Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

English Martyrs' Catholic Primary School

Inspected 22 Sept 2005 · published 19 Jan 2006 · URN 110004

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Caroline Bolton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Sept 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Caroline Bolton

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    RG30 4BE

  • Name on report verified

    English Martyrs' Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    110004

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−19Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallypositiveenjoycleareffectivelystrengthssupportiveimproved
Criticisminadequateweaknessesinconsistentbelownot alwaysinconsistenciesconcerndecline

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1376w+19
  • What needs to improve1833w−46

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
3,178
about usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 44
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 43%What needs to improve 57%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report English Martyrs' Catholic Primary School

p.1

110004 Unique Reference Number Reading LEA LEA 278340 Inspection number 21 September 2005 to 22 September 2005 Inspection dates Caroline Bolton HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Dee Road School address Primary Type of school Tilehurst Voluntary aided School category Reading RG30 4BE 4 to 11 Age range of pupils 01189015466 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 01189015467 Fax number 316 Number on roll Mrs A Taplin Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Miss L Heneghan Headteacher 5 April 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 278340 21 September 2005 - 4 to 11 22 September 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three of Her Majesty's Inspectors of schools.

p.3

Description of the school

English Martyrs Catholic Primary School is a large primary school. Most of the pupils are from white British or Irish backgrounds but there is a significant minority of pupils who come from a range of other ethnic backgrounds. The proportions of pupils who are entitled to free school meals and of pupils who have special educational needs are below the national averages but the percentage for whom English is an additional language is a little higher. The school has experienced difficulties in recent years in recruiting and retaining sufficient numbers of suitably qualified staff, partly because of the high cost of housing in the area.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: English Martyrs' Catholic Primary School, 21 September 2005 to 22 September 2005

p.3

Grade: 4

English Martyrs Catholic Primary School has a number of strengths, particularly in the care and guidance provided for the learners and in the quality of the relationships between the adults and pupils. Its effectiveness overall, however, is inadequate because the leadership and management are insufficiently rigorous in their evaluation of the school's performance and because the quality of the teaching and the pupils' progress, while good in several classes, are inconsistent. The school's results for the national tests in 2004 showed that the pupils' progress over Key Stage 2 was below the average. The school did not meet its targets for the 2005 national tests. In judging its overall effectiveness to be good, the leadership and management of the school take too little account of the weaknesses. The governing body is supportive of the school but is also too generous in evaluating its performance. Since the last inspection in 2000 there

p.4

Grade: 4

has been a decline in the school's overall effectiveness. The quality of teaching and learning is not as good as it was at the last inspection, when none was unsatisfactory. The provision for information and communication technology, however, has improved. The leadership and management have not demonstrated the capacity to bring about sufficient improvement since the last inspection. The school provides inadequate value for money.In accordance with section 13(3) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

* improve standards and ensure that all groups of pupils make the expected progress in each key stage* improve the consistency of the teaching and learning, with a particular emphasis upon meeting the full range of the pupils' attainment and needs* ensure that the leadership and management adopt more rigorous approaches to the monitoring and evaluation of the school's work.

p.4

Grade: 4

The standards reached by pupils at the end of Key Stage 1 in 2004 were above the national average in reading and writing and in line with the average in mathematics. The results for 2005 show an improvement on 2004 in the proportions of pupils reaching the expected level for their age in reading and mathematics but a decline in writing. Between 2000 and 2004, the trend in the school's attainment at Key Stage 1 was below the national trend. The pupils who have just entered the Foundation Stage have speaking and listening skills similar to those expected for their age. In 2004, the test results at Key Stage 2 were below the national average in English and mathematics and well below in science. The five-year trend in the results from 2000 to 2004 was below the national trend. The year group of pupils who took the tests in 2004 had 2 Inspection Report: English Martyrs' Catholic Primary School, 21 September 2005 to 22 September 2005

p.4

Grade: 4

made progress over Key Stage 2 which was below the national average overall. At Key Stage 2, the 2005 results indicate that a lower proportion of pupils achieved the age-expected Level 4 or above in English and mathematics. The school's assessment data show that while some pupils made satisfactory progress during Key Stage 2 others did not. The school did not reach its targets for the 2005 tests.The pupils' progress in lessons is inconsistent, ranging from inadequate to good, and is inadequate overall. While the pupils with learning difficulties make satisfactory progress, the progress made by the more able is uneven.

p.5

Grade: 2

The pupils' overall personal development, including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. The relationships between the pupils and adults are good. The pupils demonstrate confidence in showing and explaining their work to others. Teachers encourage pupils to respect other people and their opinions and this contributes to the positive climate in the school community. The staff use a variety of methods to recognise and reward good behaviour, effort and achievement. The pupils' ideas about how to achieve the school's current priorities for development are included in the school improvement plan. Most pupils say they enjoy their time at school and feel it is a safe and secure environment. The school has comprehensive policies on behaviour and bullying and most pupils report that they know where to seek support from an adult if they have problems. However, while many parents were

p.5

Grade: 2

content, a few expressed concerns about the effectiveness of the school's approach to dealing with incidents of bullying and bad behaviour. The pupils' behaviour in classrooms and around the site is generally good, although there are occasional exceptions. Pupils have a clear understanding of school rules on how to behave and how to treat others. They develop social skills by collaborating harmoniously with each other. Pupils make a positive contribution to the school and wider community. Many are involved in charity and fundraising projects, some of which have been initiated by the school council. They also perform in concerts and drama productions in the local community. The school has achieved the silver award for healthy schools. It promotes healthy lifestyles through themed weeks, healthy snacks in the tuck shop and work on health and hygiene with the local health authority. Water is provided throughout

p.5

Grade: 2

the school and there is a good range of sporting activities on offer during and after school.

p.5

Grade: 4

The school has systems for monitoring the quality of the teaching and learning and provides a satisfactory range of opportunities for professional development for the staff. The school's self-evaluation, however, takes too generous a view of the teaching and learning because it does not take enough account of the weaknesses. There is a 3 Inspection Report: English Martyrs' Catholic Primary School, 21 September 2005 to 22 September 2005 significant amount of good practice in classes across the school, including those for Year 6 pupils. At best, the teaching is well-planned, engages the pupils by making use of a good range of resources and activities and provides a suitable level of challenge for pupils of all levels of attainment. In effective lessons the teachers manage discussion well and make skilful use of questioning to involve the less confident pupils, as well as those who are keen to contribute. Where the teaching is unsuccessful, the resources

p.5

Grade: 4

and activities are not matched to the pupils' needs and attainment so that the more able pupils in particular make too little progress. Time is not well used; activities are continued for too long so that pupils lose interest, while the closing part of the lesson is not always well planned to ensure that everyone has fully understood the key learning points. Occasionally, the pupils become restless and talk over the teachers' voices without effective action being taken to restore their concentration. While teaching and learning are good at best, the quality is too uneven and inadequate overall.The school has a clear assessment policy which is reviewed regularly. Targets are set for individual pupils and for groups and, while many pupils are aware of their targets, they are often less clear about how they can reach them. There are procedures for the transfer of assessment information between teachers as pupils move from one year

p.6

Grade: 4

group to the next. There is, however, inconsistency in the use made by staff of assessment information in planning work matched to the pupils' needs.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is appropriately broad and balanced. Progress has been made in implementing the national strategy for primary education but the school recognises that more work remains to be done to ensure that the staff are confident in developing a broader range of teaching methods. The school offers a variety of sporting activities for pupils outside lesson time and a reasonable choice of extracurricular opportunities overall. The provision for the pupils in the Foundation Stage provides for a range of appropriate learning activities but the use of assessment information in planning the curriculum for these pupils is at an early stage of development.

p.6

Grade: 2

The quality of care, guidance and support for pupils is good. Most parents feel that the school cares for and supports their children well. The school uses a suitable range of strategies to support pupils with special educational needs; these include literacy and behaviour support. There is also provision for language development work with children for whom English is an additional language. However, there is not yet any specific programme to meet the needs of gifted and high attaining pupils. The school recognises this as an area for development. There are appropriate arrangements in place for the assessment of the impact of additional support, including feedback from class teachers and termly reviews with parents. The school has a clear child protection policy but it does not reflect recent changes in staff responsibilities. There has been a high turnover of staff in recent time and only a few of those currently in post have

p.6

Grade: 2

4 Inspection Report: English Martyrs' Catholic Primary School, 21 September 2005 to 22 September 2005 had sufficient training in child protection while they have been in the school. There are plans to address this issue but not until the spring term. Health and safety procedures are clear and risk assessments have been completed for all areas of the school.Parents and pupils report inconsistencies in the setting of homework. Some parents express the concern that homework is not always set regularly and does not extend their children's schoolwork.The school is strengthening its arrangements to ensure smooth transition between years. These arrangements include parents' information evenings and new arrangements for teaching in the first part of the first term in which pupils begin a new key stage. However, the teachers' use of information on pupils who are new to them is inconsistent. There are good transitional arrangements

p.6

Grade: 2

for Year 6 pupils progressing to the local Catholic secondary school.

p.7

Grade: 4

The school's managers are committed to ensuring the welfare of the pupils and to fulfilling the school's aims as set out in its mission statement. The pupils behave well and most enjoy coming to school. Overall, the support and guidance provided for pupils are good and the current school improvement plan focuses upon achieving the outcomes set out in the government's recent white paper, Every Child Matters. The staff work in collaboration with those of other schools locally to address issues of common concern and to widen the opportunities available to the pupils, for instance in sport. Senior managers have worked hard to overcome difficulties in recent time in recruiting and retaining suitably qualified staff. They have not, however, had enough impact upon the pupils' progress because they do not have sufficient knowledge about the key measures of the school's performance. The 2005 test results supplied before

p.7

Grade: 4

and in the early part of the inspection were, for example, replaced by different figures towards the end of the inspection. The results of the 2005 national tests at Key Stage 2, which were available in unvalidated form in the summer, have not been analysed thoroughly enough in order to provide a clear picture of the progress made by the pupils in the year group. The school has arrangements to seek the views of the parents; the great majority of those responding to the questionnaire supplied in advance of this inspection agreed that their views were sought and acted upon but a significant minority felt that this was not the case.There are systems in place for monitoring the work of the school but the school's own written self-evaluation is unduly generous in judging its overall effectiveness to be good. This judgement takes too little account of inconsistencies in the teaching and the pupils' progress. The governors are committed

p.7

Grade: 4

to and supportive of the school but their evaluation of its effectiveness is also over-optimistic. Leadership and management are inadequate. The managers do not have detailed enough knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses in the provision and the pupils' achievement to demonstrate satisfactory capacity to improve. 5 Inspection Report: English Martyrs' Catholic Primary School, 21 September 2005 to 22 September 2005 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: English Martyrs' Catholic Primary School, 21 September 2005 to 22 September 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 3 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 3 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA No The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well do learners achieve? NA 4 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 3 How well learners enjoy their education NA 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 4 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 4 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 4 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 3 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 4 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA No The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements Yes Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

After our visit to inspect your school, we would like to tell you our findings and to thank you for welcoming us and talking to us during our visit. You will perhaps have heard that we have decided that your school needs special measures. This means that, although the school does some things well, there are some areas which are weak and which the school needs help to improve. One of the main reasons that the school needs special measures is because many of the children could learn more than they do. There are several reasons for us to believe this. Some lessons could be planned better to make sure that all the children have work to do which is right for them. We also think that time in some lesson is not used as well as it could be. Although children usually behave well, occasionally there are some who do not listen carefully enough to the teacher and sometimes they make it difficult for others to hear properly.There are many things

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

about your school which are good. We saw several interesting lessons, in which everyone was working well and enjoying their work because the teaching was so good. The adults in the school work hard to care for you and you usually get on very well with them. They encourage you to respect each other and to take part in activities which help other people. They also try to make sure that you eat healthy food and keep yourselves healthy in other ways. Most of the children we spoke to said they enjoy their time in school. You will not be surprised that we have asked the school to improve the things which need to be better as quickly as possible. Your teachers will have help to make the improvements and Her Majesty's Inspectors will be visiting the school regularly to check on how well the school is making progress. Thank you again for welcoming us to your school.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion