Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Puller Memorial, Church of England, Voluntary Aided Primary School

Inspected 10 Feb 2006 · published 8 Mar 2006 · URN 117453

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Helen Ranger LI

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Feb 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Helen Ranger LI

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    SG11 1AZ

  • Name on report verified

    Puller Memorial, Church of England, Voluntary Aided Primary School

  • URN verified

    117453

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentSatisfactory
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelypositiveexceptionallyenjoyeffectivegood progresssuccessfullyclear
Criticismweaknessweaknesseslacknot alwaysinconsistenttoo lowinadequatepoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1457w+47
  • What needs to improve1713w−16

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
3,122
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%What needs to improve 54%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Puller Memorial, Church of England, Voluntary Aided Primary School

p.1

117453 Unique Reference Number HERTFORDSHIRE LEA LEA 280083 Inspection number 9 February 2006 to 10 February 2006 Inspection dates Mrs. Helen Ranger LI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

High Cross School address Primary Type of school SG11 1AZ Voluntary aided School category 3 to 11 Age range of pupils 01920463178 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01920463178 Fax number 66 Number on roll Mrs.Debbie Morley Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Ms. Liz Aitken Headteacher 18 September 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 280083 9 February 2006 - 3 to 11 10 February 2006 Inspection Report: Puller Memorial, Church of England, Voluntary Aided Primary School, 9 February 2006 to 10 February 2006

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a much smaller than average school. Many pupils live nearby, but a significant minority come from a much wider area because their parents choose this school. All pupils are from White British backgrounds and a lower than average proportion are identified as having learning difficulties. On admission, their attainment covers a very wide range, but is average overall. The school has had a succession of acting headteachers over the past few terms and there have been several other changes to the teaching staff. The difficulties in recruiting a suitable headteacher have only been resolved this term and the new head started in the school last month.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Puller Memorial, Church of England, Voluntary Aided Primary School, 9 February 2006 to 10 February

p.3

Grade: 3

The school judges its overall effectiveness as satisfactory at present and the inspection agrees. The turbulence caused by many staff changes over the past two years, and especially the absence of a permanent headteacher, led to a lack of continuity and leadership. This had an unsettling effect on the pupils and staff alike. The school is now in a sound position to improve following the arrival of its new headteacher. Although she has not had time to have a great impact on standards, she has quickly identified the school's strengths and weaknesses and has acted well to deal with the most urgent priorities. Pupils currently make adequate progress, supported by a sound curriculum. They are on track to reach the levels expected nationally by the end of Reception and Year 2, and above average levels by Year 6. However, the teaching they receive, while generally satisfactory, is of an inconsistent quality. It is securely

p.4

Grade: 3

satisfactory in the Foundation Stage, of a variable, but a broadly satisfactory standard in Years 1 to 4 and good in Years 5 and 6. Most pupils enjoy school and are positive about learning, although the presentation of their work is often untidy and does not always reflect the quality of their ideas. A small number of pupils in the two classes covering Years 1 to 4 have significant emotional and behavioural difficulties. Because staff do not always deal with these pupils effectively enough, other pupils are affected by inappropriate behaviour and sometimes join in. At times, pupils do not show enough kindness or respect for each other. This is at odds with the school's Christian ethos. This is the most urgent area for improvement and one that the headteacher is already tackling effectively. The new headteacher is experienced and energetic and parents and pupils agree that she has already brought stability to the school. She is working

p.4

Grade: 3

closely and successfully with staff and governors to provide the leadership that has been lacking in the school. She knows that the systems for self-evaluation and development planning need to be more rigorous and consistent and has already started to work on this. The school gives satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

- Improve the standards of behaviour, respect and tolerance of the pupils in Years 1 to 4 in line with the school's stated aims and ethos. - Improve the quality of teaching in Years 1 to 4 by establishing effective strategies for managing pupils' behaviour and raising teachers' expectations of how pupils present their work. - Improve the arrangements for school self-evaluation and development planning so that the school has a more accurate view of how well it is doing and what its next priorities should be.

p.4

Grade: 3

Achievement is satisfactory overall. It is good in Years 5 and 6, but the quality of teaching is not consistent enough across the school as a whole for pupils always to make securely good progress. From an average starting point at the age of three, pupils make sound progress in the Foundation Stage towards reaching the expected 2 Inspection Report: Puller Memorial, Church of England, Voluntary Aided Primary School, 9 February 2006 to 10 February goals in all areas of learning. In recent years, the overall standards reached in the Year 2 assessments of reading, writing and mathematics have been significantly above the national average. They are currently average and represent satisfactory progress. Pupils in Years 5 and 6 are making good progress. They are on course to reach above average standards this year in English, mathematics and science, as they have done for the past few years. They meet the challenging targets set for them. While there is no

p.4

Grade: 3

significant underachievement by pupils, including those with learning difficulties, all but the pupils in Years 6 have been affected to some extent by the changes in staffing of the past two years. This has led to a dip in pupils' academic achievements. The inspection did not examine progress in all subjects, but checked standards in information and communication technology (ICT) which were too low at the time of the previous inspection. They are now in line with expected levels.

p.5

Grade: 3

Pupils' personal development, including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, is satisfactory overall, but not as strong as at the time of the last inspection. Most pupils have positive attitudes to learning and enjoy school. Attendance is broadly average. The youngest children are quite boisterous, but are settling well to school routines. The oldest pupils are sensible and are considerate young adults who are a credit to themselves and the school. In the other age groups, most pupils form good relationships and behave well. However, a small number of pupils in Years 1 to 4 do show challenging behaviour. This sometimes disrupts the learning of their classmates or gives encouragement to others to behave badly. Some parents and pupils are rightly concerned about this. These pupils do not always show enough respect either to each other or to the adults in the school. This is partly because there has not

p.5

Grade: 3

been clear leadership in this aspect of school life in the recent past and partly because some of the less experienced teachers lack expertise in managing challenging behaviour. The new headteacher is dealing with this weakness firmly and effectively and this action needs to continue for standards to reach the good levels achieved in recent years. Pupils are clear about how to keep themselves safe, for example, when they go swimming or use the internet at home. They know what to do when occasional incidents of bullying occur and trust the adults in the school to help them. They take advantage of the many opportunities to keep fit and eat healthily. Pupils take on responsibilities around the school as they get older. They are happy that the school council represents their views. They work well in teams, helping to organise projects that they initiate, such as a toy sale and the purchase of a goat for an African family. The oldest are well

p.5

Grade: 3

prepared for the next stage of their education and for later life by their good standards in literacy and numeracy and their sound computer skills. 3 Inspection Report: Puller Memorial, Church of England, Voluntary Aided Primary School, 9 February 2006 to 10 February

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory overall, but inconsistent. Teaching in the Foundation Stage class has improved well since the last inspection when it was a weakness. The provision in the Foundation class is now well balanced and relevant. Teaching is best in Years 5 and 6 where well organised, purposeful lessons ensure all pupils do well. In the other two classes, expectations of what pupils can achieve are rising, but more still needs to be done to settle pupils' behaviour and ensure that learning is consistently effective. The teaching assistant gives valuable support to pupils with learning difficulties in these two classes. Across the school as a whole, teachers' written planning includes clear objectives for what pupils of all capabilities will do. The small class sizes ensure that teachers give high levels of individual attention to each pupil, offering feedback regularly and setting the agenda for the next stage

p.6

Grade: 3

of learning. Expectations of how pupils present their work are sometimes too low, a weakness at the time of the last inspection that has still not been fully remedied. As a result, poor handwriting and layout mean that the finished written work does not reflect well enough the quality of pupils' thinking and discussions. Teachers have recently begun to track pupils' longer-term progress rigorously and use this information to set regular learning targets for all individuals. The information gained from this tracking now needs to be used even more effectively to inform the overall school strategies for improvement.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory and covers all the subjects it should. The range of activities and resources for the Foundation Stage in particular are better than at the time of the last inspection. All subjects are planned to take account of the needs of the mixed-age classes, although some time is wasted in delivering these plans, for example, by overly long snack times. The support planned for pupils with learning difficulties is adequate, but the headteacher has rightly identified the need for further improvements to their individual education plans and how these are shared with these pupils and their parents. There is good provision to ensure that pupils do not miss out on opportunities that larger schools can provide, including a breakfast club and after-school activities. The school works closely with others nearby to make up sports teams and to offer a wider range of activities that it can do alone. There is particularly

p.6

Grade: 3

good provision for swimming. Teachers regularly plan lessons that promote pupils' personal and social development, but these are less effective than they should be because of the failure to eradicate all examples of disruptive or unkind behaviour. 4 Inspection Report: Puller Memorial, Church of England, Voluntary Aided Primary School, 9 February 2006 to 10 February

p.6

Grade: 3

The quality of care is satisfactory overall. The day-to-day pastoral care of pupils is good, for example, if they are unwell. Pupils say they are looked after well and have adults they can turn to if they have any problems. However, the weaknesses in managing behaviour, means that the overall quality of care provided by the teachers is no better than satisfactory. Child protection arrangements are in place. Disruptions to the leadership of the school and changes to the governing body led to a lack of continuity in how the full range of health and safety arrangements were checked. The new headteacher and recently appointed chair of governors have quickly identified areas of weakness in formal health and safety procedures and have swiftly set about improving the school's systems to good effect. During the inspection, for example, a very efficient fire drill was carried out that fully met all safety requirements.

p.7

Grade: 3

The leadership and management of the school is now satisfactory after a period of instability for the past two years. Staff, pupils, parents and governors have welcomed the new head's arrival and comment that she is already having a positive impact. After the former upheavals and uncertainties, all these interested parties are becoming more involved in deciding how the school will move forward. With no permanent headteacher for some time and the retirement or promotion to other schools of several experienced staff, it had been difficult for the school to work systematically through its plans for improvement. The existing written development plan is very comprehensive, but does not focus clearly enough on what is currently most urgent or important. The school has not had an accurate enough view of how well it was doing, for example, in relation to other schools, and needed a clearer and more manageable statement of priorities.

p.7

Grade: 3

The new head quickly assessed the current position and identified a good timetable for the action necessary to boost standards again. The quality of governance is satisfactory. Governors have supported the school well during the unsettled period and provided some necessary continuity. They have worked closely with the local authority's advisers for the past few months to support the remaining staff and to encourage better provision for pupils; this action is continuing while the headteacher establishes her position. The subject leaders have benefited from this support and are checking standards and provision effectively. In spite of its difficulties, the school has managed to keep pace with the national improvement in academic standards and has acted successfully on most of the areas identified as weaknesses by its last inspection in 2000. The appointment of its new headteacher and the determination by all parties

p.7

Grade: 3

to do the best for the pupils put it in a sound position to improve in the future. 5 Inspection Report: Puller Memorial, Church of England, Voluntary Aided Primary School, 9 February 2006 to 10 February .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Puller Memorial, Church of England, Voluntary Aided Primary School, 9 February 2006 to 10 February

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 2 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 3 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 3 How well learners enjoy their education NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for welcoming me to your school and helping me to find out about it. This letter is to tell you about some of the most important things I saw. Many of you have had many changes of teacher and headteacher in the last two years and I hope that Miss Aitken's arrival makes things more settled for everyone. There are many good things about your school. It values your ideas and gives you opportunities such as the school council to have your say. Your teachers make sure that, although your school is small, you have plenty of activities to enjoy, including clubs, visits and sports events. The oldest children in your school reach high standards in their work and behaviour and are a good example to the younger ones. Your new headteacher knows what is needed to make your school even better and she is working hard with the other adults in the school to do this. As well as these good things, some things in your school need to be

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

improved. In particular, I was sad to see that a few children do not behave well in lessons or treat other people with enough respect or kindness. I hope you will all work with the adults to make this better. Everyone has a part to play in improving this. Miss Aitken has already worked out how your school can be a better place to learn and you and your teachers will need to help her achieve this. Finally, you all think hard about your work and discuss it well in class, but many of your books are too untidy and your handwriting needs to be better. I know that you can improve this if you try. I enjoyed visiting your school and meeting you all.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion