Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Mudeford Community Infants' School

Inspected 11 Oct 2005 · published 22 Nov 2005 · URN 113738

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Oct 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Burghart RISP

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Outstanding

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Mudeford Community Infants' School

  • URN verified

    113738

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentOutstanding
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+81Very positivemore positive than 96% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyoutstandingenjoyexceptionallyimprovedvery wellwell ledmake good progress
Criticismbelowlackinadequateconcernsnot alwayslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1223w+77
  • What needs to improve1491w+80

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,669
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%What needs to improve 54%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Mudeford Community Infants' School

p.1

113738 Unique Reference Number Dorset LEA 279232 Inspection number 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005 Inspection dates Michael Burghart RISP Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Queen's Road School address Infant Type of school Mudeford Community School category Christchurch, Dorset BH23 3HH 4 to 7 Age range of pupils

p.1

01202 485513 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01202 488142 Fax number 174 Number on roll Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Diane Murcott Headteacher 20 September 1999 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 279232 10 October 2005 - 4 to 7 11 October 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two additional inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This is an above-average-sized infant school which draws its pupils from a diverse area. Virtually all pupils are White British. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties is about average. The percentage of pupils with formal statements of personal need is above average. The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals is below average. Children’s attainment when they entered Reception this year was about average. However, attainment varies year on year from below average to average. The school is an Investor in People and a Healthy School, and received a Department for Education and Skills Achievement Award for improvements in standards in 2002. It has been through an unsettled period with regard to staffing but this is now resolved.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Mudeford Community Infants' School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005

p.3

Grade: 3

This is a happy school. It provides pupils with a secure education and gives sound value for money. The school’s own views match inspectors’ judgements. Standards are average overall with pupils doing better in reading and mathematics than in writing. Pupils make at least satisfactory progress, with those with learning difficulties achieving well for their abilities. Pupils’ personal development is outstanding and the very good care the school takes of pupils continues to be a strength. Teaching is satisfactory overall. The more stable staffing is bringing about improvements, particularly in planning and assessment. The leadership team is good at evaluating strengths and areas for development. It knows that some lessons lack sufficient pace and challenge. Communication with parents over staff changes could be better. Children in Reception are given a good start and usually make sound progress to achieve as well as they

p.4

Grade: 3

should. The school is well led and managed by the headteacher and her deputy. The management of the school as a whole is satisfactory. There is still more to do to develop the ways in which governors and some subject coordinators monitor the effects of new initiatives. There is a good team spirit and a clear commitment to making improvements. The school has a good capacity to improve and this reflects its continued progress since the last inspection. Grade: 3

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

In order to be even better the school should: •raise standards in writing •further improve the quality of teaching and learning by ensuring that pupils are always well challenged, and by developing the pace of lessons •develop the part governors and staff play in managing the school •improve communications with parents over staffing issues.

p.4

Grade: 3

Standards are about average in reading and mathematics but below average in writing. Standards vary year on year with a close match between what pupils achieve and their attainment when they join Reception. Children start school with literacy skills that are often below average. National assessment results in 2005 were down on 2004, but were much the same as 2003. The school’s performance has followed the national trend over the past four years. Pupils make at least satisfactory progress. Those with learning difficulties often make good progress. There is no significant difference in the achievement of boys and girls. Pupils reach the targets set for them but some of these could be more challenging. Consequently, more able pupils’ achievement is satisfactory rather than good. The school, through improved assessment and tracking procedures, has an accurate view 2 Inspection Report: Mudeford Community Infants' School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005

p.4

Grade: 3

of how well pupils are doing. Improving writing and raising the performance of more capable pupils already feature in the school’s improvement plan. Children in Reception make satisfactory progress to reach nearly all that is expected of them before joining Year 1, doing well in personal, social and physical development. Overall, pupils are achieving as well as when the school was last inspected. There has been an improvement in information and communication technology (ICT), where standards are now close to satisfactory, having been below expectations in 1999. Grade: 3

p.5

Grade: 1

Pupils’ personal development and behaviour are outstanding. Pupils really enjoy school and share excellent relationships with adults and each other, for example, when Year 1 pupils entertained parents at the school coffee morning. Pupils learn happily together and say, “This is a smashing school!” The few pupils with specific behavioural needs do well with support. Teachers and assistants value pupils’ efforts and promote very good attitudes in lessons. Attendance is average and most pupils come early to school to enjoy activities such as reading. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Rules, rights and expectations are displayed in classrooms and teachers give clear guidance in these aspects. Spiritual and cultural development is enriched well through studying Aboriginal art and Caribbean music. Parents from different backgrounds contribute positively to cultural development.

p.5

Grade: 1

Pupils express their views and take responsibility effectively, for example, as members of the school council and as monitors helping with physical education (PE) apparatus. They use equipment carefully and develop a good awareness of safe practice. Pupils contribute very well to the wider community and participate very successfully in local competitions such as ‘Christchurch in Bloom’. Pupils develop an excellent understanding of healthy lifestyles through growing vegetables, break time activities, and in daily ‘fruit eating’ periods held in class. Satisfactory basic skills prepare pupils appropriately for everyday life. Grade: 1

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are sound overall with some good features. They are developing well now that the school has a stable staff. Teachers have successfully taken on board the need to vary their approaches to make work interesting, and, where possible, enjoyable. Consequently, pupils are happy and respond well. Learning is secure, and frequently good. 3 Inspection Report: Mudeford Community Infants' School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005 Highlights include: teaching assistants are used well, especially in supporting pupils with learning difficulties teachers’ good questioning techniques get pupils to explain their points of view good class management means work is well planned and prepared staff present a stimulating learning environment children in Reception are taught effectively through a mix of play and more formal opportunities. Increasing the pace and challenge of some lessons is an area for development where

p.5

Grade: 3

expectations, particularly of the more able pupils, could be higher. The school is aware that aspects of teachers’ assessment could be better. Assessment is satisfactory with some good elements in literacy and numeracy. It is used satisfactorily to modify planning and set targets. Improving assessment remains one of the school’s targets to ensure work always builds on what pupils already know. There are good examples of how relationships encourage learning. In a good Year 2 ICT lesson, pupils’ confidence in staff allowed everyone to have a go without fear of making mistakes. Pupils made good progress, learning sometimes from what they got wrong. The lesson was fun! Grade: 3

p.6

Grade: 2

The school provides a good curriculum which has good breadth and balance and meets requirements. Extra support programmes, for example, in literacy, help pupils with learning difficulties to make good progress. Parents and pupils value and talk about the ‘lively, varied activities’. Learning opportunities in Reception and for pupils with particular needs are planned effectively. The school has achieved much in recent years in adapting and upgrading the school buildings to support pupils’ learning. A good range of well equipped indoor and outdoor facilities enrich opportunities. For example, gardening and outside equipment help pupils enjoy and benefit from their play times. An increasing emphasis on practical activities is strengthening enjoyment and learning in lessons. Staff are adjusting the curriculum further to promote more creativity and enjoyment for pupils. A good range of clubs, including early morning aerobics and

p.6

Grade: 2

initiatives for being a Healthy School, extends pupils’ learning. Grade: 2

p.6

Grade: 2

Adults working in the school know pupils well and cooperate very well to provide very good care, good guidance and effective support for all pupils. Arrangements for ensuring welfare and safety are particularly strong. Personal, social and health education 4 Inspection Report: Mudeford Community Infants' School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005 is given clear emphasis in all classes. Pupils on the school council were keen to say that adults are really helpful! Teachers and support staff follow a warm, caring and effective approach when managing pupils’ behaviour. Pupils with specific behavioural and other learning needs receive good support. Teachers mark pupils’ work effectively. Pupils’ views are welcomed in lessons and through the school council, where pupils offer ideas about how to improve the school. Most parents are very supportive. They appreciate being able to work closely with the staff to enhance their children’s education. Many parents accompany children into

p.6

Grade: 2

school at the beginning of each day to help with reading. Children in Reception are very effectively introduced to school life and routines, and settle in very quickly. Year 2 pupils are well prepared for transfer to the junior school. Very good relationships underpin the school’s caring ethos and support pupils’ growing self-esteem. Grade: 2

p.7

Grade: 3

The school is well led and managed by the headteacher in a strong partnership with the deputy. However, the overall quality of management, which includes the contributions of all concerned, is satisfactory. There is good teamwork and a clear educational direction. The quality of the school’s self-evaluation is good and indicates where improvements can be made. There are appropriate procedures to ensure that staff, some of whom are very new to their responsibilities, are involved. The school has a good capacity to improve. Its track record of improvement is sound and has some good features, for example, in how ICT provision has been improved. The effectiveness of staff as subject coordinators reflects a variety of experiences and time in post. It is satisfactory overall and improving. The management of ICT and of support for those with learning difficulties is good. Parents have positive views of the school and its support for their children. “A school

p.7

Grade: 3

that cares about the whole child,” was a comment to inspectors. A minority of parents have concerns about staff changes. The school has managed some difficult staffing issues effectively but has not always communicated what is going on clearly enough to parents. The governance of the school is satisfactory. It has been restricted for a long period by the lack of a clerk. Governors are supportive but their effectiveness in helping to manage the school could be improved by developing how they monitor and contribute to strategic planning. The ageing building is managed well to provide a safe environment, and finances are used effectively to ensure sound value for money. Grade: 3 5 Inspection Report: Mudeford Community Infants' School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Mudeford Community Infants' School, 10 October 2005 to 11 October 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 1 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 1 How well learners enjoy their education NA 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 2 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for making us so welcome in your school. We were pleased with the way you behaved and that you were keen to talk about your work and what you enjoy. It is good to know that you feel safe and that there is someone to turn to if you have a problem. Here are some of the strengths we found: •Your school helps you to learn and make progress as well as making very sure you grow up into sensible, healthy people. •Teachers and their assistants take very good care of you and do their best to show you how to improve. They try hard to make work interesting and fun. •The building and grounds are made attractive and well used to help you learn. •Your headteacher is a good leader and the staff are a good team. Some things could be even better: •You could improve your writing. •In some lessons, teachers could set you harder work and speed up learning. •Governors and staff need to find out more about what works well and why.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

•The school should explain more carefully to your parents why you sometimes have different teachers. We are sure you will help your teachers by trying hard and listening carefully. We wish you all the best for the future.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion