Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

East Huntspill SchoolOfsted inspection, 19 Oct 2005

Inspected 19 Oct 2005 · published 12 Jan 2006 · URN 123685

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Ofsted inspected East Huntspill School on 19 Oct 2005, led by David Curtis RISP. The overall judgement was Inadequate. Ofsted published the report on 12 Jan 2006. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Oct 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Curtis RISP

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Inadequate

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    East Huntspill School

  • URN verified

    123685

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportInadequate
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentSatisfactory
  • Teaching and learningInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 38% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallyenjoypositiveimprovedeffectivelyconfidentoutstandingsafe
Criticisminadequateweaknessesconcernslacknot sufficientlylowweakpoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1232w+8
  • What needs to improve1402w−18

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,607
about usual (typical 2932)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%What needs to improve 53%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

123685 Unique Reference Number Somerset LEA 281538 Inspection number 19 October 2005 to 19 October 2005 Inspection dates David Curtis RISP Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

New Road School address Primary Type of school East Huntspill Community School category Highbridge, Somerset TA9 3PT 4 to 11 Age range of pupils

p.1

01278 782453 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01278 792523 Fax number 86 Number on roll Mrs Valerie Shellard Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Ms Alison Norcross Headteacher 27 November 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 281538 19 October 2005 - 4 to 11 19 October 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two additional inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This small three-class village school is near Highbridge. All pupils are White British. Sixteen pupils are identified with learning difficulties and disabilities. All are at the early ‘school action’ stage of support. No entitlement to free school meals has been taken up. In the last two years, the school has been affected by staffing difficulties linked to maternity leave and illness.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: East Huntspill School, 19 October 2005 to 19 October 2005

p.3

Grade: 4

In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. Inspection evidence is consistent with the school’s judgement of its own effectiveness as being inadequate. The school gives inadequate value for money. Children make a good start in the school and make satisfactory progress in reception. From Year 1 onwards, pupils do not make sufficient progress in their learning. By the end of Year 6, standards are exceptionally low in English and mathematics. There is significant underachievement amongst all groups of pupils. Most pupils behave well. However, a third of parents who returned the questionnaire expressed concerns about

p.4

Grade: 4

behaviour and a number of pupils in Year 6 are worried about bullying. Teaching is inadequate and is not meeting the learning needs of pupils by ability or age. Planning for pupils from more than one year group in the same class is not detailed enough. As a result, pupils are not challenged or extended in their learning, particularly in key basic skills. Pupils with learning difficulties are, however, well supported by learning support assistants. Leadership and management are inadequate. There is an understanding of the weaknesses in standards and teaching. However, there is a lack of rigour in tackling these problems with the result that standards continue to fall. Progress since the last inspection has been inadequate, especially in relation to falling standards. At present, the school does not have the capacity to bring about the improvements needed.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•raise standards of pupils’ basic skills in English and mathematics •ensure that teaching meets the needs of all pupils by age and ability •ensure that leadership and management have detailed and measurable targets for school improvement.

p.4

Grade: 4

By the end of Year 6, standards are exceptionally low. There are significant weaknesses in pupils’ basic literacy and numeracy skills. Spelling and punctuation are particularly weak. Pupils do not use and apply these key skills in other subjects to a high enough standard. Progress is inadequate, especially in Years 3 to 6. Standards in Year 2 are broadly average but too few potentially more-able pupils achieve the higher levels in national tests. No pupil has achieved the higher Level 3 in writing in the past six years. Pupils do not build successfully on their previous learning and this starts in Year 1. 2 Inspection Report: East Huntspill School, 19 October 2005 to 19 October 2005 Children start school with standards expected for four-year-olds. Standards at the end of reception are average. Most children meet the goals they are expected to achieve. They make satisfactory progress from the time they start school, especially in

p.4

Grade: 4

communication, language and literacy. The results of the 2005 national tests for pupils in Year 6 fell significantly below the school’s targets. Results in English and mathematics were significantly lower than in 2004, although there was an improvement in science. There is a clear downward trend in English and mathematics. Currently, the targets set by the school and the local education authority, for pupils in Year 6, are far too demanding and pupils do not achieve them.

p.5

Grade: 3

Most pupils enjoy school and this is shown by levels of attendance meeting the national average. In lessons, pupils work hard when work is challenging. Older pupils openly admit that sometimes, ‘work is too easy’ or ‘it is too hard’. They say that this causes them to become bored and lose interest. Behaviour is satisfactory, although older pupils express anxiety about bullying. This primarily happens at lunchtimes and is linked to football. A number of older boys and girls expressed unhappiness about the way they are treated by lunchtime supervisors, especially in ‘being shouted at’. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory. Pupils take great delight in receiving awards for their efforts, especially house points. Most know right from wrong and pupils say that relationships in the school have improved recently. Through personal, social, health and citizenship lessons, pupils develop a satisfactory

p.5

Grade: 3

awareness of issues linked to health and their well being. Most adopt safe practices when working in lessons. Pupils enjoy sport and taking part in after-school clubs. They know why it is important to drink water regularly and to eat healthily. They enjoy taking part in events, such as Harvest Festival and the country dancing festival at The King Alfred School. Weaknesses in their basic literacy and numeracy skills limit their future economic well being.

p.5

Grade: 4

Teaching and learning are inadequate. This is a key factor in pupils not making sufficient progress in their learning. As a result, standards are exceptionally low by the end of Year 6. In the Foundation Stage, teaching is satisfactory and enables children to develop a satisfactory range of knowledge and skills. Difficulties in staffing in the previous school year, especially for pupils in the mixed-age Year 4, 5 and 6 class, have caused inconsistent expectations for pupils’ progress and a lack of challenge in many lessons. Teachers’ assessment of pupils’ learning is not 3 Inspection Report: East Huntspill School, 19 October 2005 to 19 October 2005 sufficiently accurate and activities do not build successfully on what pupils already know and can do. Relationships through the school are positive and, in the most effective lessons, pupils are interested, listen well and confident to ‘have a go’. Learning

p.5

Grade: 4

support assistants are often used well to support groups of pupils especially those with learning difficulties so they take can active part in lessons. Teachers have set targets for individual pupils’ future learning but they do not indicate clearly enough how pupils can improve. Pupils are not fully aware of their own targets for improvement. Planning is not used sufficiently well to ensure that lessons meet the needs of all pupils in the class by age or ability.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory and covers all the requirements of the National Curriculum. The provision for children in the Foundation Stage is sound and prepares them satisfactorily for the next stage in their learning. A strength is the school’s provision for information and communication technology. Most pupils say they enjoy their lessons and activities. Those pupils spoken to were particularly enthusiastic about their sport and games activities. They said they enjoy art lessons and their history topics, such as the Aztecs. The staff are currently reviewing their planning to look for ways to use pupils’ interests more to stimulate good learning. These ideas have not had time to have an impact on standards. Pupils’ basic skills of reading, writing and mathematics are not sufficiently promoted in other subjects. Pupils enjoy going on educational visits, including the costume museum in Bath and the school camp. The

p.6

Grade: 3

school makes good use of visitors, including the local vicar, to widen pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding.

p.6

Grade: 4

Most pupils feel safe in school and are confident that their teachers will listen to them if they have concerns. The school has dealt successfully with a previous issue whereby there was conflict in relationships between pupils. However, it has not fully addressed parental concerns about behaviour. Child-protection procedures are fully in place. The school takes sufficient care to ensure that pupils work in a safe and secure environment. However, it has not fully addressed pupils’ concerns about midday supervision Support for pupils’ academic development is inadequate. Targets set for pupils are not based on a clear understanding of pupils’ current levels of knowledge, skills and understanding. As a result, neither teachers nor pupils know what needs to be done next in order to improve learning. This is a key reason in pupils not making sufficient progress. 4 Inspection Report: East Huntspill School, 19 October 2005 to 19 October 2005

p.6

Grade: 4

Leadership and management are inadequate. As a result, standards are exceptionally low and pupils’ progress is poor. The headteacher knows the school’s weaknesses and that standards are falling. However, she has not taken action quickly enough to deal with this major issue. The plan of action to identify what needs to be done in order to raise standards does not have clear and measurable outcomes. Ideas that have been put in place are not monitored and there are no means by which success can be measured. As a result, the school does not currently have the capacity to improve. The role of subject co-ordinators is not sufficiently developed, especially in English. The headteacher is not getting enough support from senior and experienced colleagues in school improvement. Recent changes to the governing body mean that it is more aware of the issues. Governors now ask challenging questions and are moving away

p.7

Grade: 4

from relying totally on the headteacher to run the school. As the result of recent initiatives by the headteacher, progress is now starting to be made in using data from the results of national tests, particularly to identify pupils who need extra help. An improved programme of support for these pupils is now in place but the effectiveness of this is not being monitored closely enough. The school regularly seeks the views of parents and pupils through questionnaires, and of pupils through the school council. The recent revision of the school’s mission statement and code of conduct is a positive outcome of this process. A number of parents expressed concerns about leadership and management. This is linked to staffing difficulties which in fairness are outside of the headteacher’s control. 5 Inspection Report: East Huntspill School, 19 October 2005 to 19 October 2005 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: East Huntspill School, 19 October 2005 to 19 October 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA No The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well do learners achieve? NA 4 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 4 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 3 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 3 How well learners enjoy their education NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 4 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 4 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 4 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 4 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 4 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 4 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 4 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

No There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

East Huntspill Primary School New Road East Huntspill Highbridge TA9 3PT 20 October 2005 Dear Pupils Thank you very much for making us feel welcome when we visited your school recently. We enjoyed talking to you in lessons and in the playground. Special thanks go to Year 6 for the time they spent talking to us during the afternoon. These are the things that we liked about your school: •you told us how much you enjoy sport and the after-school clubs •your singing in assembly was good •you enjoy taking responsibility, such as being on the school council or being a librarian •you enjoy art and project work in particular. We think that your school could be even better than it is now. In order to improve your school, we feel that your headteacher and teachers need special help to do this. These are the most important things that need to be done and you will need to help too. •your work needs to get better in English and maths •we have asked your teachers to make

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

sure that the work you do always sets you new challenges and helps you to learn more •we have asked those who run the school to make plans to help the school to improve, and to check that things get better. Yours sincerely David Curtis Lead inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion