Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Scotter Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
8 Jun 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Kathleen Yates LI
- Achievement verified
Good
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Good
- Postcode verified
DN21 3RY
- Name on report verified
Scotter Primary School
- URN verified
120473
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- AchievementGood
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumGood
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teaching and learning are good overall and pupils make good progress, achieving standards by Year 6 which are consistently and exceptionally high compared with national averages. p.4
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.9
- Your behaviour is excellent and in lessons you listen carefully to your teachers and do all that is asked of you. p.11
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Most children in the Foundation Stage reach at least the expected levels and many reach above average standards in personal, social and emotional development, in speaking, listening and in reading. p.4
- Overall their achievement is satisfactory. p.4
- Achievement by pupils in Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2, including those with learning difficulties and disabilities, is good. p.4
- In the national tests in 2005, results were above national levels in reading, writing and mathematics at Year 2, where there were no significant differences in the performances of boys and girls. p.4
- In Year 6, standards were high in all the tests. p.4
- Results in science were particularly high. p.4
- They represent good improvement in the subject on the results at the time of the previous inspection when they were a cause for concern. p.4
- Analysis of these findings, and concerns over the lack of progress some p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,682
- about usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Scotter Primary School
p.1
120473 Unique Reference Number LINCOLNSHIRE LEA LEA 280823 Inspection number 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 Inspection dates Mrs. Kathleen Yates LI Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
High Street School address Primary Type of school DN21 3RY Community School category 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01724762259 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01724764453 Fax number 290 Number on roll Mrs.Ellie Hallam Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs. Heather Reid Headteacher 9 October 2000 Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 280823 7 June 2006 - 4 to 11 8 June 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
This is an above average sized school where mobility is a little higher than average. Nearly all pupils are White British. The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals and with learning difficulties and disabilities is below average. The proportion of pupils with statements of special educational needs is above average. Attainment on entry is slightly above average.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Scotter Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006
p.3
Grade: 2
Scotter School provides a good standard of education. In most respects this judgement matches the school's own view of its effectiveness. Teaching and learning are good overall and pupils make good progress, achieving standards by Year 6 which are consistently and exceptionally high compared with national averages. Teaching, learning and achievement are satisfactory in the Foundation Stage where standards are above average. The school's procedures for assessing pupils' work and for tracking their progress lack rigour so that it is difficult for teachers to measure pupils' achievement. Pupils' attitudes and personal development are good and this leads to the school's friendly ethos. Parents are pleased with the education their children receive and pupils are very happy. Pupils' behaviour is excellent. The curriculum is good and extra activities enhance pupils' learning well. The care, guidance and support given to all pupils,
p.4
Grade: 2
including those with learning difficulties and disabilities, are good. There are good links with other organisations to promote the well-being of learners. While leadership and management overall are satisfactory, some subject leaders are not carrying out their role effectively. Improvements since the last inspection have been satisfactory. There has been very good improvement in the standards pupils reach in science, but the recommendation to improve provision in the Foundation Stage remains an area to be addressed. The school has good capacity to improve further and provides good value for money.
p.4
Grade: 8
- Provide children in the Foundation Stage with an exciting curriculum where they are actively involved in making choices. - Establish clear and consistent assessment procedures so that all staff have ready and regular access to information about the progress pupils make. - Establish rigorous procedures for monitoring and evaluation by subject leaders so that they know what is happening in their subjects.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
Most children in the Foundation Stage reach at least the expected levels and many reach above average standards in personal, social and emotional development, in speaking, listening and in reading. Overall their achievement is satisfactory. Their progress in reading is good. Achievement by pupils in Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2, including those with learning difficulties and disabilities, is good. In the national tests in 2005, results were above national levels in reading, writing and mathematics at Year 2, where there were no significant differences in the performances of boys and girls. In Year 6, standards were high in all the tests. Results in science were particularly high. They represent good improvement in the subject on the results at the time of the previous inspection when they were a cause for concern. Boys outperformed girls significantly. Analysis of these findings, and concerns over the lack of progress some
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
girls make in mathematics at Key Stage 2 have led to the school taking appropriate action in an attempt to meet their needs. Pupils did least well last year in English where 2 Inspection Report: Scotter Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 the school did not meet its targets in writing. The school contested these results, believing them to be an inaccurate reflection of the writing ability of those children. Their views have been confirmed by external investigations.
p.4
Grade: 2
Most children in the Foundation Stage reach at least the expected levels and many reach above average standards in personal, social and emotional development, in speaking, listening and in reading. Overall their achievement is satisfactory. Their progress in reading is good. Achievement by pupils in Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2, including those with learning difficulties and disabilities, is good. In the national tests in 2005, results were above national levels in reading, writing and mathematics at Year 2, where there were no significant differences in the performances of boys and girls. In Year 6, standards were high in all the tests. Results in science were particularly high. They represent good improvement in the subject on the results at the time of the previous inspection when they were a cause for concern. Boys outperformed girls significantly. Analysis of these findings, and concerns over the lack of progress some
p.5
Grade: 2
girls make in mathematics at Key Stage 2 have led to the school taking appropriate action in an attempt to meet their needs. Pupils did least well last year in English where the school did not meet its targets in writing. The school contested these results, believing them to be an inaccurate reflection of the writing ability of those children. Their views have been confirmed by external investigations.
p.5
Grade: 2
Pupils' personal development and well-being are good. The school is an orderly community where pupils feel safe. They understand the importance of a healthy lifestyle. Pupils speak proudly about the school and enjoy the good range of activities. Behaviour is excellent. Pupils show a keen sense of self-discipline and consideration for others. Most pupils listen with interest and concentrate well. Attendance is above average. Older pupils contribute well to the school community and confidently undertake responsibilities. They regularly help to organise fund-raising activities. They speak enthusiastically about the range of clubs and other activities, including residential visits, which help them to develop important life skills. The school council provides pupils with a clear voice in the organisation of the school. The opportunity is missed for pupils to take a leading role in the management of the council. Pupils' spiritual,
p.5
Grade: 2
moral, social and cultural development is good. In personal, social and health education, pupils reflect on a wide range of issues affecting their own lives and the lives of others. The school prepares pupils well for the next stage in their education and for their future economic well-being. 3 Inspection Report: Scotter Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006
p.5
Grade: 2
The quality of teaching and learning is good overall. Teaching is consistently good in Years 1 to 6. Occasionally it is outstanding, when it is demanding but tempered with touches of humour that motivate the pupils to try hard. Teachers ask a good range of questions to move learning forward. Staff expect a lot of pupils and provide work that is challenging but generally appropriate, although at times the use of some recording formats limits the opportunity for pupils to set out their own ideas. Teachers of mixed age classes plan carefully to ensure there is a suitable level of challenge. Teaching in the Foundation Stage is satisfactory. However, sometimes activities are too formal for this age group, including the overuse of a large number of worksheets. The previous inspection identified the need to extend opportunities for the younger pupils to develop imagination and learn through exploring and experimenting, which the school has not
p.6
Grade: 2
fully addressed. The way in which the school tracks the progress the pupils make is satisfactory overall. The headteacher manages much of the assessment information. However, this is not familiar to or, therefore, used by all subject leaders or class teachers to refine planning in order to improve achievement further.
p.6
Grade: 2
The curriculum is good overall. It is broad and, with improvements since the last inspection, it is now well balanced. There are strengths in curriculum enrichment with a good range of lunchtime and after school activities. These are well attended and support personal development and learning well, including in sport. Teachers have worked successfully to enhance opportunities in science for pupils to plan, carry out and record their investigations. There are improving cross-curricular links in English and opportunities to extend writing skills through other subjects, but this could be developed further. The overuse of some commercial materials limits the development of open-ended problem solving and recording skills, for example, in mathematics. The curriculum for pupils in the Foundation Stage shows similar limitations with overly formal activities that do little to develop imagination and creativity. The school has
p.6
Grade: 2
made some improvements to the information and communication technology (ICT) curriculum and the new resources will further this improvement.
p.6
Grade: 2
This is a caring school that provides good quality care and support for its pupils. The staff are committed to the well-being of the children. Relationships are good. Child protection arrangements are robust and staff receive regular training. Risk assessments are monitored carefully. Pupils regard the school as a safe place where they can do well. Good procedures are followed to deal with the rare cases of bullying or 4 Inspection Report: Scotter Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 unacceptable behaviour. The school effectively identifies pupils with learning difficulties and gives them the support they need to make good progress. Pupils' individual targets are set regularly and this challenges them to want to learn. Teachers have their own effective systems for the day-to-day assessment of pupils' progress. However, the absence of formal whole school monitoring procedures leads to inconsistencies in how
p.6
Grade: 2
effectively pupils' overall longer-term progress can be guided or supported.
p.7
Grade: 3
The inspection agrees with the school's own evaluation that leadership and management are currently satisfactory. The headteacher has a clear vision for the school and what it needs to do to improve. She knows her staff and pupils well and parents are very happy with the way the school is run. The headteacher ensures there are equal opportunities for all children including those in mixed age classes. While the leadership of the Foundation Stage is satisfactory, the recommendations of the last report to bring about improvements have not been fully implemented and progress in this area has been too slow. The current level of resources for ICT falls short of government recommendations and this limits the progress pupils make in the subject. This is to be addressed in the coming term along with relevant training for all staff. Because of the headteacher's hard work the school is doing well. The school's self-evaluation
p.7
Grade: 3
arrangements are satisfactory overall, but it is not making the most efficient use of subject leaders to check how well it is doing and raise standards further. They are not sufficiently involved in regular and rigorous monitoring and evaluation of teaching and learning. The school improvement plan has recognised the need to develop this aspect of leadership and management. Governance is good. Governors are supportive of the school; they recognise the strengths and weaknesses and question decisions well. 5 Inspection Report: Scotter Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 .
p.7
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Scotter Primary School, 7 June 2006 to 8 June 2006
p.8
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
learners?
NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 1 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 1 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.9
and supporting all learners?
NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.10
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.10
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
As you know, a team of inspectors came to your school recently to carry out an inspection. This letter is to thank you for the warm welcome you gave us, for helping us with our work and to let you know what we found out about your school. This is what we liked about your school Your friendly manner and politeness made our visit a pleasure. Your behaviour is excellent and in lessons you listen carefully to your teachers and do all that is asked of you. All the adults care for you well and keep you safe. You look after one another well. You have achieved very good results, especially in science. This is what we have asked the school to do now We have asked the school to provide the very youngest children with more exciting activities and to let the children make choices in their work. We have asked teachers who are subject leaders to make regular checks on the progress you make so that they have a clear understanding of how
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
well you are doing. The school has also been asked to improve the way it records the progress you have made. We hope you will continue to enjoy going to Scotter School and wish you all the best for the future.
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion