Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Hillside Primary School

Inspected 3 Nov 2005 · published 24 Jan 2006 · URN 109930

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Sean O'Toole

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Nov 2005

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sean O'Toole

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    RG6 4HQ

  • Name on report verified

    Hillside Primary School

  • URN verified

    109930

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+6Mostly positivemore positive than 51% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyexceptionallypositiveeffectivemake good progressrigoroussuccessfulenjoy
Criticismnot good enoughweaknessesinconsistentseriouslyinconsistenciesunevenlacklimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1447w+39
  • What needs to improve1405w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,817
about usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 44
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%What needs to improve 49%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Inspection Report Hillside Primary School

p.1

109930 Unique Reference Number Wokingham District Council LEA 278310 Inspection number 2 November 2005 to 3 November 2005 Inspection dates Sean O'Toole AI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Rushey Way School address Primary Type of school Lower Earley Community School category Reading RG6 4HQ 3 to 11 Age range of pupils 0118 975 5771 Telephone number Mixed Gender of pupils 0118 975 8389 Fax number 329 Number on roll Mr T Yendell Chair of governors The governing body Appropriate authority Mr A Griffin Headteacher 3 July 2000 Date of previous inspection

p.1

Inspection number Inspection dates Age group 278310 2 November 2005 - 3 to 11 3 November 2005 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Hillside is much larger than most primary schools. It has a mixed intake with pupils coming from a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds. Fewer pupils are eligible for free school meals than in most schools. The proportion with learning difficulties and statements of special educational needs is average. Most come from White British heritage backgrounds. About one in six speaks English as an additional language. Ten pupils are at an early stage of learning English and their main languages are Arabic, Korean and Danish. The school has a nursery where children attend daily either in the morning or afternoon. Attainment on admission is average. Currently, there is a major rebuilding project. There have been significant changes in leadership at the school with four headteachers in three years. The present headteacher started at the school in September 2005.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 1 Inspection Report: Hillside Primary School, 2 November 2005 to 3 November 2005

p.3

Grade: 4

The decline in the school's effectiveness over the last few years is being tackled assiduously by the new headteacher. The absence of rigorous self evaluation and effective action in the past has led to inconsistent and sometimes unsatisfactory teaching. As a result, some pupils do not achieve as well as they should. Progress is good in Years 5 and 6 but varies between satisfactory and unsatisfactory in other year groups. Although standards are average overall, the quality of pupils' writing is not good enough. Children in the Foundation Stage progress well and attain average standards. Pupils' personal development is good overall. They take responsibility seriously and most behave well. Relationships are good and staff are committed to caring for individuals. Pupils' cultural and ethnic traditions are valued. The curriculum has several good features but lacks balance. The school provides unsatisfactory value

p.4

Grade: 4

for money. There has been considerable disruption to the leadership of the school but the new headteacher has now set a well focused agenda for improvement. This has already brought about significant positive changes. Underachievement is being tackled. Consequently, the school now has the capacity to improve. The headteacher has quickly gained the confidence and respect of parents, governors and pupils. He has a far more realistic view of the school's effectiveness than in the past when senior staff made overgenerous assessments of its performance. In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than in all the circumstances it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a Notice to Improve. Significant improvement is required in relation to raising

p.4

Grade: 4

pupils' achievements, making better use of assessment, raising standards in writing and improving the balance of the curriculum.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

* Improve the effectiveness of the school's leadership team in raising pupils' achievements by bringing consistency to teaching and learning * Make better use of assessment to plan the next steps in pupils' learning, increase the pace of lessons and expect more of the pupils* Raise standards in writing* Improve the balance of the curriculum.

p.4

Grade: 4

Standards have declined since the previous inspection and the school has not been rigorous enough in setting targets. Children in the Foundation Stage make good progress, especially in their personal, social and emotional development. By the end of the reception year most attain the expected goals for their age in the areas of learning. Achievement overall is unsatisfactory because of inconsistencies in teaching. The pupils' writing is not as good as it should be. Handwriting is poor. Standards are not high enough in history and geography. However, achievement is satisfactory in 2 Inspection Report: Hillside Primary School, 2 November 2005 to 3 November 2005 Years 1 and 2 and standards in reading, writing and mathematics are average at the end of Year 2. Progress in Years 3 to 6 is uneven. Pupils in Year 4 make unsatisfactory progress and this has a detrimental impact on progress over time. Pupils in Years 5

p.4

Grade: 4

and 6 achieve well. By the end of Year 6, standards are average in English and above average in mathematics. Girls are more successful than boys in English. The pupils with learning difficulties make satisfactory progress. Those at an early stage of learning English make good progress and often attain higher standards than their classmates. Already, the headteacher has made significant headway in tackling underachievement by setting and monitoring challenging targets.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils' personal development is good. Pupils enjoy school and some say, 'It's like a second home.' Parents say, and inspectors agree, that the way cultures are celebrated helps pupils to become more tolerant and understanding of others, promoting spiritual, moral, social and cultural development effectively. Pupils are particularly enthusiastic about the opportunities provided to join clubs and take part in a good variety of interesting activities. They enthused about the visit of an African chief and relished questioning him about his customs and traditions. Pupils know and follow the Golden Rules and most behave well. A few pupils were excluded during last year. However, relationships between pupils are good and there are few concerns about bullying or anti-social behaviour. Attendance is satisfactory, although a few pupils arrive late and miss important parts of the lesson. The staff encourage pupils' understanding of safe

p.5

Grade: 2

practice within the school and wider community. Pupils have a good awareness of the benefits of healthy eating and regular exercise. The school council takes its responsibilities seriously, commenting that, 'because the teachers listen to what we think, it makes us feel special.' They represent the pupils' views and are bringing about improvements to school life by funding playtime resources. Pupils are developing appropriate skills that will be valuable to them in adult life and at work.

p.5

Grade: 4

Pupils make uneven progress because teaching varies between unsatisfactory and very good. Teaching and learning are at their best where an imaginative approach and purposeful pace promotes effective learning. Good examples of this were evident in Year 5 and 6 lessons. In a Year 6 English lesson pupils were engrossed in solving a murder mystery. One girl said, 'I can't wait until Friday to share my answer.' Pupils with learning difficulties are supported effectively because there is well focused support which enables them to improve. One boy said, 'I have lots of help because I would struggle without it.' The needs of those at an early stage of learning English are quickly identified and support is provided to enable them to contribute in lessons. Teaching in the Foundation Stage is good and the children thrive on the opportunities to take 3 Inspection Report: Hillside Primary School, 2 November 2005 to 3 November 2005

p.5

Grade: 4

part in practical activities.Teachers plan and prepare lessons but do not always take sufficient account of the range of abilities in the class. This leads to a lack of challenge and unsatisfactory progress. Assessment is not used consistently to promote effective learning. It is used well in some classes in conjunction with marking and target setting to guide pupils on how they might improve. Some teachers, especially in Year 4, do not expect enough of their pupils. The slow pace of some lessons and limited use of resources result in a few pupils losing concentration. Teaching in this year group is not good enough and results in slow progress.

p.6

Grade: 3

The well-structured programme of personal education effectively promotes pupils' understanding of healthy living. Pupils enthusiastically participate in a good range of activities, including sport and music which enhance learning. There is an imbalance in the time allocated to some subjects and opportunities for pupils to study history and geography are limited. Lack of rigorous monitoring has led to inconsistencies between classes in matching work to pupils' needs. Opportunities for pupils to extend their literacy skills in other subjects are limited. Inconsistent planning has resulted in variations in the quality of pupils' work. Provision for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is satisfactory. The support for those who find some aspects of English difficult has improved recently because there is more rigour in identifying and meeting their needs. Gifted and talented pupils have weekly opportunities to extend their skills.

p.6

Grade: 3

Pupils at an early stage of learning English benefit from good support.

p.6

Grade: 3

Pupils are well cared for. There are good procedures to protect all pupils and staff are fully committed to their welfare. Although the health and safety policy states the need for regular risk assessment of the premises, this has not been done in the past and the governing body is not fulfilling its statutory requirement in this respect. The headteacher has taken steps to ensure the safety of pupils, staff and parents for the duration of the building project. Pupils with learning difficulties say, 'We feel safe and happy.' Parents trust the school to take care of their children and are made to feel welcome in school. Although the systems to assess pupils' work are satisfactory, they are not used consistently through the school to track progress and to raise standards. Those pupils who have targets, say that they help them to focus on their work.

p.6

Grade: 3

Parents justifiably speak highly of the impact made by the new headteacher. They say that, 'The school is much better...the headteacher has strong values...there is now real enthusiasm.' Until recently self evaluation was unsatisfactory as it lacked a critical edge and the school was complacent about its own performance. In the past, leadership 4 Inspection Report: Hillside Primary School, 2 November 2005 to 3 November 2005 and management have been unsatisfactory and led to some complacency and uneven progress. The leadership now has clearly defined objectives and is much more aware of the school's strengths and weaknesses. Improvements have included a more rigorous monitoring and self evaluation, and better tracking of pupils' progress. These initiatives are beginning to raise achievement but more remains to be done to improve some important aspects of teaching. Strategic planning has recently been linked to raising

p.6

Grade: 3

standards and improving teaching. New initiatives are now beginning to bite illustrating clearly that the school has satisfactory capacity for improvement. There is a willingness to work together but more consistency is needed to improve teaching and learning, add excitement and balance to the curriculum and raise standards in writing. The governors now have a clearer understanding of the school's strengths and weaknesses and are focused on improvement. They are pleased with the school's positive ethos and the way in which individuals are valued. They now link spending decisions to raising standards and have been successful in improving the school's accommodation, although more remains to be done. 5 Inspection Report: Hillside Primary School, 2 November 2005 to 3 November 2005 .

p.7

set out in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s

website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 Inspection Report: Hillside Primary School, 2 November 2005 to 3 November 2005

p.8

Overall

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

learners?

NA 2 How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? NA 2 The quality and standards in foundation stage NA 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation NA Yes The capacity to make any necessary improvements NA No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well do learners achieve? NA 3 The standards 1 reached by learners

p.9

Achievement and standards

NA 4 How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners NA 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

NA 2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development NA 2 The behaviour of learners NA 3 The attendance of learners NA 3 How well learners enjoy their education NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices NA 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles NA 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community NA 3 How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

NA 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

needs and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low.

p.9

and supporting all learners?

NA 3 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education NA 3 How effectively performance is monitored, evaluated and improved to meet challenging targets, through quality assurance and self-review NA 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can NA 4 How effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money NA 3 The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities NA Yes The adequacy and suitability of staff to ensure that learners are protected

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to be healthy

Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to eat and drink healthily Yes Learners are encouraged and enabled to take regular exercise Yes Learners are discouraged from smoking and substance abuse Yes Learners are educated about sexual health

p.10

The extent to which providers ensure that learners stay safe

Yes Procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements No Risk assessment procedures and related staff training are in place Yes Action is taken to reduce anti-social behaviour, such as bullying and racism Yes Learners are taught about key risks and how to deal with them

p.10

The extent to which learners make a positive contribution

Yes Learners are helped to develop stable, positive relationships Yes Learners, individually and collectively, participate in making decisions that affect them Yes Learners are encouraged to initiate, participate in and manage activities in school and the wider community

p.10

The extent to which schools enable learners to achieve economic well-being

Yes There is provision to promote learners’ basic skills Yes Learners have opportunities to develop enterprise skills and work in teams NA Careers education and guidance is provided to all learners in key stage 3 and 4 and the sixth form NA Education for all learners aged 14–19 provides an understanding of employment and the economy

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

We enjoyed visiting your school and were especially pleased with the way in which you welcomed us. Thank you for all the help you gave us. I told some of you that I would write to you all to tell you what we found out about your school. Although there have been many changes at the school and it has not improved as much as it should. We have asked Mr Griffin and your teachers to find ways to make all of your lessons more interesting, challenging and exciting. Your headteacher and other staff are very keen to make sure that you are well cared for and that everyone has an opportunity to be included in the interesting activities at the school. We thought that the youngest children make a good start to school and are happy and well cared for. We like the plans for your new building and hope that it will make a real difference to your learning when it is completed. It was good to see the oldest children taking an interest in and

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

supporting the youngest. You were very interested in finding out about how other people live. I thought that the questions you asked the African chief were particularly interesting. The school councillors are good at expressing your views and have lots of good ideas to improve playtimes. The headteacher and governors are going to look for ways to improve what you are taught and provide more opportunities to learn about history and geography. The staff are also going to make sure that lessons will be planned to help you to learn more quickly. We have asked them to find ways to check how well you are doing and to give you more guidance on how to improve your work. There are some important things for you to do to help the school to improve. In a few lessons some children become restless and spoil learning for others. You need to work harder on your writing and on presenting your work more neatly.

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion