Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St White's Primary School

Inspected 26 Apr 2006 · published 18 May 2006 · URN 115520

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Janet Simms

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Apr 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Simms

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    GL14 3DH

  • Name on report verified

    St White's Primary School

  • URN verified

    115520

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 22% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyeffectiveexceptionallyimprovedeffectivelyexemplarysupportivepositive
Criticismweaknessesweakerinadequatebelowdeclinednot alwaysinsufficientlyconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1363w+56
  • What needs to improve1383w+27

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,698
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%What needs to improve 50%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report St White's Primary School

p.1

115520 Unique Reference Number Gloucestershire LEA 279615 Inspection number 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006 Inspection dates Janet Simms AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

St White's Road School address Primary Type of school Cinderford Community School category Gloucestershire GL14 3DH 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01594 822311 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01594 822578 Fax number 294 Number on roll Mrs Sylvia Doggett Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Paul Woodward Headteacher 11 October 1999 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 279615 25 April 2006 - 4 to 11 26 April 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

St White’s is a community primary school situated on two sites, either side of an increasingly busy road in Cinderford, Gloucestershire. With nearly 300 pupils, it is larger than average. Almost all pupils are White British, with English as their first language. There is an average number of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities. Numbers claiming free school meals are below average.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St White's Primary School, 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The school provides a satisfactory education for its pupils. The school evaluated its standard of education as good but, while some elements of its work are good, pupils’ academic achievements are not high enough for this to be true overall. Children in Reception make a secure start and settle quickly. Progress is satisfactory and by the time they enter Year 1, children’s standards match expectations, with personal and social skills well developed. Progress is satisfactory in Years 1 and 2, but slower in Years 3 to 6. In past years this resulted in below average standards in Year 6. Recent improvements in organisation and practice have increased the rate of older pupils’ progress, so they are catching up, although some weaknesses remain. Writing skills are below average on entry and remain weaker than most aspects of work through all year groups. The school recognises this and now has effective strategies in place to improve writing.

p.4

Grade: 3

Personal development and well-being are good. Pupils’ attitudes and behaviour in lessons and at play are good, and sometimes exemplary. They readily engage in pleasant conversation and are interested in what others have to say. Pupils understand how to live healthily and enjoy opportunities for exercise and fitness. Teaching and learning are satisfactory but rather stronger for younger pupils, as more able pupils in Years 3 to 6 are not stretched as much as they could be. The curriculum is satisfactory, with good focus on developing creativity, but arrangements for mathematics in Years 3 to 6 restrict some pupils’ progress. Care, guidance and welfare are satisfactory, but assessment and target setting have weaknesses which have hindered achievement. External agencies are satisfactorily involved in helping pupils to achieve their potential. Leadership and management are satisfactory, with particular strengths in developing

p.4

Grade: 3

a safe and supportive atmosphere in the school. Improvement since the last report has been satisfactory. Older pupils’ achievement declined for a period but effective measures are being taken to turn things round, indicating that the school has adequate capacity to make further improvements. The school provides satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Improve achievement in Years 3 to 6 by strengthening teaching to provide more challenging work for able pupils and more opportunities for pupils to develop problem-solving skills in mathematics. • Improve the presentation of pupils’ written work and opportunities for more able pupils to write extended pieces of English. • Improve individual tracking and target setting to ensure that all pupils, particularly older ones, achieve more. 2 Inspection Report: St White's Primary School, 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006

p.4

Grade: 3

When children enter the school, standards are broadly average, although writing is weaker. They make satisfactory progress through Reception and enter Year 1 with broadly average standards. Satisfactory progress continues to Year 2, where standards in national tests have been average for several years. Standards were below average in recent Year 6 tests. The school did not meet its 2005 targets, which were suitably challenging. As a result of recently implemented measures to improve this, progress is now satisfactory in Years 3 to 6 and standards in the current Year 6 are closer to the average. However, more able pupils still perform less well than they could because improved systems for identifying and planning to challenge them have only just been put in place. Across Years 3 to 6, pupils show weaknesses in problem-solving skills in mathematics. Writing skills are a weaker part of pupils’ work throughout the school. They do not

p.5

Grade: 3

present written work carefully enough and more able pupils in Years 3 to 6 do not write enough extended work, although opportunities to do so have recently improved. However, the school’s emphasis on developing pupils’ creative experience leads to good achievement in areas such as art. Throughout the school, achievement of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is satisfactory in all aspects of work.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils’ personal development and well-being, including spiritual, moral, social and cultural aspects, are good. Relationships are good. Pupils are confident, display good attitudes and enjoy their work. They respect each other, working successfully in groups and pairs. This generates very positive atmospheres in lessons and at play. Pupils value teachers’ rewards for good behaviour, effort and achievement, which raise self-esteem. They talk enthusiastically about what they enjoy, and feel safe and secure in school. Attendance is satisfactory. Pupils know what to do when occasional bad behaviour occurs because school systems are effective. They understand school rules and what may happen if they break them. Pupils are satisfactorily involved in charity and fundraising activities. Competitions are held to raise money to help educate an African pupil, for example. The school council has successfully contributed several ideas to improve the pupils’ environment. These

p.5

Grade: 2

include better playground games and the peer mediation system which helps resolve disagreements during playtimes. Pupils respond well to “healthy living” opportunities such as the CHAMPS scheme, which rewards those involved in physical exercise, and they run a “healthy” tuck shop. Pupils are properly prepared for future education and work now that achievement in English and mathematics is better in Years 3 to 6. 3 Inspection Report: St White's Primary School, 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory, but stronger in Reception and Years 1 and 2 than in Years 3 to 6. Teachers plan carefully and share learning objectives with classes. They check pupils’ understanding well, managing behaviour skilfully. Across all ages and subjects, pupils apply themselves well to learning. They collaborate purposefully in groups and enjoy acquiring new skills and knowledge. Older pupils begin to develop independent learning skills. The school has concentrated on improving the quality of teaching in Years 3 to 6 after the recent run of disappointing test results. This is bearing fruit and pupils are now learning at a faster rate. There are still weaknesses in the pace and rigour of some work, particularly in the level of challenge for more able pupils. In some lessons the use of resources to engage pupils is also unimaginative. The school’s assessment systems are improving, but teachers do not always use

p.6

Grade: 3

knowledge of prior attainment to ensure that teaching fully challenges all pupils. Many pupils do not know what their targets are or what they mean. Those with learning difficulties and disabilities are properly identified and they learn well. Marking is satisfactory and most pupils learn from teachers’ supportive comments. Information and communication technology is beginning to improve learning; for instance, in Years 5 and 6, laptops have enabled pupils to observe Egyptian artefacts closely. Few classrooms have interactive whiteboards but the school is trying to improve this.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is broad and balanced throughout the school. It is suitable for the needs of children in the Reception Year. This secure start ensures that they are satisfactorily prepared for Year 1 because they have good personal and social skills and work together well. Good artwork features strongly in creative indoor and outdoor displays. The mathematics curriculum has some weaknesses. It does not provide consistent opportunity for pupils to develop problem-solving skills, so most find it difficult to apply mathematical knowledge and understanding. Recent additional funding has been well used to enable large classes of older pupils to be split, so pupils are now making better progress. The school provides satisfactorily for pupils with learning difficulties through well-targeted individual support programmes. Older pupils enjoy a good range of after-school clubs, including many sporting opportunities, but there are limited activities for younger pupils. Well-organised

p.6

Grade: 3

lunchtime sessions promote healthy lifestyles through energetic, structured play. Pupils greatly enjoy visits, for example, to the local ‘wilderness centre’, which develops observational art skills well. 4 Inspection Report: St White's Primary School, 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006

p.6

Grade: 3

The quality of care, guidance and support is satisfactory. Staff are very sensitive to the challenges of working on a split site, such as crossing a busy road, and manage them well. Pupils work in a supportive, caring environment and child protection procedures are secure. Systems to monitor and track pupils’ progress have not been established long enough to be fully effective. Older pupils are insufficiently involved in setting their targets and many do not understand them. The school supports pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities well, so they enjoy work and achieve well. “Booster” lessons help raise achievement for targeted groups. However, identification of and provision for gifted and talented pupils have barely started. The school recognises that the use of assessment information is in its early stages and has rightly prioritised this. Improvements in assessment are already helping to raise achievement.

p.7

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory. Governors play their proper role in challenging leaders. An example of this is their concern about recent test results in Year 6, which they helped to analyse. Parents value the school’s provision and feel their children are happy and secure. Pupils strongly endorse this. Self-evaluation is improving, but currently lacks sufficient focus on achievement. This has led to managers believing that the school is more effective than it is. The school has recently recognised weaknesses and implemented improvements to address them. Leaders actively seek ways to engage parents more effectively in their children’s education, but are disappointed that efforts have had a lack of response. Such involvement declines as pupils get older. Resources, including staff, are sufficient and properly managed to provide a suitable curriculum. Outside agencies are properly involved in supporting achievement. Recent

p.7

Grade: 3

improvements are particularly benefiting older, more able pupils, who are now closer to achieving their potential. Leaders have been successful in creating a safe, caring environment in which pupils enjoy learning. Since the last inspection, some aspects of provision have improved. Accurate identification of several areas still requiring improvement, such as assessment and tracking, demonstrates satisfactory capacity to improve. 5 Inspection Report: St White's Primary School, 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St White's Primary School, 25 April 2006 to 26 April 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you very much for making us so welcome in your school on 25 and 26 April. The other inspectors and I were very pleased to hear your feelings about the school and were glad you talked to us in such a friendly and polite way. I am writing to let you know what we found out about your school. Here are the main points: Good things: • You feel happy and safe in the school and your parents are pleased with what you do there. • You enjoy learning and work well together in lessons. You play nicely together and your behaviour is very good when you work and play. • Your teachers take good care of you and make sure you keep safe, including the times when you cross the busy road. • Older pupils are starting to make better progress. • You like after-school activities and enjoy opportunities to keep fit and healthy. Things which could be better: • We feel that older pupils have not been progressing well enough, but that you have started to do so recently. You need

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

to understand better how “problem solving” is used in all areas of mathematics. • Your written work could be better presented and some of you need to write longer, more complicated pieces of English. • Not all of you fully understand your targets and what they mean. Teachers are going to find ways to make these clearer to you and to find better ways of tracking how well you are doing in your learning. We know you will try to help with this, so you can explain your targets clearly to other people, including your parents. Thank you again. Yours sincerely Janet Simms, Lead inspector

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion