Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Andrew's CofE Primary School

Inspected 28 Feb 2006 · published 20 Mar 2006 · URN 123477

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Feb 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Driscoll

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    St Andrew's CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    123477

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisevery wellexceptionallymake good progressexcellentgood progressenjoyvery highpositive
Criticisminadequateweaknessweaknessesweakerbelowinsufficientlacknot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1254w+76
  • What needs to improve1312w+68

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,537
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%What needs to improve 51%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report St Andrew's CofE Primary School

p.1

123477 Unique Reference Number Shropshire LEA 281485 Inspection number 28 February 2006 to 28 February 2006 Inspection dates David Driscoll AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Hopton Lane School address Primary Type of school Nesscliffe Foundation School category Shrewsbury, Shropshire SY4 1DB 4 to 11 Age range of pupils

p.1

01743 741331 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01743741648 Fax number 59 Number on roll Mrs Pauline Dranssfield Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Jennifer Anne Parr Headteacher 22 May 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 281485 28 February 2006 - 4 to 11 28 February 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

St Andrews is a very small, rural primary school serving a relatively affluent area. The number of pupils in some year groups is very small, so classes are often made up of a wide range of ages and abilities. Very few pupils come from minority ethnic groups.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St Andrew's CofE Primary School, 28 February 2006 to 28 February 2006

p.3

Grade: 2

The school provides a good education. Parents have a very high opinion of the school and the way it is run, because staff communicate with them well and take notice of what they say. Pupils make good progress throughout the school, because the good teaching instils in them a desire to work hard and do well. Pupils leave the school with above average standards, particularly in English, science and design and technology. Standards in mathematics are not quite as good, because pupils do not get enough practice with their tables in Years 3 and 4. This means they are not confident enough in their skills in mental arithmetic. Pupils are very happy at school and attend regularly. Their social and moral development is very good, as seen in their excellent behaviour and the way they work so well with one another. Pupils’ understanding of other cultures is weaker. Staff know the pupils very well, so they are safe and well cared for. Teachers have a good idea of how well

p.4

Grade: 2

pupils are progressing academically, but do not provide pupils with enough advice on how to improve their work. The quality of provision in Reception is good. Standards on entry vary between average and below average but children make good progress in most areas of learning. The school’s view of its performance is accurate and matches that of the inspectors. Managers have shown that they know what is needed to improve the school’s performance in broad terms and have the capacity to do so, but they are not yet getting enough information about how well teachers are doing in individual lessons. The school is relatively expensive to run, as it is so small, and provides satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•Raise standards of mental arithmetic by ensuring pupils get more practice in learning their tables in Years 3 and 4. •Ensure teachers give pupils better individual guidance on how to improve their work. •Ensure managers have a clear view of what does and does not work well in lessons. •Provide pupils with more opportunities to learn about other cultures.

p.4

Grade: 2

Pupils make good progress in all years. Standards on entry to the school vary from year to year, but the usual pattern is one of pupils starting school with average standards and leaving with standards that are above average. This record of good progress and above average standards is true for the pupils currently at the school. Test results in 2005 showed a slightly different pattern. Pupils who took their tests at the end of Year 2 had started Reception with very low standards and made good progress in each year to gain results that were only a little below average. In Year 6, results were affected by some prolonged pupil absence. 2 Inspection Report: St Andrew's CofE Primary School, 28 February 2006 to 28 February 2006 Standards in English, science and design and technology are particularly good. Standards in mathematics are a bit lower, because pupils in Key Stage 2 are held back by their mental arithmetic, which is not as quick as it could be. This is partly because

p.4

Grade: 2

pupils are panicked a little by being put under pressure, but another reason is that they do not get enough practice with their tables in Years 3 and 4. The school met its targets last year, and is on course to meet the much more challenging targets set for this year.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils’ personal development is good. Social and moral development is very good. Pupils know right from wrong, and have a very well developed understanding of the needs of others. They are very polite and well mannered when talking with adults. They work and play very happily together. Older pupils keep a good eye out for younger ones. Pupils’ spiritual and cultural development is satisfactory, although their understanding of other cultures is a relative weakness. The behaviour of pupils in lessons and around the school is excellent, reflecting the school’s motto ‘To show care and consideration to others at all times’. No pupil has ever been excluded. Their attitude to work is very positive, so they attend regularly. The pupils enjoy their education a lot. They particularly enjoy active lessons, and the sports and music clubs in which participation rates are high. They know how to work and play safely, understanding the need for rules, for example when using the internet.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils make a satisfactory contribution to the community. They are developing well the skills that will help them become valuable members of society through the numerous responsibilities they are given in school, such as acting as councillors and friendship monitors. Younger pupils can talk about healthy food and other foods that are treats. Older pupils can explain why they should eat at least five portions of fruit or vegetables each day, and follow their own advice at lunchtimes.

p.5

Grade: 2

Teaching is good, so pupils enjoy their lessons and make good progress. Throughout the school, teachers have high expectations of the way that pupils will approach their work. They instil a great sense of commitment and a work ethic that prepare pupils well for their life when they leave school. The very mixed classes mean that teachers have to prepare carefully for lessons, ensuring that all pupils are set work that they find hard enough at their own level. Teachers are very successful in meeting such demands, and this results in all pupils, regardless of their age or past achievements, making good progress. The use of support staff is very effective, as classes are usually split into several small groups according to the ability of the pupils. 3 Inspection Report: St Andrew's CofE Primary School, 28 February 2006 to 28 February 2006 Some work, such as analysing mechanisms in design and technology, is exceptionally

p.5

Grade: 2

demanding. However, while good emphasis is placed on developing literacy skills, pupils are not given enough practice with their tables in Years 3 and 4. Pupils’ work is marked frequently and thoroughly. Good work is praised, but it is rare that a pupil is told how to do even better in a piece of work.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school provides a good curriculum. Teachers combine topics well, so pupils learn more than one subject in a lesson. The school has many visitors, including specialists such as authors and artists, who not only enhance subjects, but also build pupils’ confidence in dealing with adults. A high proportion of pupils learn a musical instrument in addition to learning the recorder. The pupils’ education is further enriched by extra activities such as choirs, sports and cycle training. These activities add to the pupils’ enjoyment of school and to their understanding about how to keep safe and stay healthy. However, not enough is done to develop their understanding of other cultures. Reception pupils presently have insufficient access to large outdoor play equipment, which is hindering their physical development.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school cares for and supports the children well, and their parents rightly recognise this. The school is welcoming and has a very strong community ethos. The teachers know the pupils very well and this helps teachers plan accurately to promote each pupil’s personal development. Academic guidance is satisfactory. Teachers are well aware of how well pupils are doing, but rarely does marking tell them how to improve their work. Child protection measures are thorough, clear and widely understood by all staff. Health and safety routines and risk assessments are fully in place. The school has effective policies for dealing with bullying and racism, although occurrences are very rare indeed. All pupils are confident that they have others to turn to if they are worried. They know that if they speak to an adult, they will be listened to.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school is led and managed well. Managers, including governors, have a very clear idea of the school’s strengths and weaknesses in broad terms. This allows them to prioritise well the areas that need to be improved. Some of the plans to bring about the improvements lack detail, because there are not enough opportunities for subject coordinators, including the headteacher, to observe others teaching and identify small changes in teaching that would bring about the greatest change. Nevertheless, the 4 Inspection Report: St Andrew's CofE Primary School, 28 February 2006 to 28 February 2006 clear focus on the progress and development of individual pupils has ensured that the good education provided at the time of the previous inspection has been maintained. Parents hold the school in very high regard. The staff work very well with parents, often on an individual basis, to improve the quality of education they provide. Pupils’

p.6

Grade: 2

views are equally as important to the staff. Managers are very keen to change the way the school operates in order to meet parents’ and pupils’ expectations. The school now holds two sports days, for example, because some parents and children were unhappy with the traditional one. The second is an ‘alternative’ sports day, which has increased pupils’ enjoyment and parents’ satisfaction. 5 Inspection Report: St Andrew's CofE Primary School, 28 February 2006 to 28 February 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St Andrew's CofE Primary School, 28 February 2006 to 28 February 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 2 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 1 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

As you know, we visited your school recently to check on how well it is doing. Thank you very much for talking to us, and a special thank you to the members of the school council who told us about their life at school. We think you are very polite and have good manners. We were most impressed by the way you behaved at playtime, when you could not go outside. It was great to see all of you quietly playing together and really enjoying yourselves. You told us that you like school a lot and we can see why. The grown ups know you very well and take good care of you. The teachers, and the other people who help them, make sure you work hard. You are good at reading, writing, science and design and technology, but some of you could still do better in your mathematics. We have asked the teachers to give some of you more practice with your times tables. You can help by learning them at home. We have also asked the teachers to tell you how you can make your work even better, and to teach you more

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

about people from different races and backgrounds. The people who run the school know how to make it even better, but we have asked them to find out what things really help you to do your best in lessons, so that all teachers can use them. Thank you again for helping us with our work.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion