Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
St Matthew's Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 Dec 2005
- Inspectorssingle source
Martin Newell LI
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
CB1 2LD
- Name on report verified
St Matthew's Primary
- URN verified
110750
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.9
- examples of good and outstanding practice. p.4
- I have told your teachers how polite and helpful you all were and I know that they are very proud of you. p.11
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure that more able pupils always achieve as well as they can. - Make the best use of assessment information to track how well pupils are achieving. - Make sure the quality of teaching and learning is checked regularly and rigorously. - Encourage pupils to take more initiative and responsibility for their own learning. p.4
- Children's knowledge, skills and understanding on starting school are a little above average overall. p.4
- Children of all abilities and different backgrounds achieve well in the Foundation Stage. p.4
- Standards are above average by the end of the reception year. p.4
- Test results for Year 2 pupils, generally show attainment to be above average in English, mathematics and science. p.4
- Inspection findings show a similar picture. p.4
- The achievement of pupils is never less than satisfactory and at times good. p.4
- The picture in Years 3-6 is more complex. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,842
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
110750 Unique Reference Number CAMBRIDGESHIRE LEA LEA 278501 Inspection number 14 December 2005 to 15 December 2005 Inspection dates Mr. Martin Newell LI Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
19 Norfolk Street School address Primary Type of school CB1 2LD Community School category 5 to 12 Age range of pupils 01223 568838 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01223 568839 Fax number 416 Number on roll Mr.Julian Jacobs Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr. Roger Marcon Headteacher Not applicable Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 278501 14 December 2005 - 5 to 12 15 December 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
This is an above average sized primary school. Although most pupils live close to the school, a significant minority travel from further afield. Some classes have experienced high levels of pupil mobility. The school has had three headteachers during the last twelve months and staff absences in middle management positions. The current situation is far more settled and stable. The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals is broadly in line with the national average. The percentage of pupils with learning difficulties is a little below the national average whilst the percentage of pupils with a Statement of Special Educational Need is similar to the picture nationally. The percentage of pupils from minority ethnic groups is much higher than found in most schools and many of these pupils are at an early stage of acquiring English.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary, 14 December 2005 to 15 December 2005
p.3
Grade: 3
This is a satisfactory school with some good features. It has good capacity for further improvement. These views are shared by the school and the inspectors. The acting headteacher provides good leadership and has put in place rigorous initiatives to make the school a better place. Pupils and parents speak well of the school. Improvement since the last inspection has been satisfactory. The school provides satisfactory value for money. Children start school with levels of knowledge, skills and understanding that are a little above average. All children achieve well in the Foundation Stage with standards being above average by the end of the reception year. Standards are currently above average by the end of Year 2 and Year 6. Achievement for pupils of different abilities and backgrounds is satisfactory overall, often good in Years 1-2, but could be better for the more able in Years 3-6. Teaching is satisfactory overall with some
p.4
Grade: 3
examples of good and outstanding practice. Pupils behave well, contribute much to the school community and thoroughly enjoy all that the school offers. Some older pupils however, do not take enough responsibility for their own learning. There are other strengths in school life. These include a high level of racial harmony, enrichment opportunities, how well pupils are cared for and how the school encourages pupils to keep fit, safe and healthy. Strong links with outside agencies support pupils with learning difficulties and pupils from different ethnic backgrounds well. The school has started to check the quality of teaching and learning in different subjects more rigorously and is improving its assessment procedures. These initiatives are not yet fully embedded in school practice to have the biggest possible impact on pupils' achievement.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
- Ensure that more able pupils always achieve as well as they can. - Make the best use of assessment information to track how well pupils are achieving. - Make sure the quality of teaching and learning is checked regularly and rigorously. - Encourage pupils to take more initiative and responsibility for their own learning.
p.4
Grade: 3
Children's knowledge, skills and understanding on starting school are a little above average overall. Children of all abilities and different backgrounds achieve well in the Foundation Stage. Standards are above average by the end of the reception year. Test results for Year 2 pupils, generally show attainment to be above average in English, mathematics and science. Inspection findings show a similar picture. The achievement of pupils is never less than satisfactory and at times good. The picture in Years 3-6 is more complex. Test results for Year 6 pupils for the last two years show standards in English, mathematics and science to be close to the national average. The value added score from the end of Year 2 to Year 6 for these pupils was significantly below the national average and indicates that they underachieved. This was mainly due to factors 2 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary, 14 December 2005 to 15 December 2005
p.4
Grade: 3
such as high pupil mobility and numerous changes of teachers because of long term absences. Inspection findings indicate that standards in Year 6 are currently above average in English, mathematics and science. Data suggests that the current Year 4 and 5 cohorts are stronger and the school is on track to attain its best test results in 2007 and 2008. Achievement in Years 3-6 is now satisfactory overall but there is still room for improvement in how the more able pupils attain and achieve. The achievement of pupils with learning difficulties or from differing ethnic minority backgrounds is similar to their classmates.
p.5
Grade: 2
The personal development and well-being of pupils is good. Pupils have positive attitudes to their learning. They appreciate the efforts of their teachers to make lessons interesting and enjoyable, although some older pupils are not always ready to take initiative for their own learning. Pupils are punctual at the start of the day and attendance is similar to the national average. Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. The school is successful in developing pupils' awareness of life in a multi-cultural society and a sense of racial harmony envelops the life and work of the school. Pupils relate well to one another and to adults and are always ready to resolve any conflict amicably. Behaviour is good. Pupils point out that bullying is not an issue in their school and they feel there is always someone to go to if they have a problem. Pupils are friendly, courteous and polite and are very aware of the wider
p.5
Grade: 2
world. They make a good contribution to the community, for example, raising significant amounts for charities through running stalls and events which also add much to their sense of economic well-being. Pupils are successfully encouraged to adopt a safe and healthy lifestyle. The revised school dinner menu and emphasis on healthy eating contributes well to this.
p.5
Grade: 3
The quality of teaching is satisfactory with some good practice in Reception to Year 6 and some outstanding practice in nursery. Teaching in nursery and reception is good overall and engages the children well. At times teaching in the nursery is exceptionally good where learning is brought springing to life through exciting and vibrant activities that enthral the children. Teaching in Years 1-6 is satisfactory with some good features. At its best teaching rattles along at a good pace and work is challenging for all pupils. Teaching is good when pupils are encouraged to find things out for themselves or instigate their own investigations. Teaching is not as effective when the work set for the more able pupils, particularly in Years 3-6, is too easy or pupils are not encouraged to take initiative for their own learning. Pupils are generally managed well across the school, relationships are good and teaching assistants add much to the quality of
p.5
Grade: 3
pupils' learning. Assessment is satisfactory. Good procedures have recently been 3 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary, 14 December 2005 to 15 December 2005 introduced to track pupils' progress in different subjects and to ensure that pupils are achieving well. However, over time this has not always been the case. The school is addressing this issue well. Marking of pupils' work is satisfactory and good when pupils are made well aware of what is needed to improve.
p.5
Grade: 3
The curriculum is satisfactory. The school has re-organised its curriculum provision in Years 5 and 6 so that literacy and numeracy are taught in single year groups. This is proving a successful initiative, particularly when work is accurately matched to pupils' abilities. Pupils are given satisfactory opportunities to develop their computer skills and the school has started to plan greater use of these in different subjects of the curriculum. Provision in the Foundation Stage is stimulating and captures the interest of the children. Pupils' personal, social and health education is promoted well. Good provision is made for pupils with learning difficulties and for pupils acquiring English as an additional language. There is still work to be done in the provision the school makes for gifted and talented and the more able pupils and the school is tackling this well. At times not enough activities are planned that would extend their learning. The
p.6
Grade: 3
school provides a good range of visits, visitors and clubs both at lunchtime and after school. These activities bring an added dimension to pupils' learning.
p.6
Grade: 3
The care, guidance and support of pupils are satisfactory overall. The school provides good levels of care for all its pupils. Pupils genuinely feel they have a voice in school that is listened to and taken on board. The school council and pupil questionnaires on school life are telling examples of how pupils' views are canvassed and acted upon. Provision for ensuring the health and safety of all pupils is good. The school promotes a good awareness of the importance of keeping fit and healthy. Child protection procedures are robust and the school works well with outside agencies to support pupils when needed. Staff know pupils well and the individuality of pupils is recognised and celebrated. The school however recognises that there is still work to be done in how well pupils' academic progress is tracked and supported.
p.6
Grade: 3
The leadership and management of the school are satisfactory overall with that of the acting headteacher being good. He is well supported in this by the deputy headteacher. They have brought stability and a shared vision to the school after a period of considerable changes in personnel. In his short time in post the acting headteacher has wasted no time in tackling issues such as improving assessment and providing greater challenge for the more able pupils. These efforts are having an increasing impact on the work of the school although there is still work to be done. However, 4 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary, 14 December 2005 to 15 December 2005 strong team work, is now a feature of the school and greater staff stability indicates that the school is very well placed for further improvement. A strength of leadership is the good quality school self-evaluation. It is honest and frank and takes account of
p.6
Grade: 3
the views of staff, pupils, parents and governors. Its assertion that this is a satisfactory school is borne out by inspection findings. The leadership of the school know what is needed to make it a better place for the pupils. This includes the further development of the role of subject leaders in checking on the quality of teaching and standards in different subjects. This role has not been effective enough in all subjects. The school has a good commitment to inclusion. Governance of the school is good. Key members of the governing body know the school well, are supportive and challenging and are well aware of the school's weaker aspects. The school makes satisfactory use of its available resources and provides satisfactory value for money. 5 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary, 14 December 2005 to 15 December 2005 .
p.7
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary, 14 December 2005 to 15 December 2005
p.8
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
learners?
NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 2 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 2 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.9
and supporting all learners?
NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 2 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.10
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.10
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Dear Children You will probably remember that we visited your school before Christmas and I am now writing to let you know what we found out. Before I do, I would first of all like to say thank you for making us feel so welcome and making our visit so enjoyable. I have told your teachers how polite and helpful you all were and I know that they are very proud of you. Through our discussions with you it was good to hear how much you enjoy school, the after school clubs and the other learning activities on offer. It was particularly good to hear that bullying is not an issue and that there is always someone to turn to if there is a problem. We found that there are a number of good things about your school. Teachers are always trying to make learning fun and interesting. There are lots of visits and visitors, the school always makes sure that you are cared for and helps you to learn about the importance of keeping fit and healthy. Another
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
strength is the way that the headteacher runs the school and the fact that the staff want to make the school an even better place to learn. But another strength of the school is you. The way you behave, how you all get on with each other so well and how you are always ready to help to make the school a better place are all strong features. We have talked to your teachers about how to improve the school further. Teachers are going to make sure that work is always challenging enough and check out more closely how well you are all doing. You can play your part as well by always being ready to find things out for yourselves and not always relying on your teachers. I would like to finish by saying that all of the inspection team wish you every success in your futures and we all feel that it was a pleasure to meet you! Martin Newell Lead Inspector
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion