Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Cropredy Church of England Primary School

Inspected 14 Jun 2006 · published 30 Jun 2006 · URN 123090

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Christopher Parker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Jun 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christopher Parker

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    OX17 1PU

  • Name on report verified

    Cropredy Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    123090

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh qualityexceptionallyenjoyeffectivecleareffectivelyimprovedstrongly
Criticismweaknessesinconsistenciesinadequatenot high expectationsconcernsconcerndisruptionbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1401w+73
  • What needs to improve1445w+35

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,808
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%What needs to improve 50%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Cropredy Church of England Primary School

p.1

123090 Unique Reference Number Oxfordshire LEA LEA 281398 Inspection number 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006 Inspection dates Christopher Parker AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Station Road School address Primary Type of school Cropredy Voluntary controlled School category Banbury OX17 1PU 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01295 750210 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01295 758553 Fax number 132 Number on roll Mr Paul Morley Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Amanda Tutt (Acting headteacher) Headteacher 4 December 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 281398 13 June 2006 - 4 to 11 14 June 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a smaller than average school. All of the pupils speak English as their first language. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties is below average. Currently, three pupils have statements. Following a period of stability half of the teaching staff has changed in the last year. In addition, the headteacher is on indefinite leave. The school is currently led by an acting headteacher with the support of an advisory headteacher. One class is currently taught by a temporary teacher and another by a supply teacher. A Partnership Foundation Stage Unit is due to open in September 2006.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Cropredy Church of England Primary School, 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The school is currently providing a satisfactory education for its pupils. The acting headteacher is giving the school much needed stability and direction following a breakdown in relationships and the long term absence of the headteacher. With the support of the teachers and governors she has put the pupils' performance and well-being at the heart of all decisions and plans for the immediate future. Pupils are achieving satisfactorily. The provision for the youngest pupils is satisfactory and most are on course to reach the goals set for the end of the Reception year. Overall, standards are significantly above average but not as high as they should be in writing because pupils do not have sufficient opportunities to produce high quality work right across the curriculum. Currently, the teaching is satisfactory but numerous changes of staff have slowed the progress of pupils in some classes. The work of some

p.4

Grade: 3

pupils has been affected by inconsistencies in expectation and challenge. The quality of marking, throughout the school, varies considerably and, in some cases, is not helping pupils to make improvements to their work. With the effective support of the local authority advisory headteacher the school has devised a very clear and comprehensive improvement plan based on an accurate assessment of the school's overall effectiveness, and current strengths and weaknesses. Along with the appointment of three new teachers, who will take up their posts at the start of next term, and the support of most parents the school is well placed to return to the high standards and good achievement of the recent past. The school has made satisfactory improvement since the last inspection. The provision for, and standards in, information and communication technology (ICT) are much improved but not enough has been done to prevent unsupervised access to the area around the school

p.4

Grade: 3

pond. The school provides satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• raise standard by increasing expectations of the range and quality of pupils' writing right across the curriculum • ensure work is marked to provide pupils with clear guidance on how they can improve • take immediate action to ensure the safety of pupils.

p.4

Grade: 3

Children in the Foundation Stage make a secure start to school life. Most are on course to reach the goals set for the end of the Reception year and a few will exceed them. They speak clearly and use mathematical vocabulary accurately. One child was able to tell her teacher that 'quarters' would result from cutting a shape into four equal parts. Good results at the end of Year 6 in 2003 and 2004 slipped marginally in 2005. Nevertheless, overall they remain significantly above average. The most notable fall 2 Inspection Report: Cropredy Church of England Primary School, 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006 was in the progress pupils made in English; in science a strong performance was maintained. The school has taken steps to reverse the trend in English results by improving writing standards. The impact of this recent initiative has yet to be seen in national test results but it has begun to bring some improvements in pupils' writing

p.4

Grade: 3

in their English books. However, not enough emphasis is placed on producing writing of high quality in other subjects. Standards in science have been maintained because the school has continued to promote and develop the pupils' investigative skills. Standards in ICT are now in line with those expected by the end of Year 6. Pupils with learning difficulties make satisfactory progress.

p.5

Grade: 2

The spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of the pupils is good. This was well illustrated in an assembly where the importance of tolerance was strongly promoted. The acting headteacher involved pupils in discussion which fostered a growing understanding of the hurt that intolerant attitudes may cause. Good standards of behaviour are expected and they are the norm. The pupils are very willing and ready to learn. The many changes in teaching staff have been unsettling for some year groups and parents commented how this had reduced their children's enjoyment of school. For the most part pupils enjoy lessons but a few become fidgety and a little impatient when they are passive for too long. Attendance is good and pupils, often accompanied by their parents, are at school in plenty of time to start lessons. Activities to encourage exercise are available at the start of the school day. Games lessons and after school clubs also contribute to the

p.5

Grade: 2

pupils' developing healthy lifestyles. Class meetings and the school council make a thoughtful contribution; the school council is currently discussing the content of a healthy eating policy. The pupils understand that they are an important part of the community and they contribute to many local activities. They are developing a range of skills which will serve them in later life, for example, in numeracy and ICT where Year 5 and 6 pupils have investigated the cost of holidays and created posters to promote charity events.

p.5

Grade: 3

The teaching is satisfactory. In some lessons there are good features but the unsettling effect of the many changes of teaching staff has had a detrimental impact on pupils' progress. The effective approaches used in some classes are not evident in others. In Year 2 the use of clear and well explained targets that pupils must, should or could achieve is successful in promoting good progress. This is not evident in all lessons and in some the teachers do not make it sufficiently clear to pupils what they are expected to learn. 3 Inspection Report: Cropredy Church of England Primary School, 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006 The teachers are working, with some success, to improve the pupils' writing in English lessons. However, they are not setting consistently high expectations of what pupils can achieve in their writing in all subjects. Furthermore, not all teachers are marking the pupils' writing with sufficient rigour to identify precisely what they need to do

p.5

Grade: 3

next. Too much of the marking is superficial. Teaching assistants support learning well, particularly for those with learning difficulties. Relationships are good. Teachers successfully promote and develop investigative skills in science. In Year 6, pupils demonstrated their ability to work collaboratively and safely whilst carrying out fair tests to find the best 'fuel' for their 'rockets'.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is appropriately broad and provides pupils with an interesting range of work. They speak thoughtfully about the opportunities the teachers plan for them. One pupil commented how he found science experiments, 'Really good fun!' As a result of the implementation of actions in the school improvement plan, the school is beginning to make links between subjects and using ICT to increasingly good effect. However, opportunities for pupils to develop, use and apply their literacy skills to produce writing of high quality in other subjects are too infrequent. The Foundation Stage curriculum is satisfactory but restricted by the range and quality of resources. This is soon to be addressed as part of the development of the Partnership Foundation Stage Unit. Educational visits, for example, to the Black Country Museum and a Victorian school day, add interest to the curriculum and help to bring colour and life to the pupils'

p.6

Grade: 3

learning in history. The school makes good provision for physical education which is significantly enhanced in the summer term by use of the outdoor swimming pool. There is a satisfactory range of well attended after school activities which provide additional sporting opportunities for the pupils.

p.6

Grade: 3

Although the quality of care provided for pupils is satisfactory and health and safety checks of the site are carried out regularly, the governors have not responded adequately to their own recorded concerns. For example, the school pond remains inadequately fenced. Procedures for child protection are fully in place and all teachers have completed the required training. The school is proud of its caring ethos and children speak of it as a happy and safe community. Every pupil is known and treated as an individual and this contributes strongly to the harmonious atmosphere. Pupils with special educational needs are supported well. The school works well with parents and other agencies. Comprehensive records are used for keeping track of pupils' progress and these provide useful information for teachers to set appropriately challenging targets. However, inconsistencies in marking, target setting and involving

p.6

Grade: 3

4 Inspection Report: Cropredy Church of England Primary School, 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006 pupils in assessing their own performance undermine the potential benefits of recent developments.

p.6

Grade: 3

Following a period of considerable turbulence the school is, in the words of one Year 6 pupil, 'Pretty much back on track!' Pupils and their parents have expressed considerable concern about the disruption caused by the period of difficulty the school has encountered. Most parents, although regretting the many changes of teaching staff, support the steps taken to reduce the impact on their children. They also support the actions taken by the acting headteacher to provide a clear direction for the immediate future of the school. The leadership team has the capacity to build on the improvements of recent months. The governing body is working with the local authority to resolve the current uncertainties surrounding the leadership of the school. It has taken control of the situation, leaving the acting headteacher to manage the day to day running of the school. Governors' increasing involvement in improvement planning and in monitoring

p.7

Grade: 3

the school's performance have added to the stature of the improvement plan which now encompasses the aspirations of the whole school community. The plan, constructed with the help of the influential advisory headteacher provides clear, precisely focussed actions. It accurately addresses the school's weaknesses because it is the result of sharply focused and realistic self evaluation and rigorous monitoring of the quality of teaching. The plan is linked to the recently revamped performance management system which involves all of the teachers and the teaching assistants. Currently, the leadership and management of the school are satisfactory. 5 Inspection Report: Cropredy Church of England Primary School, 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Cropredy Church of England Primary School, 13 June 2006 to 14 June 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 2 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 3 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Pupils This letter is to tell you about the findings of the recent inspection and to thank you for taking the time to talk to me. I chatted to some you who told me that you found the many changes that had taken place earlier this year unsettling and that you were pleased that the acting headteacher and teachers had been able to sort things out so that you could have fun learning new things. You told me that you enjoy most lessons particularly now the teachers are giving you work that you find more challenging. At the moment the school is providing a satisfactory education for you. The acting headteacher and teachers have put together a good plan to improve the school. They want to improve writing. I looked at some of your work and although some of you produce good writing, some of you could do better. I have asked the teachers to give you more opportunities to do some really good writing in science, history and geography, as well as in

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

English. Some, but not all of your work is marked well. I have also asked the teachers to make sure that all marking helps you to improve your work. You now have many more opportunities to use information and communication technology (ICT) than you used to, and some of you really enjoy this and showed me the interesting work you have been doing. When the school was last inspected it was asked to put a fence around the pond. I know you are very aware of the dangers, and there is a small barrier but I have asked the governors to improve it immediately so that any possibility of an accident is avoided. I enjoyed being in your school. I hope that in the future it is successful in helping you to do as well as you possibly can. Yours sincerely Christopher Parker Lead Inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion