leadership team agrees that one of the main priorities is to bring about more consistently good teaching by sharing the successful practice in the school. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, pupils who move into the school do not always have their records sent on, and the school is too slow to assess their attainment. p.4
- The school has not identified these high fliers early enough because its system for tracking pupils’ progress is relatively recent and not effective enough. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Develop leadership by broadening the skills of the senior teachers, refining systems to track pupils’ progress and further developing the contribution of the governing body. p.5
- Enhance the quality of teaching by placing more emphasis on assessment, including opportunities for the pupils to contribute. p.5
- Improve achievement by ensuring that more able pupils are identified early in the school and are given hard enough work as they move up through the school. p.5
- Last year, standards in Year 6 were not good enough because the pupils’ learning had been interrupted by numerous changes of staff. p.5
- This year, there is clear improvement in the pupils’ work and standards are within expected levels. p.5
- Achievement in reading is good because it is taught systematically. p.5
- The guided reading groups are having a really beneficial impact on progress but could be even better if the pupils themselves were clearer about what they need to learn next. p.5
- In other subjects, the pupils make satisfactory progress, but some of the more able pupils are not doing as well as they should because the work is too easy. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,650
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report St Chad's CofE (C) Primary School
p.1
124265 Unique Reference Number Staffordshire LEA 281676 Inspection number 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006 Inspection dates Mary Hamby HMI Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
The Gateway School address Primary Type of school Redstreet Community School category Newcastle, Staffordshire ST5 7AB 3 to 11 Age range of pupils
p.1
01782 562507 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01782 565094 Fax number 336 Number on roll Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Gareth Davies Headteacher 30 October 2000 Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 281676 13 June 2006 - 3 to 11 14 June 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and two Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
Most pupils are from White British backgrounds and very few of them have English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils entitled to free school meals is lower than average, as is the percentage who have learning difficulties or disabilities. There has been a significant turnover in staffing within the last two years, including the appointment of a new headteacher and deputy. The school buildings are not easy to work in as there are numerous mobile classrooms to cope with the expanding school.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St Chad's CofE (C) Primary School, 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006
p.3
Grade: 3
‘St. Chad’s is special because of the teachers and how everyone gets on’. The pupil who said this was absolutely right because relationships are excellent, based in the school’s Christian values. The pupils enjoy school, behave well and attendance is good. They develop confidence and benefit from the many opportunities they get to make a contribution to their community, and to work together in teams collaboratively and competitively. This helps them to understand important life skills like cooperation and taking ownership for their own actions. The pupils achieve well in the arts and sport and these talents are celebrated regularly. Achievement in other respects is satisfactory. Standards are broadly average, but in the past have been affected by the turnover of staff in Key Stage 2. Staffing is now more settled and progress for most pupils is satisfactory. However, some of the more able pupils are not making enough progress
p.4
Grade: 3
because the work is not hard enough for them. The school has not identified these high fliers early enough because its system for tracking pupils’ progress is relatively recent and not effective enough. Leadership and management of the school are satisfactory. The headteacher has been successful in bringing about improvements despite the significant staff changes. The high focus on English, for example, has resulted in some dramatic progress, particularly in reading. He has also made the best of what is undoubtedly a challenging set of buildings. He is keenly aware that the school needs to develop further if he is to fulfil his personal ambition to make it one of the best schools in the county. He has worked very hard towards this goal and recognised that the time is now right to develop the leadership skills of others and encourage governors to play a bigger part in school development. This is a school that
p.4
Grade: 3
has embraced the national guidance that Every Child Matters and has a good action plan setting out what it needs to do. The leadership team agrees that one of the main priorities is to bring about more consistently good teaching by sharing the successful practice in the school. Currently, the inconsistency of the teaching means that in some classes the pupils get a better deal than in others. This particularly affects the more able pupils in those classes where there is a wide ability spread. There are some consistent strengths in the teaching, such as how the pupils are taught to keep themselves safe and healthy and how topics are effective in reinforcing key messages, such as the dangers of smoking. However, assessment is a weaker area. The pupils do not have enough opportunity to contribute to their own learning, and are unsure of their targets and how to achieve them. Marking, despite recent improvements, is not
p.4
Grade: 3
helpful enough in identifying the next steps for the pupils. The school listens to the views of the parents and is swift to respond to their queries. Parents are very satisfied with what the school provides, for example by commenting, ’I have nothing but praise for the school’. They are pleased with the level of care given to their children. Systems for safeguarding the pupils are appropriately in place and there are good arrangements to look after more vulnerable pupils. However, pupils who move into the school do not always have their records sent on, and the school is too slow to assess their attainment. Overall, the school has a balance of strengths and weaknesses and offers a sound quality of education. Its own judgement that it is a good school is entirely understandable because it has made progress since the last inspection, offers a rich 2 Inspection Report: St Chad's CofE (C) Primary School, 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006
p.4
Grade: 3
curriculum for most of its pupils and makes effective provision for the pupils’ personal development. However, it is not as good as it could be in ensuring that the teaching is consistently effective and that the more able pupils are served well enough. Assessment and tracking procedures are insufficiently effective and the talents and strengths of the governors and senior teachers are not used well enough.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
• Develop leadership by broadening the skills of the senior teachers, refining systems to track pupils’ progress and further developing the contribution of the governing body. • Enhance the quality of teaching by placing more emphasis on assessment, including opportunities for the pupils to contribute. • Improve achievement by ensuring that more able pupils are identified early in the school and are given hard enough work as they move up through the school.
p.5
Grade: 3
Achievement is satisfactory. Last year, standards in Year 6 were not good enough because the pupils’ learning had been interrupted by numerous changes of staff. This year, there is clear improvement in the pupils’ work and standards are within expected levels. Achievement in reading is good because it is taught systematically. The guided reading groups are having a really beneficial impact on progress but could be even better if the pupils themselves were clearer about what they need to learn next. In other subjects, the pupils make satisfactory progress, but some of the more able pupils are not doing as well as they should because the work is too easy. Children in the Foundation Stage make sound progress in almost all aspects, with good progress evident in personal development.
p.5
Grade: 2
This is a key strength of the school. Good behaviour is the order of the day and helps lessons to run smoothly. The pupils know how to keep themselves safe and report that bullying is rare. The lunchtime staff are friendly; they encourage the pupils to make healthy choices and play sociably. Pupils are developing well as young citizens through opportunities to make real decisions, such as helping to design the new toilets. The spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils is good and improves the pupils’ self-esteem and understanding of the needs of others. The school is aware that in order to make personal development even better, the pupils could contribute to the assessment of their own work. 3 Inspection Report: St Chad's CofE (C) Primary School, 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006
p.5
Grade: 3
This is satisfactory. Typically, the staff enjoy excellent relationships with their pupils which encourage them to contribute to lessons. Lesson planning is improving but does not yet take sufficient account of the range of abilities in some of the classes. Consequently, the lessons do not hold high enough expectations of the more capable pupils. In lessons which are very successful, the pace is brisk and questions are varied, interesting and challenging. Teaching and assessment in reading are good, but could be even better if the pupils were clearer about their targets. Other assessments are insufficiently precise, and marking in particular does not clearly identify the next steps for the pupils.
p.6
Grade: 2
The curriculum in the Foundation Stage is satisfactory and for the rest of the pupils is good. Throughout Years 1 to 6, the curriculum includes numerous opportunities which help the pupils to develop as well-rounded individuals through links with artists, sports people, and visitors from a range of cultural backgrounds. The wide variety of clubs helps some of the pupils to excel in areas outside the usual range of subjects. A good programme of personal development enables the pupils to be healthy, stay safe and begin to understand relationships. The curriculum for personal development in the Foundation Stage is also good and so the children gain confidence and develop good attitudes to learning. However, there is not enough attention given to creative development and so their imaginative play is not developing as well as it should.
p.6
Grade: 3
The school takes satisfactory care of its pupils. Systems to protect children are appropriate and vulnerable pupils are well supported by the school and their good contacts with other professionals. There are good links with secondary schools and so the pupils transfer from one school to the next with relative ease. The tracking of pupils’ academic progress is a weaker element of the provision because it does not identify more able pupils early enough and new arrivals into school are not always adequately assessed.
p.6
Grade: 3
‘Over the last 12 months the school has made some very good changes and improvements.’ This remark from a parent reflects the dedication shown by the headteacher, who has brought about numerous improvements through inspiring the 4 Inspection Report: St Chad's CofE (C) Primary School, 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006 staff to try new ways of working. He has recently encouraged senior staff to take on more responsibilities and together they have good capacity to take the school forward. Evidence of capacity for improvement is shown in the senior staff’s evaluations of lessons which accurately identify the strengths and weaknesses of the teaching. Other forms of evaluation, such as examining progress data, have begun, but these are not as rigorous. The governors are keen to play a role in self-evaluation and other aspects of leadership, but as yet their role as ‘critical friends’ is underdeveloped. 5 Inspection Report: St Chad's CofE (C) Primary School, 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006
p.6
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St Chad's CofE (C) Primary School, 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006
p.8
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
learners?
NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.9
and supporting all learners?
NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.10
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.10
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
15 June 2006 Dear Children I am writing to tell you about the things we found when Mrs O’Hare, Mr Horwood and I came to visit your school. The first thing we noticed was how friendly and kind you were. You helped us to learn about your school and made us very welcome. We enjoyed visiting your lessons, talking to you and your teachers and looking at your work. We know that you like school, and no wonder, when the staff are so friendly and helpful. You have good opportunities to learn from visitors too and take part in a range of competitions. The school makes sure that you are cared for, happy and that you learn to lead a healthy lifestyle. In most lessons, you make reasonable progress but we have identified some improvements to make learning even better for you all. One of the things we noticed is that you don’t always know what to do improve your work. This is because teachers do not always specify what you should
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
learn next. They are starting to decide what levels you are achieving, but this information is not being used well enough to make sure that you are all making the progress you should. We think you should be given more opportunities to talk about your work and you can help with this by telling your teachers when it is too easy or too hard for you. Some of you are capable of much harder work, so you might need to put your thinking caps on soon! Mr Davies has worked very hard since he became your headteacher and has made many improvements. Now is the time for him to start sharing this work with some of the other teachers and with the governors. Good luck with everything you do at school and remember to always try your best. Best wishes from Mrs Hamby, Mrs O’Hare and Mr Horwood
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion