Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Francis Church of England Primary School

Inspected 22 Mar 2006 · published 20 Apr 2006 · URN 123172

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Mar 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Charalambos Loizou

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    OX4 2QT

  • Name on report verified

    St Francis Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    123172

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 24% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveenjoyeffectiveeffectivelyexceptionallymake good progressimprovedgood progress
Criticismnot alwaysinadequatelowbelownot yetlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1392w+78
  • What needs to improve1376w+61

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,735
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%What needs to improve 49%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report St Francis Church of England Primary School

p.1

123172 Unique Reference Number Oxfordshire LEA LEA 281420 Inspection number 21 March 2006 to 22 March 2006 Inspection dates Charalambos Loizou AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Horspath Road School address Primary Type of school Cowley Voluntary controlled School category Oxford OX4 2QT 3 to 11 Age range of pupils 01865 468190 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01865 468194 Fax number 289 Number on roll Mr Ejaz Khan Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Janice Gordon Headteacher 27 March 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 281420 21 March 2006 - 3 to 11 22 March 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

St Francis is an average sized primary school and nursery serving an area of social and economic deprivation. The number of pupils entitled to free school meals is above average. Most pupils are of white British heritage although a significant number of pupils are from a diversity of ethnic backgrounds; the largest group is of Pakistani heritage. A small number of pupils are in the early stages of learning English. A significant proportion of pupils are from the families of asylum-seekers or refugees. The percentage of pupils with learning difficulties is similar to most schools although the number with a statement of special educational need is much higher than most schools. Attainment when pupils first join the school is low. The large majority of pupils are taught in mixed-age classes.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St Francis Church of England Primary School, 21 March 2006 to 22 March 2006

p.3

Grade: 2

In nearly all respects inspectors agree with the school's view of itself. The school provides a good education, good value for money and pupils achieve well overall. Pupils enjoy school, behave well and have good attitudes to school and learning. Their care, welfare and support are good. There is good provision in the Foundation Stage. Children start school with low language, communication and personal skills. They make good progress in the nursery because provision is very good although standards are below those expected by the time they start Year 1. However, older reception children are taught alongside Year 1 pupils where the curriculum is not always matched to their needs. The teaching is good and is having a positive effect on the pupils' personal development and achievements. Pupils reach the standards expected for their age by Year 6. Standards are well below average by Year 2 and are improving but could be higher.

p.4

Grade: 2

Consequently, progress overall is good and is satisfactory in Years 1 and 2. Although assessment is satisfactory, managers are not making best use of the information gathered to identify the specific needs of different groups of pupils to ensure they all make enough progress, particularly by Year 2. Pupils with learning difficulties and those with special educational needs do well throughout the school. Good leadership and management ensure that the school knows its strengths and what needs to be improved further. The school has a good capacity to keep on improving, having successfully dealt with the areas for improvement identified at its last inspection. Governors are effective and work in close partnership with parents, who think highly of this popular school.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

* Accelerate pupils' progress and raise standards in Years 1 and 2. * Complete improvements to assessment so that managers analyse pupils' performance more effectively to maximise their progress. * Ensure that provision for the oldest reception children matches the good provision made for reception aged children in the nursery.

p.4

Grade: 2

The pupils start school with low language, communication, personal and social skills. The school modestly graded achievement as satisfactory when, in fact, the pupils achieve well, in relation to their starting points, to reach average standards by Year 6. Pupils make very good progress in the nursery and in Years 5 and 6 where provision is strongest. The school sets reasonably challenging targets and meets them in the main. 2 Inspection Report: St Francis Church of England Primary School, 21 March 2006 to 22 March 2006 In the Foundation Stage, both nursery and reception age children based in the nursery do well in all areas of learning because there is a stimulating range of activities. The progress of older reception children who join Year 1 during the year slows, and is only satisfactory, because their learning needs are not always being met. In 2005, Year 6 pupils did well in the English tests and had made good progress since

p.4

Grade: 2

Year 2. Their progress in mathematics and science from Year 2 was broadly average. Although mathematics standards were lower than previous years they have recovered well this year and are in line with those expected. Tests show that standards by Year 2 are low but achievement is satisfactory in relation to the pupils' starting points. Pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities achieve well throughout the school because their progress is monitored closely and effectively. Pupils in the early stages of learning English do well as do pupils from asylum or refugee families because they are well supported.

p.5

Grade: 2

This is a good feature of the school. Pupils are confident, mature and polite. Relationships are very positive. Pupils enjoy learning and happily engage in conversation with others. They show good attitudes and behaviour and support one another in maintaining good friendships. Attendance is satisfactory, despite being adversely affected by a few families who choose to take extended holidays during term time. Older pupils care for younger ones so gain a good understanding of personal and collective responsibilities. The school council enables the pupils to learn a good range of enterprise skills, for example when organising charities or lobbying local councillors to improve the physical environment of the school. Pupils have a good understanding of how to stay safe and healthy and make useful suggestions, for example, to display dinner menus clearly for other pupils. They show maturity when they discuss and reflect on spiritual and moral

p.5

Grade: 2

issues raised in assemblies and lessons. Pupils are thoughtful and considerate to others. They show a good appreciation and understanding of each other's cultural heritages.

p.5

Grade: 2

Teaching and learning are good and this has a positive impact on the pupils' achievement and personal development. The strongest teaching is in the nursery and Years 5 and 6 where pupils' progress is most brisk. Across the school, teachers work together well in teams to ensure a similar approach in classes containing pupils of similar age. Pupils at the early stages of learning English are well taught and they make good progress. More able pupils are usually provided with the harder work they need, while the teaching of pupils with learning difficulties is good and they, too, achieve 3 Inspection Report: St Francis Church of England Primary School, 21 March 2006 to 22 March 2006 well. Pupils appreciate the help they are given, one commenting that 'teachers are patient and explain things.' A close check is kept on the progress of children in the nursery and the information gathered is used well to ensure that they, including the youngest of reception age,

p.5

Grade: 2

achieve well. Improved assessment procedures in older classes are beginning to provide clearer information about pupils' progress, although this is not yet sufficiently well established to monitor specific groups. Teachers' expectations are particularly high in Years 5 and 6. Marking is most effective in these classes, as the pupils are given a clear indication of how well they are doing and, as one pupil put it, 'we know what to do next time.' Appropriate targets are set in Years 1 and 2, but the pupils are not always sufficiently aware of them, which slows their progress.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school provides a broad and balanced curriculum that meets the needs of pupils of different ages, backgrounds and abilities. The challenge of mixed-age classes is met successfully by a two-year cycle of planning that ensures that the work becomes progressively more demanding from year to year. Good planning in the Foundation Stage provides a stimulating curriculum and a good emphasis on practical activities. This has a positive impact on the children's learning. However, the oldest children in reception do not always have sufficiently regular access to all of the required areas of learning. Although they make satisfactory progress, this could be better. Across the school, good links are made between subjects to make the learning relevant and enhance the pupils' enjoyment. For example, pupils in Years 5 and 6 enjoyed using the internet to research the Victorians. The pupils' learning is enriched by a good range

p.6

Grade: 2

of visits, visitors and clubs. Good planning for literacy, numeracy and information and communication technology (ICT) ensures that most pupils are well prepared for their future economic well-being.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school provides good care and support for its pupils. Member of staff are committed to the needs of the pupils. This is evident in the way in which new pupils to the school are supported and in the programmes for pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities as well as those in the early stages of learning English. The school is a happy and secure place and parents appreciate the fact that their children are safe and well cared for. Pupils have regard for their own and others' safety in lessons and at playtimes and are well supervised. Child protection procedures are securely in place. Health and safety routines and risk assessments are carried out systematically. The school checks the progress of individual pupils although assessment information is not always being used to identify groups of pupils to analyse their progress over time. 4 Inspection Report: St Francis Church of England Primary School, 21 March 2006 to 22 March 2006

p.6

Grade: 2

Leadership and management are good. The headteacher and governors know the school well. This is reflected in their accurate self-evaluation and good improvements since the last inspection. There is good teamwork and subject leaders are developing their monitoring skills to raise standards further. Analysis of the pupils' performance is satisfactory but is not sharp enough to identify trends over time, especially for pupils in Years 1 and 2. The school's track record in maintaining and improving standards and its capacity to continue this are good. The management of provision for pupils with learning difficulties and those with special educational needs is good. This means they achieve well and are well cared for. Similarly, the management and provision for those in the early stages of learning English are effective, enabling these pupils, and those from asylum or refugee families, to settle quickly into school and make good progress.

p.7

Grade: 2

Governors carry out their roles and responsibilities well. They have effective systems to monitor the school's performance and ensure good value for money. Parents hold the school in high regard and both staff and governors provide good opportunities to listen to the views of parents and pupils. 5 Inspection Report: St Francis Church of England Primary School, 21 March 2006 to 22 March 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St Francis Church of England Primary School, 21 March 2006 to 22 March 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Pupils The inspectors enjoyed visiting your school. I am writing this letter to you to explain what we found out. We were pleased to see how well behaved and polite you all are. Many of you told us that you enjoy coming to school because you like making friends, have lots of fun things to do and enjoy learning. We believe that your school provides a good education. We saw that all your teachers are good at helping you to understand things better so that, by the time you get to Year 6, most of you reach your targets. The school council have come up with some good ideas to improve your school and many of you told us that you like the way teachers and other adults are always there to help you.The staff and governors manage your school well and make sure you are safe and well cared for. You have good opportunities to take part in special activities and events as well as some exciting visits to special places.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

There are three main things we would like the school to do to improve further: * We would like the school to make sure that more pupils in Years 1 and 2 reach higher standards.* We would like your teachers to keep a closer check on how well you are doing to make sure that all of you reach your targets.* All the children in the nursery do well and during each school year the older reception age children leave the nursery to join Year 1 pupils. We would like your teachers to make sure that the reception children who join their new class have the same exciting things to do as in the nursery, as well as doing harder work.Thank you for making us welcome. I wish you all the very best for the future. Yours faithfully Charalambos Loizou Lead Inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion