Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

The Martin Wilson School

Inspected 2 Nov 2005 · published 25 Nov 2005 · URN 123447

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Nov 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Knight RISP

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    The Martin Wilson School

  • URN verified

    123447

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyexceptionallypositivemake good progressimprovedenjoyconsistentlyoutstanding
Criticismconcernsinadequatelowweaknessbelownot alwaysdisruptive

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1169w+83
  • What needs to improve1324w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,443
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%What needs to improve 53%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report The Martin Wilson School

p.1

123447 Unique Reference Number Shropshire LEA 281480 Inspection number 1 November 2005 to 2 November 2005 Inspection dates Ian Knight RISP Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

New Park Road School address Primary Type of school Castle Fields Community School category Shrewsbury, Shropshire SY1 2SP 3 to 11 Age range of pupils

p.1

01743 236520 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01743 245 737 Fax number 211 Number on roll Ms Karen Benjamin Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr John Golightly Headteacher 12 June 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 281480 1 November 2005 - 3 to 11 2 November 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

The Martin Wilson School is a medium sized primary school serving one of the most disadvantaged areas in the county. Almost all pupils are of White British or European backgrounds. A few are Asian or of mixed heritage. Six pupils are identified as being at the early stages of learning English. The proportion of pupils who are eligible for free school meals is high, as is the proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities, including those with a statement of special need.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: The Martin Wilson School, 1 November 2005 to 2 November 2005

p.3

Grade: 2

The school judges itself as being satisfactory, but inspectors find that it is good and gives good value for money. Children join the school with standards well below those normally found. They make good progress throughout the school because of good teaching. Leadership and management of the school are good. The headteacher knows exactly how he wants the school to be and this vision is shared by staff. The senior team identified that the school needed to concentrate more on improving how pupils learn. Work on ‘learning to learn’ and innovative techniques to improve learning and behaviour are consistently applied throughout the school. The curriculum has been developed well so that it meets the needs of all pupils in the school, including those with learning difficulties and disabilities, or who speak English as an additional language. As a result teaching, learning, behaviour, personal development and achievement have all improved and are good. The school cares for

p.4

Grade: 2

its pupils well. These improvements indicate the school has the capacity to improve further. Parents think highly of the headteacher and the school. Governance is only satisfactory because the governing body is not involved in the long term planning process at an early enough stage. Although the school sets rigorous targets for individuals’ progress each year, it has recognised that it needs to establish straightforward, short-term targets that are negotiated with pupils because pupils do not always know exactly what they need to do to get better. Grade: 2

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•Implement the school improvement plan target regarding the setting of short term, straightforward targets for each pupil. This will ensure that pupils know exactly what they need to do to improve and can work towards their targets.

p.4

Grade: 2

Children enter the Early Years Centre with attainment that is especially low in the areas of language and personal development. Good teaching that focuses particularly on children’s personal and social skills enables good progress, but pupils still enter Year 1 with standards that are below those expected. Results from the 2004 National Curriculum tests show that standards at the end of Year 2 were average in writing and mathematics, but very low in reading. The provisional results for Year 2 in 2005 show a significant improvement in the number of pupils gaining the higher levels in reading, and standards are just within the average range. Results from the 2004 National Curriculum tests for pupils in Year 6 were broadly average and had been rising since 2002. The provisional results for 2005 are similar. 2 Inspection Report: The Martin Wilson School, 1 November 2005 to 2 November 2005 School data shows that pupils make good progress across Years 1 to 6. The school sets

p.4

Grade: 2

challenging targets for all pupils that most attain. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities often exceed their targets because they receive good support. Whilst the few pupils who speak English as an additional language do not receive support from outside agencies, adults provide good support in lessons which ensures that these pupils make the same progress as others. The school has been awarded the ‘Artsmark Gold’ award by the Arts Council in recognition of the quality of the work that is achieved in this area. Pupils are encouraged to investigate and experiment with various artistic elements and their work, which is displayed around the school, is of a high standard. Grade: 2

p.5

Grade: 2

Throughout the school pupils recognise the importance of working together and sharing ideas and resources. They are clearly motivated by praise and encouragement, and like coming to school, as shown by their attendance and good behaviour. Pupils show a good deal of respect for each other and for adults. They develop a sense of curiosity and enjoy solving problems, particularly when using the information and communication technology (ICT) facilities. A range of extra-curricular activities and community links foster good spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. For example, through fund raising for local charities pupils realise the difficulties that homeless people in this country experience. The promotion of the National Fruit Scheme and sporting opportunities give pupils an awareness of the importance of good health. The school promotes self esteem very effectively through celebrating a range of pupils’ achievements. Safety awareness is actively promoted. For example,

p.5

Grade: 2

the headteacher explained to pupils the danger of bad light at this time of the year when leaving school with a special emphasis on road safety. The elected school council enables pupils to make a positive contribution to their school community in initiatives such as the purchasing of new sports equipment. Grade: 2

p.5

Grade: 2

The school’s focus on techniques that enable pupils to ‘learn to learn’ is evident in all classrooms. Pupils understand about learning styles and are comfortable discussing such techniques as mind and sense mapping. Teachers are skilful at using a range of methods to maintain pupils’ attention, including ‘Brain Gym’ and the imaginative use of ICT. Questions and tasks are closely matched to the needs of individual learners. Teaching assistants make a good contribution to lessons, supporting pupils including those with learning difficulties and disabilities, and leading small groups. Staff enable 3 Inspection Report: The Martin Wilson School, 1 November 2005 to 2 November 2005 children in the Early Years Centre to develop independence through the daily ‘Plan-Do-Review’ sessions, in which they choose their own activities. Adults question children about their ideas at a level appropriate to their needs. During these sessions

p.5

Grade: 2

adults play alongside children effectively extending their thinking and vocabulary and enabling children to remain purposefully engaged. Grade: 2

p.6

Grade: 2

The curriculum is well planned and supports pupils’ personal development well. It reflects the school’s vision of itself as a learning community. The wide range of stimulating activities and imaginative use of resources in the Early Years Centre enables children to achieve well. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities achieve well because work is planned and adapted to meet their needs. Extra-curricular activities are good, supported by visits from professional artists and musicians. These add to pupils’ wide experiences and enjoyment. External agencies such as the Family Learning organisation provide useful activities during and after school for both pupils and their parents. Grade: 2

p.6

Grade: 2

Pupils are cared for well. Procedures for child protection are firmly established. Careful recording of concerns and good links with support services ensure the well-being of vulnerable pupils. Pupils are confident that adults listen to their concerns, care for them well and will deal with any problems quickly and fairly. They are given opportunities to take responsibility, for example, being representatives on the school council. The ‘Star Pupils’ from each class have afternoon tea with the headteacher, a feast they all enjoy. Children in the Early Years Centre settle quickly at school because they are well supported and cared for. From day one children are expected to be independent and manage their own routines. Parents are kept well informed of their child’s progress at regular meetings. However, not all pupils have negotiated individual targets for improvement. As a result, their understanding of how to improve is satisfactory rather than good. Parents know the

p.6

Grade: 2

school provides a safe place for children and speak highly of the headteacher and his staff. Grade: 2 4 Inspection Report: The Martin Wilson School, 1 November 2005 to 2 November 2005

p.6

Grade: 2

Shortly after his appointment the headteacher realised that, although teaching was good, pupils were not making enough progress. Together with his assistant headteachers, he identified barriers to learning for pupils, including the low self esteem of many pupils, negative attitudes, and the disruptive behaviour of a minority. From this came the school’s high profile focus on ‘learning to learn’. The headteacher inspired the whole school community so that this vision is shared and is evident in all classrooms. For example, pupils understand different learning styles and techniques to support them, such as mind maps. As a result, pupils are more positive about learning, behaviour is improved, progress is quicker, and test results are rising, albeit modestly. Parents praise the headteacher highly. None were critical. One parent wrote, ‘I have never met a head so involved in every aspect of the school. He always seems to like and care

p.7

Grade: 2

about all the children and does a lot to reassure us as parents.’ The school’s evaluation of its own work is accurate and based on test data and good quality monitoring carried out by the senior leadership team. It recognises that there is still work to do and the satisfactory school improvement plan includes appropriate targets and actions. A weakness of school improvement planning is that it is short term and not based on a set of explicit aims for the school. The governing body is aware that it is not involved early enough in its construction. The recent improvements in the school, however, indicate a good capacity for further improvement. Grade: 2 5 Inspection Report: The Martin Wilson School, 1 November 2005 to 2 November 2005 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: The Martin Wilson School, 1 November 2005 to 2 November 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

The Martin Wilson School New Park Road Castlefields Shrewsbury Shropshire SY1 2SP 3 November 2005 Dear Pupils Thank you for being so welcoming when we visited your school. We enjoyed talking to you and hearing what you think about your school. This letter is to tell you what we found out. What we liked about the school Your teachers teach you well because they understand how you learn and what level you’re working at. You understand things like mind maps which help you to learn. You behave well which helps your teachers to teach you, and you to learn. The headteacher knows the school really well and is helping it to get better. What we have asked your school to do next Not all of you have targets that tell you what you need to do to get better. We have asked the school to talk to you about your targets and you can help by trying to remember them in all of your lessons. Yours sincerely Ian Knight (Lead inspector)

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion