Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Mayfield Church of England Primary School

Inspected 15 Jun 2006 · published 6 Jul 2006 · URN 114512

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

David Collard

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jun 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Collard

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    TN20 6TA

  • Name on report verified

    Mayfield Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    114512

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 19% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyimprovedexceptionallygood progressstrongstrengthsenjoypositive
Criticismweaknesseslackinadequatepoornot yetbelowdisruptinsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1374w+65
  • What needs to improve1438w+18

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,772
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%What needs to improve 51%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Mayfield Church of England Primary School

p.1

114512 Unique Reference Number East Sussex LEA 279400 Inspection number 15 June 2006 to 15 June 2006 Inspection dates David Collard AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Fletching Street School address Primary Type of school Mayfield Voluntary controlled School category East Sussex TN20 6TA 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01435 873185 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01435 873553 Fax number 131 Number on roll Mr Alan Nethercot Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Ms Sue Hooper Headteacher 19 June 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 279400 15 June 2006 - 4 to 11 15 June 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Mayfield is a smaller-than-average village primary school. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is below that nationally and there are no pupils from minority ethnic groups. At the time of the inspection, the newly appointed headteacher had only been in post for six weeks. Previously, the school had been led by an acting headteacher, supported by an acting deputy headteacher.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Mayfield Church of England Primary School, 15 June 2006 to 15 June 2006

p.3

Grade: 3

The school presently provides a satisfactory quality of education but has the potential to improve very rapidly under the strong, determined leadership provided by the new headteacher and acting deputy headteacher. Even in a short space of time, there is evidence of an impact on pupils’ achievement and the quality of provision, particularly teaching. This is because there has been a stringent and accurate evaluation of both the key strengths and weaknesses. The standards and achievement of pupils, including those in the Foundation Stage, are satisfactory. Children enter the school with the attainment expected for their age, make satisfactory and sometimes good progress through the Reception class and, despite some variability in the interim, achieve the nationally expected levels by the time they leave the school in Year 6. More significantly, progress for higher-attaining pupils has improved and nearly a fifth now

p.4

Grade: 3

reach the higher levels. Teaching, the quality of the curriculum offered and the care of pupils are all satisfactory. There have been many staff changes and this along with the lack of a comprehensive analysis of the assessment data in the past meant that teachers did not know exactly how pupils were progressing. This is no longer the case. The governing body, staff and the pupils are now very aware of the improvements needed. Significantly, the difficult messages have been conveyed in a sensitive way and, as a result, the school has continued to enjoy very solid support from parents and pupils. The school now readily recognises that, while pupils’ progress has generally remained at satisfactory levels overall between the two inspections, more progress could have been made that would have addressed the variability in its provision. There is a clear determination to improve this position as quickly as possible but, at present, the school

p.4

Grade: 3

only provides satisfactory value for money.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Build on the early successes in action planning so that all pupils achieve as well as they can. • Raise the quality of satisfactory teaching to that of the best so that pupils are effectively challenged. • Help teachers make the best use of the new tracking data so that they all have a better understanding of pupils’ progress and plan activities to ensure better achievement.

p.4

Grade: 3

Achievement is satisfactory. The impact of better support for more-able pupils can be seen in the marked improvement in their overall performance. The challenging targets are likely to be met this year and possibly exceeded for the more-able pupils in English. 2 Inspection Report: Mayfield Church of England Primary School, 15 June 2006 to 15 June 2006 Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities make satisfactory progress because their needs are now closely identified and appropriate support is effectively provided. Children make satisfactory progress through the Foundation Stage and are suitably prepared for work when they start Year 1. Nearly all achieve the expected goals for learning and make particularly good progress with their communication, language and literacy. As in last few years, pupils will leave Year 6 with the standards expected for their age. While this represents satisfactory achievement overall, data analysed by the headteacher

p.4

Grade: 3

shows that pupils’ progress has fluctuated in the time they have been at the school. For instance, those now in Years 3, 4 and 5 have all underachieved at some time in the past and subsequent teaching has had to remedy this poor progress. The school’s improvement plan rightly focuses its main priority on removing these fluctuations and ensuring that pupils make consistently good progress in each year.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils’ personal development, including that for spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, is good. Pupils enjoy school and attend regularly. Attendance is good. Pupils say they feel safe and the adults listen to their views. They are confident that, whatever the problem, the school can solve it. Pupils of all ages report that they feel able to discuss any problems with adults in school. Through subjects such as science and design and technology, pupils are taught how to play and work safely and about the need for a healthy lifestyle. There are good opportunities to be involved in activities within the local community. Discussions with pupils show that behaviour has improved measurably in the last term. Most pupils behave well and consider the needs of others but in some classes there is occasional inappropriate behaviour that can disrupt the learning of others. This is partly the result of many staff changes, with a consequent lack of knowledge about

p.5

Grade: 2

individuals. For instance, when one boy was asked how many teachers he had had this year, he could not remember all of them. The school is very aware of the importance of pupils being prepared for a future life beyond school, and uses ways to help pupils develop basic skills and financial awareness such as being responsible for their own lunch money.

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory overall but better in the Reception class and Year 6. Here they are much better focused on the individual needs of the pupils and are therefore more challenging and interesting. As a result, pupils are more motivated by what they are asked to do and make the most progress. The satisfactory teaching 3 Inspection Report: Mayfield Church of England Primary School, 15 June 2006 to 15 June 2006 is characterised by more mundane activities, insufficient use of individual activities and some unsatisfactory marking which provides limited guidance for pupils about how to improve their work. The many staffing changes in some classes have led to inconsistencies in teaching but there are good indications of improvement. The headteacher has a good plan to help eliminate the weaknesses through the use of assessment and stringent monitoring of classroom practice. A key priority is to ensure tasks motivate pupils and keep them

p.5

Grade: 3

interested. Already the first effects of this can be seen. Improved planning in literacy and numeracy means activities are more relevant to the capability of the pupils. In addition, teachers have a more realistic view about how well their pupils can do and so are starting to provide more challenging work. One pupil said, “The work seems to be harder since the new headteacher arrived.”

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum provided by the school is satisfactory, with the Foundation Stage curriculum providing particularly rich experiences for learning. Recent curricular revision is now providing a broader base for developing key literacy and numeracy skills as well as promoting important life skills such as being healthy and staying safe. This is still at an early stage of development and so has not yet impacted sufficiently on pupils’ learning. A whole-school focus on Native American Indians was being used well, amongst a group of local schools, to promote the pupils’ personal, social, moral and spiritual development as well as improving academic success. The outside areas and recently developed facilities of an adventure trail and quiet area, together with a wide range of popular clubs and activities, contribute effectively to the extended curriculum. Pupils say that these are a valuable and enjoyable part of

p.6

Grade: 3

their school life and are extending their awareness of society and their roles and responsibilities within it.

p.6

Grade: 3

The care, guidance and support of pupils are satisfactory. Statutory requirements for health and safety and child protection are met. The provision for pupils with learning difficulties has recently been improved because a new dedicated co-ordinator now provides support for teachers in developing individual education plans. Guidance and support of learners is enhanced by good links with external agencies such as the local authority and the educational psychology service. Better guidance for pupils about improving their work needs more attention, although there are some examples of good and helpful feedback. Parents are informed about their children’s progress. However, a small number feel that they could play a more active role in supporting their children if they were kept more fully informed of learning and behavioural targets. 4 Inspection Report: Mayfield Church of England Primary School, 15 June 2006 to 15 June 2006

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory overall but there are some notable strengths such as the particularly strong teamwork between the two senior managers. Since her recent appointment, the headteacher has begun to introduce very effective procedures for monitoring how well the school is doing and consequently has an accurate and realistic understanding of its main strengths and weaknesses. She is ably supported by an acting deputy headteacher. Both have experience of similar issues in other schools so this, along with the improvements already made, indicates that the potential for rapid and effective development is good. Middle managers are less confident in their role but recognise a need for more training to ensure they are able to take an active role in supporting school development. Recently, the more rigorous systems for assessment have made middle managers more accountable for their areas of responsibility. For example, by using careful analysis of

p.7

Grade: 3

the performance data, some members of staff have already identified the need to address the comparative individual weaknesses in learning for some pupils. Although this is not yet a universally adopted system, it is planned to make it so. Parents are positive about the school, with several commenting that they are now more active participants in their children’s learning. Links with parents are strengthening so that they include their views in the procedures for checking school effectiveness. The governing body fulfils its statutory duties and generally has a sound understanding of the development required. A financial deficit in the school budget has now been turned into a small surplus. The governors are aware that continued stringent financial management will be needed this year in order to ensure continued development on a restricted budget. Currently, it does not provide sufficient challenge but plans to

p.7

Grade: 3

extend its monitoring procedures so that it is in a better position to hold the school to account. 5 Inspection Report: Mayfield Church of England Primary School, 15 June 2006 to 15 June 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Mayfield Church of England Primary School, 15 June 2006 to 15 June 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 3 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for looking after us during our recent visit to your school. We enjoyed watching the work you were doing linked to ‘Native American Indians’ and hope the totem pole turns out to be as good as it looked. You are probably wondering what we have said about your school so I have included a few of the main points below. You told us how much you enjoyed school and we could see that this was the case. We thought that when we saw you in lessons nearly all of you behaved well. You told us how you now felt you understood what was expected of you in class and that you were better behaved because of this. Until recently, more of you could have been achieving better but we think this is now improving. Those of you who find work too easy are being given work that you find more challenging and this is helping you to gain higher standards. We think this is likely to improve now there are better systems for checking your test results and from the new half-termly assessments that

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

are given to you. Your teachers provide you with suitable work and we have taken note of the point you made about there being too many changes of teachers. We have asked if this can be changed in the future. You told us you feel safe and well cared for. We agree because we can see that all the adults know you all as individuals. It was very noticeable how friendly it was in the playground and during lunchtime. Your new headteacher has worked hard to improve the opportunities at your school. She, along with your deputy headteacher, has many exciting things planned for the year ahead. We think these will make an improvement and ensure that you all achieve as well as you can. Finally, can we wish you all the best for your time at Mayfield and hope that your future life brings you all you want.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion