Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Dallimore Primary & Nursery School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 Mar 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
David Speakman LI
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Satisfactory
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
DE7 4GZ
- Name on report verified
Dallimore Primary School
- URN verified
112675
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentSatisfactory
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.9
- Some issues from the previous inspection are still outstanding but the headteacher and deputy headteacher, both new since the previous inspection and working in partnership for the last two years, are getting to grips with these and have introduced a number of sound strategies for improvement. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children enter school with standards that are well below those normally expected for children of this age, particularly in language and personal development. p.4
- They progress well, especially in their personal, social and emotional development, but overall standards are below those nationally expected by the end of Reception. p.4
- Progress in Years 1 and 2 is satisfactory and standards in reading, writing and mathematics remain 2 Inspection Report: Dallimore Primary School, 23 March 2006 to 24 March 2006 below average by the end of Year 2. p.4
- Work seen during the inspection confirms the results in national tests. p.4
- Standards at the end of Year 2 have been falling for the past few years but school assessment data indicates an upward trend for the next two years. p.4
- Progress is satisfactory overall in Years 3 to 6, but good in Years 5 and 6, where teaching is more effective. p.4
- Assessment data shows progress between Years 3 and 6 is satisfactory p.4
- This is reflected in standards, which are average in mathematics, science and reading but below average in writing at the end of Year 6. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,751
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Dallimore Primary School
p.1
112675 Unique Reference Number DERBYSHIRE LEA LEA 278988 Inspection number 23 March 2006 to 24 March 2006 Inspection dates Mr. David Speakman LI Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Dallimore Road School address Primary Type of school DE7 4GZ Community School category 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 0115 9320741 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0115 9440292 Fax number 343 Number on roll Mr.Andrew Jowett Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr. Glyn Julian Headteacher 3 April 2000 Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 278988 23 March 2006 - 4 to 11 24 March 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
This is a larger than average sized primary school. Almost all pupils are of a White British background. There are no pupils at an early stage of English acquisition. The proportion of pupils entitled to claim free school meals is above average and the proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is average. Attainment on entry to the Nursery is well below that nationally expected for children of this age.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Dallimore Primary School, 23 March 2006 to 24 March 2006
p.3
Grade: 3
The inspection team agrees with the school that its effectiveness is satisfactory. It provides satisfactory value for money. The quality of teaching and learning in the Foundation Stage and for the pupils in Years 5 and 6 is good and achievement in these years is good as a result. It is satisfactory in other year groups. However, in a few classes lengthy introductions reduce the time pupils have to actively learn and teaching assistants are not always used to best effect. Standards at the end of Year 2 are below average in reading, writing and mathematics. By the end of Year 6 standards are average overall but below average in writing. Although provision in the Foundation Stage is good, standards are below those children are expected to reach by the end of Reception. Most pupils are positive about school but, despite the efforts of the school to improve it, attendance is unsatisfactory. The school shows good personal
p.4
Grade: 3
care for pupils. Procedures for target setting and tracking pupils' achievement have recently been introduced and they form a good basis for further development. Along with the marking of pupils work, assessment information is not yet used consistently enough to let pupils know how well they are doing and what they need to improve. Leadership and management are satisfactory overall. Although the school has correctly identified its priorities, the school improvement plan does not define its targets clearly enough or reflect a long-term vision. Some issues from the previous inspection are still outstanding but the headteacher and deputy headteacher, both new since the previous inspection and working in partnership for the last two years, are getting to grips with these and have introduced a number of sound strategies for improvement. The school's capacity to improve is satisfactory.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
- Improve the rate of progress in Years 1 and 2, in order to raise standards by the end of Year 2, by informing pupils more clearly of what they need to improve and about how much progress they are making. - Improve the quality of writing throughout the school by giving pupils opportunities to practise writing skills in a range of subjects. - Revise the school improvement plan to define targets for improvement more clearly and how they will be achieved in both the long and short term. - Improve teaching so that the best practice is reflected in all lessons, especially through making better use of teaching assistants and providing more time in lessons for pupils to actively learn. - Work closely with parents to improve the attendance of their children.
p.4
Grade: 3
Children enter school with standards that are well below those normally expected for children of this age, particularly in language and personal development. They progress well, especially in their personal, social and emotional development, but overall standards are below those nationally expected by the end of Reception. Progress in Years 1 and 2 is satisfactory and standards in reading, writing and mathematics remain 2 Inspection Report: Dallimore Primary School, 23 March 2006 to 24 March 2006 below average by the end of Year 2. Work seen during the inspection confirms the results in national tests. Standards at the end of Year 2 have been falling for the past few years but school assessment data indicates an upward trend for the next two years. Progress is satisfactory overall in Years 3 to 6, but good in Years 5 and 6, where teaching is more effective. Assessment data shows progress between Years 3 and 6 is satisfactory
p.4
Grade: 3
in mathematics, good in science, but unsatisfactory in English. This is reflected in standards, which are average in mathematics, science and reading but below average in writing at the end of Year 6. The school did not meet the challenging overall targets set for the end of Year 6 in 2005, but higher attaining pupils met those set for them. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities make satisfactory progress. The below average standards in information and communication technology (ICT) noted at the time of the previous inspection have improved and standards are now in line with those expected nationally.
p.5
Grade: 3
Pupils' personal development and well-being are satisfactory. The Nursery and Reception children behave very well. In the rest of the school the number of exclusions is high and the school has yet to find effective strategies to improve the behaviour of the small number of pupils concerned. The attitudes and behaviour of most other pupils are satisfactory and often better in lessons. Relationships are sound and older pupils develop an adequate sense of responsibility through caring for younger ones. Pupils generally enjoy school but a few pupils show a lack of enthusiasm. Attendance is below average and unauthorised absence is high. Absence, particularly in Years 1 and 2, has a detrimental effect on standards and those pupils with poor attendance records make too little progress. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory overall. Events, such as 'Star of the Week' assemblies, promote a strong
p.5
Grade: 3
sense of community. Pupils gain awareness of other cultures when guests such as Indian dancers visit the school. Pupils make a valuable contribution to the life of the school through fund raising activities and the school council provides an effective means for pupils to influence what happens. Pupils have a satisfactory understanding of the importance of healthy lifestyles and know how to stay safe in and around school. Pupils generally develop adequate skills for future life.
p.5
Grade: 3
Teaching and learning are satisfactory overall. Teaching is good in the Foundation Stage enabling children to achieve well through an exciting range of well-structured activities. Progress slows to satisfactory in Years 1 to 4 because some teachers do not have high enough expectations of pupils, including those in mixed age classes. Tasks do not always meet all pupils' learning needs, are too easy for some pupils and are too difficult for others. As a result, some pupils do not make enough progress. Teaching 3 Inspection Report: Dallimore Primary School, 23 March 2006 to 24 March 2006 in Years 5 and 6 is good and pupils achieve well, making up much lost ground. With extra support, pupils with additional learning needs achieve as well as others of the same age. Pupils are mostly managed well and, in the best lessons, good relationships and a lively and enthusiastic approach to teaching inspire pupils to be keen and
p.5
Grade: 3
effective learners. There is some difference in the learning styles teachers promote. In more effective lessons, pupils are actively engaged in learning but there are times when pupils sit passively while teachers do most of the work. Teachers do not always make effective use of good quality support staff, who are not always fully involved during lengthy introductions. There is some inconsistency in the feedback given through the marking of pupils' work and not all pupils get sufficient guidance about how to improve.
p.6
Grade: 3
All subjects are taught as required and work is planned to ensure smooth progress from year to year, particularly for mixed age classes. Provision for children in the Foundation Stage is good, giving them a wide variety of well-chosen activities with a strong emphasis on developing language skills. Satisfactory provision is made for pupils' personal, social and health education, although not all pupils receive the recommended amount of physical education each week. Planning for the use of ICT in lessons makes this a regular part of pupils' day-to-day learning and provides additional opportunities for them to develop computer skills. Curriculum provision for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is good. The curriculum is supported by a satisfactory range of after-school clubs and activities, many of which are sport based, but the take-up of these is limited. Visitors to school and visits to places such
p.6
Grade: 3
as to local museums and outdoor centres successfully enrich pupils' learning.
p.6
Grade: 3
Care, guidance and support are satisfactory overall. The school takes good care of its pupils' safety and well-being. There are secure arrangements for child protection and staff know what to do if concerned. Risk assessments are carried out on activities to ensure pupils' safety. The school has taken a positive approach to incidents of bullying, which the pupils say are handled effectively and are decreasing in number. Pupils are encouraged to confide in a trusted adult when in need of support. The 'friendship bench' in the playground is successful and has helped eliminate some inappropriate behaviour. Arrangements for supporting pupils' academic development are satisfactory but the school does not use information about pupils' progress in a consistent or effective enough way. Current initiatives for improving this are in their early stages of implementation and do not yet give pupils a clear understanding about what they
p.6
Grade: 3
need to do to improve or whether they are making enough progress. 4 Inspection Report: Dallimore Primary School, 23 March 2006 to 24 March 2006
p.6
Grade: 3
The quality of leadership and management is satisfactory. The headteacher and deputy work well together and have established a shared commitment amongst staff to raise standards and provide for pupils' personal development. The work of the subject leaders is satisfactory overall. The Foundation Stage is well led and managed, as is provision for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities. Governance is satisfactory. Those governors spoken to show commitment, know the school well and are supportive of its work. There is an accurate view of what needs to be done and school self-evaluation is satisfactory. It takes adequate account of assessment data and of staff, governors', parents' and pupils' views. It results in clearly identified areas for development that are relevant to current school improvement. The school improvement plan is based on these outcomes. However, it is not structured well and not easy to
p.7
Grade: 3
follow in terms of guiding school improvement. It focuses on the current year only and, as there is no indication of future development targets, it does not provide a clear enough view of the school's long term goals. Although there has been limited improvement since the previous inspection in standards overall, the headteacher, deputy and subject leaders are getting to grips with addressing these weaknesses, giving the school a satisfactory capacity to improve. This has resulted in early indications of a more optimistic trend in achievement in Years 1 and 2. There has been a good level of improvement in ICT standards and provision. 5 Inspection Report: Dallimore Primary School, 23 March 2006 to 24 March 2006 .
p.7
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Dallimore Primary School, 23 March 2006 to 24 March 2006
p.8
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
learners?
NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
NA 3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 3 The behaviour of learners NA 4 The attendance of learners NA 3 How well learners enjoy their education NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.9
and supporting all learners?
NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.10
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.10
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Thank you for making us welcome when we visited your school recently and for talking to us about your school and the work you have done. We particularly liked the lessons we saw in the Foundation Unit and in classes for older pupils in Years 5 and 6. We saw some exciting teaching and learning in these classes. We did feel that standards could be better by the end of Year 2 and in writing throughout the school. Most of you behave well but a few pupils let the school down. Too many of you take too much time off school and are not making as much progress as you could as a result. The school cares well for all of you. The headteacher, deputy headteacher, staff and governors are all trying hard to improve what the school does and what it achieves. To help them do this we have suggested that they: - help pupils in Years 1 and 2 to do better so that standards in reading, writing and mathematics improve, - help you all to
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
improve the quality of your writing, - make the written plans that the staff and governors have for the school easier to understand, - make sure that every lesson helps all pupils to do their best, - work with those parents whose children miss school to improve their attendance. Thank you once again and good luck in the future.
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion