Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Rodmarton Primary School

Inspected 8 Jun 2006 · published 14 Jul 2006 · URN 115535

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Alison Grainger

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Jun 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alison Grainger

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    GL7 6PE

  • Name on report verified

    Rodmarton School

  • URN verified

    115535

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 34% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallystrengthsenjoypositiveeffectivelyimprovedoutstandingsafe
Criticisminadequateweaknessespoorweaknessnot good enoughbelownot mettoo low

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1419w+12
  • What needs to improve1538w−24

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,929
about usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 44
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%What needs to improve 52%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

115535 Unique Reference Number Gloucestershire LEA 279619 Inspection number 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 Inspection dates Alison Grainger AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Rodmarton School address Primary Type of school Cirencester Community School category Gloucestershire GL7 6PE 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01285 841284 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01285 841284 Fax number 56 Number on roll Mr Roger Randall Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Susan Pillinger Headteacher 6 December 1999 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 279619 8 June 2006 - 4 to 11 8 June 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Situated in the heart of the village of Rodmarton, this small school draws its pupils from a wide area. Some travel from further away than Cirencester and Tetbury to attend the school. Almost all pupils are of white British heritage. About 10 % of pupils are from the travelling community although their families no longer travel. A quarter of pupils have learning difficulties, which is more than in most primary schools. When children start in the Reception Year there is a wide spread of individual attainment and there is also variation from year to year. Taken collectively, children’s attainment on entry is broadly average for their age. The school has recently gone through an unsettled period and has had four headteachers during the last four years. The present headteacher has been in post for a year, having been acting headteacher prior to this. There have also been several changes in the teaching staff.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Rodmarton School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006

p.3

Grade: 4

In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than in all the circumstances it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a Notice to Improve. Significant improvement is required in relation to pupils’ progress and the quality of teaching. The overall effectiveness of the school is inadequate as is the value for money provided. Poor progress has been made since the last inspection and the school is no longer meeting pupils’ needs well enough. Many pupils are underachieving and standards are too low. In particular, the most capable pupils and those with learning difficulties do not do well enough. The main cause of underachievement is teaching that is too inconsistent and is inadequate overall. The unsettled period in staffing, including at

p.4

Grade: 4

senior leadership level, has taken its toll. It has led to an unsatisfactory quality of education, including in the Reception Year. Although things are not good enough, the school is demonstrating that it has the necessary capacity to improve and its self-evaluation is satisfactory. This capacity is there even though the school judged the improvements already made to result in the school’s overall effectiveness being satisfactory. Action has already started to rectify some of the main weaknesses. Parents continue to be pleased with the school and have confidence in the new headteacher, as do the governors. There is some good expertise on the staff, particularly with regard to special educational needs. However, teachers’ involvement in leadership and management and in accountability for pupils’ standards and progress is underdeveloped. The school does some things well. There are significant strengths in pupils’ personal

p.4

Grade: 4

development and in the care for their welfare. Pupils like the adults in school who look after them well. They have good attitudes to learning and behaviour is good. Pupils of all ages and from all backgrounds mix well. Although there is good care for pupils personally, pupils are not given clear enough guidance about how to improve their school work. Pupils’ targets for English and mathematics are not sufficiently matched to their individual needs and not all marking is good enough.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Match teaching to pupils’ differing needs so that they all do as well as they should. • Improve the guidance to pupils so that they are clear about what they need to do to make progress with their school work. • Increase the involvement of teachers in leading and managing the school and make sure that they are accountable for pupils’ standards and progress. 2 Inspection Report: Rodmarton School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006

p.4

Grade: 4

Pupils’ progress through the school is inadequate. In particular, pupils with learning difficulties and the most capable ones do not do as well as they should. This is of particular concern as, in several year groups, there is a mix of very capable pupils and those with significant learning difficulties, with few who are in the middle. Underachievement begins in the Reception Year and is continued in Years 1 and 2. This underachievement is to some extent evident in pupils’ test results at the end of Year 2, which have often been below the national average in recent years in reading, writing and mathematics. In Years 3 and 4 standards are exceptionally low. These pupils were low attaining when they reached Year 3, and their current overall progress is too slow, especially in writing. Some more capable pupils in Year 4 have not moved on sufficiently since the end of Year 2. Although standards in pupils’ school work are below average in the current Year 6

p.5

Grade: 4

overall, this year group began Year 3 with below average standards and a significant proportion has learning difficulties. Pupils with learning difficulties in Years 5 and 6 are making good gains this year. Overall, the pupils now in Year 6, including the more capable ones, are doing as well as they should be in mathematics. However, there are examples of more capable pupils in Year 5 underachieving in writing. The inspection evidence on the standard of pupils’ school work shows that older pupils are currently on course to reach appropriately challenging targets in relation to their starting points in mathematics but not all are on course to do so in writing.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils’ personal development, including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, is good overall. Pupils enjoy school, and say how much they enjoy activities such as sports and brass lessons. They really like their teachers and the other adults who help them. Attitudes to work are good although there is some restlessness when pupils are required to sit gathered together on the carpet for too long. Pupils with learning difficulties try hard. Relationships are good and pupils from different backgrounds mix well. Behaviour is good in lessons and around the school. Pupils show a good awareness of others as, for example, they follow safe practices in moving sensibly about the school. Pupils have a good understanding of how to keep fit and healthy. They make a good contribution to the school community through the school council. They also contribute to the wider community by raising funds for charities and by taking part in local events.

p.5

Grade: 2

Although skills important for their future lives, such as working together, develop well, too many pupils do not develop adequate basic skills, particularly in writing. 3 Inspection Report: Rodmarton School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 Moral and social development is the strongest feature of personal development. Pupils’ understanding of the diversity of modern multicultural Britain is a relatively less well developed aspect. Attendance and punctuality are satisfactory.

p.5

Grade: 4

Inadequate teaching is the main cause of pupils’ underachievement. There are some positive features, particularly in the quality of relationships between teachers and pupils, which result in pupils having good attitudes to learning. Learning support workers are often used well to work intensively with individuals or groups. At such times there is effective learning, for example in the Reception Year or for pupils with learning difficulties. However, the needs of these pupils are not met well enough at other times. The main weakness in teaching is that it is not well enough matched to pupils’ differing needs. In the Reception Year to Year 2, for instance, teaching is often matched to the age of the pupils rather than to their capabilities and what they already know, understand and can do. In Years 3 and 4, the adult input in whole-class sessions and the activities that follow are too similar for all pupils. Often, pupils with learning

p.6

Grade: 4

difficulties have little understanding of the lesson’s content and the more capable pupils coast along with work that is too easy. In Years 5 and 6, teaching is better matched to pupils’ needs than in other years. Expectations of the standards all pupils are capable of attaining are appropriately high in mathematics but there is not enough challenge for the more capable pupils in writing.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum satisfactorily covers the recommended areas of learning for children in the Reception Year and the National Curriculum in Years 1 to 6. Good attention is given to pupils’ personal development and well-being. This begins in the Reception Year with a strong focus on personal, social and emotional development. The comprehensive programme of personal, social and health education helps older pupils to make informed choices about how to keep safe. Enrichment of the curriculum is good with a wider range of extra-curricular activities than is found in most small schools. Visits and visitors broaden pupils’ experiences, as do French lessons and a variety of sporting activities. Provision for mathematics has improved this year through a whole-school focus on developing skills in written calculations and numeracy. Some good practice is now taking place in this area in Years 5 and 6. The school recognises that further work is

p.6

Grade: 3

needed to ensure that mathematics provision is good enough in all years. There is 4 Inspection Report: Rodmarton School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 insufficient focus on developing skills in writing. The more capable pupils, for example, are not given enough opportunities to write at length for different purposes.

p.6

Grade: 3

Care, guidance and support are satisfactory overall. The warm family atmosphere does much to nurture pupils’ personal development. Pupils feel safe and secure at school and are confident that they have an adult to whom they can turn should the need arise. Good relationships are successfully promoted and older pupils are encouraged to care for younger ones. Pupils have a good voice in the school through the school council. Health and safety arrangements are satisfactory, as are those for child protection. The school works closely with parents of pupils from all backgrounds. Guidance to pupils about how to improve their school work is a weakness. Pupils have targets with which they are familiar, but these targets are not closely enough matched to their individual needs. There is some good marking to support pupils in Years 5 and 6, but marking is not used well enough in other years.

p.7

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory overall because capacity for improvement is being demonstrated. Self-evaluation is satisfactory and the headteacher has a generally accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. She has gained the confidence of parents and ensures that pupils have a good voice in the school. The headteacher and staff have worked closely with the local authority to improve mathematics provision this year. As a result, the older pupils are now making secure progress in this area although the school recognises that more work is needed. Action has also started, for example, to ensure that the needs of all those taught together in Reception to Year 2 are met. There is some valuable expertise within the staff although this is not yet used fully. The special educational needs co-ordinator has considerable understanding of the needs of all pupils with learning difficulties. She ensures that they get good support

p.7

Grade: 3

through intensive one-to-one or small group teaching. However, few checks are made on the quality of provision for these pupils within lessons. Involvement of teachers as leaders and managers with accountability for pupils’ standards and progress is underdeveloped. A start has been made with the appointment of a new mathematics co-ordinator. Governors have demonstrated commitment to the school and have supported it through its recent unsettled period. They have a reasonable awareness of the school’s strengths and weaknesses and recognise that the many changes in leadership and staffing have taken their toll on the quality of education. They know that changes are necessary. 5 Inspection Report: Rodmarton School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 The school’s progress since its last inspection has been poor. With settled staffing now, including at senior leadership level, indications are that it can rectify its

p.7

Grade: 3

weaknesses. 6 Inspection Report: Rodmarton School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 .

p.8

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 Inspection Report: Rodmarton School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006

p.9

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.10

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 4 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.10

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well do learners achieve? NA 4 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.10

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 4 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.10

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.10

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.10

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.10

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 4 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 4 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.11

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.11

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.11

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.11

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

No There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for making us welcome when we visited your school. We enjoyed talking with you. We found that by the time you reach Years 5 and 6 you are very mature and sensible. We saw that pupils of all ages like school and behave well. You get on well together and those of you who are older look after the younger ones. You were very courteous and polite to us. You told us that the adults look after you well and we agree. We also agree that you have many interesting activities in addition to your usual lessons, such as sports and brass lessons in Years 3 to 6. We know that there have been lots of changes of teachers lately and that the older pupils have had several different headteachers. Things are more settled now. We have asked your headteacher and all the other adults to do some things to make sure that you all do as well as you should. We have asked the adults to make sure that the teaching is always at just the right level for

p.12

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

you. We have also asked them to make sure that you are told clearly how to make good progress. All the adults will be working hard together to make sure that the school does its best for you. Other inspectors will visit the school to see how they are getting on. Thank you once again for your help.

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion