Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Sussex Road Community Primary School

Inspected 9 Feb 2006 · published 7 Mar 2006 · URN 118286

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Carole Skinner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Feb 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Carole Skinner

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    TN9 2TP

  • Name on report verified

    Sussex Road Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    118286

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 24% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyenthusiasmexceptionallyrichsuccessfulimprovedstrongeffectively
Criticismnot alwaysinadequatebelowat riskweaknessesinsufficientnot strongnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1255w+54
  • What needs to improve1515w+31

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,742
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%What needs to improve 54%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Sussex Road Community Primary School

p.1

118286 Unique Reference Number Kent LEA 280285 Inspection number 8 February 2006 to 9 February 2006 Inspection dates Carole Skinner AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Sussex Road School address Primary Type of school Tonbridge Community School category Kent TN9 2TP 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01732 352367 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01732 352367 Fax number 387 Number on roll Mr Simon Southworth Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Nigel Amos Headteacher 11 October 1999 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 280285 8 February 2006 - 4 to 11 9 February 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a larger than average primary school situated close to the centre of Tonbridge. Attainment on entry to the school is below average. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is higher than in most schools. Pupils come from a wide variety of social backgrounds. Most are White British with approximately 6% from minority ethnic backgrounds. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is lower than that in most schools. There has been a high turnover of staff and governors during the past two years, which has interrupted the pace of development.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Sussex Road Community Primary School, 8 February 2006 to 9 February 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The school judges its own effectiveness as good, based on its success in creating a stimulating environment for learning where pupils are enthusiastic and develop good all round personal qualities. Whilst acknowledging these strengths, the inspector’s view is that the school’s overall effectiveness is satisfactory. This is because it is not yet effective enough in promoting good achievement. Achievement for the majority of pupils is satisfactory, but pupils in Years 1 and 2 do not do well enough and have to catch up in Years 3 to 6. Children in Reception make satisfactory progress overall and do particularly well in their personal and social development. However most do not reach the goals expected by the end of the year due to their low starting point. Teaching is satisfactory and has some good features, such as the way teachers generate enthusiasm for learning. The quality of marking of pupils’ work is variable and it does

p.4

Grade: 3

not always give pupils a realistic view of their achievement or show them how to improve. Pupils enjoy learning because the school provides a rich, varied and exciting curriculum. The good systems to ensure pupils’ health and well-being help them to feel safe and well cared for. However, pupils with learning difficulties do not make enough progress as the targets set for them are not sharp enough and work planned does not always match their needs. The leadership and management are satisfactorily focused on raising standards but have not ensured that teachers’ expectations and the targets for pupils to achieve are high enough in Years 1 and 2. Improvements in teaching and in the provision for information and communication technology (ICT), together with recent initiatives to raise standards in writing and mathematics, demonstrate that the school has the potential for further improvement. The school gives satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•Ensure that standards are raised in Years 1 and 2 by setting higher expectations and more challenging targets for pupils •Ensure that the targets set for pupils with learning difficulties and the work that is planned for them all take good account of their specific needs •Give all pupils clearer guidance on what they need to do to improve their work

p.4

Grade: 3

Achievement is satisfactory for the majority of pupils and standards are broadly in line with national averages. Children start school with below average standards. They make sound progress in Reception but, although they do particularly well in their personal and social development most do not reach the goals set for the end of the year in other areas of learning. In Years 1 and 2, pupils do not do well enough in order to reach the standards expected by the age of 7. This is because they often do not have sufficiently challenging targets to improve their learning. However, they make up lost ground in Years 3 to 6, and reach broadly average standards by the time they leave. 2 Inspection Report: Sussex Road Community Primary School, 8 February 2006 to 9 February 2006 Pupils with learning difficulties do not make enough progress because their individual targets are not clear enough and work is not always carefully matched to their needs.

p.4

Grade: 3

In mathematics, standards have been below average for some time and are now showing signs of improvement. This is a direct result of initiatives introduced by the school to extend pupils’ skills in calculation and problem solving. Standards in writing are also rising in Years 3 to 6, where higher attaining pupils are doing particularly well. The school has implemented a number of strategies to improve the style and content of pupils’ written work, as well as spelling and punctuation.

p.5

Grade: 2

The school justifiably prides itself on nurturing pupils’ personal development and well-being, which are good. Pupils really enjoy learning and appreciate the exciting range of activities that the school provides. They talk with enthusiasm about their favourite lessons and the other exciting things teachers arrange for them. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. They appreciate the variety of cultures in society and develop a good understanding of different faiths and customs. Pupils work and play together safely with very few instances of bullying or anti-social behaviour. Attendance is satisfactory. Pupils develop healthy lifestyles through a good range of sporting activities and understand the importance of a healthy diet. They contribute willingly to the school community, taking on responsibilities, as ‘buddies’ and members of the Eco Club, for example. The school council has been successful in introducing new ideas, such as

p.5

Grade: 2

better play equipment for breaktimes and improvements in the library. Managing these projects has also helped pupils to understand how to work to a budget. Pupils’ involvement in a number of initiatives, both in the local community and further afield, extends their awareness of the needs of others. They participate with enthusiasm in various fund raising activities and manage projects, which helps to prepare them soundly for later life, by contributing to the development of their skills in mathematical calculations and problem solving.

p.5

Grade: 3

Although teaching is mostly satisfactory, there is clear evidence to indicate that it is improving as a result of training and sharing good practice. Expectations of what pupils can achieve have not always been high enough and this has led to underachievement, especially in Years 1 and 2. Although this is beginning to improve as a result of more rigorous target setting procedures, there is as yet limited evidence of its impact on pupils’ learning. Teachers get on very well with the pupils and are particularly successful in engaging pupils’ interest and harnessing their enthusiasm. As a result, pupils work with concentration and are keen to learn. For example, Year 5 pupils were happy to 3 Inspection Report: Sussex Road Community Primary School, 8 February 2006 to 9 February 2006 spend an extra 10 minutes finishing a mathematics task in their lunch break. ICT is much improved since the last inspection, and is used well to enliven and support

p.5

Grade: 3

learning. Teaching assistants are deployed well during whole-class teaching to keep track of which pupils are answering the teacher’s questions. This ensures that every child takes a full part in the lesson. Teaching assistants also give effective support to pupils who need help with their learning, but these pupils nonetheless make less progress than others because work is not always matched closely enough to their needs. Although there are examples of good marking that gives pupils clear guidance on what they need to do to improve their work, there is too much marking that offers only encouragement rather than helpful feedback. A few teachers’ marking gives indiscriminate praise that bears little relationship to the quality or quantity of work done.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school has been very successful in creating a rich curriculum that engages pupils’ interest and contributes strongly to their personal development and their enjoyment of school. Classroom displays are vibrant and stimulating. They help to create an environment where pupils are keen to learn. The range of subjects covered in Years 3 to 6 is much broader than in most other schools and includes, for example, French and Spanish. Pupils also benefit from a wide range of clubs and additional activities. Welldeveloped links between subjects provide opportunities for pupils to learn in more detail and depth about the topics covered. Opportunities for pupils to develop their writing and mathematical problem-solving skills are improving due to the school’s participation in local and national initiatives. The reception curriculum is soundly planned to incorporate all areas of learning under umbrella themes, but play activities

p.6

Grade: 2

are not always organised well enough to ensure that all children are learning and playing purposefully.

p.6

Grade: 3

The care, guidance and support provided for pupils is satisfactory overall. Welfare and first aid arrangements are good but the academic support given to pupils is not as strong. The consistent approach taken to rewards and sanctions has enabled the school to establish an orderly community where pupils are helped to feel secure and to grow in confidence. There are good arrangements in place to support looked after children and those identified as being at risk. Pupils are given targets to help improve their learning in English and mathematics but they are not all aware of what their targets are. Pupils with learning difficulties have individual and, in some cases, shared education plans, but these are not always tightly enough focused on each child’s specific learning needs. Consequently these pupils make less progress than others as they move through the school. 4 Inspection Report: Sussex Road Community Primary School, 8 February 2006 to 9 February 2006

p.6

Grade: 3

Although there are several strong features in the school’s leadership and management, its overall quality is satisfactory. Senior managers have successfully created a happy school where pupils enjoy a rich variety of learning experiences and opportunities in a vibrant and stimulating environment. They have also remedied most of the weaknesses identified by the last inspection. However, the school has not fully harnessed the pupils’ enthusiasm for learning to ensure that all are achieving the highest standards of which they are capable. Following a number of staff changes, the new leadership and curriculum teams are already beginning to have an impact on raising achievement, notably in writing and mathematics. Improved procedures for staff and governors to monitor the school’s performance are leading to greater rigour and more accurate self-evaluation. However, the main focus has been on Years 3 to 6 and insufficient attention has been given to

p.7

Grade: 3

considering ways to raise achievement in Years 1 and 2. The school takes good account of parents’ and pupils’ views when deciding its priorities for improvement and governors and staff are becoming increasingly involved in determining the pace and direction of development. Senior managers have acknowledged the need to improve their use of data to track pupils’ progress throughout the school and have already done much to hone their skills of analysis and interpretation. However, this has not been sufficiently thorough in Reception and Years 1 and 2. The school is aware that it needs to address the root causes of underachievement. Now that there is a renewed vision for the future, which is shared by all staff, strong teamwork and good support from a number of external advisers, the school has the capacity and the will to increase the momentum of improvement. 5 Inspection Report: Sussex Road Community Primary School, 8 February 2006 to 9 February 2006

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Sussex Road Community Primary School, 8 February 2006 to 9 February 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 4 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

We very much enjoyed our recent visit to your school and would like to thank you for being so friendly and helpful. The inspectors enjoyed talking to you and looking at your work. What we liked most about your school: •You really enjoy learning and take part in lots of activities with enthusiasm •You behave well, help each other and enjoy taking responsibility •Your teachers plan lots of exciting activities for you to do, and you get the chance to learn French and Spanish and to take part in special events •All of the adults take very good care of you and make you feel safe What we have asked your school to do now •Help those of you in Years 1 and 2 to reach higher standards in your work by giving you harder challenges •Make sure that you all understand what you need to do to improve your work •Help those who find learning difficult, by giving them work that helps them to make better progress We are sure you will continue to work hard and enjoy your time at Sussex Road School.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion