Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Luke's Church of England Controlled Primary School

Inspected 13 Jan 2006 · published 6 Feb 2006 · URN 115082

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Jan 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ruth Frith LI

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CO5 0SU

  • Name on report verified

    St Luke's Church of England Controlled Primary School

  • URN verified

    115082

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+78Very positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresseffectivelyeffectiveexceptionallymake good progressoutstandingimprovedenjoy
Criticismweaknessesinadequatebelowlowvariablenot effectivelowernot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1291w+87
  • What needs to improve1502w+65

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,756
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%What needs to improve 53%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report St Luke's Church of England Controlled Primary School

p.1

115082 Unique Reference Number ESSEX LEA LEA 279510 Inspection number 12 January 2006 to 13 January 2006 Inspection dates Ms. Ruth Frith LI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Church Road School address Primary Type of school CO5 0SU Voluntary controlled School category 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01621815456 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01621819887 Fax number 288 Number on roll Mr.Julian Wyncoll Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs. Wendy Enguell Headteacher Not applicable Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 279510 12 January 2006 - 4 to 11 13 January 2006 Inspection Report: St Luke's Church of England Controlled Primary School, 12 January 2006 to 13 January 2006

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a larger than average primary school, situated in the village of Tiptree, where a significant number of pupils come from outside the school's immediate catchment area. Most pupils come from White British backgrounds. The percentage receiving free school meals is below the national average. Children's attainment on entry is below the local authority average. The percentage of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is broadly average and a small number have statements for special educational needs. Five new teachers started at the school at the beginning of the current academic year.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St Luke's Church of England Controlled Primary School, 12 January 2006 to 13 January 2006

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school where the individual child lies at the heart of all its work. Staff meet the pastoral needs of pupils well and are working hard to drive up academic standards. Many pupils find learning difficult. The school strives to counter this through the provision of a rich curriculum, stimulating teaching and effective support and guidance. Quality and standards in the Foundation Stage are good and children quickly adapt to school life. Standards by the end of Year 2 are broadly average, which indicates good progress. By the end of Year 6, standards are broadly satisfactory, which indicates good progress from pupils' below average attainment entry to school. Teaching and learning are good overall. Although the vast majority of teaching is good and occasionally outstanding, teaching is not so effective in lower Key Stage 2, where pupils' learning slows. This affects the progress made over time from Key Stage 1 to

p.4

Grade: 2

Key Stage 2. The curriculum is stimulating and makes pupils enthusiastic and keen to learn. Staff are developing pupils' spoken and written language but more needs to be done. Although pupils know they should work hard to improve, they are frequently unsure about what they should do. Improvement since the last inspection has been good. The enthusiasm and commitment of staff and governors, together with the headteacher's and deputy headteacher's good leadership, show that the school has a good capacity to improve. Staff have a clear understanding of what they do well and have identified appropriate priorities for improvement. These arise from the good self-evaluation procedures, the results of which closely correlate with the inspection findings. The school provides good value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

- Improve the quality of teaching at lower Key Stage 2 so that pupils' good progress is maintained throughout their time in school. - Improve the target-setting process for pupils so that they more clearly understand what they need to do to improve their work. - Make greater use of literature to extend pupils' spoken and written language.

p.4

Grade: 2

From below-average starting points, pupils make good progress and achieve well overall. Children respond well to the good quality teaching they receive when they start school and settle quickly to learning. Pupils continue to do well so that by the time they reach the end of Year 2, standards in reading, writing and mathematics are broadly average. Pupils in the current Year 2 are well challenged and are likely to meet the realistic targets set. However, in Years 3 and 4, the pupils' rate of learning slows. Evidence indicates that there is a legacy of underachievement over several years for pupils in these year-groups. Pupils' progress in Years 5 and 6 is good and this partly compensates for weaknesses in Years 3 and 4. Pupils' standards are broadly average in English, mathematics and science by the time they leave school. Staff have recognised the need to raise achievement in writing following the disappointing test results last

p.4

Grade: 2

2 Inspection Report: St Luke's Church of England Controlled Primary School, 12 January 2006 to 13 January 2006 year and are ensuring that pupils are better prepared to tackle the specific tasks set. There have been significant improvements in pupils' standards in information and communication technology due to good leadership, improved resources, a richer curriculum and better teaching. The most capable pupils generally receive sufficiently challenging work, which results in good achievement, as shown by the good number who attained the higher levels in the national tests last year. Pupils with learning difficulties usually achieve well because their needs are quickly identified and good support is given by the class teachers and skilled support staff.

p.4

Grade: 2

Personal development and well-being are good. Attendance is above the national average. Pupils arrive at school punctually and settle quickly to work. Most approach learning with enjoyment and confidence. They develop mature attitudes to healthy living and talk confidently about sensible eating, drinking and regular exercise. Older pupils make willing and helpful contributions to the school and the wider community as play leaders and librarians and through projects that support charities or local recreation amenities. They have social and team-work skills that promise sound future well-being. These are applied well in lessons and in activities, such as helping the school's visitors and the operation of a thriving and effective school council. In recognition of potential hazards, many of the older pupils achieve cycling proficiency awards and some also learn about basic first aid. Though there are occasional

p.5

Grade: 2

exceptions, the behaviour of the pupils in lessons and around the school is good. The pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Most develop sound self-esteem even though many start school with low personal aspirations and ambitions. They have a clear understanding of right and wrong and a healthy interest in, and respect for, the range of individuals, groups and activities in the local and wider community.

p.5

Grade: 2

Overall, teaching and learning are good, though pupils in Years 3 and 4 make slower progress than those in other year groups because the teaching is more variable. The senior management is working effectively to improve teaching in these year groups. Many pupils do not find learning easy and sometimes believe they cannot achieve high standards. Teachers work very hard to counter this and provide them with wide-ranging opportunities to help them become interested and motivated. Good relationships and a safe ethos in classrooms provide a basis for the pupils' learning where pupils can try out ideas and make mistakes without being ridiculed. Pupils speak warmly about adults in school being friendly and supportive. Most teachers are enthusiastic and knowledgeable and plan their lessons well. Objectives for lessons are shared and pupils reflect effectively on their learning. Teachers know their pupils well and track progress

p.5

Grade: 2

3 Inspection Report: St Luke's Church of England Controlled Primary School, 12 January 2006 to 13 January 2006 carefully. Underachievement is picked up quickly and appropriate steps are taken, such as identifying pupils for booster groups. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities are provided for well and make good progress. Most pupils feel their work is marked well and teachers give an indication of what could be improved. Pupils are less clear about their targets, which aim to raise standards over time. For example, they know that they have to improve in mathematics and writing, but do not specifically know how to do this. Occasionally, their targets are written using vocabulary that the pupils do not understand. The school recognises that it needs to make greater use of literature to help pupils use a wider range of language, including formal Standard English.

p.5

Grade: 2

The curriculum is good. Recent improvements have ensured that it meets statutory requirements and the needs of pupils. The school has focused on making topics more exciting and links between subjects more relevant. Good use of speaking and listening activities, art and drama enhance many subjects. The Foundation Stage curriculum for children in the Reception classes is good and the effective planning ensures that children take full advantage of learning through discovery and investigation. Senior managers are strongly committed to widening the experiences of all pupils and to providing a good range of visits and visitors. These enrich pupils' appreciation of the arts, history and the wider world. A good range of extra-curricular activities helps pupils develop a healthy lifestyle and learn new skills, such as chess and French. However, some inequality of provision is caused by having three classes accommodated

p.6

Grade: 2

in temporary classrooms quite a distance from the main school building.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school makes good and strongly inclusive provision to support pupils' development. Efficient day-to-day care is based on good communication and relationships between pupils, staff and parents. The school recognises potential hazards quickly and uses its safeguarding arrangements systematically. Risk assessments are conducted routinely. Staff recruitment, training and management reflect up-to-date requirements for child protection. The school's arrangements for assessment enable the staff and senior managers to share information about pupils' attainment. They refresh this frequently, track the progress of individuals and identify pupils who have specific learning needs or who risk under-achievement. Helpful measures are introduced by directing the work of teaching assistants towards particular subjects or groups of pupils. Parents are kept well-informed about their children's progress. The school is approachable and helpful

p.6

Grade: 2

in resolving difficulties through the use of the 'Lavender Room', where pupils receive respite, guidance and support. 4 Inspection Report: St Luke's Church of England Controlled Primary School, 12 January 2006 to 13 January 2006

p.6

Grade: 2

The headteacher, supported effectively by the deputy headteacher, leads the school well. There is a strong sense of shared purpose and teamwork throughout. New staff have been absorbed quickly into the school community because of these mutual values. Strategic planning is good and reflects the views of parents, teachers, governors and pupils. The school has clarity of purpose and a sustained and determined approach to raising standards, aided by the staff's good use of external experts. Gains in academic standards are, however, hard won. School data show that pupils are now making good progress in the reception year, Key Stage 1 and upper classes in Key Stage 2. There is an effective and appropriate strategy which is now tackling the slower progress in lower Key Stage 2. The senior leadership team has a very good understanding of the school's strengths and weaknesses and what needs to be done to extend the range

p.7

Grade: 2

and quality of provision. Members of the team act as good role models. A particular skill of the headteacher lies in devolving leadership and encouraging the professional development of individual members of the school team. Finance is managed well and the school provides good value for money. A significant change in the governing body recently has meant that a number of governors are still developing their understanding of the role. Nevertheless, they are very committed and supportive, and several are prepared to challenge appropriately, when needed. The school has made good improvement since the last inspection and its capacity for further improvement is good. 5 Inspection Report: St Luke's Church of England Controlled Primary School, 12 January 2006 to 13 January 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St Luke's Church of England Controlled Primary School, 12 January 2006 to 13 January 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you very much for making us feel welcome in your school, for talking to us and for answering our questions. We think St. Luke's is a good school and particularly like the following: All staff work very well together as a team and want you to do as well as you can. They give you interesting work which helps you to do well. They enjoy teaching you. - You enjoy school a lot and are keen to do good work. You like the rewards you are given that recognise how well you are doing. - You behave well and are kind to each other. You work and play together well. - Staff look after you well and you feel safe in school. Mrs Enguell and the staff work hard and want to do the best for you. They have lots of ideas which will help the school to improve even further. - They will make sure that the quality of teaching is good throughout the school so that you always make good progress. - They will provide clearer and more focused targets so

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

that you fully understand what you should do to improve your work. - They will make more use of different types of literature so that you learn how to speak and write using a wider range of exciting and appropriate words. Thank you once again and good luck in the future.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion