Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Burnley Ightenhill Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Oct 2005
- Inspectorssingle source
John Heap
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Satisfactory
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
BB12 6ED
- Name on report verified
Burnley Ightenhill Primary School
- URN verified
119264
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentSatisfactory
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- At the time of the last inspection the school was judged to have serious weaknesses. p.3
- The school’s previous designation as having serious weaknesses no longer applies. p.4
- The school has successfully tackled: most of the underachievement shown then by the higher attaining children; the weak management systems and procedures; and shortcomings in the planning of the curriculum. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inspectors agree with the school that achievement and standards are satisfactory. p.4
- Children enter the school with skills and aptitudes that are a little below average. p.4
- They make good progress in the Reception Year because of the effective teaching and lively programme. p.4
- Progress is steady through the infants and juniors. p.4
- By Year 6, standards are above average in reading, mathematics and science and children meet challenging 2 Inspection Report: Burnley Ightenhill Primary School, 3 October 2005 to 4 October 2005 targets. p.4
- Higher attaining children are achieving more in mathematics and science than they were at the time of the last inspection. p.4
- These successes are a great credit to the leadership and management; improvements in these subjects and in reading have come about because of the school’s strong focus on developing them. p.4
- Attainment in information and communication technology is average. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,753
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Burnley Ightenhill Primary School
p.1
119264 Unique Reference Number Lancashire LEA 280507 Inspection number 3 October 2005 to 4 October 2005 Inspection dates John Heap Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Alder Street School address Primary Type of school Burnley Community School category BB12 6ED 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01282 428246 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01282 839938 Fax number 333 Number on roll Frank Havard Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Melanie Darcy Headteacher 1 October 2003 Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 280507 3 October 2005 - 4 to 11 4 October 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by two additional inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
The school is large and located in a disadvantaged area. Very few children are from minority ethnic backgrounds and they all speak English. A below average number of children have learning disabilities and difficulties but the proportion with a Statement of Special Educational Need is well above average. The school has a Special Educational Resource Facility which draws children from a wider area than the locality. At the time of the last inspection the school was judged to have serious weaknesses. Since that time, the leadership and management of the school have changed frequently.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Burnley Ightenhill Primary School, 3 October 2005 to 4 October 2005
p.3
Grade: 3
The school’s previous designation as having serious weaknesses no longer applies. Inspectors judge the school to be satisfactory. The school‘s judgement about its overall effectiveness is good. This is more a correct reflection of the good progress they have made since the last inspection rather than its present level of effectiveness, overall. The school provides satisfactory value for money. Children benefit from a wide range of initiatives to include them in all that the school is doing. The school has successfully tackled: most of the underachievement shown then by the higher attaining children; the weak management systems and procedures; and shortcomings in the planning of the curriculum. The quality of assessment and marking has improved and is still being developed. These improvements have been brought about through the very strong partnership between the governing body, successive managers and local authority
p.4
Grade: 3
personnel. The school is well placed to continue improving. Children’s academic achievement and personal development are satisfactory. Children in the Reception Year make good progress and enter Year 1 with broadly average standards. This good start enables them to make satisfactory progress in the infants and juniors. As a result, standards in Year 6 are above average in reading, mathematics and science; and too low for the higher attaining children in writing. The quality of teaching is satisfactory and there are strengths in the Special Educational Resource Facility and in the reception class. Good monitoring procedures have ensured that the acting headteacher has a clear and accurate view of teaching quality. The school has done well to drive improvement at a time when the leadership and management have been highly unstable. Great credit is due to the joint actions of the school and local authority (LA).
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
Improve achievement and standards in writing, particularly for the higher attaining children, by: • increasing the amount and quality of writing in all other subjects; • making targets for improvement specific to individual children’s needs; and • improving marking so that it focuses clearly on individual writing targets and gives pupils clear guidance on how well they are moving towards them.
p.4
Grade: 3
Inspectors agree with the school that achievement and standards are satisfactory. Children enter the school with skills and aptitudes that are a little below average. They make good progress in the Reception Year because of the effective teaching and lively programme. Progress is steady through the infants and juniors. By Year 6, standards are above average in reading, mathematics and science and children meet challenging 2 Inspection Report: Burnley Ightenhill Primary School, 3 October 2005 to 4 October 2005 targets. Higher attaining children are achieving more in mathematics and science than they were at the time of the last inspection. These successes are a great credit to the leadership and management; improvements in these subjects and in reading have come about because of the school’s strong focus on developing them. Attainment in information and communication technology is average. Standards in writing are below average. The school understands that standards in
p.4
Grade: 3
writing should be higher, particularly for the higher attaining children. Children do well when the writing task is a brief one. Their difficulties come when the writing needs to be longer. There are two main factors: they do not do enough writing in other subjects; and individual targets set for children are too general and the marking of their work does not focus clearly on those targets. Children with learning disabilities and those in minority groups make satisfactory progress.
p.5
Grade: 3
Inspectors agree with the school’s view that personal development and behaviour are satisfactory, with some good features. Children like their school very much and enjoy their lessons, particularly geography, art and design, mathematics and physical education. Good levels of attendance reflect their enjoyment of school. Older children are eager to act as playground ‘buddies’, fruit monitors and secretaries. As well as being members of the school council, children have productive experiences of working to improve their own community. Staff and children have collaborated effectively through the school council to improve behaviour by devising the school rules. One parent writes, “My son’s role as school/class councillor has made him more aware of his behaviour and what is to be expected of him”. Children comment that some pupils do not always behave as well as they should, but are confident that staff quickly resolve
p.5
Grade: 3
any problems. Consequently, they feel safe in school, a view shared by parents. The school makes satisfactory provision for the spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of all children. They value the reward system and their self-esteem grows when their achievements are celebrated. They are caring towards others, particularly the children from the Special Educational Resource Facility. The Healthy Fruit Scheme has been received enthusiastically and the pupils understand the need to be healthy and act safely. Most basic skills are well developed. Writing skills need further development if they are to contribute effectively to the children’s future economic well-being.
p.5
Grade: 3
Inspectors confirm the school’s view that the quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory. The good quality monitoring by management and local authority officers has provided a clear and accurate picture of strengths and areas for development. 3 Inspection Report: Burnley Ightenhill Primary School, 3 October 2005 to 4 October 2005 There are examples of good practice: teaching is effective in the Foundation Stage and provides the children with interesting learning experiences; and in the Special Education Resource Facility it is consistently good. There are some outstanding features, such as the way learning activities are very closely matched to the needs of each individual child. Planning is much better than at the last inspection and teachers collaborate well so that children of the same age have equal access to the same programme. Good lessons are planned well, move along quickly and keep children interested and actively learning.
p.5
Grade: 3
Teaching assistants are used effectively to support children with learning disabilities. Improving assessment systems are helping staff track children’s progress and gather information to plan the next steps in learning. Targets are set but in writing they are not sufficiently specific to individual learning needs. Work is marked regularly but teachers’ comments do not usually refer directly to children’s targets or show them how they are progressing. Sometimes, children are given prepared answer sheets to complete and they lose an opportunity to develop their writing and plan their own responses.
p.6
Grade: 3
Inspectors agree that the curriculum is satisfactory. The school has successfully improved the curriculum and it provides a broad and balanced programme. In the Foundation Stage, learning is promoted effectively by the well planned and lively activities. The curriculum for children in the Special Education Resource Facility is planned in collaboration with the Foundation Stage staff and meets their needs well. Work is suitably adapted to match the needs of children with learning disabilities. The highest attaining and most talented children are encouraged to participate in more challenging activities and extend their learning. Children of all ages enjoy attending the extra-curricular activities the school provides, especially the sports clubs. The school is rightly very keen for all children to have the opportunity to join in these activities and some clubs are therefore held at lunchtimes. This enables younger children and those from the Special Educational Resource Facility
p.6
Grade: 3
Overall, inspectors agree with the school that care, welfare and guidance are satisfactory. Procedures and practices for welfare and safety are good, including those for attendance and child protection. Liaison with outside agencies is strong. As a result, children are confident and happy and this is a source of satisfaction to their parents. Children who are identified as being vulnerable are monitored effectively. Their academic and social needs are met. The school council is effective because it liaises well between management and pupils; and it consults on matters of school order and safety, such as rules for the playground. 4 Inspection Report: Burnley Ightenhill Primary School, 3 October 2005 to 4 October 2005 The tracking and monitoring of academic achievements are sound. Assessment procedures cover all groups of children. As a result, teachers have an improving understanding of their pupils’ progress. However, improvements are needed in
p.6
Grade: 3
target-setting for writing and in the quality of marking.
p.7
Grade: 2
The leadership and management of the school are good. Some parents are rightly concerned that the school has suffered a long period of instability and disruption. As one parent wrote, “Constant changes of head and the impact on the school staffing when teachers become acting or deputy heads is disruptive to the school”. Nevertheless, the vast majority of parents who contacted inspectors rightly think the school is led and managed well. The school knows its strengths and weaknesses and clear direction has been set in the face of very difficult circumstances. Procedures and practices for checking on the school’s work have been improved to meet the various challenges confronting the school. The governing body is robust and benefits from strong and informed leadership from the chair. As a result, the school has continued to move forward at a time when there have been four headteachers in two years. Financial management is satisfactory
p.7
Grade: 2
and prudent decisions are made about spending. The school has effective procedures and practices for ensuring that it gets value for money in its purchasing of supplies and services. This instability has been steadied by sensible decision-making, and by the timely intervention and considerable support of the local authority. The work of successive acting and associate headteachers has led to the school making good progress overall since the last inspection. As a result, the school is well placed to meet the needs of all its children and ensure that all benefit fully from what is on offer. Subject leadership is sound. Staff are making satisfactory use of data to track children’s progress. Action planning is reasonable and there is a greater emphasis on using the information from monitoring to support development. Morale is good and staff are keen to move forward. 5 Inspection Report: Burnley Ightenhill Primary School, 3 October 2005 to 4 October 2005
p.7
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Burnley Ightenhill Primary School, 3 October 2005 to 4 October 2005
p.8
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
learners?
NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
NA 3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 3 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 3 How well learners enjoy their education NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.9
and supporting all learners?
NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.10
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.10
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0207 421 6800 F 0207 421 6707 www.ofsted.gov.uk Burnley Ightenhill Primary School Alder Street Burnley BB12 6 ED 5 October 2005 Dear children We thoroughly enjoyed being in your school this week. It has been a privilege and a pleasure for us to work with you and the adults. We were delighted that many of you wanted to talk to us and we were impressed by the courtesy and help you provided. We particularly liked the way: Mrs Darcy and her team have led and managed your improving school; the results in national tests have improved, particularly for children reaching the higher levels in reading, mathematics and science in Year 6; the school council talks to you about the ways the school can get better still and the way it takes your views to meetings with Mrs Darcy; many of you help in the school such as by being playground ’buddies’. A friend on the playground is a great help and comfort to someone who is feeling lonely;
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
the school provides you with lots of activities outside lesson time; you are finding out more about what you know and can do; you nearly all behave well in classrooms and around the school. We have asked your teachers to make some improvements in the way that you are taught writing. This is very important because you will need to have the very best skills when you go on to secondary school and, later, when you get a job. We wish you well for the future and good luck to you all. Yours sincerely Mr Heap (Lead inspector) Annex B
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion