Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Beckley Church of England Primary School

Inspected 8 Jun 2006 · published 8 Sept 2006 · URN 114490

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Kathryn Taylor

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Jun 2006

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kathryn Taylor

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    TN31 6RN

  • Name on report verified

    Beckley Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    114490

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−11Mixedmore positive than 31% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedexceptionallyeffectivelyeffectiveconsistentlypositivehappystrengths
Criticismweaknessesinadequatelacknot alwaysshortcomingstoo lownot effectivelimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1253w+25
  • What needs to improve1550w−32

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,765
about usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 44
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%What needs to improve 55%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Beckley Church of England Primary School

p.1

114490 Unique Reference Number East Sussex LEA 279394 Inspection number 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 Inspection dates Kathryn Taylor AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Main Street School address Primary Type of school Beckley Voluntary controlled School category Rye, East Sussex TN31 6RN 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01797 260324 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01797 260324 Fax number 96 Number on roll Mr Mark English Smith Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Margaret Hufford Headteacher 28 February 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 279394 8 June 2006 - 4 to 11 8 June 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors

p.3

Description of the school

Beckley is a small village school. Almost all pupils attending the school are from white British backgrounds and have English as their first language. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties is about average. Socio-economic circumstances are average.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Beckley Church of England Primary School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006

p.3

Grade: 4

In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than in all the circumstances it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a Notice to Improve. This is a happy school with a strong family ethos which provides well for pupils’ personal development. It runs smoothly on a day-to-day basis. Most parents are pleased with the school, although some say that improvements are needed, a view with which inspectors agree. Standards are broadly average in English and science by age 11 and the quality of education is satisfactory overall. Nevertheless, pupils underachieve in mathematics between Years 3 to 6, and standards are below average by age 11. The school has identified the need to improve pupils’ achievement in mathematics and raise standards. Weaknesses in planning and marking pupils’ work mean that pupils are not always

p.4

Grade: 4

challenged sufficiently and the school’s expectations of what the pupils should achieve by the end of Year 6 is too low. Leadership and management are unsatisfactory as senior managers do not have a clear enough picture of the strengths and weaknesses in the school. Nevertheless, the school is making effective use of external support to address some of the weaknesses it has identified. It has the capacity to improve and is improving, albeit slowly. Provision in Reception is satisfactory. The school is not effective and does not provide satisfactory value for money. Inspectors disagree with the school’s own view that it is satisfactory. Significant improvement is required in relation to standards and progress in mathematics between Years 3 and 6 and the headteacher’s and subject leaders’ roles in checking and evaluating teaching, learning, standards and pupils’ progress.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

• Raise standards and improve pupils’ achievement in mathematics between Years 3 and 6. • Improve the way teachers plan and mark pupils’ work so as to support and challenge all pupils to improve. • Implement systems to regularly and rigorously check and evaluate the standard of the school’s work, particularly teaching and pupils’ learning and progress.

p.4

Grade: 4

Standards at age 7 and 11 are broadly average. Although achievement is satisfactory overall in Reception and Years 1 and 2, there is underachievement, particularly in mathematics, between Years 3 to 6. 2 Inspection Report: Beckley Church of England Primary School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 The evidence available does not support the school’s view that children’s attainment on entry to Year 1 is low. It is at least average. Most pupils in the current Reception class have good basic skills in mathematics, communication, language and literacy. The year-on-year variations evident in overall standards at age 7 and 11 are fairly typical of small schools. However, senior managers cannot easily explain these variations, or those across subjects, because of weaknesses in their tracking of pupils’ progress, and in checking teaching and learning. Data for 2005 show that standards in English and science at age 11 were broadly average and progress was satisfactory.

p.4

Grade: 4

Mathematics standards were, however, below average and progress was inadequate as was the case in 2002 and 2004. About half the pupils in Year 6 in 2005 did not make the overall progress expected of them, due to this inadequate progress in mathematics. The targets the school sets for Year 6 pupils are also too low, when taking account of the same pupils’ attainments when they were in Year 2. The school does not have a clear picture of standards that pupils currently in Year 6 are likely to attain, or indeed why some pupils are not on course to attain the standards reasonably expected. Pupils with learning difficulties generally make satisfactory progress. Standards in information and communication technology (ICT) have improved and are now average.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils’ personal development and well-being are good. Pupils understand how to stay safe, the dangers of substance abuse and the importance of healthy lifestyles, diet and regular exercise. Pupils’ enjoyment of school is reflected in their consistently good attendance rates. Pupils form very good relationships, behave well and are confident that any incidents of bullying are swiftly resolved. They are articulate, very polite and friendly. Although they generally have good attitudes towards learning, at least some pupils in Years 3 to 6 say they could sometimes be made to work harder. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good, including their appreciation of other cultures. Pupils contribute very positively to the school and local community. The school council, which meets periodically, gives pupils a voice. Pupils lead a range of successful fund-raising activities, and older pupils perform jobs such

p.5

Grade: 2

as supervising younger children. Pupils’ good social skills prepare them appropriately for secondary school.

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory. Inspection evidence shows good relationships and behaviour management are consistent features of teaching. Teachers and pupils also use ICT increasingly well to support learning across a number of subjects. Staff 3 Inspection Report: Beckley Church of England Primary School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 plan interesting activities and create lively displays to celebrate pupils’ learning. Teaching assistants are generally used well and provide effective support for pupils with learning difficulties. In Reception and Years 1 and 2, tasks are appropriately matched to pupils’ needs. In Years 3 to 6, this is not always the case and expectations are not always high enough, especially for potentially higher attaining pupils. The school has gained very little information about the quality of teaching and learning from checking lessons or evaluating pupils’ work. The school recognises that weaknesses

p.5

Grade: 3

in standards and progress in mathematics at age 11 stem from shortcomings in teaching. All teachers have therefore received additional training to improve their knowledge and skills. While this appears to have had a positive impact on improving teachers’ confidence and lesson delivery, there is as yet no clear picture that this has had any significant impact on all pupils’ learning and progress. Assessment, although developing, still has shortcomings. Assessments in Reception are firmly established. Improved assessments have been introduced through the rest of the school. However, marking does not do enough to explore pupils’ mistakes, guide them about how to improve, and challenge them to work harder and improve the presentation of work. Pupils are given individual targets, but weaknesses in marking raise questions about whether teachers select the most appropriate targets. Parents are keen to support their children’s learning, but a few feel that homework is not used

p.6

Grade: 3

consistently to help their children progress.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory and covers all subjects. That in Reception incorporates all areas of learning with a satisfactory mix of adult-led and independent activities for children. The accommodation limits access to outdoor activities, but improvements to the building are planned. While the curriculum in Years 1 to 6 is satisfactory, the timetables provided during the inspection indicate that there is not enough time allocated to mathematics in Years 3 to 6. Curriculum planning is not consistent across the school and does not specify sufficiently the coverage for different age groups within mixed-age classes. Policies provide too little guidance to teachers about the teaching of subjects. The installation of interactive whiteboards and classroom computers has greatly improved ICT provision since the last inspection, enabling pupils to develop their skills well across subjects. Past weaknesses in provision for religious education have been

p.6

Grade: 3

addressed and the curriculum now provides good examples of work that promote pupils’ understanding of cultural diversity. Curricular enrichment opportunities are good and include instrumental tuition and sporting activities. Visits, including residential visits and visitors to school, are greatly enjoyed by pupils and have a good impact on their learning. There are good links with other schools. The staff work hard to ensure that the physical education curriculum is taught appropriately, despite the lack of a hall. 4 Inspection Report: Beckley Church of England Primary School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006

p.6

Grade: 3

Pastoral support is good, but there are weaknesses in academic guidance for pupils. This is why provision is satisfactory, rather than good. The headteacher and staff know pupils’ personal needs well. They ensure they settle into school quickly, and support them well to make the transfer to secondary school. Child protection procedures are securely in place. Staff maintain good links with external agencies to support vulnerable pupils. Staff and governors take satisfactory steps to ensure the school is safe. Risk assessments are undertaken regularly.

p.7

Grade: 4

Leadership and management are unsatisfactory, due to significant weaknesses in checking teaching, learning, pupils’ work, progress and standards. This limits the reliability of the school self-evaluation document. The school has experienced some staffing and financial difficulties in recent years, which resulted in the headteacher having a heavy teaching commitment. As this is no longer the case, the headteacher has begun to make improvments, for example, to the way in which pupils’ year-on–year progress is tracked and subjects are led. The pace of improvement is, however, slower than it needs to be. This is in part due to a lack of urgency on the part of the school and the lack of monitoring and effective self-evaluation. Senior leaders and teachers are not sufficiently alert to the weaknesses that need addressing, such as those related to marking, teachers’ expectations, planning and some pupils’ limited progress. Consequently, the work the school has done in the

p.7

Grade: 4

recent past has not yet impacted sufficiently on improving pupils’ standards and achievement. Furthermore, there is still some uncertainty about precisely how to tackle weaknesses in mathematics, about the standards individual pupils in Year 6 are likey to attain and why some pupils are not on course to attain the standards that should be reasonably expected of them. The headteacher and staff ensure the school is a caring community that effectively nurtures pupils’ personal development, personal welfare and enjoyment of school. The school runs smoothly on a day-to-day basis. Improvement since the last inspection has been satisfactory, though slower than it should have been. Some weaknesses still need attention. Responsibility for leading subjects has recently been distributed to staff. Although the staff’s roles are as yet limited, they have potential and are receiving appropriate training. Those improvements made and the school’s voluntary participation

p.7

Grade: 4

in a number of external support programmes provides the school with the capacity to improve further. Governance is satisfactory and has improved since the last inspection. Governors support the school well and have a secure understanding of its strengths and weaknesses. 5 Inspection Report: Beckley Church of England Primary School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Beckley Church of England Primary School, 8 June 2006 to 8 June 2006

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 2 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 4 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 4 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 4 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

We enjoyed talking to you and finding out about your school. Thank you for being so helpful and making us welcome. We think there are some good things about your school, and things that need to be improved quickly. These are the things we especially liked about Beckley Primary School: • Everyone who works in the school makes sure that pupils are happy. • You are friendly, polite and helpful and your behaviour is good. • You show respect for adults and each other and get on really well together. • The staff provide many interesting activities that ensure you enjoy school. These are the things that need to improve: • The standards pupils achieve in mathematics by the time they leave the school are usually not as high as in other subjects, and some pupils do not make enough progress. Some older children also told us that they lack confidence with their mathematics work and find it difficult. • We have asked your teachers to check the work in your books more carefully and improve

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

their marking and planning, so that they can tell you how to improve, and encourage some of you to work harder. • We do not feel your work and lessons are looked at often enough by your senior teachers, so that they can see where there are weaknesses and where they need to make improvements. We would like to wish you lots of success in your future education.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion