Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Randlay Primary School

Inspected 26 Jan 2006 · published 21 Feb 2006 · URN 123441

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Frances Gillam

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Jan 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Frances Gillam

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness AI-checked

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    TF3 2LR

  • Name on report verified

    Randlay Primary School

  • URN verified

    123441

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 12% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyexceptionallyenjoymake good progresspositivesuccessfullyimprovedsuccessful
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysinconsistencyinadequatenot good enoughweakergapsbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1247w+31
  • What needs to improve1653w+32

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,868
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 43%What needs to improve 57%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Randlay Primary School

p.1

123441 Unique Reference Number Telford and Wrekin LEA 281478 Inspection number 25 January 2006 to 26 January 2006 Inspection dates Frances Gillam AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Randlay School address Primary Type of school Telford Community School category Shropshire TF3 2LR 3 to 11 Age range of pupils 01952 590929 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01952 598736 Fax number 340 Number on roll Mr Andrew Collier Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Bromley Jones Headteacher 29 November 1999 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 281478 25 January 2006 - 3 to 11 26 January 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Randlay is an above-average-sized primary school. Most of its pupils come from a White British background. Thirteen per cent of pupils come from minority ethnic groups, including pupils from mixed heritage, Black African and Asian backgrounds. Just over half of these pupils are at the early stages of learning English. The children’s attainment on entry to the Nursery is similar to that expected for three-year-olds, but an increasing number are being admitted with under-developed speech, language and personal skills. By the time the children are ready to move into Year 1, their attainment is similar to that expected for their age. In the past eighteen months almost half the teaching staff have changed, including members of the senior management team.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Randlay Primary School, 25 January 2006 to 26 January 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The school provides a satisfactory standard of education for its pupils. Although inspectors agree with some of the school’s views of its work, they do not agree with the school’s judgement that it is a good school overall. This is because teaching is satisfactory and not good enough in some classes. Pupils could achieve more in mathematics. Attendance is good. Pupils behave well and enjoy coming to school. A good range of lunchtime and after-school activities adds much to the curriculum. Pupils’ progress is good in the Foundation Stage and in reading and writing in Years 1 and 2. Mathematics is weaker at the higher levels in Year 2. Pupils’ progress is satisfactory overall by Year 6. However, progress is slower for many pupils in Years 3 and 4 compared with Years 5 and 6. This is due to weaknesses in the quality of teaching. The school has successfully addressed the weaknesses identified in the last inspection

p.4

Grade: 3

and has the capacity to make further improvements. Standards in writing are now above average by Year 2, marking has improved and checking the quality of pupils’ written work is part of the school’s review of its provision. Leadership and management are satisfactory. Senior managers currently have good procedures in place to evaluate the quality of the school’s work and identify weaknesses, but the action taken does not always have the desired impact and some weaknesses in teaching and learning for example persist. The school provides satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•Ensure that teachers always take account of what pupils already know in mathematics so that all pupils are challenged and stretched sufficiently by the work set. •Carry out more regular and ongoing checks so that senior management can be assured that weaknesses in some teaching are being eradicated, particularly in some classes in Years 3 and 4.

p.4

Grade: 3

Pupils enter the school with broadly average standards. Children progress well in the Nursery and Reception Year. They settle quickly and develop a broad understanding across the areas of learning. Activities provide good opportunities for children to explore and make discoveries for themselves. They reach the goals expected for their age by the time they enter Year 1. This good rate of progress continues in Years 1 and 2. Although standards achieved in the national tests in 2005 were broadly average, they were not as high as the above average results of previous years. Challenging targets have been set for 2006 and current work in pupils’ books indicates that standards are rising, although higher attainers could be doing better in mathematics. Pupils enter Year 3 with above-average standards and standards are also above average overall by the end of Year 6, as shown by results in national tests in 2005. Progress is

p.4

Grade: 3

2 Inspection Report: Randlay Primary School, 25 January 2006 to 26 January 2006 satisfactory as there are weaknesses. Average attainers do not achieve as well as they could in mathematics. Progress made by pupils in Years 3 and 4 is not as good as in other year groups and the school’s own data support this judgement. Some lost ground is made up by progress accelerating in Years 5 and 6 but not enough to compensate for pupils’ slower progress in Years 3 and 4, particularly in mathematics. This is evident, for example, in the average-attaining pupils’ insecure knowledge in aspects of shape, space and measures. Pupils at the early stages of speaking English make good progress. They receive well-focused support and good opportunities to talk and develop their vocabulary. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities make good progress in reaching the targets set for their improvement. They receive well-focused support in lessons and

p.4

Grade: 3

build effectively on what they have learned before.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils’ personal development and well-being are good. Pupils behave well in and around the school and work hard. They say that ‘school life is enjoyable, teachers are kind and lessons are interesting.’ Rates of attendance are good and, by Year 6, pupils are confident learners. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Pupils learn to respect each other and are pleased to celebrate each other’s achievement in lessons and assemblies. They work hard to raise funds for those less fortunate than themselves and take part in a range of community activities. Pupils are proud of the way in which the playground buddies care for their classmates and older pupils look after the younger pupils well. There is a very active school council which enables pupils to make a positive contribution to school life. Their suggestions have helped in many ways, for example, by introducing new litter bins into the playground to keep the outdoor environment

p.5

Grade: 2

tidier. Children realise the importance of healthy eating, which the school promotes well, and the necessity for regular exercise to grow up fit and well. Staff encourage pupils from minority ethnic groups to share knowledge of their culture and country of origin. This helps all pupils to develop a good understanding of other faiths and cultures and develops in pupils an understanding of their place in the world. Older children confidently show initiative. Activities such as learning how to manage small businesses help them to gain a secure understanding of how to manage simple budgets, preparing them well for the world of work. 3 Inspection Report: Randlay Primary School, 25 January 2006 to 26 January 2006

p.5

Grade: 3

The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory. While there are aspects of good teaching throughout the school, it is the inconsistency in the quality of teaching in some classes in Years 3 and 4 which leads to a slower rate of learning, and affects the overall progress pupils make by Year 6. Throughout the school, relationships between pupils and adults are good, leading to most lessons proceeding smoothly. Pupils are eager to do their best. Most teachers follow agreed school practice in their teaching methods and there are notable examples of that being successful in helping pupils to improve in all subjects and in building up their confidence, including in mathematics. However, in Years 3 and 4 and sometimes in Year 2, teaching does not take sufficient account of what pupils already know and work set is therefore not always at the right level to help them to progress. This leads to some pupils struggling to master their work or to some finding it too easy,

p.6

Grade: 3

particularly in mathematics. For example, some higher-attaining pupils in Year 2 quickly completed worksheets that were too easy for them. The worksheets did not test, as intended, their ability to solve number word problems and they did not learn as much as they were capable of doing. All teachers mark pupils’ work regularly and most provide guidance for pupils to help them improve. They question pupils to encourage thinking but in some lessons teachers do not do enough to draw average- and lower-attaining pupils into discussion and therefore miss opportunities to check how well such pupils are learning.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum offers the full range of required subjects and is organised so that most lessons build systematically on what has gone before. In the Foundation Stage this works particularly well but in the rest of the school the curriculum planning is not always modified sufficiently well to meet the needs of all the pupils. The teaching of information and communication technology is enhanced through a well-resourced computer suite and interactive whiteboards in the classrooms. These are used effectively to support children’s learning in lessons. The school provides well for health education and focuses successfully on the healthy eating initiative. Pupils also receive the recommended two hours of physical education each week. The school offers pupils a good variety of enrichment activities that helps their learning. A wide range of visits and visitors adds to pupils’ experiences and enjoyment. Older

p.6

Grade: 3

pupils especially enjoy the residential trips to Wilderhope Manor and Llangollen. They participate enthusiastically in a good range of out-of-school activities, including sporting activities. 4 Inspection Report: Randlay Primary School, 25 January 2006 to 26 January 2006

p.6

Grade: 2

Pupils are taught well about the importance of adopting healthy lifestyles and staying safe. They are well cared for as staff have a good knowledge of pupils’ social and emotional needs. The support for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is good and they are therefore fully involved in school life. Staff usually provide good support and sound guidance, despite some inconsistency in the use of assessment information to plan the next steps in learning. There are rigorous child protection procedures in place and risk assessments are carried out regularly to ensure that pupils are kept safe. Parents are pleased with the good start the children get to their education. Good opportunities are provided for children to work in the school before they start full-time, and this is a key factor in the good progress that they make in the Foundation Stage.

p.7

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory overall. Parents have great confidence in the headteacher and with good reason. He has provided very clear direction during the extended period of staff changes and has maintained a clear focus on raising standards. He is ably supported by the deputy headteacher. There is an extensive programme of monitoring and evaluating which provides him and his senior managers with a secure understanding of the school’s strengths and the areas where further improvement is required. However, not all action following on from these evaluations has been successful in developing good teaching in all classes and in making sure that pupils always achieve as well as they could. Despite the school holding staff more accountable for the quality of learning in their class, some weaknesses continue. Targets which are set for some teachers are not reviewed regularly or rigorously enough

p.7

Grade: 3

to ensure improvements are being made. Some teachers therefore need better support and guidance. Although leadership and management make teachers aware of good teaching practice, there is still work to be done in helping some teachers to adapt lesson plans to take full account of what pupils already know or where they have gaps in knowledge. Some of the action taken has led to improvements across the school, for example, in the quality of pupils’ writing and investigational skills in science, and clearly reflects the school’s capacity to improve. Governors support the school and are well informed across a range of areas but are not raising questions to challenge whether pupils are doing well enough in all classes. The school makes good use of the effective links it has with local schools, colleges and businesses to support the well-being and education of its pupils. The views of parents are sought regularly and valued by the school. For example, after discussions

p.7

Grade: 3

with parents and listening to their ideas, changes were made to the accommodation and organisation of the Nursery and Reception classes. 5 Inspection Report: Randlay Primary School, 25 January 2006 to 26 January 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Randlay Primary School, 25 January 2006 to 26 January 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 2 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you very much for making Miss Robinson, Mrs Underwood and myself so welcome when we came to visit your school. We enjoyed talking to you and seeing what you were learning in your lessons. We would like to tell you what we thought of your school. •Children in the Nursery, Reception and infant classes do well with their work, especially in reading and writing. •You behave well; you are kind to your classmates and polite to your teachers and visitors. •You told us that your teachers are very kind and take good care of you and we agree; all the staff in the school make sure that you are happy and kept safe and well. •You told us how you like to work hard and we think that you do; you enjoy most of your lessons because they are fun. •There are lots of good activities that you can do at lunch times and after school; you are especially excited about the trips you make to interesting places like Llangollen. •We think that many of you can do better in mathematics and that some children

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

in Years 3 and 4 could do better in their lessons, so we have asked Mr Jones to check that your teachers help you to do your very best.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion