Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Humberston Maths and Computing CollegeOfsted inspection, 13 Sept 2005

Inspected 13 Sept 2005 · published 20 Oct 2005 · URN 118101

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Ofsted inspected Humberston Maths and Computing College on 13 Sept 2005, led by Honoree Gordon. The overall judgement was Satisfactory. Ofsted published the report on 20 Oct 2005. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).

Summary

Satisfactory

Honoree Gordon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Sept 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Honoree Gordon

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    DN36 4TF

  • Name on report verified

    Humberston Comprehensive School

  • URN verified

    118101

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 20% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveexceptionallyenjoyimprovedpositiveconsistentlystrength
Criticismweakinadequatepoortoo manyineffectivelimitedslownot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings629w−20
  • What needs to improve2800w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
3,389
about usual (typical 2787)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 18%What needs to improve 81%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Humberston Comprehensive School

p.1

118101 Unique Reference Number North East Lincolnshire LEA 280241 Inspection number 12 September 2005 to 13 September 2005 Inspection dates Honoree Gordon Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Humberston Avenue School address Secondary Type of school Humberston Community School category Grimsby, DN36 4TF 11 to 16 Age range of pupils 01472 319990 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01472 319993 Fax number 706 Number on roll Mrs Wendy Bagnall Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Ms Carol Sanderson Headteacher 1 May 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 280241 12 September 2005 - 11 to 16 13 September 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors of schools and two additional inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Humberston Comprehensive School is a community school of average size for pupils aged 11 to 16. It is over subscribed. The majority of its pupils come from two relatively advantaged areas. The proportion receiving free school meals is low, and there are few minority ethnic pupils. The number of pupils with special educational needs is just below the average found in schools nationally, but more pupils than usual have a Statement of Special Educational Need. In the earlier years of the school, there are more boys than girls. Further up the school, the reverse is true. Pupils’ attainment on entry has been a little above average, but is declining slightly and becoming closer to the national average.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Humberston Comprehensive School, 12 September 2005 to 13 September 2005

p.3

Grade: 3

Inspectors agree with the school that it provides satisfactory education. It cares for its pupils and promotes their well-being effectively. To quote one parent: ‘Pupils come to school with smiles on their faces and leave with smiles’. The school provides good support for those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Pupils say they enjoy school, parents are very supportive and teachers and classroom assistants work well together. Pupils’ results in tests and examinations are consistently above average and their personal development is good. Pupils learn the value of a safe and healthy lifestyle. Success in sport is a strength. Although overall pupils make satisfactory progress, some groups of pupils do not progress as well as they could compared to other schools and to their own starting points. This is related to two factors: lessons are not always sufficiently stimulating or challenging; and systems for checking and reinforcing pupils’ progress are not well

p.4

Grade: 3

enough developed. Leadership and management are satisfactory and the school provides good value for money. It is all credit to the headteacher and staff that, despite severe budgetary difficulties and only adequate resources, standards have been maintained and continue to rise. The school has satisfactory capacity to improve, but self-evaluation is generally weak: managers cannot really demonstrate what difference the decisions they take make for pupils. The headteacher has good ideas for moving the school forward and a growing number of staff are keen to ensure this happens. There has been satisfactory improvement since the last inspection, though a number of points still need attention and the indoor accommodation for physical education remains poor. Physical education results suffer as a result. Too many parents take their children out of school for holidays in term time and attendance figures are slipping, though they are still in line with

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• implement systematic procedures for monitoring the quality of lessons to ensure they better meet the needs of all groups of pupils • establish formal, regular means of checking how pupils are doing in all aspects of their education • set out clear priorities and timescales for plans and how the school will know they have been successful • ensure that the requirements for religious education (RE) in Key Stage 4 are met.

p.4

Grade: 3

Pupils consistently reach standards that are above average in public examinations and tests, with good performance in mathematics and a number of general certificate of secondary education (GCSE) subjects. Recently, attainment in some subjects at GCSE, 2 Inspection Report: Humberston Comprehensive School, 12 September 2005 to 13 September 2005 for example modern foreign languages, art and geography, has improved noticeably. In assessment tests at the end of Year 9, English results are less good than in mathematics or science, but are improving. Able pupils go on to obtain high grades in English at GCSE and also in science. Pupils generally do well in mathematics. Results at GCSE in physical education give cause for concern. This represents satisfactory progress for most pupils and good progress for some. However, some groups of pupils make less progress than they should: for example, some girls and some pupils from

p.4

Grade: 3

less advantaged backgrounds. Where this is the case, it is sometimes related to less than stimulating teaching, or to ineffective use of assessment data to design and set challenging work. Basic skills in literacy, numeracy and information and communications technology (ICT) are well developed.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils’ personal development is good. Pupils are polite, courteous, cheerful and enthusiastic. They work hard and take pride in what they do. They have good relationships with each other and with their teachers. Those inspectors interviewed said they enjoyed school and valued the support and efforts of their teachers. They make good progress overall in their moral, social and cultural development. Pupils are able to trust each other and are confident that their belongings are safe. There are few incidents of anti-social behaviour; pupils behave well in and around school and they keep their recreational areas are free from graffiti and litter. There are few incidents of bullying and, when these do occur, the school deals with them effectively. Opportunities to develop spiritual awareness are more limited. For example, pupils do not worship together and older pupils have insufficient time given to religious education

p.5

Grade: 2

lessons. Attendance, although satisfactory, has shown a steady decline in the last two years. Support from the local authority to follow up long-term absence is slow and far too many pupils are taking holidays in term time. Pupils are able to make mature and informed judgements about staying healthy and safe and are well prepared for adult life. Careers advice is very good and all pupils, at some stage, do work in the community. Pupils are consulted about school matters and through the school council are able to have some influence on decisions.

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory. Lessons are thorough and teachers have good subject knowledge. The school has high-calibre support assistants; it has selected and trained them well and their work does much to promote effective learning. Some good lessons were seen during the visit, where teachers had acted on advice about how to improve the quality of their work. Because these lessons had pace and challenge, pupils clearly enjoyed taking an active part and made good progress. Some teachers took care to explain the objectives of lessons and to encourage pupils to think about what 3 Inspection Report: Humberston Comprehensive School, 12 September 2005 to 13 September 2005 they had learnt during the lesson. All of the good lessons were characterised by good planning, an interesting range of activities and skilled questioning which involved all learners. In the weaker lessons observed, teachers needed to give more thought to

p.5

Grade: 3

how the wide range of pupils, particularly those with learning difficulties, require different approaches to help them learn more effectively. • Overall, most pupils make the progress expected of them. They are willing to learn and behave well in lessons. Pupils enjoy their lessons and they will listen attentively to the teacher, but in the less effective lessons they complain of dull activities such as copying notes, and slow pace. • The headteacher has begun to observe lessons more closely, but is not yet doing this systematically enough for all subjects. Where such intervention has taken place to improve teaching quality, it has been effective and examination results have improved noticeably. This process, therefore, needs to move at a faster pace so that all subjects and teachers can benefit.

p.6

Grade: 3

Curriculum provision is satisfactory and there are good extra-curricular opportunities, especially for sports. The school provides well for the development of literacy, numeracy and ICT skills, but does not meet the regulations for religious education in years 10 and 11. Pupils in years 7 to 9 follow a broad and balanced curriculum. In addition, the social education programme teaches them about citizenship, health including drugs education, sex and relationships. This helps pupils to know about healthy lifestyles and how to deal with risk-taking behaviour. The programme also prepares pupils to appreciate the demands of the world of work and how they can contribute to their community. There are modules on industrial awareness and enterprise, a two- week work placement in Year 10 and a community placement for all. The school is gradually developing some vocational courses for years 10 and 11 to meet the changing needs

p.6

Grade: 3

of pupils. Two such courses run in partnership with local colleges. A local training provider and college offer a more suitable work-based alternative to GCSEs for a small number of Year 11 pupils who have lost interest in education in school. Although the short lunch hour limits the number of extra curricular activities which can be offered in school time, the school works round this well and pupils are willing to stay at the end of the day to follow interests. Participation and success adds to pupils’ confidence and develops responsibility and good teamwork.

p.6

Grade: 3

The school rated this section as good but inspectors have given an overall grade of satisfactory. There are indeed many good features and some very good provision, for example, the careers guidance. Matron and other non-teaching staff provide very 4 Inspection Report: Humberston Comprehensive School, 12 September 2005 to 13 September 2005 good support for pupils when they need someone to turn to and talk things through. A senior member of staff has responsibility for organising the care of vulnerable pupils and does this effectively. Child protection procedures are securely in place and the required checks have been completed. There is a happy atmosphere in school. Pupils say they enjoy school, there are good links with home and parents are very supportive. Many parents responded to the questionnaire and their replies were overwhelmingly very positive, with support for pupils with learning difficulties singled out for particular

p.6

Grade: 3

praise. The school enjoys a good reputation locally. One comment stood out: “Happiness and receiving a top class education, what more could a parent want?” However, some aspects could be more thorough: the school needs to track more carefully and more regularly how pupils are progressing in their subjects. In addition, the contribution the school makes to preparing pupils for adult life and their personal development requires monitoring more closely. Pupils in some years are now set academic targets, but progress towards these is not followed up sufficiently well. Pupils with learning difficulties are making satisfactory progress, but some teachers have not yet adapted their teaching sufficiently to the new challenges these pupils present.

p.7

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory. The headteacher has set a clear direction for the school and is well supported by the governors, parents and a number of staff. She listens to pupils’ views. The school’s limited resources are effectively deployed and it provides good value for money. The headteacher inherited a large budget deficit and has had to make unwelcome cuts over the past three years. Despite this, the school has continued to achieve examination results that are above the national average. Overall, improvement since the last inspection report is satisfactory, but more work needs to be done on some of the points raised then. There is still a lack of formal, consistent procedures in place to analyse how the school is doing and what progress pupils make. Managers have the capacity to do this, though there are a number of managers and teachers who do not appreciate the need for change. The school’s

p.7

Grade: 3

procedures for checking and analysing how it is doing are weak. Its self-evaluation was rather vague and short on detail and evidence to support its conclusions. Managers are not clear whether what they are doing is making a difference to pupils’ progress. Lesson quality varies too much. Where managers have stepped in to improve teaching and learning it has made a difference, but they have only tackled a few areas so far. The governors are beginning to hold the school to account by developing links with subject areas to gain information to plan for the school’s development. 5 Inspection Report: Humberston Comprehensive School, 12 September 2005 to 13 September 2005 .

p.7

Grade: 3

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Humberston Comprehensive School, 12 September 2005 to 13 September 2005

p.8

Inspection judgements

16-19 School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Inspection judgements

NA 3 How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Inspection judgements

Achievement and standards NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 2 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Inspection judgements

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

Inspection judgements

Personal development and well-being NA 2 How good is the overall personal development and well-being of the learners? NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

Inspection judgements

The quality of provision NA 3 How effective are teaching and learning in meeting the full range of the learners' needs? NA 3 How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

Inspection judgements

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

Annex A

Leadership and management NA 3 How effective are leadership and management in raising achievement and supporting all learners? NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 4 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

Annex A

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them The extent to which learners make a positive contribution Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the

p.10

Annex A

wider community The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams Yes Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form Yes Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0207 421 6800 F 0207 421 6707 www.ofsted.gov.uk Humberston Comprehensive School Humberston Avenue Humberston Grimsby DN36 4TF To the school council 15 September 2005 Dear pupils Thank you for contributing to the recent inspection of your school. We were able to visit lessons and to talk to a number of you and to the staff. We also read the results of questionnaires completed by you and by your parents. These were very helpful to us and we enjoyed visiting your school. Here is a summary of our main findings: The school provides you with a satisfactory education. We know you and your parents are proud of the good reputation of your school and we want to congratulate you on your results in tests and examinations. These are above national averages and still rising. Some of you get really high grades. This represents a lot of hard work by you and your teachers. Most of you make the amount of progress we would expect to see, but we know that you come

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

in to the school with good results from your primary schools and we feel, therefore, that your school could expect even more from you. We would like to see you progress faster in the time that you are here. Your personal development is good; you were cheerful, confident, and polite and we noticed how well you get on with each other and the staff. Your behaviour is good and you work hard in lessons. The school takes care of you and you have people you can turn to if need be. We noticed a number of good features, like opportunities for sport and careers advice. The school provides a suitable range of subjects for you to study and is adding new courses as well as GCSEs. Your teachers have good subject knowledge; we saw some good lessons, but some were a bit dull. We were disappointed that indoor physical education facilities had not improved yet. (We know the school has tried to get action on this).

p.11

Annex B

The leadership and management of the school are fine and the school provides good value for money. Your headteacher and senior staff have some good ideas for how to move the school on. We have made some suggestions: 1. We know you are keen to do well so we think your teachers should set you challenging targets and check your progress towards meeting these more frequently. 2. We know from what you told us that you like lessons which are interesting, go at a fast pace and where you can get involved. We could see you responded well to these sorts of lessons and were enjoying them, so we have asked the school to look at how more of your lessons can be like this. We think this will help you to do even better. 3. We have asked the headteacher and senior managers to be very clear about their plans for acting on our suggestions and then get them into place quickly. Your school has improved since its last inspection and it is continuing to maintain above average

p.12

Annex B

standards. We feel confident your headteacher and staff can work on our suggestions and that, with your support, your school will go from strength to strength. Mrs H Gordon Her Majesty’s Inspector of schools Annex B

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion