Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
St Mary's Catholic Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Feb 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Jackie Barnes
- Achievement verified
Good
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Good
- Name on report verified
Lea St Mary's Catholic Primary School
- URN verified
119634
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- AchievementGood
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.9
- Pupils’ personal development is good; they enjoy school, are well behaved, keen to learn and attend well. p.4
- You trust your teachers to keep you safe, and most of you make good progress with your work. p.11
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve pupils’ progress in Years 3 and 4, so they can continue to achieve the good standards evident at the end of Year 2. p.4
- Identify more clearly in teachers’ planning the learning expected for pupils with different capabilities, so their progress towards their targets can be readily checked. p.4
- Build on the good practice in the early years to ensure the work of teaching assistants in Key Stage 2 makes a significant impact on pupils’ progress in lessons. p.4
- Although individual children vary in what they know and can do when they start school, overall they are about average for their age. p.4
- They make good progress and by the end of the reception year, almost all have achieved the goals for the age group with many exceeding these. p.4
- Good progress continues to be made in Year 1 and, by Year 2, the 2005 national test results showed that standards were above average in reading, writing and mathematics. p.4
- The most capable pupils achieved very well, especially in mathematics. p.4
- National test results for Year 6 pupils had declined over two years but recovered well in 2005 when overall results were a little above average. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,640
- about usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Lea St Mary's Catholic Primary School
p.1
119634 Unique Reference Number Lancashire LEA 280619 Inspection number 2 February 2006 to 3 February 2006 Inspection dates Mrs Jackie Barnes Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Darkinson Lane School address Primary Type of school Lea Town Voluntary aided School category Preston, Lancashire 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01772 729881 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01772 729801 Fax number 93 Number on roll Mrs Katherine Taylor Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Elizabeth Schofield Headteacher 1 July 2000 Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 280619 2 February 2006 - 4 to 11 3 February 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out over two days by an additional inspector.
p.3
Description of the school
This is a small school with four classes, situated close to the south western boundary of Preston. It serves the village of Lea Town and the surrounding area. The school is oversubscribed, and some pupils live nearby but most arrive by bus or car. Children start school in the Reception year with different skills and abilities, but overall the intake is about average. All pupils have English as their home language. Entitlement to free school meals is low. The school welcomes all pupils, and the number with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is about average.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Lea St Mary's Catholic Primary School, 2 February 2006 to 3 February 2006
p.3
Grade: 2
This is a good school. This judgement matches the school’s own evaluation. It is well managed and has a supportive, friendly atmosphere that encourages learning. Pupils are well cared for and feel safe. They make good progress when they start school and achieve well by the end of the Reception year and by Year 2. Many pupils continue to make good progress, with almost all achieving at least the expected standards for their age by Year 6. However, progress is too slow for a minority of pupils in Key Stage 2 who could achieve better standards. Teaching assistants support individual pupils well, and in the early years, their work benefits the learning of all the children. Pupils’ personal development is good; they enjoy school, are well behaved, keen to learn and attend well. Teaching is generally good, although written planning for pupils’ learning is not precise enough. Assessment information is used well to ensure good support
p.4
Grade: 2
for most pupils. Value for money is good. The school has significantly improved all the areas identified in the last inspection and has the capacity to improve further. not applicable
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Improve pupils’ progress in Years 3 and 4, so they can continue to achieve the good standards evident at the end of Year 2. • Identify more clearly in teachers’ planning the learning expected for pupils with different capabilities, so their progress towards their targets can be readily checked. • Build on the good practice in the early years to ensure the work of teaching assistants in Key Stage 2 makes a significant impact on pupils’ progress in lessons.
p.4
Grade: 2
Pupils’ achievement is good overall. Although individual children vary in what they know and can do when they start school, overall they are about average for their age. They make good progress and by the end of the reception year, almost all have achieved the goals for the age group with many exceeding these. Good progress continues to be made in Year 1 and, by Year 2, the 2005 national test results showed that standards were above average in reading, writing and mathematics. The most capable pupils achieved very well, especially in mathematics. National test results for Year 6 pupils had declined over two years but recovered well in 2005 when overall results were a little above average. The number of pupils taking the tests in 2005 was small and so the performance of a single pupil could make a substantial difference to results. Nonetheless, the best results were in English and science where all pupils achieved at least the level expected for their age and over half
p.4
Grade: 2
achieved the higher level in science. The results in mathematics were average, which was an improvement on the previous year, but did not reach the targets set by the school. 2 Inspection Report: Lea St Mary's Catholic Primary School, 2 February 2006 to 3 February 2006 The overall results indicate that in 2005 pupils made average progress from Year 2 to Year 6. Currently, work in lessons, in pupils’ books and the school’s records indicate that progress varies through Key Stage 2. Many pupils make good overall progress in basic skills, especially those with learning difficulties and disabilities, and the most capable pupils. The small number of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds and looked after children also make good progress, and some are high achievers. In Years 3 and 4 pupils’ overall progress tends to slow, and a few pupils across the ability range make less progress than expected, especially in mathematics and writing. Progress
p.4
Grade: 2
accelerates in Years 5 and 6, with the older pupils working well towards meeting their challenging targets for 2006.
p.5
Grade: 2
Personal development is good. Pupils have very positive attitudes to learning, enjoy school and attend well. They are confident, have respect for themselves and others, and behave very well. They know about things that lead to healthy lifestyles, including the dangers of drug misuse and the importance of personal relationships. They feel safe in their school, know how to avoid conflict and trust the staff to listen to any concerns or ideas. They use their growing independence and leadership skills well when given the opportunity. Overall, this creates a positive family atmosphere which supports learning effectively and successfully develops the skills and understanding needed for pupils’ future well being. Their social, moral, spiritual and cultural development is good, and well supported by the faith community. Pupils are also involved in the wider community, with concerts and fundraising. They are able to
p.5
Grade: 2
compare their own circumstances with those of others of their age around the world, including the advantages of other ways of life.
p.5
Grade: 2
Teaching and learning are good. Staff have supportive relationships with their pupils that help them to achieve. Literacy and numeracy are taught systematically. Lessons are well prepared, have a brisk pace, and maintain pupils’ interest. Learning is enhanced considerably by pupils’ positive attitudes, their sense of fun and willingness to cooperate with each other. Sometimes, the introduction to lessons is too prolonged and their enthusiasm wanes. They learn particularly well when involved in practical work, especially in information and communication technology (ICT). However, in most lessons pupils are keen to participate and eager to answer questions. Teachers know their pupils’ strengths and weaknesses and make good use of opportunities during group work to reinforce teaching points for individual pupils. This approach generally works well in encouraging progress, although the teachers’ assessment of what pupils
p.5
Grade: 2
with different capabilities are intended to achieve is rarely identified in their written planning. As a result, it is difficult for the school to check regularly that pupils are 3 Inspection Report: Lea St Mary's Catholic Primary School, 2 February 2006 to 3 February 2006 making consistent progress towards their targets, especially on the rare occasions when pupils have been taught by several different supply teachers as in the Year 3 and 4 class. The planning of teaching and learning in the Reception year is very thorough. It is closely linked to the assessment of individual children’s needs and supports the good progress of all pupils, with teaching assistants having a clear role to play. A similar approach for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities enables them to achieve suitably high standards throughout the school. In Key Stage 2, teaching assistants are not always used to best advantage in promoting pupils’
p.5
Grade: 2
learning, especially when the introduction to lessons is lengthy.
p.6
Grade: 2
The curriculum is good. Particularly effective is the impact of improved resources for ICT on pupils’ skills and confidence, such as pupils in Years 5 and 6 receiving their homework and discussing their progress with their teacher on-line. Due attention is given to providing lessons and experiences so pupils learn how to keep themselves safe and healthy. Learning is enhanced by visits to places of interest and by visitors to school, which pupils talk about with enthusiasm. A good range of clubs and after school activities for pupils in Key Stage 2 contribute to their self confidence and social and leadership skills. Pupils appreciate the extended time for work in subjects such as history and geography, which enables them to study in greater depth and complete their work carefully. The school is still at the early stages of identifying gifted and talented pupils. Good provision is made for pupils with learning difficulties and/or
p.6
Grade: 2
disabilities, and many achieve the levels expected for their age.
p.6
Grade: 2
Pupils are well cared for and protected by the attention of staff and safety procedures that are well known and regularly checked. Relationships are warm and supportive and help pupils to feel safe enough to be adventurous in expressing their ideas and in their physical activities. Work in lessons and day to day examples encourage healthy lifestyles and self esteem. Pupils appreciate being part of a school family and look forward to being with their friends. In general, they are successfully encouraged to work towards high standards through targets and personal praise. Pupils of all ages respond well when allowed to work independently, and many have the personal skills to do more of this. The good links with secondary schools encourage older pupils to be well informed and confident about the next stage of their education.
p.6
Grade: 2
Leadership and management are good. The school is well led by a capable and experienced headteacher, supported by a well trained governing body, and has the confidence of its parents. This is a small school, with all staff carrying extensive 4 Inspection Report: Lea St Mary's Catholic Primary School, 2 February 2006 to 3 February 2006 responsibilities. They fulfil these well, ensuring pupils’ personal development is successfully promoted, new ideas are introduced and National Curriculum subjects are kept under regular review. Information and data on pupils’ attainment and progress are thoroughly interrogated and used well to identify areas for improvement and individual pupils who need support. This works well for most pupils, but is not yet fully effective for those who are gifted or talented. There are sound procedures for self-evaluation, which include the views of parents and pupils, and clear priorities for
p.6
Grade: 2
improvement are supported by suitable action plans. The school has a good record for making improvements, including to accommodation and resources, and curriculum development with national initiatives, such as the focus on healthy lifestyles, is successfully taken into account. The school’s evaluation procedures accurately identified the need to raise standards and accelerate the progress of pupils in Key Stage 2. National test results have significantly improved but, despite the school’s efforts, the progress of some pupils in Years 3 and 4 is still affected by having several supply teachers. It is a challenging situation for a small school, although determination to minimise the impact on pupils is strong. Further support for learning in these year groups is due to be implemented very soon, including keeping a closer check on progress. 5 Inspection Report: Lea St Mary's Catholic Primary School, 2 February 2006 to 3 February 2006
p.7
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Lea St Mary's Catholic Primary School, 2 February 2006 to 3 February 2006
p.8
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
learners?
NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 2 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.9
and supporting all learners?
NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.10
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.10
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Mrs Elizabeth Schofield Lea St Mary's Catholic Primary School Darkinson Lane Lea Town Preston Lancashire PR4 0RJ 4 February 2006 Dear Children Thank you for making me so welcome when I visited your school. You helped me to see how much you enjoy school and appreciate your friends. You behave well and look after each other. You trust your teachers to keep you safe, and most of you make good progress with your work. Your school makes sure you have opportunities for sport and you enjoy the clubs and visits to places of interest. Your teachers take care to make sure you learn well, and they look for ways to make school better. I have asked them to help you to make quicker progress before you transfer to your secondary school, and to use all they know about your work to help them to do this. I enjoyed my visit to St Mary’s very much, and send my best wishes to you all. Yours faithfully J M Barnes Lead inspector
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion