Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Francis Catholic Primary School, GoosnarghOfsted inspection, 5 Jul 2006

Inspected 5 Jul 2006 · published 21 Jul 2006 · URN 119633

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Ofsted inspected St Francis Catholic Primary School, Goosnargh on 5 Jul 2006, led by Jennie Platt. The overall judgement was Good. Ofsted published the report on 21 Jul 2006. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Jul 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jennie Platt

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Outstanding

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Outstanding

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PR3 2FJ

  • URN verified

    119633

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportOutstanding
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentOutstanding
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+83Very positivemore positive than 65% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentvery wellmake good progresseffectivelyexceptionallypositiveconsistently
Criticismlackinadequateseriouslimitedbelowlownot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1313w+89
  • What needs to improve1499w+77

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,775
about usual (typical 2677)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%What needs to improve 53%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

119633 Unique Reference Number Lancashire LEA 280618 Inspection number 4 July 2006 to 5 July 2006 Inspection dates Mrs Jennie Platt Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

The Hill School address Primary Type of school Horns Lane Voluntary aided School category Goosnargh, Preston PR3 2FJ 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01772 865369 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01772 863947 Fax number 91 Number on roll Mr Harry Phayre Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Moira Barron Headteacher 1 May 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 280618 4 July 2006 - 4 to 11 5 July 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a smaller than average school where pupils are taught in four mixed age classes. The school is in a beautiful rural setting and serves a socially and economically advantaged area. No pupils take a free school meal. Very few pupils are from minority ethnic groups and no pupils need help in speaking English. An above average proportion of pupils have learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Attainment on entry varies because of the small number of pupils involved but is slightly above average.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St Francis Catholic Primary School, Goosnargh, 4 July 2006 to 5 July 2006

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school with some outstanding features. It provides good value for money. The school is held in high esteem by parents who are appreciative of the very high quality of care that makes this such a welcoming and friendly school. The school provides extremely well for pupils’ personal development. Excellent partnership with external agencies and the support from teaching assistants make a very good contribution to this provision, especially in guiding those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Teaching is good and, consequently, pupils make good progress. Results in national tests as pupils leave school show standards have been consistently high. Test results in Key Stage 1 are above average and show good achievement. Provision in the Foundation Stage is good and children achieve well with many of them exceeding the standard expected for their age. The curriculum is rich and enhanced by a very good

p.4

Grade: 2

variety of clubs, visits and visitors. The children in the Foundation Stage enjoy practical activities but the small classroom and organisation makes it difficult for them to work independently and to have full access to role play. Leadership and management are good. The headteacher is an outstanding leader and has sustained high standards in the school. The focus has correctly been on numeracy and literacy, which are well managed by the headteacher and the assistant headteacher. The monitoring role in other subjects is less well developed. The school is not complacent and eagerly embraces change. Consequently, the school is very well placed to improve further.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Improve the curriculum for the children in the Foundation Stage. • Extend the role of the subject managers in checking teaching and learning and setting targets.

p.4

Grade: 2

Achievement is good overall. Test results over recent years make it very clear that pupils leave school with high standards. When children enter Reception, their ability varies but overall is slightly above average. In response to good teaching they make good progress and, by the end of the Reception class, the majority reach and many exceed the expected learning goals for their age. They achieve very well in personal and social skills, providing a firm base for learning as they move to Year 1. Results of national tests at the end of Year 2 fluctuate because of the small numbers involved but are generally above average. Mathematics gained the highest results in 2005 because of the high number of pupils reaching above average levels. The evidence from inspection is that pupils of all abilities are suitably challenged and make good progress. 2 Inspection Report: St Francis Catholic Primary School, Goosnargh, 4 July 2006 to 5 July 2006

p.4

Grade: 2

Good progress in Key Stage 2 means pupils consistently perform very well in national tests at the end of Year 6. The school is not complacent and challenging targets are met. Last year’s focus was on increasing the proportion of pupils reaching above average levels in English and mathematics. Recent test results show this aim has been fulfilled. The school has a deserved reputation for its support for helping pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities to make good progress.

p.5

Grade: 1

Outstanding personal development makes a major contribution to the high standards achieved. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is outstanding. This school’s ethos is rooted in its Catholic faith. Pupils respect each other and give serious thought to how they can help others. Moral and social development is very strong and parents and pupils insist this is a happy school because all are welcoming and respectful. Relationships are very good and, consequently, pupils enjoy school and attendance is good. Behaviour is excellent and pupils work hard. Year 6 pupils are mature and sensible and have sustained a sense of enthusiasm for all that is offered to them. Pupils have a very good knowledge of keeping safe and healthy. Many join in the early morning ‘wake up, shake up’ activities that they say get them going for the day. With support from visitors, pupils gain a thorough understanding of the dangers of drugs

p.5

Grade: 1

and alcohol. Pupils play an excellent role in this close-knit community. They share their talents by entering in local craft shows and eagerly raise funds for charities. Pupils’ confidence in numeracy and literacy, enhanced by opportunities to manage the school shop, prepares pupils very well for the future.

p.5

Grade: 2

Teaching and learning are good and include many positive features. Lessons are managed well so that pupils learn in an orderly environment. Relationships are warm and friendly with much joshing which makes lessons enjoyable. Other strengths include the effective use of questioning both to assess previous learning and to extend knowledge. This skill is used very effectively in numeracy lessons when teachers draw from pupils their methods of calculation so that all learn from each other. The good variety of activities and resources used capture pupils’ interest so they want to learn. The school has focused on extending the use of information and communication technology (ICT), and computers are used effectively to support learning. Some outstanding teaching was seen in Year 6 where the pace was brisk and expectations high. Much is achieved in the final year in school. On occasions in other classes, time

p.5

Grade: 2

is not used well and teachers talk too much so that there is not enough time for activity. Teaching in the Foundation Stage is good with an array of activities available, although 3 Inspection Report: St Francis Catholic Primary School, Goosnargh, 4 July 2006 to 5 July 2006 some tasks are too directed by staff so that children do not have the chance to come up with their own ideas. Marking is thorough with good examples in Year 6 of comments that enable pupils to take the next step in their learning.

p.5

Grade: 2

The curriculum is good with some very good features. Teachers plan carefully to meet the needs of the different ages and abilities in their classes. Use of literacy, numeracy and ICT in other subjects is very good. Personal, social and health education includes practical activities and drama so that important messages are acted upon in the daily life of the school. A visiting musician and teacher of French add breadth to the pupils’ experiences. The Foundation Stage curriculum is satisfactory and is correctly based on all of the required areas of learning. However, the classroom is small and not organised efficiently to encourage independent learning. Creative development is not seen as being as important as other areas of learning, and the role play areas were underused during the inspection. These areas lack a clear focus because of the storage of old resources which restrict the use of better equipment. The hall is used for some

p.6

Grade: 2

activities but this entails moving resources daily and it is not as attractive an environment as the classroom. Support for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is good. Detailed individual education plans drawn up by teachers and pupils guide staff well and allow these pupils to play a full and active part in daily life. The range of after-school activities is very good. Pupils especially appreciate the sporting and music opportunities and look forward to taking part in the school’s famous drama productions. Many visits and visitors also enhance the curriculum.

p.6

Grade: 1

Care, guidance and support are outstanding. Thorough attention is given to pupils’ welfare and all required safety checks are carried out. Child protection procedures are rigorous and all staff are fully trained. Induction to school is very good both as children start and as they move on to secondary education. Year 6 pupils get a taster of secondary education as they work on tasks set by their next school, leading to a smooth transition. The school is quick to spot when additional help is needed and make prompt contact with professionals if a pupil needs support to overcome a personal difficulty. Excellent contact with parents and external agencies ensures that pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities have their very specific physical and academic needs fully met. Teachers assess pupils’ progress well and use assessment information effectively to plan work that matches pupils’ ability. They involve pupils in their own learning by

p.6

Grade: 1

setting targets and discussing with them how they are progressing. This is most effective with the older pupils and their clear understanding about how to improve has helped them to achieve high standards. 4 Inspection Report: St Francis Catholic Primary School, Goosnargh, 4 July 2006 to 5 July 2006

p.6

Grade: 2

Leadership and management are good. The headteacher has provided outstanding leadership over many years, ensuring the school sustains high standards as well as keeping the pupils’ personal development at the core of the school’s mission. Parents and pupils feel valued. As one parent was led to say, ‘The school works well with parents to give the children the best time within school.’ The headteacher has earned the admiration of all involved with the school. The self-evaluation process is good. The school’s accurate picture of its strengths and areas to develop leads to detailed plans for improvement which are having a positive impact, especially on standards in literacy, numeracy and ICT. Management of literacy and numeracy is good. Other subject leaders, including leadership of the Foundation Stage, do not have a full grasp on standards and progress within the school. A review of their analysis of pupils’ work and their action plans shows a lack of focus on what

p.7

Grade: 2

really needs attention to improve standards. Governance is good. Governors are well informed and involved in school. They are very aware of the importance of increasing numbers and plans are in place to extend care at the start and end of the day as requested by parents. The school recognises the importance of staff development and the school has Investors in People status and pupils benefit from more experienced staff. These many strengths in leadership and management put the school in a strong position to move forward. 5 Inspection Report: St Francis Catholic Primary School, Goosnargh, 4 July 2006 to 5 July 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St Francis Catholic Primary School, Goosnargh, 4 July 2006 to 5 July 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 1 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 1 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 1 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 1 How well learners enjoy their education NA 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 1 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 1 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 1 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0207 421 6800 F 0207 421 6707 Ofsted helpline 08456 404045 To the pupils of: St Francis Catholic Primary School The Hill Horns Lane Goosnargh Preston Lancashire PR3 2FJ 6 July 2006 Dear Pupils Many thanks for the wonderful welcome you gave me when I visited your school. How lucky you are to learn in a good school in such a wonderful area. I will remember with great pleasure my stroll along your Millennium Walk. I appreciated everything you told me about your school and it has helped me to write this report. I agree that yours is a very friendly school and you behave very well and work hard. You told me you could not think of anything that you would change to make it better. I am glad you feel safe and I think the way the school looks after you all is excellent. You also know how to keep healthy as I saw when many of you took part in the ‘wake up, shake up’ sessions. I agree

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

teachers make your lessons interesting and this enables you to make good progress. Many of you and your parents told me how you will miss Mrs Barron when she retires and I agree she has been an outstanding leader. I have asked Mrs Barron and the governors to look at the experiences offered to the younger children especially because there is limited space in their classroom. The teachers are also working on ways to find out what needs to be done to improve your school. I hope you enjoyed your barbecue and other end of term activities. These will be just a few of the wonderful memories I am sure you will have of your time in school. I wish you well for the future. Yours sincerely Mrs J E Platt (Lead inspector)

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion