Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Park Junior School

Inspected 8 Mar 2006 · published 29 Mar 2006 · URN 115539

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

David Clegg

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Mar 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Clegg

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    GL10 2NP

  • Name on report verified

    Park Junior School

  • URN verified

    115539

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+57Positivemore positive than 57% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongpositiveexceptionallyclearvery welleffectivelymake good progressenjoy
Criticismweaknessnot alwaysnot consistentlyinadequatetoo lowlackstrugglesvariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1158w+80
  • What needs to improve1396w+38

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,525
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%What needs to improve 54%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

115539 Unique Reference Number Gloucestershire LEA 279621 Inspection number 7 March 2006 to 8 March 2006 Inspection dates David Clegg AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Elm Road School address Junior Type of school Stonehouse Community School category Gloucestershire GL10 2NP 7 to 11 Age range of pupils 01453 823108 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01453 791193 Fax number 270 Number on roll Mrs Victoria Walker Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Christopher Taylor Headteacher 15 November 1999 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 279621 7 March 2006 - 7 to 11 8 March 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This is an average-sized junior school. The pupils are predominately White British and all are fluent English speakers. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties is higher than average.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Park Junior School, 7 March 2006 to 8 March 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The school’s effectiveness is satisfactory and there are a number of aspects of its work that are good. Pupils make steady progress and by the time they leave the school they reach average standards in English and mathematics. Standards in reading are better than in writing. In both English and mathematics, a small number of average-attaining pupils could achieve more if more was expected of them. Pupils with learning difficulties benefit from the support they receive and make good progress. The school provides satisfactory value for money. Pupils receive a good level of care and support that ensures their good personal development. This is also supported by the rich curriculum that gives pupils a good range of opportunities. The school knows itself reasonably well, although its evaluation of its effectiveness as good is over-generous. It has made sound progress since the last inspection, particularly in strengthening the provision for pupils with learning difficulties The

p.4

Grade: 3

school monitors the standards that pupils reach, but does not have a secure way of evaluating the rate of progress that they make as they move through the school. Lessons are carefully planned and meet the needs of the majority of pupils. However, teachers do not have end-of-year National Curriculum targets for what pupils are striving to achieve. This is why the school struggles to evaluate pupils’ progress. Pupils are not as aware as they need to be about what level they are at and what they need to do to achieve even higher standards.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

•Improve the achievement of average-attaining pupils by raising expectations of what they can achieve. •Establish end-of-year targets for each pupil and ensure that teachers monitor their progress towards meeting them. •Make sure that teachers give pupils clear guidance on how well they are doing towards their end-of-year targets and what they need to do next to improve.

p.4

Grade: 3

Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory. The majority of pupils start Year 3 with average standards. They make steady progress across the four years and leave with average standards. However, there is some variation in the progress made in different subjects and between different groups of pupils. The majority of pupils make good progress in reading but the progress in writing, particularly for a small group of boys, is too low. Consequently, a few boys underachieve. Progress in mathematics and science from Years 3 to 6 is steady, although in the most recent national tests at the end of Year 6, a small number of average- ability pupils did not achieve as much as expected. It is not possible to evaluate the progress between each year group as this information is not available. 2 Inspection Report: Park Junior School, 7 March 2006 to 8 March 2006 The high proportion of pupils with learning difficulties does well and makes good

p.4

Grade: 3

progress. This is particularly evident in reading and spelling, on which the majority of the help is focused. However, pupils also benefit from the extra help they get in mathematics lessons.

p.5

Grade: 2

This is a strong aspect of the school. Pupils’ personal development is good because the school makes good provision to help them to grow up and mature. Pupils are very positive about their lessons, they enjoy coming to school and the great majority are keen to learn. Pupils’ comments included, ‘the school’s perfect,’ and ‘I think the school’s pretty good’. Pupils behave well. Attendance is in line with the national average. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Their moral and social development is particularly strong, with pupils having a clear sense of right and wrong. Cultural and spiritual development is promoted well through aspects of art, music and performance. Pupils understand the importance of exercise and eating healthily and they adopt safe practices. This was evident when they worked on science experiments where they had to be particularly careful with some of the equipment. There is a good level of

p.5

Grade: 2

involvement with the community in aspects such as country dancing, sport and music festivals. The pupils have a good range of personal skills and attributes and satisfactory basic skills that will help them in later life.

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory. Pupils are generally keen to learn and they cooperate well and share equipment sensibly. Lessons are characterised by good relationships and a purposeful atmosphere. Lessons are often carefully planned with some interesting activities; for instance, some ‘hands on’ science experiments in Year 6 about absorption maintained pupils’ interest and challenged them to think hard. However, a weakness is the lack of teachers’ awareness of what National Curriculum levels pupils are working at. This results in some pupils’ short-term targets being too easy and pupils not always being clear about how well they are doing. The marking is positive and often, but not consistently, helpful. For example, the marking of some Year 3 English work is very clear in identifying what pupils need to do to improve. Unfortunately, this is not consistently replicated across all year groups.

p.5

Grade: 3

Good small-group teaching of pupils with learning difficulties is sharp and well focused on their learning needs. The lessons follow a clear programme that enables pupils’ progress to be carefully monitored on a regular basis. 3 Inspection Report: Park Junior School, 7 March 2006 to 8 March 2006

p.5

Grade: 2

The school provides a good curriculum. It covers all the subjects that it should and is supplemented by a number of other activities that give pupils a rich and interesting range of opportunities. There is some scope to improve curriculum planning by making more reference to National Curriculum levels. Provision for the arts benefits from the involvement with the local specialist secondary school. This has extended pupils’ opportunities, particularly in aspects of music, dance and drama. Several Year 6 pupils were very positive about the opportunities to learn an instrument and take part in performances. Pupils in Years 4, 5 and 6 are learning rudimentary French and are linking with a French school. The curriculum is also made more interesting through regular visits to places of interest and an annual residential visit. There is a regular stream of visitors to the school, including musicians and theatre groups. There is a good range of after-school

p.6

Grade: 2

activities, mainly concerned with sport.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school provides a good level of support and care for pupils. The arrangements for keeping pupils safe and secure are strong. Staff know pupils very well and they give a high priority to pupils’ pastoral support. Parents are enthusiastic about how effectively the school looks after their children. Pupils are especially appreciative of how lessons focusing on their personal development help them. One pupil commenting about the circle time lessons said, ‘It gives you more confidence to do your work’. The school is particularly good at supporting children who are vulnerable. Pupils whose lives have been disrupted for various reasons are happy and content with the stability the school gives them The school tracks pupils’ attainment as they move through the school by a series of regular assessments. However, these assessments do not tell the school whether pupils are making enough progress. This means that the guidance given to pupils about how

p.6

Grade: 2

well they are doing is not always as sharp as it could be.

p.6

Grade: 3

The leadership and management of the school are satisfactory. The headteacher provides a very strong steer to the school and gives it a clear sense of purpose and direction. The school knows itself reasonably well, although its evaluations are over-generous. Its views of its own effectiveness are informed by the regular canvassing of parents’ views and the views of pupils. The school uses a number of sensible strategies to assess how well it is doing. These include checking on teaching, looking at pupils’ work and analysing the results of tests. This is providing some good feedback about how effective the curriculum is in, for instance, English and mathematics. There 4 Inspection Report: Park Junior School, 7 March 2006 to 8 March 2006 is some good use of test information that is being used to identify what aspects of the school’s work need some attention. This, for instance, was how the school recognised the need to do more to improve the quality of boys’ writing.

p.6

Grade: 3

However, the school is not doing enough to monitor the progress of pupils on a year-by-year basis. Essentially, the school has a clear picture of the standards reached by pupils at the end of each year but teachers do not have the information to judge the progress pupils have made. One reason for this is that not enough use is made of the National Curriculum levels to describe standards and progress at the end of each year. This is a weakness in the school’s evaluation of its work. The school has made sound progress since the last inspection and has a satisfactory capacity to improve further. Most noticeably there is a much stronger picture of the provision for pupils with learning difficulties, subject managers evaluate pupils’ work and there is a clear sense of teamwork. There is still some work to do to achieve an effective approach to assessment. Governors are supportive of the school and are involved in the strategic development.

p.7

Grade: 3

For instance, they are playing a full part in planning the building programme that will increase the size of classrooms. 5 Inspection Report: Park Junior School, 7 March 2006 to 8 March 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Park Junior School, 7 March 2006 to 8 March 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you very much for making us feel so welcome in your school. We enjoyed our visit tremendously. We found that the school is providing a satisfactory education for you. We do feel that the school does some things particularly well. One of the most important things is that they make sure that you enjoy learning and like coming to school. Here is a list of some of the other things that we judged to be good: •You are positive about school and work hard •Children and staff like and respect each other and so there is a good atmosphere in the school •Your headteacher knows you all very well and has your best interests at heart •Your work is interesting •There is a good range of after-school clubs •You are cared for well and kept safe at school •Children who find their work difficult are given good support. We think that there are some things that your headteacher, staff and governors could do to make the school even better.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

•Make sure that you all do as well as you can by expecting some of you to do harder work •Set you targets that you aim to reach at the end of each year •As teachers mark your work, make sure you know what you need to do to get better.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion