Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Iver Heath Junior School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 May 2006
- Inspectorssingle source
Barbara Atcheson
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Good
- Curriculum verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Outstanding
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
SL0 0DA
- Name on report verified
Iver Heath Junior School
- URN verified
110279
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportGood
- CurriculumGood
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentOutstanding
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. p.9
- Inspectors agree and judge this to be outstanding. p.4
- Although teaching is satisfactory overall, there are examples of good and outstanding practice. p.4
- We thought you would like to know what we liked about your school and how we thought it could get even better.* Your behaviour is outstanding. p.11
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve target setting to ensure that all pupils with the potential to reach the highest levels do so. p.4
- Further develop the monitoring and evaluation skills of subject coordinators in order to increase the impact that they have on the quality of teaching and learning. p.4
- Enable governors to become more actively involved in assessing the school's needs. p.4
- In 2005 standards at the end of Year 6 were above average in science, broadly average in English but below in mathematics. p.4
- More able pupils did not make enough progress. p.4
- School data indicates that recent initiatives together with improved teaching are beginning to raise standards. p.4
- Standards at the end of Year 6 are now average in English 2 Inspection Report: Iver Heath Junior School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006 and above in mathematics and science. p.4
- Progress is slow in Year 3 and satisfactory in Year 4. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language6
“Pupils in the language disorders department are effectively integrated with the school.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,536
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection Report Iver Heath Junior School
p.1
110279 Unique Reference Number Buckinghamshire LEA LEA 278399 Inspection number 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006 Inspection dates Barbara Atcheson AI Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
St Margaret's Close School address Junior Type of school Iver Heath Community School category SL0 0DA 7 to 11 Age range of pupils 01753651382 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01753655135 Fax number 228 Number on roll Mr Jonathan Christie-Rundle Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Ms V Canter Headteacher 8 May 2000 Date of previous inspection
p.1
Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 278399 2 May 2006 - 7 to 11 3 May 2006 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
Most pupils from this average sized school have White British heritage and come from a range of backgrounds. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and statements of need is above average. A lower number than average are eligible for free school meals. In 1998 the school changed from a middle school to its present junior school status. A department for language disorders was established in 1998. It currently caters for 11 pupils.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Iver Heath Junior School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006
p.3
Grade: 3
This school provides a sound quality of education and satisfactory value for money. It also has many good features. One of the features of the school which parents appreciate most is the personal development of their children. Inspectors agree and judge this to be outstanding. Pupils are well cared for and a good curriculum supports their individual learning needs well. Pupils in the language disorders department are effectively integrated with the school. Achievement and standards are satisfactory overall. The school has effectively tackled issues of variations in pupils' attainment raised by their analysis of national tests and a local authority review. As a result achievement and standards are now rising. However the school recognises that more able pupils could do better. Although teaching is satisfactory overall, there are examples of good and outstanding practice. Rigorous monitoring and evaluation of teaching by the senior leadership
p.4
Grade: 3
team are resulting in improvements. However, these improvements are not yet firmly embedded across the school. Subject leaders have a clear view of their duties, though some have yet to develop their skills in monitoring and evaluation in order to improve standards in their subjects. Governors are enthusiastic and hard working supporters of the school. However, some governors are not skilled enough in interpreting the school's performance data. This means that they are unable to monitor the school's effectiveness as well as they should. The headteacher and senior leadership team have an accurate view of the school's strengths and areas for development. They have identified the correct courses of action to move the school forward, but recognise that much remains to be achieved. These well-considered plans and the thorough response to the issues raised by the last inspection show that the school has good capacity to improve.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
• Improve target setting to ensure that all pupils with the potential to reach the highest levels do so. • Further develop the monitoring and evaluation skills of subject coordinators in order to increase the impact that they have on the quality of teaching and learning. • Enable governors to become more actively involved in assessing the school's needs.
p.4
Grade: 3
Achievement is satisfactory overall. In 2005 standards at the end of Year 6 were above average in science, broadly average in English but below in mathematics. More able pupils did not make enough progress. School data indicates that recent initiatives together with improved teaching are beginning to raise standards. Standards at the end of Year 6 are now average in English 2 Inspection Report: Iver Heath Junior School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006 and above in mathematics and science. Progress is slow in Year 3 and satisfactory in Year 4. The best progress is seen in Years 5 and 6. The current Year 6 make expected progress in mathematics whilst a small minority are set to exceed expectations. The school recognises that more able pupils could do better. However indications are that in English, a recent more systematic and creative approach to writing is improving the rate of progress for all pupils, particularly the more able.
p.4
Grade: 3
Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities are effectively provided for and achieve in line with others. Parents of pupils in the school's department for language disorders praise the school's work with these pupils and cite examples of significant gains in their children's learning.
p.5
Grade: 1
The personal development and well-being of pupils are outstanding. Pupils say they love school and enjoy learning. They value their inclusion in making decisions about all aspects of school life. Through the school council they are currently evaluating the quality of 'smoothies' as a healthy food. This illustrates their good commitment to a healthy lifestyle. Pupils show a very good understanding of how to keep themselves safe. Satisfactory attendance reflects a period of sustained illness during winter months. Behaviour is outstanding. Pupils are courteous and eager to help others. Bullying is very rare, and is dealt with swiftly. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Pupils regularly raise funds for charities. Racial harmony is promoted effectively through the study of cultures across subjects. Spiritual development is linked well to literature and religious education. Improving standards in English and mathematics
p.5
Grade: 1
contribute effectively to pupils' future economic well being.
p.5
Grade: 3
Teaching is satisfactory with some good and some outstanding elements. There are already signs that initiatives introduced as a result of rigorous monitoring are resulting in improved teaching. As these are very recent they have yet to impact on pupils' achievement. Learning objectives are now identified and linked to success criteria which are used by pupils to assess their learning. However this has highlighted that success criteria for the more able pupils are not challenging enough in almost half of the lessons and there is a lack of challenge for more able pupils. Where teaching is good, pupils benefit from a wide range of practical experiences, for example pupils in Year 3 enjoyed rising to the challenge as they used the large chess board in the playground to describe direction. However, where teaching is satisfactory the level of challenge is comfortable rather than demanding. As a result, progress is
p.5
Grade: 3
satisfactory, rather than rapid. In these lessons, a lack of practical activities means that learning does not capture the pupils' interest and motivate them to learn. Most 3 Inspection Report: Iver Heath Junior School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006 pupils with learning difficulties achieve in line with others because the targets set for them are clear and frequently reviewed. Teaching assistants work effectively to promote learning.
p.5
Grade: 2
The curriculum is good and supports individual learning needs well. Pupils are involved in planning exciting projects which promote effective learning. They say lessons are fun and value practical opportunities to learn through experience. For example, work on the Aztecs demonstrates how good links between subjects promote creativity and make learning relevant. The curriculum has been effectively reviewed and provision improved since the last inspection. The range of extra-curricular activities is good. Residential and local visits provide good starting points for projects and self-initiated learning. Pupils really enjoy their French lessons which prepare them well for secondary school. Provision for information and communication technology (ICT) has improved significantly since the last inspection. Links between personal, social and health education, science and physical education promote healthy and safe lifestyles.
p.6
Grade: 2
The level of concern for the welfare of all pupils is good. There are effective links with support agencies. As a result, the school is a happy and secure place where pupils thrive. Great importance is placed upon the quality of relationships. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities are quickly identified. They receive effective support and make good progress. Good liaison between the department and class teachers ensures a smooth transition for pupils with language disorders. Procedures for child protection, risk assessment and health and safety are robust and staff training is fully up to date. Effective means of dealing with bullying and racism are in place and the number of recorded incidents is very low. Pupils know their targets in literacy and numeracy and are supported well by staff and parents. Good transition arrangements between schools and classes prepare pupils well for change. The school has effective systems for monitoring the progress of all
p.6
Grade: 2
pupils. However this information is not always used effectively to plan the next steps in learning particularly for the more able pupils.
p.6
Grade: 3
Leadership and management are satisfactory with some good features. The headteacher shows good leadership in her clear vision for improvement. This vision is shared by the senior leadership team. They understand the school's strengths and weaknesses. Under their guidance the school has made rapid improvement in response to their 4 Inspection Report: Iver Heath Junior School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006 analysis of national test results in 2005 and a recent local authority review. Recommendations have been implemented rigorously. School data indicates that this is already leading to improvement in the quality of education, and standards are rising. The school has successfully tackled the weaknesses from the last inspection. This is best illustrated by the significant improvement made in the provision for ICT. The school has a good capacity to improve. Subject leaders have a clear view of their duties. Some have yet to learn the necessary
p.6
Grade: 3
skills that will enable them to monitor and evaluate teaching and learning in their subject. Consequently this aspect of their work has yet to have an impact on improving standards. Improvements in teaching have been made as a result of the regular monitoring and evaluation by the senior leadership team, but more remains to be done to improve the challenge for more able and lift the quality of teaching in some areas. The provision for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is well led and managed. Financial management is good and resources are used well. Governance is satisfactory. Not all governors have the skills to analyse school data, but they are enthusiastic, hard working supporters of the school. They ensure that statutory requirements are met. The school is well supported by parents whose views are sought through formal questionnaires and good positive informal relationships. 5 Inspection Report: Iver Heath Junior School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006
p.7
set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s
website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Iver Heath Junior School, 2 May 2006 to 3 May 2006
p.8
Overall
Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
learners?
NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA NA The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners
p.9
Achievement and standards
NA 3 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 1 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 2 How well learners enjoy their education NA 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
needs and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.
p.9
and supporting all learners?
NA 2 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 2 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 2 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy
Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health
p.10
The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe
Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them
p.10
The extent to which learners make a positive contribution
Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community
p.10
The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being
Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Pupils Thank you for making us so welcome when we visited your school. We really enjoyed talking to you and watching you learn. Your school provides you with a sound education and has many good features. We thought you would like to know what we liked about your school and how we thought it could get even better.* Your behaviour is outstanding. You are courteous and eager to help others. * There is very little bullying* You know your class rules and how to keep safe and stay healthy.* Your headteacher, teachers and teaching assistants work very hard to care for you, and everyone is valued. These are the things that we have asked the school to make even better.* Teachers in charge of subjects are always looking for ways to help you learn more and we have asked them to do more of this in the future. * We have asked teachers to set harder targets for more able pupils* Ensure that all your governors know how to keep a check on how well you are doing.Thank
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
you once again for looking after us so well on our visit. Mr Iles joins me in sending our very best wishes for your future. Yours sincerely, Mrs Barbara Atcheson Additional Inspector
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion