Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Pitsford Primary School

Inspected 22 Nov 2005 · published 8 Dec 2005 · URN 121850

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

John Paull RISP

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Nov 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Paull RISP

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NN6 9AU

  • Name on report verified

    Pitsford Primary School

  • URN verified

    121850

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+55Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronggood progressoutstandingeffectiveexceptionallypositiveimprovedeffectively
Criticismweaknessweaknessespoorinadequatenot good enoughdeclinedlacknot sufficiently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1298w+68
  • What needs to improve1462w+44

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,731
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%What needs to improve 53%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Pitsford Primary School

p.1

121850 Unique Reference Number Northamptonshire LEA 281114 Inspection number 22 November 2005 to 22 November 2005 Inspection dates John Paull RISP Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Moulton Road School address Primary Type of school Pitsford Community School category Northampton, Northamptonshire NN6 9AU 4 to 11 Age range of pupils

p.1

01604 880 866 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01604 880 866 Fax number 60 Number on roll Mr Shane Atherton Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Sonja Henman Headteacher 3 July 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 281114 22 November 2005 - 4 to 11 22 November 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Pitsford Primary School is in a village on the outskirts of Northampton. All pupils in the school are of White British origin. The number known to be eligible for free school meals is very low although, as hot meals are not provided, actual numbers may be higher. Socio-economic circumstances are close to average. The number of pupils identified with special educational needs is broadly average, although none has a statement of entitlement. Attainment on entry is also around average. Just recently, the school has passed through a period of considerable change in its staff and governors.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Pitsford Primary School, 22 November 2005 to 22 November 2005

p.3

Grade: 3

The inspection confirms the school’s view that it provides a satisfactory education and that sound value for money is achieved. Recent improvement is good, an opinion that parents overwhelmingly share. Their view is typified by those who commented that many rapid changes in senior personnel caused them to lose confidence, but that they now feel reassured by the determination and calm approach of the acting headteacher. The inspection endorses this view. Confidence in the school is now rising, along with standards. The 2005 national tests in Year 6 indicate above average standards, especially in mathematics and science. Pupils’ personal development is good and includes outstanding behaviour. This feature makes a very positive contribution to pupils’ good progress, although multicultural education is a weakness. The staff are working together well with parents, governors and the local authority, following the acting headteacher’s

p.4

Grade: 3

strong lead. Teaching and learning are good. However, some detailed plans on which teaching is based are out of date and do not take account of the latest national emphasis on linking knowledge and skills in different subjects. Much work has been done to monitor teaching, planning and test results to base improvements on solid information. This work is now well managed, although not yet established long enough to be routine. Improvement since the inspection of 2000 has been satisfactory, although spasmodic. Information and communication technology (ICT) and communications with parents are much improved. Strengths in care and support have been built on and the quality of provision and children’s achievement in the Reception year are good. However, academic standards declined before their present strong improvement.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•ensure that monitoring and evaluation are rigorous and carried out routinely, so action taken to tackle weaknesses is fully followed through •carry out a review of those subjects where schemes of work have not been updated for some time and ensure aspects of multicultural education are included in all subject areas.

p.4

Grade: 2

The most recent national test results and standards seen during the inspection indicate that pupils are now making good progress. It follows below average results in 2003 and 2004, when standards were particularly poor in English. The turnaround is remarkable and shows that challenging targets are now being met. The school’s own tracking of pupils’ progress suggests that even better results are likely in the next couple of years. The determined leadership of the acting headteacher, supported by hard-working staff, is the main reason for this significant turnaround in performance. Considerable monitoring of pupils’ progress to establish what was going wrong has given rise to 2 Inspection Report: Pitsford Primary School, 22 November 2005 to 22 November 2005 effective remedies. Where gaps in pupils’ knowledge were found, new targets were set, teaching was adapted to meet them, and learning has benefited strongly. In science

p.4

Grade: 2

especially, good knowledge of what pupils needed to concentrate on to raise their performance was used to good effect. Standards lower down the school are also rising. This is reflected in test results at the end of Year 2 and in the good progress made by pupils in Year 1. Children in their Reception year are also well catered for. Although they are in a mixed-age class with Years 1 and 2, an effective, qualified nursery nurse understands their particular needs well. Nearly all of them are on course to reach the standards expected for their age by the end of the year. Provision for pupils with special educational needs is satisfactory. Their targets match their needs and their progress towards these targets is good.

p.5

Grade: 2

Children in the Reception year want to emulate the older pupils in their mixed-age class and quickly develop good attitudes to learning. Pupils throughout the school often show outstanding behaviour in the classroom. They enjoy their work and are determined to do their best, particularly in timed tests, or when responding to a challenge, such as the headteacher’s request for finding out about South Africa. Pupils are mature and caring towards each other and keep up very good relationships, which ensures that the school is well ordered and a happy place. Pupils themselves say that bullying is not an issue. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural education is good. It contributes to recently improved attainment and progress, because pupils understand the importance of working together socially and appreciate the importance of studying their environment to make it better. Pupils contribute well to school rules and they

p.5

Grade: 2

take responsibility through the School Council. Understanding of healthy eating has been promoted, although the lack of school meals allows the school little direct opportunity to influence what is actually eaten. Visits and visitors extend pupils’ learning beyond their village community. However, education about the cultures of people from backgrounds and countries that are different from pupils’ own is not sufficiently well developed. Attendance is satisfactory. Pupils with 100% attendance are recognised on the school’s Roll of Honour, which acts as a good incentive. Nevertheless, a small minority has a poor record, and the number of holidays taken during the school year remains high. The upturn in standards in literacy and numeracy is now equipping pupils well in the basic skills for their future well-being. 3 Inspection Report: Pitsford Primary School, 22 November 2005 to 22 November 2005

p.5

Grade: 2

A couple of years ago, it was identified that teaching and learning were not good enough. The departure of an experienced teacher, coupled with frequent changes in senior staff, contributed to this picture. Pupils’ learning suffered and standards dropped. The present acting headteacher then introduced several remedies, based on observations and feedback, strong management of performance and the development of strong partnerships with the local authority and the involvement of governors. Teaching and learning are now good. Each class is relatively small, so teachers and teaching assistants know their pupils very well and are sensitive to signs that pupils have not understood or are lacking the confidence to progress. As a result, teachers adapt planning quickly to meet changing circumstances, according to pupils’ ages and prior knowledge. This pattern includes the teaching of pupils with learning difficulties

p.6

Grade: 2

and the young children in the Reception class, who benefit from the knowledgeable support of their nursery nurse. The use of monitoring and assessment in the school’s mixed-age classes has recently improved considerably, adding an increasingly systematic dimension to this picture. Learning is therefore well focused on what is needed to help pupils develop skills and to build knowledge as they move through the school.

p.6

Grade: 3

Teachers provide an interesting curriculum. All subjects of the National Curriculum, religious education and other statutory elements are planned satisfactorily. Whilst many subjects, especially literacy and numeracy, have good plans of work, provision in a few - art and design and history are examples - is not fully up to date with the latest ideas about linking the body of knowledge and skills across the curriculum. This means that opportunities for cross-curricular work are sometimes missed. The previous weakness in ICT has been addressed and the use of interactive whiteboards is a good feature. In the Reception class, the curriculum in all areas of learning meets the needs of children well. The school offers pupils a good variety of enrichment activities that help their learning. They participate enthusiastically in a wide range of lunchtime clubs. These clubs are often run by Year 6 pupils, who are full of anecdotes and praise for the achievements

p.6

Grade: 3

of their younger members. Visits and visitors further add to pupils’ experience and enjoyment.

p.6

Grade: 2

A parent governor commented that the school’s motto, ‘Pitsford is a caring and sharing school’, has always been its aim, but that she now believes ‘…it is realised’. Care of 4 Inspection Report: Pitsford Primary School, 22 November 2005 to 22 November 2005 pupils is indeed good and everyone is now sharing a common purpose of providing strong guidance and support. The inclusion of vulnerable pupils in the school’s good family atmosphere is strong, which ensures their happiness and positive contribution. Attendance procedures are rigorous and well focused on improving a previous rise in absences. With parents’ support, behaviour management is especially strong and adds to purposeful learning. Health and safety procedures are developing well and there are no significant areas of concern. Child protection arrangements are in line with local guidelines. The assessment, monitoring and tracking of pupils are satisfactory and

p.6

Grade: 2

have contributed well to recent improvement in pupils’ achievement. Pupils with learning difficulties have action plans that are tailored to their individual needs.

p.7

Grade: 2

Leadership and management are good. The acting headteacher is proving to be a very good leader. Parents, staff, governors and pupils alike all report that they feel united in a purposeful and sustainable drive to reverse an unstable recent past. The inspection has confirmed this view. Spasmodic improvement since the last inspection has been turned into ongoing, secure progress. The determination of governors to keep abreast of developments is a strong contributory factor. The chair and vice-chair are well informed and are thinking strategically about what has been most effective in bringing about change. Their purpose is to work with the acting headteacher to build good practice firmly into the school’s future. The impact of this drive is very obvious in the good quality of teaching and the sharp recent rise in standards and progress through the school. Parents are overwhelmingly supportive of what is being done to eliminate

p.7

Grade: 2

any underachievement. Staffing is more stable than has been the case recently, which contributes more effectively to the management of subjects. Provision for special educational needs is sound and coordination of work in the Reception year is strong. Leaders and managers have ensured that the school has made good progress recently. It is well placed to improve further, because self-evaluation has proved accurate and effective, concentrating on a manageable programme of key improvements. 5 Inspection Report: Pitsford Primary School, 22 November 2005 to 22 November 2005 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Pitsford Primary School, 22 November 2005 to 22 November 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 1 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Pitsford Primary School Moulton Road Pitsford Northamptonshire NN6 9AU 22 November 2005 Dear Children Thank you for being so welcoming when Mr Wood and I visited your school. We think that you are making good progress. We were very pleased to see how hard you and your teachers are working to help you achieve this. We thoroughly enjoyed being in your school and coming to your lessons. We thought that you behaved outstandingly well. We especially enjoyed chatting with you about your work. You were all very helpful and polite. What we like most about your school •Your acting headteacher and the staff are working very successfully to help you reach the expected levels of work. •You work very sensibly in your lessons. •Many of you enjoy school and you do a lot of things to help it run smoothly – ‘Bring a Brush Day’ sounded very productive, as well as great fun, and the buddies and school council are other examples. •Your teachers help you to feel safe and sound.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

What we have asked your acting headteacher, the staff and the school’s governors to do next •To make sure that they check everything about the school all the time, including your progress, so any weaknesses can be put right straight away. •To see that what they teach you is fully up to date with latest ideas, including education about the cultures of people from backgrounds and countries that are different from your own. We hope that you will always be proud of your school and wish you well in the future. Yours sincerely John William Paull Lead Inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion