Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Hertford Junior School
Summary
Steffi Penny (lead), Alexandra House
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
8 Feb 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Alexandra House, Steffi Penny
- Achievement verified
Good
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BN1 7FP
- Name on report verified
Hertford Junior School
- URN verified
114383
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- AchievementGood
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.8
- This is because of the good and, at times, inspirational teaching. p.4
- It is an extremely caring school where everyone is valued and listened to. p.4
- Their responses to the confidential questionnaire were extremely positive. p.4
- This is a good school with a few outstanding features, providing good value for money. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils make good progress and achieve well throughout the school. p.4
- Pupils start in Year 3 with below average standards. p.4
- By the end of Year 6, overall standards are average. p.4
- In 2005, the results from the statutory tests showed that the school has made substantial progress in many areas, for example in science where results were significantly higher than average. p.4
- Although writing has been rightly identified by the school as an area needing improvement, the school now compares favourably with other local schools. p.4
- Most pupils progress at a good and steady rate, including those with special educational needs and looked after children. p.4
- There is some variation between subjects, in the performance of boys and girls, which the school has identified and is attending to, but these are not significantly more than those found nationally. p.4
- The school monitors statutory and optional test results carefully and takes effective p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment13
“This is because of the good and, at times, inspirational teaching.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,428
- about usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Hertford Junior School
p.1
114383 Unique Reference Number Brighton and Hove LEA 279374 Inspection number 8 February 2006 to 8 February 2006 Inspection dates Steffi Penny HMI Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Lynchet Close School address Junior Type of school Brighton Community School category East Sussex BN1 7FP 7 to 11 Age range of pupils 01273 557341 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01273 330919 Fax number 120 Number on roll Mr David Kendall Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Daniel Weiner Headteacher 10 January 2000 Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 279374 8 February 2006 - 7 to 11 8 February 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and one Additional Inspector.
p.3
Description of the school
Hertford Junior School is located within a large mixed housing estate to the north of Brighton. This is a smaller than average sized school which has experienced falling rolls in recent years. Most pupils are White British and have attended the local infant school. The percentage of pupils who have special educational needs is above average, as is the proportion entitled to free school meals.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Hertford Junior School, 8 February 2006 to 8 February 2006
p.3
Grade: 2
This is a good school with a few outstanding features, providing good value for money. It has improved well since the last inspection and its capacity to improve further is good. The school knows itself well and judges itself to be good and the inspection confirms this. It is an extremely caring school where everyone is valued and listened to. A pupil said, 'the headteacher puts children's ideas first' and staff also hold this view. Parents agree. Good relationships are a key feature to the success of this school. Children enjoy coming to school and behave well. They feel that this is a good school because 'all of us get on well together'. Communications are good and parents feel well informed and involved. Their responses to the confidential questionnaire were extremely positive. More could be done to raise the profile of the school in the surrounding area. Standards are average overall, but all pupils achieve well and make
p.4
Grade: 2
good progress. This is because of the good and, at times, inspirational teaching. The headteacher has rightly focused on combating historic issues relating to behaviour and raising standards. The school has made rapid progress in achieving these aims. The introduction of robust systems for monitoring in English, mathematics and science have begun to raise standards and the school knows that these could be even higher, particularly in writing.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• raise the standards in writing to the same high level as those in science • continue to fine-tune the monitoring of pupils’ progress and achievement • raise the profile of the school in the surrounding area.
p.4
Grade: 2
Pupils make good progress and achieve well throughout the school. Pupils start in Year 3 with below average standards. By the end of Year 6, overall standards are average. In 2005, the results from the statutory tests showed that the school has made substantial progress in many areas, for example in science where results were significantly higher than average. Although writing has been rightly identified by the school as an area needing improvement, the school now compares favourably with other local schools. Most pupils progress at a good and steady rate, including those with special educational needs and looked after children. There is some variation between subjects, in the performance of boys and girls, which the school has identified and is attending to, but these are not significantly more than those found nationally. The school monitors statutory and optional test results carefully and takes effective
p.4
Grade: 2
action to address weaknesses. This includes challenging target setting and focused intervention and support. 2 Inspection Report: Hertford Junior School, 8 February 2006 to 8 February 2006
p.4
Grade: 2
Attendance is satisfactory and improving. The school's focus on promoting attendance through weekly newsletters and awards is effective. Pupils have extremely good relationships between themselves and with adults, resulting in good attitudes and behaviour. Pupils have a good grasp of right and wrong and a strong sense of belonging to the school. Pupils' spiritual, moral and social understanding are well developed although their cultural development is a little less so. The school emphasises the need for healthy lifestyles for its own sake and to help children be in a better position to learn. The curriculum and other activities support the school’s aim to become an accredited healthy school, as do the tasty school lunches. Pupils enjoy coming to school because they feel safe, and recent initiatives such as the 'bully box' mean pupils know that action will be taken when they raise concerns. They act sensibly and safely around
p.5
Grade: 2
the school. Pupils believe they are listened to and have voted-in a new school council which has a dedicated budget and acts as an effective avenue for their opinions. They welcome their responsibilities in the school, for example by organising the selling of fruit at playtime, which are giving them good skills for the future.
p.5
Grade: 2
Teaching and learning are good. Excellent relationships ensure that pupils are highly motivated and enjoy learning. Children with special educational needs have particularly close relationships with teachers and other adults that help them to make the best progress they can. Teachers make very good use of resources, particularly, Interactive whiteboards and other. In a good lesson pupils used digital video cameras to evaluate their own poetry performance and improve upon it. Marking is informative and helps pupils to know the next steps in their learning. In the very best teaching, pupils are reminded of their own targets regularly and as a result, use these to improve their work consistently.
p.5
Grade: 2
There is a well planned curriculum provided for both boys and girls, including those with special educational needs. A good range of activities outside lessons is available which many pupils participate in and enjoy, such as gardening, cookery, art, sports and ICT. Specialist teachers for physical education and music provide a greater level of expertise, enabling pupils to develop a better depth of understanding and skills in these areas. The school is rightly proud of its Gold Artsmark Award. Other visitors, workshops, visits and other activities all productively extend understanding and pupils' positive attitudes to learning. Pupils in Year 5 were excited to be going on a residential visit to the Isle of Wight when they are in Year 6. The creative and cross-curricular 3 Inspection Report: Hertford Junior School, 8 February 2006 to 8 February 2006 approach through topic work, along with careful planning, helps pupils to use skills
p.5
Grade: 2
that they have learned in one subject through others. A good example of this in Year 6, where in their music topic pupils are learning about body percussion, which links well with their science topic on the human body and growth and sex education.
p.6
Grade: 2
This is a caring school that provides well for pupils’ health, welfare and security. Both pupils and their parents recognise this and it is a key factor in pupils' positive attitudes to school. Pastoral care is outstanding. Child protection procedures are clear and pupils who are at risk or who are vulnerable, for whatever reason, are quickly identified and supported well. The school works extremely well with a number of outside agencies and parents. A key feature is the use of the ‘buddy’ system to ease the move between the feeder infant school and Year 3. Likewise, the links with local secondary schools are equally constructive. A counselling service was introduced to the school in 2003. It is well thought of by pupils and their parents, and has had a considerable impact in increasing confidence, self-esteem, improved behaviour and attitudes to learning. Support for pupils’ learning through target setting, marking and checking their own
p.6
Grade: 2
understanding of new ideas is effective. Where support is outstanding, it enables pupils to move rapidly in their learning.
p.6
Grade: 2
Leadership and management are good. All staff work as an effective team and take on leadership responsibilities. The headteacher has been in post for a year, following a period of considerable changeover in staff. He has developed a clear and shared vision that identifies raising standards as a priority, whilst also nurturing a community spirit. A parent said 'He is an excellent head who has had a tremendous impact since his arrival'. Staff are committed to providing the best education they can for all pupils. There is a regular cycle of monitoring and evaluation that successfully checks teaching and learning, enabling staff to identify correctly the areas that the school needs to develop to improve further. A consequence of this is improved planning and a sharper focus on learning in lessons. By further fine-tuning, targets could be even more incisive. Governors are fully and effectively involved in the life of the school and share the
p.6
Grade: 2
headteacher’s vision. The school self-evaluation is accurate and it takes into account the views of parents and pupils and responds to them well. More could be done to raise the profile of the school in the local area in order to help increase the number of children on roll. The vast majority of parents feel that the school seeks their views and acts upon them. For example, the after-school club, following parental concerns, is now registered and run by the school. It serves three schools and is currently oversubscribed. 4 Inspection Report: Hertford Junior School, 8 February 2006 to 8 February 2006 .
p.6
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 5 Inspection Report: Hertford Junior School, 8 February 2006 to 8 February 2006
p.7
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.8
learners?
NA 1 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.8
Achievement and standards
NA 2 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.8
Achievement and standards
NA 2 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.8
learners?
NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.8
needs and interests of learners?
NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.8
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.8
and supporting all learners?
NA 1 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.9
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.9
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.9
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.9
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Dear Pupils As you know, your school was inspected on 8 February 2006. Some of you met the inspectors and many of you will have seen us around the school. Thank you for telling us what you thought about your school. This helped us to decide how well you are doing. This letter is to let you know what your school does well and how you can help your school to be even better. Many of your parents or carers responded to a confidential questionnaire and we also took their views into account. Hertford Junior is a good school. We can see that you are very happy in school and that you are proud of the good work that is in your books and on the walls. You really like school and in particular the school clubs and visits. You are friendly and take good care of one another. The staff help you to learn new things in exciting ways and involve lots of other people so that you are getting the best help. We have asked Mr Weiner to work with
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
the staff to look more closely at how fast you are learning and in particular to help you to improve your writing. We have also asked the school to tell more people how good your school is. Perhaps you could help them do this? Thank you again for helping us to have such a great visit to your school. Wishing you a happy and successful future. Steffi Penny Her Majesty's Inspector Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0207 421 6800 F 0207 421 6707 www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion