Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Merrydale Infant School

Inspected 3 May 2006 · published 24 May 2006 · URN 120023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 May 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Doris Bell

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    LE5 0PL

  • Name on report verified

    Merrydale Infant School

  • URN verified

    120023

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Positivemore positive than 21% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelysuccessfullyexceptionallyoutstandingpositivesuccessfuleffectiveexcellent
Criticismnot yetweaknessesnot alwaysinadequatelowpoorstrugglemissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1197w+74
  • What needs to improve1351w+65

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,509
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%What needs to improve 53%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Merrydale Infant School

p.1

120023 Unique Reference Number Leicester City LEA 280711 Inspection number 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006 Inspection dates Doris Bell AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Claydon Road School address Infant Type of school Leicester Community School category Leicestershire LE5 0PL 3 to 7 Age range of pupils 0116 2767593 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0116 2761116 Fax number 290 Number on roll Mrs Joan Chadd Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Keith Lishman Headteacher 19 June 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 280711 2 May 2006 - 3 to 7 3 May 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This large infant and nursery school serves an area that has very many social and economic disadvantages. A number of key features have changed since the last inspection. A large proportion of children now come from minority ethnic backgrounds and there are thirteen different languages spoken. Movement in and out of the school is very high and many children arrive with little or no knowledge of English. Most children’s attainment is very low when they start school. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties is well above average.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Merrydale Infant School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school. It has met well the challenges posed by the changed nature of its intake. The quality of teaching is good. As a result, although standards are low in Year 2, children’s progress is good. The information gained from the school’s good assessment procedures is used effectively in planning and target setting. However, children’s understanding of how to reach their targets is not yet wholly secure throughout the school. This limits the usefulness of the targets. The quality of provision is good in the Foundation Stage. Children who find learning difficult for whatever reason make good progress in relation to their targets. High levels of care, support and guidance ensure that almost all children are successfully enabled to learn and develop, personally and academically. The outstanding work of the ‘Nurture Group’ is particularly successful in supporting the most vulnerable children.

p.4

Grade: 2

Within this positive picture, a small number of children who are capable of reaching higher levels do not always do so. This is because they are sometimes left to work for too long on their own without direct help from the teacher. Effective leadership and management keep everyone focused on raising achievement. The school knows its strengths and weaknesses and its own evaluation of its work is accurate and perceptive. It has successfully addressed all of the issues from the previous inspection. This, the commitment of the staff and the way they have faced up to new challenges demonstrate that the school has the capacity to improve further. It provides good value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Provide more direct support for higher attainers in lessons in order to raise the numbers of pupils reaching higher levels. • Help all children to understand their targets and how to achieve them.

p.4

Grade: 2

The children’s good achievement is the result of effective teaching and good leadership and management. These have successfully enabled the school to meet the unique challenges it faces. Standards in reading, writing and mathematics, though improving, are still low in Year 2. The children’s initially poor grasp of the English language hinders their learning as they struggle to understand the meaning behind a written text or to solve word problems. Nevertheless, they quickly acquire social English and, by Year 2, have a greater understanding of the language and its use. The majority reach the point where they are well placed to catch up with what they have previously been unable to do. The strong emphasis placed on helping them to listen carefully and acquire a secure range of spoken vocabulary is improving their ability to read and write. 2 Inspection Report: Merrydale Infant School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006

p.4

Grade: 2

The school works very hard to reach the challenging targets it sets itself. It missed its targets last year because significant numbers of pupils left and others arrived in Year 2. Secure assessment data and the meticulous recording of pupils’ progress show that there is good improvement, no matter at what point a child comes to the school, and whatever their background. However, the data also shows that a small number of pupils capable of reaching higher levels do not always do so. The school’s involvement in an Intensive Support Programme has identified this and good strategies are in place to remedy the situation.

p.5

Grade: 2

Personal development, including spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, is good. Attendance is satisfactory. The school does all it can to encourage good attendance but the level of unauthorised absence is still relatively high. Children behave well and develop good attitudes to school, to learning, and towards each other. Relationships are good throughout the school. Children feel safe. They care for each other and are confident about approaching friends and adults for help and support. Play and lunchtimes are positive experiences, aided by a successful ‘buddy’ system, games equipment and the blue ‘friendship seat’. Children very much appreciate the rewards for good behaviour, effort and hard work and are proud to receive their wrist bands from the headteacher. They have a good understanding of what makes a healthy lifestyle because the school promotes this well. Children reflect and consider the

p.5

Grade: 2

feelings and beliefs of others. Though literacy and numeracy levels are comparatively low, good social skills are effectively fostered from an early age, as are independence skills. For example, Reception children register themselves using the interactive whiteboard, and throughout the school, children show good levels of self-confidence, working on their own or in groups. Thus they are adequately prepared for the future.

p.5

Grade: 2

Good planning, which is evaluated well and based on accurate assessments of children’s progress, results in good teaching and learning. The very effective use of highly skilled teaching assistants, several of whom speak a variety of languages, ensures that pupils who find learning difficult, for whatever reason, can participate equally well in all parts of a lesson. Occasionally, however, higher-attaining pupils are left to work on their own for too long and this limits their progress. Teachers very effectively involve all pupils in whole-class sessions. They are very skilled at helping pupils to speak and listen, explaining unfamiliar vocabulary and involving all pupils in question-and-answer sessions. The very good relationships within each class give children the confidence to ask the meaning of words and phrases they do not understand. Techniques such as ‘talking partners’ are used very successfully, giving

p.5

Grade: 2

3 Inspection Report: Merrydale Infant School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006 children time to articulate their thoughts before answering a question. The technique was also used very effectively in one lesson to encourage children to improve the quality of each other’s writing. A particular strength, much appreciated by parents, is the way teachers very successfully use a nurturing approach to foster good behaviour and attitudes.

p.5

Grade: 2

A well-founded curriculum supports the needs of the children well. It provides a good framework for teaching and learning and very strongly promotes speaking and listening skills in all subjects. Work is under way to promote reading, writing and numeracy equally strongly in other subjects but this is not yet fully in place. A good range of visits and visitors enriches the curriculum and provides pupils with many worthwhile additional learning experiences. The good programme for personal and social education is particularly successful in helping children to understand each other, and to begin to understand and become part of the different culture in which many now reside. The well-structured curriculum for the Foundation Stage gives children a good start in their education. There is good provision for children with learning difficulties or disabilities, and for children whose first language is not English.

p.6

Grade: 2

Care, guidance and support are good. Health and safety procedures are fully in place and child protection procedures are good. The outstanding work of the ‘Nurture Group’ successfully enables the most vulnerable children to take a full part in all that the school has to offer. High levels of personal care, guidance and support are given to all children. This very effectively supports learning and personal development. The school uses external agencies well and very successfully involves parents in helping their children to learn. For example, parents remain in school to read with their children at the start of the day. This builds their understanding of how to help their children at home and contributes to the children’s improving progress. Children and their parents are well supported at whatever point they start school. Good links with the junior school ease transition to the next stage of education. The

p.6

Grade: 2

school tracks pupils’ academic progress well and sets targets accordingly. However, the process of involving children in assessment and target setting is not yet consistent throughout the school. This limits the effectiveness of targets as a means of guiding children and accelerating their learning.

p.6

Grade: 2

Good leadership and management keep the school highly focused on improving achievement and raising standards. Staff and parents speak very highly of the 4 Inspection Report: Merrydale Infant School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006 headteacher’s excellent support for them and for the children. They share his exceptionally clear vision of how to improve the school and know that their contributions are valued. This is reflected in the overwhelmingly positive response to the inspection questionnaire. The headteacher is very ably supported by the new senior management team, all of whom have a very good understanding of their different roles and responsibilities. This very successfully ensures that all children are fully included in all that the school has to offer. The school’s rigorous systems for checking how well it is doing ensure that it has an accurate view of its strengths and weaknesses. This is helping it to move forward.

p.6

Grade: 2

Performance management systems are good. The links between targets, well-considered whole-school priorities and staff training are clear. Governance is satisfactory. Governors support the school well but they rely heavily on the headteacher for information. Their own role in checking the school’s work is improving but not yet fully developed. Nevertheless, the school has moved forward considerably since the last inspection and clearly has the capacity to improve further. 5 Inspection Report: Merrydale Infant School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Merrydale Infant School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 4 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

We very much enjoyed visiting your school. It was lovely to talk to you and to find out how well you are doing. I have asked Mr Lishman to read this letter to you. There are lots of good things about your school. Here are some of them: • Your teachers do their very best to help you learn as well as you can. • You behave well and are kind and helpful to each other. • Your headteacher runs the school very well. He listens carefully to what you and your parents think. • All the staff work very hard to make the school better every day for you. We have asked your school to work at two things to try to help you to learn even more. These are: • making sure that those of you who learn faster, get enough help to do so at all times • helping you to understand what your targets are and what you have to do to achieve them. We hope that you will always enjoy learning as you grow up. Yours sincerely Doris Bell Lead inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion